Comments by "Julia P." (@juliap.5375) on "Hindustan Times" channel.

  1. 69
  2. 43
  3. 31
  4. 20
  5. 16
  6. 15
  7. 15
  8. 15
  9. 13
  10. 11
  11. 9
  12. 9
  13. 9
  14. 7
  15.  @doddsalfa  Far right, fascism? Putin returned 75% of Russian economic in state property, it is exactly same economical system which existed during Stalin’s era: 2/3 is communism, 1/3 is capitalism. Ideology — same internationalism. In 2006 Putin founded BRICS — union of Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa. Goal — independent from colonial empires financial and economical system. Just week ago to Russia came leaders of 45 African countries (!), discussion — how to resist to modern western neo-colonialism. Moreover, Russia right now in UA fight against classical fascists and nazis (they SS declared as own heroes, deny languages, last year burned 11 million books as said itself), even all same countries as 80 years before — full former Hitler’s coalition + several colonial empires. USA in everything is opposing to Russia. Country even born as opposition to Europe, so Russia and US are like two polar points, only Europe somewhere between and have elements from both. One had slavery, another — never. One had race segregation — another arrived as multi-race union. One born capitalism, another — communism. One represent Protestants (reject initial Christianity), another — Orthodoxes (initial Christianity). One in Cold War fought for preserving colonialism, another — liberated colonies. … Even exist funny psychological tests. As example situation: you return back to home, home in fire, inside your parent and spouse, you can save only one, your action? In USA 99% choose — spouse. In Russia 99% choose parent. So different values and mentality of both nations :)
    7
  16. 6
  17. 6
  18. 6
  19. 6
  20. 6
  21. 5
  22. 5
  23. 5
  24. 4
  25. 3
  26. 3
  27. 3
  28. 3
  29. 3
  30.  @Ast151  Lol. Looks like you are drunk. 1. In Russia funding from state which movie makers can get is limited by just $1 million, moreover, this budget is limited for only few movies per year, rest get much less (in average $500 thousands) and then must return money back to state. Who will get this payment is discussed on public presentations after public vote. In 90% cases it is just tiny loan with zero percent. Americans also of course use federal budget, do you really think when in movie as example a lot of weapons, for it paid producers? Right to Pentagon? Facepalm. It is free for movie makers (for that paid taxpayers). Also in US is popular direct order of movies by state organizations. As example almost all police drama series, they all ordered/funded by officials. Just more complicated and less public scheme: state gave grant to university which prepares students for forensic science, then this university order TV show series about criminalists and paid for it with money from grant. Looks like you never saw “film about movie/series”, directors often itself tell that it was state order. 2. The most stupid thing in world is attempt to compare foreign salary with ordinary conversion. As example (2017) in Russia for $10 possibly to buy 5 BigMacs, at same time in US for $20 only 4 BigMacs. It means $10 in Russia in over than 2 times more than $20 in USA. That why nobody in world with a bit of brain compares salaries directly, goods have different prices. Also you lied, average Russian salary nowadays is $760 (after all taxes). It means something like $2000 in USA. And it is average salary for largest in world country, if talk about industrial regions, not rural areas where living nomads, e.g. Moscow, then it is already $1400, which means like over $3000 in USA. I can remind to you, that Russia is 2nd in world by popularity country for migrant workers, because even courier or taxi driver earn enough to live in Russia and send money to own family abroad. Also need to remember, that in Russia education is free (in USA people need loans for that), medicine is free (of course for some rare and super expensive things nobody will pay, but in average, e.g. ordinary cancer, broken leg and so on people paid zero, while in US it is real tragedy, people afraid to ill), when you born kid, state to you give a lot of money (~10 month salary), heat and electricity in Russia cost almost nothing, apartments also cheap, almost each family have own apartments in city and summer house somewhere in rural area in own property already at age of 35-40 years, a lot of more examples. That why in Russia almost no homeless and majority have education, while in USA millions and millions of homeless and one of the largest amount of people in world which can’t read and write (is it 3rd world or not?). 3. Over 75% of Russian population living in cities, it means have centralized water system and even centralized heat system. So you just lie. While lack of water can be only in rural area, especially between nomadic tribes. Which, believe, not cares about running water at all. While examples of “3rd world”, it is when during winter in England died up to 40 thousands people because of cold, in cities (at same time Russians in own apartmens wear only underwear and love to open windows at -30 for fresh air). Or “3rd world” is what we saw during modern epidemic in USA, because country have no enough hospitals, lack of doctors, have no equipment, have no isolation boxes. For comparison in any large Russian city there are more isolation boxes than in whole US state. I’m even silent about homeless, ghettoes and no-go zones.
    2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39.  @warren6891  1) Russia already over year not send additional troops to battlefield, so no, it not lost "thousands more". It means it almost have no losses actually. In Avdeevka Russia used just 7 brigades, while UA - 17 brigades. UA last two months publicly discussed about needs of additional 500k (total losses already close to 1 million). 2) Are you just compared Iraq and UA? Iraq — small country with weak army which rejected to fight immediately. UA — hugest in Europe army, more than have all EU countries combined. With more weapons than have all European countries combined. Army with one of the lowest loss threshold (not retreat until left few out of hundreds). Iraq — had no help. UA — have help from 50 countries, including whole NATO. Both with weapons and even dozens thousands of soldiers (so-called volunteers, actually illegally troops). In Iraq US used strategy of cover bombings, in result there are near 2 million losses of civilians. Russia do not use such strategy, so loses on civilians is less than as example for 2 month in Gaza (with population in 10 times less). One of the lowest in history actually. 3) Russia not lost anything. When UA signed treaty, Russia declared about own withdraw of forces back to home, operation was finished in 1 month. But then joined Wes and forced UA to fight. If they were clever enough and wait at least a week before cancel deal, then whole troops would return back. Initially UA had chance to return to Minsk agreement and preserve all own territories, it was publicly declared condition. While nowadays Russia declared another goals for own operation, like "demilitarization". It means it will fight until in UA army exist at least one soldier. While territories — nobody cares about territories, main goal — to reduce amount of soldiers in UA to zero. By estimations already 1 million done.
    2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49.  @halberderdier8073  Facepalm. 1. It was not separatists, but forces from Afghan who invaded Chechnya soon after dissolve of USSR. Open list of commanders — almost all were arabs from Qatar, Oman, Saudia, etc. how they arrived there? Together with USSR gone everything, like KGB (border guards). Borders of country were opened and non controlled. CIA funded them in Afghan and then started to transfer inside of Russia already. They started from massacre on city’s square against ethnical groups and non-muslims. 2. After short war in was signed peace — they agreed to liberated all people (hundreds thousands of refugees) and promised peaceful live, while Russia agreed on independence. Russia never cared about lands. If you forgot, Yeltsin openly visited each republic in Russia and called to independence. Moscow was only happy to expel them. 3. In 1999 they attacked Russia — Dagestan republic, decide to build Islamic Caliphate (whole this region, except several lands — fully consist from muslims). It’s when Russians became angry. So very soon everyone was wiped out. Including those who ran away abroad. Locals after years under Sharia laws (music — prohibited, women have no rights, etc) of course voted to rejoin with Russia. And you forgot main example — UA itself. UA became independent because in Moscow happened coup. It is exactly what is written in declaration of independence. So, you can’t support at same time right of UA for independence and reject in exactly same right to territories of former UA. You have double standards. Actually it was illegally before, but West back in 1999 created Kosovo. Without any referendum, just occupied that lands and declared new independent state. Moreover, forced whole world to accept this in UN, so nowadays any territory have right to declared own independence without opinion of rest country. Also you forgot rest aspects: — in Jan 2022 UA in Munich said they planning to create a-bomb. — they declared SS as own state heroes. After Nurnberg it means they are outlaw. — they are nobody, they seized power in country, so they are illegal. — they violated Minsk agreement. — they attacked two independence countries (after Kosovo, it is irrelevant how Kiew regime perceive this territories — they had referendum and proclaimed self, so they are not anymore part of UA). This countries signed alliance with Russia, so according to UN rule 51, Russia came to protect allies against invader (illegal outlaw forces which occupied UA)…
    1
  50. 1