Comments by "" (@rvdb8876) on "Dr. John Campbell"
channel.
-
2
-
The importance of vitamin D is indeed greatly underestimated.
It is being silenced in the media.
When they do talk about it, it is laughed at and even dismissed as quackery.
Same with Ivermectin, by the way.
Even a lot of doctors don't even realize the usefulness of vitamin D.
They prefer to prescribe drugs.
I take 100 µg (4000 IU) per day and I feel very good and healthy.
Unlike a vaccine, vitamin D offers many additional health benefits that a vaccine, (with side effects), cannot possibly achieve.
You can clearly see from the propaganda in the media that it has nothing to do with public health anymore, but the media is simply complicit in the agenda that was agreed at the Euro/American level with the vaccine manufacturers.
The constant hammering in the media on vaccines and vaccination speaks volumes.
Not to mention how they try to justify the absurd corona measures (lockdowns and the like) in the media.
While it is now gradually becoming clear that vaccinated people can also become infected, the fairy tale is that they would become less ill.
But vaccinated people do receive a free pass to infect everyone freely, given that their virus load, when infected, is the same as unvaccinated.
The logic is completely lost.
Fortunately, more and more people are starting to see it.
Better late than never? (question mark)
2
-
2
-
@7YBzzz4nbyte
Thanks, for the Swedish link.
I see remarkably few deaths in Sweden now, in a period (from September) that the number of diseases and deaths traditionally increases annually as winter approaches.
But I see a huge discrepancy between the number of deaths/cases of the "real" epidemic in the spring, compared to what we see now.
That is why this increase is often called a "casedemic" by many people.
Anyway, I think the virus had its best time.
It is clear that group immunity among the population increases with each infection, as a result of which the virus loses its breeding ground.
Apart from seasonal effects (summer), the virus will continue until that point is reached.
One can try to influence it by all kinds of tricks, for example by lockdowns and the like, but that is all only of a temporary nature and can not stop the virus.
Many countries are now catching up with the virus, as they were able to reduce it sharply in April/May with strict lockdowns and were subsequently spared by the summer period.
In Sweden, there was a much slower decline in May, making it look wider, as is usually the case with a flu epidemic.
Belgium and England applied a lockdown this week, while the number of cases was actually leveling off.
This could not possibly be due to that lockdown.
The government-paid virologists shouted for a lockdown and the government went to its knees.
But the only effect that such a lockdown has is that they will stretch the case and the epidemic will last longer.
Correction, not "the only effect".
Another effect is that this "second" lockdown will be even more dramatic for the economy than the first lockdown.
Because many small and medium-sized businesses are already on their knees, making this a final blow to many of them.
2
-
1
-
1
-
Pfizer was not asked to investigate whether the "vaccine" would prevent the spread.
This was not necessary for the emergency approval (with a waiver of responsibility).
They only had to demonstrate through self-conducted (non-independent) studies whether at least 50% of the vaccinated people do not get sick from corona.
They (Pfizer) also undermined further research, because shortly after the vaccine received approval and vaccination began, they also started vaccinating the placebo group.
This placebo group should have remained unvaccinated in order to evaluate further research in the longer term.
In other words, the placebo group was (consciously or unconsciously?) destroyed.
In this way, adverse side effects could no longer be compared with the (destroyed) placebo group.
Meanwhile, politicians and media have started to trumpet that you should get vaccinated, not only to protect yourself, but above all to protect others.
While there was no research that could support this.
People who, for whatever reason, did not get vaccinated were excluded from social life, demonized, labeled as antisocial and selfish.
In short, the worst government and media polarization I've seen in my life.
It is an outright scandal.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Something to think about?
Are we still allowed to think for ourselves from our dictatorial governments?
I also heard a lot of "assumptions" in this talk.
Which isn't really scientific.
Moreover, I find it shocking that there is propaganda that lockdowns and the like would work and that those measures are justified time and again.
There is not yet a single scientific study that has shown that these measures help or have helped.
If it were the case, while we are talking about the States, then the states in the US, which applied very strict dictatorial measures, would be easy to pick out.
But what do we see?
States with strict measures often do worse than states where absurd measures were treated less strictly.
Herd immunity has helped humanity over and over again from such epidemics as this one.
Why should it be any different now?
In addition, "real" scientists have long known that developing vaccines against respiratory viruses is a hopeless task because of the numerous mutations.
The flu vaccine is a good example of this.
It is estimated that it only protects about 15% against the upcoming flu mutant, for which there is no vaccine yet.
They inject you with a cocktail of earlier known variants, in the hope that it could work more or less for the upcoming variant.
Which is sometimes very disappointing.
These flu vaccines are very effective to pay for your doctor's skiing holiday.
Apparently people stubbornly refuse to learn from history and prefer to disrupt the entire society and economy, with a colossal cost as a result, which the next and younger generation will be stuck with.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@noelcayer3599
When they give you a flu shot, you get a cocktail of three to four vaccines, one of which they hope will work against the variant to come.
That did not work very well in 2018.
A variant surfaced to which the cocktail did not responded well.
Vaccinated, well, supposedly vaccinated people got the flu anyway, and many died.
Almost as many died as of corona now.
Also with overcrowded ICs like now.
But no drama was woven around.
Strange, isn't it?
The point remains: It has never been possible to market a vaccine that causes no side effects in certain people.
Some with permanent lifelong injuries, such as the swine flu vaccine in 2009, which led to narcolepsy in some, including small children.
The time span in which that corona vaccine was developed is far too short.
Certainly those vaccines based on that new mRNA type that has never been used in humans.
So I stick to my point: The mutational properties of these viruses is the main reason why vaccine manufacturers never attempted to develop a vaccine for them.
Because the development of a valid vaccine takes about 5 to 20 years to study its long-term effects.
Something that has not happened here and that can't be done with these mutating viruses.
Hence the 2009 debacle with the swine flu vaccine.
A very risky business, which made me decide not to get vaccinated.
Incidentally, unnecessary because I was already naturally infected with the corona virus in May last year and survived it with ease at the age of 66.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1