Comments by "antonyjh1234" (@antonyjh1234) on "Richard J Murphy" channel.

  1.  @physiocrat7143  I have had a fridge running, my entire life, I have had hot and cold running water at the turn of a tap and a toilet that takes away my number two's and have had electricity, my entire life, this is what I call, white privilege. it is a systemic failure and breakdown if other people don't have these things, have never had any of these things, if a fridge means a medicine stays viable and you have no electricity and die then it goes beyond a tax system and I am in disagreement about why poor people are poor, they are an integral part of the debt based system in the UK but I am talking global, this is not just one part, about just what is important to Europe, or the church. Unless you have taxes on jobs how does the money leave the system again?
    1
  2.  @richardharvey1732  We don't need to control money, we need to control the system humans live in. Money could be done away with, should be done away with and we all have a carbon value we can spend per day. Most people of course have to stop working and we go to a rolling public service jobs for each person in their life but controlling the human system is easy, if given the chance. We have spent our lives paying off debt thinking it had value, electricity in the UK is 15.68% of total energy used and renewables are around 2% of total energy, point being unless we stop working and thinking money can be exchanged for unlimited energy, the whole thing is done. Of course, it would mean a policy of less jobs, that shouldn't be a hard sell, tell 90% of the world they will get food, shelter and medical care for free but you have to stop working and live a low impact life and it would be a step up, would people vote for a policy of less jobs and a complete reset though? PS : Even an energy value would work, people get all these for free, do not work except five or however many tears each person has to be in the three trades. they get an energy value that could mean the same products are still sold, fly to the moon, 200,000 credits better save up if you only get given 2000 a month.
    1
  3.  @richardharvey1732  Do we need to control money, we need to control the system humans live in, money could be done away with, should be done away with and we all have a carbon value we can spend per day. Most people of course have to stop working and we go to a rolling public service jobs for each person in their life but controlling the human system is easy, if given the chance. We have spent our lives paying off debt thinking it had value, electricity in the UK is 15.68% of total energy used and renewables are around 2% of total energy, point being unless we stop working and thinking money can be exchanged for unlimited energy, the whole thing is done. Of course, it would mean a policy of less jobs, that shouldn't be a hard sell, tell 90% of the world they will get food, shelter and medical care for free but you have to stop working and live a low impact life and it would be a step up, would people vote for a policy of less jobs and a complete reset though? Even an energy value would work, people get all these for free, do not work except five or however many tears each person has to be in the three trades. they get an energy value that could mean the same products are still sold, fly to the moon, 200,000 credits better save up if you only get given 2000 a month.
    1
  4.  @richardharvey1732  Hard to get a reply to you as you tube removes it, will keep trying different ways
    1
  5.  @richardharvey1732  We don't need to control money, we need to control the system humans live in. Money could be done away with, should be done away with and we all have a carbon value we can spend per day. Most people of course have to stop working and we go to a rolling public service jobs for each person in their life but controlling the human system is easy, if given the chance. Of course, it would mean a policy of less jobs, that shouldn't be a hard sell, tell 90% of the world they will get food, shelter and medical care for free but you have to stop working and live a low impact life and it would be a step up, would people vote for a policy of less jobs and a complete reset though? Even an energy value would work, people get all these for free, do not work except five or however many tears each person has to be in the three trades. they get an energy value that could mean the same products are still sold, fly to the moon, 200,000 credits better save up if you only get given 2000 a month. We have spent our lives paying off debt thinking it had value, electricity in the UK is 15.68% of total energy used and renewables are around 2% of total energy, point being unless we stop working and thinking money can be exchanged for unlimited energy, the whole thing is finished.
    1
  6.  @richardharvey1732  Money could be done away with, should be done away with and we all have a carbon value we can spend per day. Most people of course have to stop working and we go to a rolling public service jobs for each person in their life but controlling the human system is easy, if given the chance. We have spent our lives paying off debt thinking it had value, electricity in the UK is 15.68% of total energy used and renewables are around 2% of total energy, point being unless we stop working and thinking money can be exchanged for unlimited energy, the whole thing is finished Of course, it would mean a policy of less jobs, that shouldn't be a hard sell, tell 90% of the world they will get food, shelter and medical care for free but you have to stop working and live a low impact life and it would be a step up, would people vote for a policy of less jobs and a complete reset though?
    1
  7.  @physiocrat7143  As long as we both are under the understanding taxes are there to remove money from the economy and if they don't keep the same value in land taxes, that will be passed down, that money inflation will happen?
    1
  8.  @richardharvey1732  Money could be done away with, should be done away with and we all have a carbon value we can spend per day. Most people of course have to stop working and we go to a rolling public service jobs for each person in their life but controlling the human system is easy, if given the chance.
    1
  9.  @richardharvey1732  We have spent our lives paying off debt thinking it had value, electricity in the UK is 15.68% of total energy used and renewables are around 2% of total energy, point being unless we stop working and thinking money can be exchanged for unlimited energy, the whole thing is finished Of course, it would mean a policy of less jobs, that shouldn't be a hard sell, tell 90% of the world they will get food, shelter and medical care for free but you have to stop working and live a low impact life and it would be a step up, would people vote for a policy of less jobs and a complete reset though?
    1
  10.  @richardharvey1732  Money could be done away with and we all have a carbon value we can spend per day. Most people of course have to stop working and we go to a rolling public service jobs for each person in their life but controlling the human system is easy, if given the chance.
    1
  11.  @richardharvey1732  Money could be done away with, should be done away with and we all have a carbon value we can spend per day.
    1
  12.  @richardharvey1732  Money could be done away with and we all have a carbon value we can spend
    1
  13.  @richardharvey1732  Controlling the human system is easy and epicentre : "the central point of something"
    1
  14.  @richardharvey1732  I noticed on a channel someone's messages were coming to me but not showing up on the public page which is new. Tried so many times just to get what came up publicly, that was the second half but no keywords or anything that I could see, just very strange how sometimes I just switch the 1st half with the second and then it does post. Preferably I'd like to switch to carbon value/emission value for all goods sold, the number of goods don't need to change, just that they will by their emission value and how many credits people get given. 20% of the modern world's energy is electricity, we could stay on that remove all personal vehicles and change society for the better within an election term.
    1
  15.  @richardharvey1732  2nd attempt for it to come up on the page so maybe you could tell me if you got this message? : I noticed on a channel someone's messages were coming to me but not showing up on the public page which is new. Tried so many times just to get what came up publicly, that was the second half but no keywords or anything that I could see, just very strange how sometimes I just switch the 1st half with the second and then it does post. Preferably I'd like to switch to carbon value/emission value for all goods sold, the number of goods don't need to change, just that they will by their emission value and how many credits people get given. 20% of the modern world's energy is electricity, we could stay on that remove all personal vehicles and change society for the better within an election term.
    1
  16. 23 countries going to lose half their population the next 80 years and never before been around 25% over 65 for most of the world.
    1
  17.  @JLSMaytham  They say for any social change the bourgeois need to be on board first. The general public are largely kept unaware to the severity because of the media bubble we live under and then the goal is to me, to do less than more, we could literally stop what we are doing and the affect would be instantaneous, we need people on the streets and not moving en masse now, we need social change where work and money are almost things of the past.\I think we will end up living like the 1800;s but with electricity, which of course means the collapse of the debt based system we have but hey, it's a start.
    1
  18.  @paulgibbons2320  Capitalism is just means of production are in private hands and not dictated to by the govt. People are still going to consume but why should private interests be more important than the whole? Why should people be allowed to produce something using resources etc, just because people are prepared to pay for it, on a world of infinite resources I can see uncontrolled consumption not being a problem but we aren't on that world. What follows is people don't starve to death in the world, that all people have shelter and medical care, the rest can be up to the people what they do but money as a ticket to energy, which in the future might not be there could be removed from the system, has to be removed from the system, money being bank debt and the only way people have basic services is if they hold someone else's debt, money, is this right that you can only eat if other people get into debt? Is this a better option?
    1
  19.  @paulgibbons2320  It seems as though your opinion is coming through that you feel my response didn't suit your emotions on the matter?
    1
  20.  @paulgibbons2320  Copy and paste and remove words or reverse the paragraphs works for me most times, your comments will be in your data, although sometimes some of mine don't get recorded there either, getting around sensitive words or topics can be difficult when we don't know what they are
    1
  21.  @paulgibbons2320  Nothing of what I said discounted what you said.
    1
  22.  @paulgibbons2320  There is no vacuum, there is no doubt as to what to do and under no circumstance's should you say the reason we aren't stopping global warming is people's fear of being less than useful.
    1
  23.  @fulloftruthguardian5420  What are you talking about?
    1
  24.  @MrPetr74125  I'm not sure of your point, money isn't valuable just because it's a measure of account, we could use sea shells in its place, I ma not sure how the bank lending money is different, both are the meaning of fund, that is the literal meaning of the word to fund an account is to supply funds, so not sure what you mean in your second message to me, neither of them came through to me I saw your comments because somebody else replied but I am confused on how debt issued by banks isn't funding or lending and am confused how what measures the total amount of goods is supposed to be valuable, just for this?
    1
  25.  @fulloftruthguardian5420  Do you know of any situation where funding is said that is never to be paid back?
    1
  26.  @fulloftruthguardian5420  Oh a verb or a noun defines if it is paid back ever uh? Do you know of a time or can you not admit they are the same, if you give anything to someone and expect it back doesn't matter on the time isn't that always a loan? If you give people something and never expect anything back for it, that is giving, isn't it? Edit maybe you are not full of truth
    1
  27.  @fulloftruthguardian5420  Yes, you are so full of truth, that you guard it so well. Are you able to share the experience of it existing in reality and could you describe it in a sentence?
    1
  28.  @fulloftruthguardian5420  No you are right full of truth and tells people to read a dictionary, take a breather from standing behind the truth, thanks I will.
    1
  29. You have an economics professor saying consume less to save the planet and you think this is flawed?
    1
  30.  @narcellius  You live in one of the most beautiful places in the world, and you complain about 15 minute cities and pre fabs while we use oil foreign people have been killed over and half the world live in tin shacks and you want to know why you should lower your living standards...? How about integrity?
    1
  31.  @narcellius  I'm not actually sure what it is that you are arguing for, the country still exists and if you can't appreciate that compared to other countries and the simple beauty the Uk has that is a choice you make. You are complaining about things and I'm talking from what I call a point of white privilege, I've had a fridge going, hot and cold water plumbed in and my toiletries flushed away, my entire life, I've had clothes and a bed, a shower etc, there are people who have never had a fridge and you want to complain because your walls were pre made and they want you to walk instead of drive?
    1
  32.  @narcellius  Reread what you wrote and then have a look at who is foolish I said : You are complaining about things and I'm talking from what I call a point of white privilege," I talked about me, not you, if you have had these things then you have had what I call privilege compared to a lot of people around the world, vaccines for examples need to be refrigerated, living in a country that has blackouts for examples makes for very different upbringings. Next is your other foolish point, taxes do not pay for anything, how are you on this channel saying this? Taxes are an indication of how much money is coming in, the money must leave again. As a first generation immigrant you are complaining about things others don't around the world. I'm not saying your argument of it being better can't happen or education of people about money but your diatribe to me was barking up the wrong tree in the wrong forest.
    1
  33.  @murunbuch  What does APRA do in australia?
    1
  34. I disagree, I think it is time to offer basics for free. Food, shelter and medical. Jobs are just more money and consumption goes down the same path that has and has to decrease. Young people need a person who will go on a platform of less jobs, not more.
    1
  35.  @downshift4503  Money as you know it will have to change in your lifetime, cost vs need is a needed shift. edit ; it
    1
  36.  @downshift4503  It is a question of money because everybody thinks they can buy the same amount of energy moving forward. The energy we revolve our lives around, oil, can not continue to be used as it is so creating oddles of money is a problem if people spend it as before on fossil fuels. THE question of money needs to be re-examined.
    1
  37.  @downshift4503  With poverty, because it hasn't happened in 200 years so stop being so confident unless you have an example, please.
    1
  38.  @downshift4503  I'm not sure what you mean. the point of society now is to reduce consumption/emissions, this can only be done with less production. edit just give an example?
    1
  39.  @downshift4503  " I disagree, I think it is time to offer basics for free. Food, shelter and medical. Jobs are just more money and consumption goes down the same path that has and has to decrease. Young people need a person who will go on a platform of less jobs, not more" I believe if you offered people shelter, food and medical care, for free, for the rest of their lives billions of people would leap at the chance, if they had to work five or so years during their life in these three industries so be it. Emissions from food is 10% in a place like USA, add medical. shelter and services, then we could cut emissions by roughly 80%, if everybody stayed home. In a place like UK electricity is 15% of total energy and half of that is gas, we could cut that in half, stay home and emissions are reduced within an election term 60% minimum,
    1
  40.  @downshift4503  The point of society for you to reject that it is to protect society must mean it is something else?
    1
  41.  @downshift4503  " for instance, you could ban tourism and flying for pleasure tomorrow - you know how people would respond to that." Once upon a time people said that about slavery. We have energy slaves that we are not paying the external costs of, yet.
    1
  42.  @downshift4503  People only need to work on a roster system like military service. It's ok you don't get. we need food etc, we don't need a lot of the jobs..
    1
  43.  @downshift4503  Everything you do is because of somebody else's choice and we are products of our environment, I am talking about changing the environment.
    1
  44.  @downshift4503  You think there is choice for military service? The point that you seem to be ignoring is most people are going to stop working, lower consumption of fossil fuels is in humanity's interests instead of letting people have pleasure boating as a hobby and spew gases into the atmosphere killing other people for thousands of years, why should some people over consume food and other people starve to death? edit If you don't want to work in the industries society needs you might not be needed in the work force.
    1
  45.  @downshift4503  If we thought people were equal we wouldn't be consuming the energy like we do ruining the planet. There is more chance we return to living like the 1800's but with electricity in your lifetime than any technological fix will replace oil
    1
  46.  @downshift4503  There is no tech fix to replace oil.
    1
  47.  @downshift4503  That's a claim under the proposal of offering free food etc, as a condition. You are ignoring the last time the world went to the temps we re going to 90% of all species died and online it has oil running out in a lot of peoples' lifetime, well easily accessible so change is coming forced or chosen, choosing early and examine what it means with the removal of it from your life has to start sometime. The tide is turning against govts who deny global warming as they do I'm done though, messages aren't coming through and I have to refresh and you are in reality a climate denier, you aren't facing the reality of the situation and you have to understand, we live under a media bubble, when people fully realise what is being held back from them, the govts that exist might get lynched.
    1
  48. There is no way an egg will come first, always the chicken.
    1
  49. An opinions are like arseholes, everyone's got one.
    1
  50. Any ism with uncontrolled consumption would do the same, it's just that this one found diesel and fertiliser by being in the right place at the right time at the end of ww2
    1