Comments by "Clint Holmes" (@clintholmes2061) on "Status Coup News" channel.

  1.  @paulxbsog1972  "yeah you are "stupid"" Talking to you at all is pretty dumb of me. Fair point.
    2
  2. If you support Elizabeth Warren let's never hang out.
    2
  3. I assume she is slithering in the the grass snake that she is.
    2
  4. "gives major grifter vibes. Sorry, not sorry." You should be sorry for making everyone dumber with this nonsense. Are you paid for this stupid shit?
    2
  5. I'm pretty sure he was black when it started.
    2
  6.  @Airith4  Keep hammering them with facts. Important facts about me that make me not like Warren include: she recently voted for an increase to the budget for the department of offense. An increase of about 80 billion per year. That increase alone would have been more than enough to pay bernies free college plan, the one the corporate media claims is "unaffordable." But that was money she felt was fine going towards bombs for trump to use. Also her willingness to take dirty money in general like you have already done (how that doesn't affect people is beyond me). There's also the fact that she didn't run against a corporate shill like Hillary in 2016 (and didn't endorse the true progressive of sanders in the race who only got the mix because warren didn't) but instead wants to run in 2020 against sanders now that he is the clear leader of the progressive movement. I also would point out that she didn't help or support DAPL protestors (sadly lots of people aren't familiar with this but for me this was really, really, really important). I'd also point out that she was a REPUBLICAN in the 90's while Sanders was busy being a progressive his entire life. If none of that sways them kick them out or move. Just kidding. Mostly. :)
    2
  7. I'd prefer a well known actor over a DNC drone anyday.
    2
  8. I could only take you less seriously if you were named "U.S.Navy Pete".... oh wait.
    2
  9. Sure. Our entire government is a dumpster fire who isn't interested in doing what's best for the people. But a guy like Bernie puts pressure on them from the time he would take office. He would use the bully pulpit like no other. He would make it perfectly clear who is responsible for making American's lives better and then we can punish them by replacing them. Think about how far the party's rhetoric has changed just since Bernie ran in 2016. Sure lots of it is pandering but it shows just how much he can do to win hearts and minds and change the public perception. Bernie knows he can't do it all by himself. There is a reason he talks about a need for a political revolution.
    2
  10.  @kristonpohlman2685  There have been polls where M4A is favored by a majority of REPUBLICANS. That is what Bernie has been busy accomplishing while only a senator. That said the politicians hardly reflect the will of their peasants but it clearly demonstrates that he is doing something right even if he can't do it all by himself.
    2
  11.  @kristonpohlman2685  It's an absolute no brainer. Again, Bernie can't do it all by himself, but if anyone can get it done it is Bernie. And if he can't during his time as president because of how terrible congress is he still will be able to push the country in that direction and make it that much more possible that the next president can finish this very important goal.
    2
  12. That and where do they get their news are things I'd like to hear from pretty much everyone.
    1
  13.  @redcapitalist  I could only take you less seriously if you gave your own moronic comments a thumbs up. Oh wait... you do that already. I guess I can't take you any less seriously than I do. Stop wasting perfectly good oxygen.
    1
  14.  @luigimario4458  Bernie legitimately made about 2 million from his best selling book.
    1
  15. That's funny coming from a complete and total dipshit.
    1
  16. @J Stone He did have one great achievement during his time IMO. The Iran nuclear deal was pretty fucking great. That said it was quickly and easily destroyed because he also helped give us Trump. But other than one thing... well let's just say my disappointed can't have been greater.
    1
  17.  @texjohnson9208  Obama's "love." https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/obamas-deportation-policy-numbers/story?id=41715661 Obama's "peace." https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jan/09/america-dropped-26171-bombs-2016-obama-legacy Obama's "unity." https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/10/the-decimation-of-the-democratic-party-visualized/
    1
  18.  @texjohnson9208  Top notch trolling. Well done.
    1
  19.  @injunsun  Regarding, " Obviously you haven't read her positions lately." Please dig deeper than her "positions lately." Politicians are rightfully known for being great liars. Don't just take their word and do some digging. Let's take her position lately of not taking pac money. I won't even point out that she has rolled pac money left over from her senate run into her campaign president, which she has, let's talk about the fact that that "position lately" only goes as far as the primary. She isn't going to take that money in the primary because she knows it's wrong and immoral. According to Warren, "corruption, the influence of money, touches every decision that gets made in Washington... Whatever issue brought you here today, I guarantee if there’s a decision to be made in Washington, it’s been touched, pushed, massaged, tilted over, just a little, so the folks with money do better than everyone else." That same warren will happily and hypocritically take pac money if she makes the general which means that her positions on anything can't be trusted because she openly admits she will take legalized bribes. Warren reeks of controlled opposition to real change. Her campaign is an effort to kneecap Sanders. She is terrible. https://publicintegrity.org/federal-politics/elizabeth-warren-president-pac-money-treasurer/
    1
  20.  @injunsun https://dailycaller.com/2019/02/25/elizabeth-warren-no-pac-money-escape/ https://www.gloucestertimes.com/election/leftover-pac-money-funneled-into-warren-s-campaign/article_f013b2ae-0a8d-53d1-afb1-ce9f80dfcc64.html http://inthesetimes.com/article/21890/elizabeth-warren-war-military-iran-north-korea-venezuela-bernie-sanders
    1
  21. Maybe but I personally think it's more a case of him only getting his "news" from corporate media.
    1
  22. Isn't Pete the guy who "won" the Iowa Caucus?
    1
  23. You think he is sexual predator. That should be enough for reasons that should be obvious to the point of never needing be explained. But if you want to act like the problem with Biden is that he isn't our "first choice" and not that he is just a disgrace to our species... you are pretty hopeless. Good luck with your sexual predator.
    1
  24. That was a really long video if it was only about him being his friend.
    1
  25. Everyone has their bias but the people who are open an honest about facts, like Jordan being honest about being a friend of Jimmy's, means he is far less likely to be letting their bias be the only thing going on. I think Pakman is a joke and his arguments were asinine and I'm not friends with Jimmy as if that has something to do with the arguments being used. Forgive me for not telling you why what Pakman said was dumb because I think Jordan already did a good enough job on that front.
    1
  26. Regarding, "The problem that people have with Jimmy isn't that he is wrong" So you have a problem with someone that, according to you here, isn't wrong. You obviously do think he is wrong as demonstrated by everything else you said. You want your cake and to eat it too. Sorry but I don't have the time or ambition to continue this.
    1
  27.  @stevekake3359  Do you know if that's the same math the government is using? So when they just gave out 600 dollar checks (1/10 of the 6K), does that mean they calculated it was costing them 200 billion? Because if that's the math the government is going by and a 1.9 (rounded to 2 is just fine) trillion dollar stimulus could be used to give everyone checks of 6K then I want to start telling everyone that.
    1
  28. Terrible idea. He should point out their bias and how and why they are terrible but threatening to not play is terrible optics and strategy. You may as well be cartmen threatening to go home on south park.
    1
  29.  @zakbrowne8470  Regarding, "as if they don't know their biases." It's obviously not about them but about the viewers. Lots of them do need to hear it. Regarding, "their wallets" What? They have an agenda and it has so much more to do with than just money for a network. Do you think they covered trump's empty podium and while avoiding sanders speaking in front of record crowds was good for ratings for them? They would love for Sanders to do what you propose because it would give them ample opportunity to act like he's "being petty," "being like Trump in attacking the media," and "whining." Now don't get me wrong they already do that shit but that's all the more reason to not give them any more ammo than they deserve. He needs to promise to always speak truth to power and be willing to go as many places as reasonably possible to speak the truth. They would prefer blackout. That was the gameplan in 16. Now they have to listen at least more than they did. He needs to use that microphone and call them out to their faces if necessary while doing it.
    1
  30.  @zakbrowne8470  Sorry bout many typos. I'm sick and medicated.
    1
  31.  @gerardcomeau2160  What a remarkably uncompelling "argument."
    1
  32.  @gerardcomeau2160  Maybe you should stop being an idiot then. Or at the very least just shut the fuck up.
    1
  33.  @pauldecristoforo  You should be embarrassed about your comprehension skills. It isn't the world's fault you don't understand what a simple word like "unofficial" means. Kids in grade school understand it even if you don't.
    1
  34.  @pauldecristoforo  We all understand that you have the comprehension skills of a 5 year old that eats paint chips and drinks water with lead. You don't need to keep proving it.
    1
  35.  @pauldecristoforo  You think and say the things you do because you are stupid.
    1
  36.  @pauldecristoforo  Seriously thou, do you even realize what a fucking hypocrite you are? Was that your idea of a "cohesive sentence?" Do you really not realize that you insult people? Or do you just not give a shit that you are a hypocrite?
    1
  37. I'll take your silence to mean that you understand what a hypocrite you are but you are too big a bitch to admit it.
    1
  38.  @kolonelkingkraker  I understand your sentiment but we should not be emulating pieces of shit. We need to be better than them.
    1
  39.  @DailyHit319  America pays TWICE as much as the rest of the world per person for health care. You are an idiot.
    1
  40.  @DailyHit319  Good lord you are stupid beyond words. You pay twice as much as everyone else you fucking dipshit because you are too fucking stupid to comprehend why it costs so much. I hope you are being paid to be an idiot.
    1
  41.  @DailyHit319  You are so busy being a selfish prick you don't stop to realize that your being that selfish prick is costing you more than anyone else in the world for the same shit. If only you were significantly smarter than you are... then you might be smart enough to realize you are an idiot.
    1
  42.  @geddydesmond451  Regarding, "I readily admit its an assumption." LMFAO. You, two seconds ago, "evidence? Pretty sure there is evidence they cheat." Regarding, "I assume because the DNC has been cheating for years that they didnt suddenly stop to make a fair election for Trump." It's pretty stupid to think that rigging your own party election is the same as rigging a general election. It's clearly not and is an apples to oranges comparison that requires EVIDENCE. But don't let that stop you from making that logical leap. And it is a logical leap. Don't pretend otherwise the way you have been all this time until finally being forced to admit you have no evidence. Regarding, "You dont admit shit." I don't have to admit lying about evidence but you do. Regarding, "You just talk shit" I know being pressed for evidence must have been very hard on you. Sorry not sorry I don't give a fuck about what you think and only care about what you can prove and you can't prove jack shit. Regarding, "No thoughtful conversation." I'm not going to lie this is really funny coming from you. Thanks for the laugh.
    1
  43.  @graywalkerjoin3rdparty74  I'm familiar with what you speak but it's still not evidence. I'd happily have it all investigated better than it is now. I do away with "proprietary information" when it comes to elections so that it can all be investigated and all the machines can be opened up. I again wouldn't be surprised if we did find good evidence some day. But as of now we don't.
    1
  44.  @graywalkerjoin3rdparty74  Get the audit. I support it happening. That might lead to evidence. If the general was rigged I want to know. But to make that conclusion I need the evidence first.
    1
  45.  @geddydesmond451  Regarding, "if someone reported uncle handsy Joe just sniffed another little girls hair, would you still run around demanding proof/evidence and calling everyone who didnt agree with you names?" The report of joe sniffing a girls hair is the evidence dipshit. I wouldn't need to have to ask for evidence. I'd already have it. Obviously. I call you names because you are not smart.
    1
  46.  @graywalkerjoin3rdparty74  Regarding, "Evidence is what justifies the Audit." Can you be more specific? I thought the audit was required by law? Or maybe I'm just thinking about the ballots being turned over. Regarding, "one way or the other, is what the Audit hopes to find." I'm not sure about your phrasing but hopefully you agree with what I'm about to say. An audit should only hope to find the truth. It shouldn't hope to find wrongdoing. But if there is wrongdoing it should out it. Regarding, " I agree there is no Proof at this time that has been admitted into court." I think you are a bit wrapped up in semantics. Evidence and proof are synonyms. The only real distinction people tend to make is in that they tend to consider "proof" to mean evidence that is beyond a reasonable doubt or the like. But call it what you want... proof of cheating or evidence of cheating... they mean the same thing to me. Regarding, "We definitely need Election Transparency for future elections so these questions cannot arise." The whole system should be reformed from top to bottom. Sadly I don't think that's about to happen anytime soon.
    1
  47.  @graywalkerjoin3rdparty74  Regarding, "I distinguish between the terms." I concede there is a difference. I told you where I think that difference is. It's very similar to your explanation and I think we are essentially say the same thing but only slightly differently. But ultimately they are synonyms. That treasure in your analogy is also rightfully called evidence. Both the map and the treasure are things you can point at and cite. Neither are just a "gut feeling" or "faith."
    1
  48.  @earlviney5212  Regarding, "Because its impossible." It's clearly not. GWB stole a general election.
    1
  49.  @kylehorvath9295  Regarding, "He is just speculating bud." He is doing more than that. "Speculating" better describes who you think JJ Watt is going to sign with. The OP is, "Well Hope you realize that DNC is very much capable of rigging the Presidential election too." except are they? They offer no evidence and expect us to just take their claim and agree with it. Regarding, "DNC unequivocally rigged the 2016 primary" Yup. Regarding, "there is a mountain of circumstantial evidence they interfered in 2020 as well" The DNC says Pete won the Iowa caucus. That's more than circumstantial evidence. But that's in the primary. Being able to rig a game being played on your home court in your hometown with a referees you are hiring for the game isn't the same as rigging another game. The primary is not the general. It's an apples to oranges comparison. Regarding, "I don't think it's crazy to suspect foul play in the general election too." I don't doubt their is foul play afoot. But ultimately I need evidence and there is none when it comes to the general. Regarding, "I however personally think the DNC didn't interfere in the general" We agree on this. Don't get me wrong I'd quickly changes this opinion if given some good evidence and wouldn't be shocked if some did come out but as of now I don't have it and I'm not going to pretend I do. Regarding, "The DNC and its donor base really don't care if Biden or Trump get elected" Meh. Lots of money spent on the general says otherwise. If it didn't matter I don't think the rich would set their money on fire like that. That said I agree that it doesn't matter much. But it does matter a little. Regarding, "The underlying detail that no one seems to address is that many people (Right and left) have little to no confidence in our electoral system and feel alienated by said system." I agree. Regarding, "Its not blantant fraud (i.e. changing votes)" Are you sure? Exit polls in the 2016 primary indicated widespread election fraud in the "democratic" primary. And now they barely even do exit polls. Regarding, "The average person realizes their voice has little sway on the political system and aren't educated enough in civics, economics, communication, law, or other subjects to properly articulate this feeling of marginalization." Even if they can articulate it and understand it that doesn't do much. The system is rigged top to bottom. Regarding, "At the end of the day are you going to trust a pick pocket with your car?" No. Regarding, "No evidence they're a car thief, just a pick pocketer right." I have contempt and hatred for the DNC. I think they are crooked and corrupt. I think they would happily cheat in the general if they thought they would get away with it. I wouldn't be surprised at all if evidence of cheating was found. But right now I don't have that. So I'm not going to pretend otherwise.
    1
  50.  @kylehorvath9295  Regarding, "beyond the wikileaks stuff" If you don't know about what happened in the Iowa caucus be sure to check it out. It's appalling. If you really want to check it out some of the stories I'd recommend (and I'm not going to put up links because youtube tends to not allow them. you should have all you would need by checking out articles such as...) "Iowa Democrats won’t correct errors on caucus tally sheets, emails show" from the chicago tribune "What a Surprise! DNC’s Shadow App Founder is a Pete Buttigieg Supporter — App Crashed and Now Pete Is Ahead of Bernie – How About That!" by the gateway pundit "Iowa autopsy report: DNC meddling led to caucus debacle" politico Long story short bernie crushed in iowa but the party conspired to give the state to pete. Just recently tom said the quiet part out loud when he just talked about how important he knows momentum is in elections. That's why they didn't let bernie get what was rightfully his. Status Coup just did a video on youtube talking about it titled, "Tom Perez Subtly Explains DNC's Motivation to Rig 2020 Iowa Caucus"
    1