Comments by "" (@rvdb8876) on "Dr. John Campbell"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Fergus-H-MacLeod
For proper functioning of the immune system, the recommended dose by the health authorities is way too low.
It may prevent rickets, but to boost the immune system and thus protect yourself against infections, these amounts are completely insufficient.
I take 10,000 IU of vitamin D3 daily and 5,000 IU in the summer.
Vitamin K2mk7 200 µg daily
Zinc 20 mg daily
Vitamin B12 1,000 µg daily, because older people like me absorb less of it from food.
I also take magnesium regularly.
Not only do cold symptoms stay away, but also my bowel function works much better now, no more constipation.
This is not insignificant, since poor digestion can be the cause of many ailments and can also affect other organs, liver, kidneys, etc.
I feel really good and the only thing I regret is that I didn't start sooner.
Because I used to suffer from long-lasting colds, especially in winter.
I don't take vitamin C because I eat enough fresh fruit and vegetables.
I may have been infected a few times during all that time, but if there are no symptoms, it goes unnoticed, doesn't it?
1
-
@Toooldforthisshite
That frustrated me too, but he always based himself on the official data.
Data that now appears to be questionable, to say the least.
And, how many so-called medical professionals have not done so?
Who, like John, also supported government measures, lockdowns, mouth masks, you name it?
We are now almost two years after the start of these ′′ so called ′′ vaccines and a lot has already come out..
Personally, I think what the governments have done is much worse.
It is now gradually becoming clear to everyone that the "experiment" has gone seriously wrong.
Even today, governments refuse to face this reality and, along with the complicit media, remain silent about this debacle.
The governments and the media are the main culprits and certainly also the media platforms that censored the dissenting voice.
John still has to weigh his words because of possible censorship on this platform.
I'm not even talking about the government's polarization of vaccinated against unvaccinated people, which has broken even years of friendships between people.
Unimaginable.
If you would have stated in 2019 that this was going to happen, you would have been declared crazy.
1
-
1
-
@smittykoi
Well, I also had it often after the flu too.
The symptoms were gone after a few days, but I still felt weak for a long time afterwards.
After all, your body is going through an ordeal, which usually causes you to lose a few pounds as well.
This applies to any serious illness and should certainly not be underestimated.
It is also the reason why weakened elderly people often die from the flu.
Strange only that everyone seems to consider "that" as normal, but not as far as covid is concerned.
Those who talk about "long covid" should know that "long influenza" also exists, so it is nothing new.
Besides, for the people who favor this (experimental) vaccine, well, the vaccine is supposed to trigger the immune system.
It is not the (so-called) vaccine, (if it works at all), but ultimately the immune system that does the job.
That is why also "they" have an interest in a well-functioning immune system.
1
-
1
-
@grammarofficerkrupke4398
Ivermectin is safer than Aspirin, if the prescribed dose is not exceeded.
Virtually no side effects have been reported in the years that the drug has been on the market.
I think the vaccines that have been hastily thrown on the market have already caused more and more severe side effects and permanent damage than Ivermectin.
It can be checked on VAERS.
Indeed, Ivermectin is most effective when administered at the first covid symptoms.
So, before one ends up seriously ill in the hospital.
There was a study that was actually done completely wrong.
It was a clinical trial, in other words, people who were already so sick that they were in the hospital.
One group was given Ivermectin at a dose that exceeded four times the maximum prescribed dose.
Which in itself is asking for trouble, and besides, the treatment started too late.
The patients were already in an advanced stage.
Another group received nothing or a placebo, so no harmful dose.
This study apparently aimed to discredit Ivermectin.
Hydroxychloroquine was not allowed to be prescribed off-label in some countries against deadly covic-19, but it may be prescribed off-label to relieve (non-lethal) pain in rheumatism patients.
Incomprehensible.
As for virologists, well, as we've seen for a year and a half now, they've already missed the mark on more than one occasion.
I tend to believe people who work in the field and get results.
I would rather call them epidemiologists, rather than virologists, who seem to live in a (lab) bubble.
1
-
1
-
@barryschwarz
I was also surprised by the openness of Minister Franck Vandenbroucke about the figures.
I don't know when or how, but he may have revealed the numbers during a live broadcast and it apparently went viral on Facebook and Twitter.
I don't know, because I don't have a Facebook nor Twitter account, but I did see the video here on YouTube.
Apparently they couldn't get the shit back in the horse.
But the media usually lies by omission.
A propaganda trick from the box of tricks that was also frequently used by the Nazis.
It is clear that the media has become the mouthpiece of the government since the government caused this crisis.
The media (press) that normally has to control the government and be critical, is anything but.
For example, I have never heard from the media that the vaccines are still in the experimental stage phase 3.
Essential to inform people that they are participating in an experiment.
According to the Nuremberg Code, it is illegal to perform experimental treatments on people without their explicit consent.
The media is complicit in covering up this information.
I don't know where you get that 1 out of 9 in your frantic efforts to justify the numbers.
97% would be the protection against hospitalization.
That would mean that virtually no vaccinated people should be in hospital
The population is not 100% vaccinated.
But even with an 80% vaccination rate, hospitals would not be able to fill up.
But if we are to believe the fear mongering of the government through their mouthpiece, the media, it is due to unvaccinated people.
While they only represent 30% of the hospitalized.
So, you're still missing the point.
With an effectiveness of 97%, the number of vaccinated hospitalized should be close to zero.
The full hospitals (if that is to be believed) are only 30% filled with unvaccinated covid patients.
So it is a blatant (media) lie that the unvaccinated are responsible for those "full" hospitals.
You're trying to convince me otherwise, but the fact that they (the government) are talking about a third jab speaks volumes, doesn't it?
The effectiveness of the vaccines is not what they have been telling us and certainly not what the vaccine manufacturers have claimed.
But they got a waiver of liability anyway, so who cares.
In the meantime, the governments (with our tax money) are buying even more of those vaccines and the cash registers of the pharmaceutical companies keep ringing.
Less than a year of vaccinations, three shots and up to the fourth jab.
Where will this madness end?
1
-
@jerrycann9072
Maybe because Germany is a neighbor and Hottentots, Boedisten, ect. are far away, as far as I'm concerned.
Also because my parents and grandparents suffered under the Nazi occupation, fortunately I wasn't born yet.
But intolerance now goes very far, doesn't it.
Even if I give an example, it is no longer possible for me to choose the "example" myself.
I think stigmatizing people is wrong, just as you see today that people are stigmatized as "white supremasists" because they are white.
This is one of the worst forms of racism, because the people who do this use the race card for political ends.
Yet you don't hear anything else these days.
Disgusting.
Now, back on topic, depriving people of (human) rights because they are not vaccinated and granting those rights to people with a vaccination card, is discrimination and stigmatization, discrimination first class, it is completely wrong and completely against human rights .
Yet there are people who defend this.
It indicates how badly one has slipped into this fear psychosis.
As Professor Matias Desmet said, "People in anxiety psychosis can be coaxed into anything and are capable of anything."
"Their gaze is so narrowed that they only see the fear object."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOLhF9fyjkk&t=1937s&ab_channel=DeNieuweWereld
1
-
@jerrycann9072
You asked me why "you people", with which you placed me in a group, of which I cannot see in your brain who you actually mean by this group "you people".
Nevertheless, I tried to give you an honest answer, given that indeed my parents and grandparents suffered under the occupation of the Nazis and it were the Nazis who stigmatized the Jews.
I also know this from the stories my grandparents and parents have told me.
I cannot say more than what actually happened.
I can't reverse or rewrite history as some try to do.
When you ask a question, it implies you're waiting for an answer, doesn't it?
If you don't like that answer, well, that's your problem.
But yes, maybe I should not have answered your nonsensical question: "why you people".
Quote: "Doesn't work."
Apparently it works, judging by your reaction.
So I will stick to my example to use the Nazis as an example and will also stick to the rest of my speech, whether you like it or not, I don't care, that is your problem.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@SkenonSLive
On billions of people, without their consent, because they are ignorant that these vaccines are still in the Phase 3 experimental stage until at least the end of 2023.
Developing a safe vaccine takes about 7 to 12 years, in order to also study its long-term effects.
Something that couldn't possibly have happened with these vaccines, which were launched on the market in a matter of months.
These vaccine manufacturers were exempted from responsibility by the "governments" when things go wrong.
If adverse effects should appear in the longer term, you are completely on your own.
You unknowingly participated in a medical experiment, which was also pushed by your own government and pushed down your throat.
Or rather, stabbed in your arm.
The government also shrugged off responsibility for the narcolepsy cases that emerged after the swine flu vaccinations.
They claimed it had not been shown to be due to the vaccinations.
Yet the government in the Netherlands stopped vaccinating and millions of vaccines were burned.
Since these mRNA vaccines are being applied to humans for the first time, some caution would not have been misplaced before mass vaccination was started.
Especially when you know that application to animals with this mRNA technique did not go well.
Phase 3 until at least the end of 2023 and then phase 4 of the experimental stage will start.
When does it end?
Well, you tell me.
Hopefully there will be no long-term effects such as leukemia or autoimmune diseases.
I don't wish anyone bad luck, but I don't let my body be messed with.
My body is too dear to me, I only have one and take good care of it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The MEDIA works with:
Two measures two weights?
Two arguments contrary to each other?
Or what should you call such a thing?
Bias?
Partiality?
Hypocrisy?
Propaganda is bringing information that fits your booth and what does not fit in your booth is concealed.
When elderly people die, so to speak, "BY" corona, the fact that these people often already have serious life-threatening conditions is constantly being dismissed, hushed up, not mentioned, etc.
No, no, these people definitely died "BY" corona and nothing else.
But look now!
Some elderly people already died after receiving the vaccine.
Some a few hours after receiving the syringe.
Now suddenly "YES" the excuse is being used that these people were ALREADY sick AND definitely did NOT die from the vaccine, BUT because of their life-threatening illness they already had.
Well well well.
I don't know if the mainstream media is paying attention to it and keeping a counter of the number of vaccination deaths, as they do for the number of (so-called) corona deaths.
No, oh no, because these people didn't die from the vaccine, no, no, no.
NOT a counter, because they died from their life-threatening illness and NOT from the vaccine.
Something that is not the case with corona, isn't it MEDIA?
However, there are news channels that do publicize those cases.
https://youtu.be/ErGQumwmZiA?t=468
1
-
Is ventilation rubbish?
Research has indeed been done by, for example, an analyst in the Netherlands, named Maurice de Hond.
He couldn't understand that in a short time hundreds of people could suddenly become infected, the so-called mass infections.
This could not be done outside just by contact with one or two infected people.
Mass infections that happened in the south of the Netherlands at the very beginning of the corona epidemic, during the carnival that is celebrated there.
The mass contamination in Ischgl, Austria also caught his attention.
He analyzed the cases and quickly came to the conclusion that the infections had not happened outside on the street or on the ski slope, but inside the halls where the after parties or apres skies were held.
In those closed spaces, the air must have been contaminated by one or two people, as a result of which everyone who stayed in this space for a few hours was infected by inhaling the contaminated air.
In other words, they were breathing the virus in large quantities directly into their lungs, the most vulnerable place to covid19.
Not their hands, lips, nose or eyes, no, directly in the lungs.
In Ischgl even the man behind the bar (bartender) was infected.
Breathing in contaminated air, due to lack of ventilation, also happens in nursing homes and yes, even in hospitals.
The people (elderly) who sit in these retirement homes breathe in the same air almost 24/7, which may possibly be contaminated.
This is also one of the reasons that older people living at home are less at risk than older people in nursing homes.
So I wouldn't underestimate ventilation.
I myself (66) was infected with covid19 by a person (49) with whom I worked, who was in turn infected by his father-in-law (82) who lived alone but had contracted the infection in hospital, where he was admitted (corona free) for about 10 days for treatment unrelated to corona.
We have all survived the infection, even the seriously ill old man (82) who was quarantined with his daughter and son-in-law because they stayed in his house to assist the man in recovering from his illness, which had nothing to do with corona.
The infection was diagnosed at the old man's home about a week after his discharge from the hospital.
The people from the hospital spontaneously came to his home to perform the test.
It has never been admitted in so many words, but apparently something wasn't kosher in the hospital.
Maurice de Hond who is a good analyst, contacted (for help) virologists and epidemiologists worldwide, they confirmed his analysis that indeed with respiratory viruses, such as influenza, corona, etc., the infection can certainly happen through the air.
For example, a lot of people who are together in a very poorly ventilated room for a long time can become seriously infected (directly in the lungs) by inhalation.
I mention Maurice de Hond, but he is certainly not the only one who has studied this.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1