Comments by "Julia P." (@juliap.5375) on "Hindustan Times"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Exactly.. looks like. They only nowadays made on own ships systems which had Soviets already 40 years ago. While Russia already works over next cycle of space exploration — testing prototype of first in world nuclear tug (powerful reactor supply engines, one nuclear load enough for 7 years of work in space, can rich great speed, in few times faster than rockets can, can maneuvers, return back to Earth, carry huge weights). At same time SpaceX talks some nonsense about conquest of Mars on... rockets! It like in mid-20 century discuss about travel on house carriage. Yep, still majority of world had and used mainly them, but developed countries preferred cars and airplanes.
As first work it will be used to build Russian-Chinese base on Moon (and base will be incredible cheap, cost of work of such tug for several years just few millions of dollars). As joke Russia gave funny name to this program — Zeus. If you remember, Zeus was father of Apollo and Artemis :D Russian humor.
1
-
1
-
1
-
About movies — it is impossibly to compare. Too different schools and products. It is like to compare Dostoevsky and comics about Spider Man. Yep, latest one is more popular, but Dostoevsky is Dostoevsky. Same with movies, I just don’t know examples of intellectual movies from USA (except some from 1930-50s), maybe they exist, but I never heard and never saw even on international presentations, only European and of course Russian, from time to time from other countries. So, to be clear, it is not truth, US not no.1 in every movie industry, in US just lack of whole directions. US mainly produce so-called ‘entertaining movies’, while in Europe it is just subgenre (in which a lot of european directors just never work). It is not good or bad, just different cultures. Some people prefer Spider Man, while other “War and peace”.
About rest industries — 100% not, few examples:
Nuclear industry — US behind for several decades in everything (after WW2 for some short time were ahead), some directions inside of industry just have no at all (already for 40-50 years, especially in space and closed cycle).
Rocket science — behind.
Modern communications (e.g. quantum lines) — behind.
Radars — far behind (for near 20 years after WW2 were ahead).
Lasers — behind (while at past times both nations won Nobel prize for invention of them).
1
-
1
-
@alexchlomandar3805 1. Movie maker company is “Yellow, Black and White”, they are the most successful company in Russia which earn billions. Even Disney order movies in this company (yep, when you see in title disney, it not means that movie made disney, they mainly just put own name and literally nothing else).
2. Actually it is not about movie or how to beat Tom Cruise, it is old Russian program how to reduce time which need to prepare non professional cosmonauts. 25 years ago it took 1 year 2 month, then 9 month, now 3,5 month. Specially for this experiment created new version of Soyuz space ship which can control only 1 professional cosmonaut (preparation of professional cosmonaut took 10 years), not two like it was before.
As continue of experiment this December Russia will send two tourists from Japan.
It is part of Lunar program, how to prepare people of different professions for short time to send on Moon. So, if not this movies makers, it could be just any other literally random people. At least movie makers will film movie and gather a lot of money.
3. I’m not sure they even paid for flight (because it is part of experiment), but anyway it is cheap and a lot of Russian companies can allow this for self. Russian space industry is not private, it in state property, that why incredible cheap. Rocket cost a bit more than cost of metal scrap, for rocket state paid to self, not to someone else. I bet cams cost more than whole this flight (director took with self 4 main cameras which cost $500 thousands and whole bunch of less expensive).
Yep, Americans paid incredible money for seats in Soyuz, but Russia always increased price for Americans after anti-Russia behavior, aggressive speeches of american officials, literally as punishment. For tourists at same time price was in several times less than for astronauts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@f-35lightningii6 According to Ukraine, Russia also lost 1500 tanks T-14 back in 2015 :D Yep, non existing T-14 and yep, back in 2015. Also Russia lost more troops than it sent and had. Miracle, isn’t it? ;)
Russia even in theory couldn’t lost so lot jets at least because it not use aviation. Jets was used during first two week actively, when destroyed whole UA fleet (largest in Europe) and then in rare cases by few jets once per several month, there are no targets there, because UA have no fleet.
Russia use cruise missiles with ranges from 1500 to 5500 km. Of course, according to best NATO experts, Russia had missiles only for 2 month of battle, while it already used more than whole West produced for last 20 years and still continue to use almost each day :)
Unlike US(West), Russia from Soviet times have different war conceptions. As example US have strategic bombers, Russia have no, it have missiles carries. Different approach. As you see, weapons looks similar, but represent different type. Different type define different kind of war. This explains why you spread fake, because such loses possibly only for NATO conception of battle, not Russian.
P.S.
Su-57 was used in Syria. Funny, but information about this leaked from US media, they demonstrated photos of fighters. Russian MoD almost never discovere such information.
Su-57 was used in first week in UA, there was videos of them.
Where you forgot Su-35? I remind, F-22 arrived to fight against Su-27. Before they finished project, arrived Su-30. And then (2012) — Su-35.
Why China must to use J-20 (canceled Soviet project MiG 1.44) in Taiwan? Facepalm.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Babumoshai.. He was just first man. Before of people sent animals, not all returned alive. And to be more correctly, before of man and animals sent nuclear bombs. Because it was not just rocket, it was 100% ICBM. If you forgot, it was soon after West declared new war against USSR after WW2 (nowadays known as Cold War, mainly regards to this flight of rocket, West afraid to attack USSR, so that war never became hot) when UK and US prepared to nuclear strike and total extermination of USSR (or more correctly everything from Poland to North China). Soviets had no possibilities to send bomb on aviation (too far, too lot risks, while UK and US had own bombers on Soviet borders), that why decide to build rockets instead of bombers. Man in space was secondary goal, so it is funny fact: man flew into space on ICBM.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1