Comments by "Clint Holmes" (@clintholmes2061) on "Status Coup News" channel.

  1. As far as I can tell Warren campaign is designed to cock block Sanders. She is controlled opposition to real change.
    3
  2.  @geddydesmond451  Regarding, "you parrot the msm argument that was used against bernie in 2016" What the actual fuck are you babbling about? I have evidence of cheating against bernie in 2016. I ask again if you have any evidence but I assume that if you say more it will continue to be nonsensical bullshit.
    3
  3. Being able to rig your own election is not the same as rigging a general election. Provide proof or STFU.
    3
  4.  @fishingsouthwestflorida1586  I don't worry about money and I'm not nearly so happy.
    3
  5.  @christopherlee9026  No prob. It's something that I think isn't talked about enough.
    3
  6.  @jackripper5240  Regarding, "coz bernie has experienced?" Um. Yes. Obviously. If you wonder why Yang supporters are tough to take seriously it might be because they have trouble with incredibly simple concepts such as this. Regarding, "do you really think that bernie will push through with his own policies?" Even Bernie knows he can't do it alone. There is a reason he calls for a political revolution. Regarding, "Dont criticize supporters." Then don't be an idiot. Respect is earned, not given. Regarding, "You might end up calling them "deplorables"." Hillary is a cunt but even she gets the occasional thing correct. Trump supporters are morons whose stupidity is currently costing this country dearly.
    3
  7. Because all the true progressives are busy fighting for Bernie like they should be.
    3
  8. Meh, he's not immoral, he's brainwashed by corporate media.
    3
  9. I wouldn't put it past her to put them on and have them conclude that Biden is telling the truth for convoluted terrible reasons.
    3
  10.  @sirfortesque8757  Regarding, "we're looking to build the party right" Speak for yourself. I give two shits about the "party." They are a dumpster fire and are in need of house cleaning. Regarding, "not just circle jerk each other" I find this really funny all things considered. Regarding, "this movement" Movement and party. I want change. Real change. Substantive change. That's what I'm fighting for. Regarding, "draw other in....yes?" Of course I want more people on the right side but eventually we need to able to stop having to debate the merits of M4A. It's a no brainer everyone should be able to agree on. At some point we need to put our foot down and fight for this. And if you aren't with us then you are standing in the way of change and are going to be dealt with accordingly. This IS a litmus test.
    3
  11.  @ish7957  Regarding, "Calm down. You're too emotional like Dimmy Dore." Bite me. We are talking about politics. If you aren't fired up it's only because you don't fully understand the topic of which you speak or you have lost your humanity. Regarding, "The progressives in congress have only been in power for two years." I don't care. Do you have a point. Regarding, "You can't change washington in two years." Why am I even bothering to address you. You offer literally nothing of real value in anything you say.
    3
  12. As soon as you hold a position of power you are no longer an "average" man or woman.
    3
  13. @Kevin Tewey While it's true that Bernie would crush Trump and Biden would lose to him it isn't even nearly as important than the fact that Bernie should be the nominee not because he would win... but because he superior to Biden in every way when it comes to policy.
    3
  14.  @subversivelysurreal3645  And let's not forget Biden's pushup challenge to Trump.
    3
  15. Even terrible human beings are like, "do I really deserve that comparison?"
    2
  16.  jerry flounders  Regarding, "it's a Sad thing." You know what's really sad? Your inability to master something as simple as capitalization much less master more complicated ideas.
    2
  17. Bloomberg needs to be on the debate stage to talk about and address the pressing issues of our day... like homeless people being given free bagels. /s
    2
  18.  Geist Maschine  Probably, but I'm not ruling out the possibility that they are just really, really, really, really, really stupid.
    2
  19.  @texjohnson9208  Oh... and Obama was a great liar because I too bought his bullshit and voted for him. I learned something from it though after all the war and broken promises. I learned to follow the money better and not trust people selling their soul the way he did. You on the other hand still use the word "peace" with him and think he did a good job even though his suck was largely responsible for giving us Trump. How I have no fucking clue. Please wake up.
    2
  20. @J Stone Yeah, cuba wasn't bad although there wasn't really any good reason for us to keep shitting on them. But speaking of cuba, guantanemo bay is still open.
    2
  21. He wasn't even running things when he was president.
    2
  22. I was always more of a fan david gilmore than waters but the gap is closing because of politics.
    2
  23.  @stevekake3359  Nevermind. I found this. "The $600 checks make up about $166 billion of the total $900 billion package" So if anything I think everyone getting 6K might be a small underestimate. Time to start screaming this to everyone so everyone knows.
    2
  24.  @jivet3919  You are going to have to be more specific. Are you referring to yang or their supporter as being new to politics?
    2
  25.  @jackripper5240  Regarding, "bernie's goal is not to engage or receive pac money from corporations. however, he receives money from individual contributors aggregated into PACs." Are you just trying to restate what I said without bothering to address the substance of it? Yang loves PACs. Sanders doesn't. Do you at least acknowledge that difference while you deflect from that fact?
    2
  26.  @jackripper5240  It's very Warrenlike of him. She too thinks that selling out is a "necessary evil" as well and sees nothing wrong with the engaging in the corruption they claim to oppose.
    2
  27. This kid restores some much needed faith in humanity.
    2
  28.  @geddydesmond451  Regarding, "whats with the constant namecalling?" It's relatated to the constant stupid shit you say. Regarding, "Triggered much?" Talking to people who make me feel like I'm living in the movie idiocracy is frustrating. Regarding, "Jordan just explained to you they cheated." In the general? Because that is what you are claiming. Just because I have evidence someone cheats on their wife doesn't mean I can just assume they are also cheating on their taxes. I can think they wouldn't have a problem cheating on their taxes. But I can't just assume they do and act like I have evidence of it. Regarding, "But now you need evidence." I ALWAYS need evidence to hold a belief. Regarding, "Too bad for me I'm having this conversation with someone who calls everyone stupid and/or dipshit." Not everyone. Just because I do it to you don't mean I do it to everyone. It's like you are trying to prove my point about your lack of intelligence. So no evidence huh? I'm remarkably unsurprised by that.
    2
  29.  @geddydesmond451  Long story short you have no evidence of cheating in the general election. Thanks for clearing that up now please shut up and stop making everyone dumber. Thanks for that in advance.
    2
  30.  @geddydesmond451  You are not everyone. What a narcissist you must be.
    2
  31.  @geddydesmond451  "At least youre persistent." If there is evidence of cheating in the general I want to know about it. But you have none.
    2
  32.  @geddydesmond451  No evidence huh? You have all the time in the world to do everything other than that don't you?
    2
  33.  @kylehorvath9295  Among the sources I cited I just told you to watch the video we are talking on. That was dumb of me. But at least I get to have a good laugh at myself.
    2
  34.  @jivet3919  Regarding, "You implied all that with your first comment? Lol" He did. I remember when people were ashamed of their comprehension problems and not proud of them like you are.
    2
  35.  @jivet3919  I knew EXACTLY what they were saying. Their writing was fine. Stop making excuses for your stupidity.
    2
  36.  @jivet3919  Regarding, "You can’t just assume you reading comprehension skills can overcome someone elses poor writing." This is your EDITED comment where you are criticizing someone else's writing skills. Too fucking funny.
    2
  37. I saw an article last night where Biden was complaining that Bernie isn't a democrat... you know the guy who said he would run with a republican. Ultimately if you are looking for intellectual consistency corporate dems isn't the place to find it.
    2
  38.  @charfire222  So. Money doesn't buy happiness.
    2
  39. She *would if she ran against Trump. It's our job to see it isn't her. Accept no imitations. Bernie Sanders 2020
    2
  40.  @Freakarmy  Meanwhile, in reality, Sanders crushes Trump.
    2
  41. Dumpster fire > DNC
    2
  42. Go subscribe to Bernie's youtube channel if you haven't already and vote for him the "democratic" primary. Thanks for that in advance.
    2
  43. It's cold in Canada.
    2
  44. This. I noticed this at first as well.
    2
  45. It's hard not to believe DWS because of her history of honesty and integrity. /s
    2
  46.  @TheMisfitPond  All substance? Hardly. The questions were terrible and the candidates aren't allowed to say anything that is too long for a bumper sticker.
    2
  47.  @TheMisfitPond  Regarding, "I don’t like the fact that they frame the questions horribly" Good. You shouldn't. But don't underestimate how important and how bad this is. The corporate media is doing everything they can to use right wing talking points to frame every issue. They also do shit like trying to pit people against one another rather than trying to educate viewers on their positions. Regarding, "give so much time to a bunch of candidates nobody cares about." I'm actually of the principled belief that all candidates should be given similar amounts of time assuming they have earned their right to be at the debate. I'm also for having lots of voices being given the right to talk, especially when we are still this far out. I'm actually pissed that Mike Gravel was not allowed to debate and I'm pissed that 3rd party candidates are not allowed to debate during the general. Or political system is better and better served by allowing more inclusion. Regarding, "But considering the circumstances, Bernie did an excellent job at being substantive and quippy with his answers." Considering the fact that the format is god awful Bernie did fucking great and I'm very, very, very happy about it. It would just be nice if he didn't have to take loaded questions and if he were allowed to speak for longer on incredibly important topics.... and for others as well. Just because he did great doesn't mean the format is better than it is. Regarding, "politics also requires you to fire back in gimmicky ways if you want to reach more people." But it shouldn't be specifically designed to make this more important than the substance. How many times do the moderators cut people off when they have things they want to say? Let them speak for fucks sake. But take that time in account. If someone wants to run over the time let them but then skip the next question that might have gone to them and even out the time in that way.
    2
  48.  @paulxbsog1972  Regarding, "i said they didnt cover it correctly and they didnt" Jimmy covered this exact story. Why am I even addressing you at this point. Regarding, "this entire "fraudsquad" take came from angered tulsi supporters." I was a bernie supporter and think fraud squad is spot on. Regarding, "they know theyre wrong." Please just STFU.
    2
  49.  @paulxbsog1972  Regarding, "actual election fraud is called gerrymandering." Thanks captain obvious. Holy shit are you stupid.
    2
  50.  @paulxbsog1972  "the truth sent you into insults." It's pretty impossible to tell the difference between you and flat earther right now. They like to say the same shit when I call them morons.
    2