Comments by "antonyjh1234" (@antonyjh1234) on "Richard J Murphy" channel.

Change is hard when no-one's seen it. It's the definition of utopia, a place no-one has ever seen but we are all supposed to go towards it. A carbon value system could equalise emissions but would we change by choice if it means 90% less, could we all go back to the carbon levels of the 1800's? I think so.
1
Google can commission 7 nuclear stations to power ai but not suck carbon from the sky.
1
Cracks me up when outside of the country people inside of it think any of them were or are going to change the system and that one is better than the other and we should argue that point. The worry with Trump is he doesn't realise how stupid he is, he will be thinking what profits can I get and if you think the other side who open borders to drive up demand and 26 million a day in drugs if 80% of the homeless spend fifty bucks an those routes are established, while we all have P Diddy in the news and J Lo will she won't she, did, she didn't while Baltimore is taking drug representatives to court for the largest opioid scandal in the world and the rest of the world hasn't heard a peep from the western media umbrella, and Trump or Biden are just a part of all that, just Trump might not know where all the pies are to stick his fingers doesn't mean those pies aren't baked. The reason the two party system around the world has dumb leaders is because progressive change isn't required by business.
1
@gregorymalchuk272 Why would anybody want to answer with their personal details on social media for?
1
They are 4% of the world. stop looking at what you are given, if it were not them it would be someone else, as far as murderous regimes, haven't they been the least amount of people in the last 80 years? They got lucky with oil in their moment in time that is it, stop looking and to be fair, the rest of the world doesn't think AMerica is adult, it may as well vote in his son next and after that the next baby in the clan, If the people don't have a plan why are any of us lokking to the people we don't trust?
1
Energy comes to the earth and must leave again, if radiant heat is trapped, which it is by adding stored carbon, then not hard to work out it will warm up, we leave what cools us, ice, out in the open. We can slow it down, all of this is just choice but warmer temps are happening increasing water vapour, no statistics agree with you, of course we can affect it, as we do, stopping what we do must also have an affect.
1
No and in no way is this true because you are assuming that everybody needed to own a camera. Next you'll say a holographic phone that uses bat guano is better because it uses just a smidgen less power. It's the production of efficiency for the masses that means no phones were really needed but meant everyone has one. Maybe you don't understand that to reach 1.5 we are supposed to cut consumption emissions in half in five years, not add another product on top, but cut overall consumption from food to holidays where you can, but the reality of accelerated global warming is supposed to be more important than any smart phone, growth in human terms, especially if we want to survive, could mean doing less.
1
@skyblazeeterno It happens now, it is not rubbish
1
@skyblazeeterno That's what I like about your stupid debate style, says words with zero application to the real world and think without explanation words like rubbish or "it doesn't happen now" is all the proof I need, your word. Sorry, but your opinion is just that and also incorrect.
1
@skyblazeeterno Opinions are like assholes, everyone's got one.
1
@kwakkers68 While nobody can disagree with what you say, when you talk of repugnant histories you seem to be a little one sided and we should also not forget we all exist because of certain policies put in place 80 years ago. While it is nice to throw stones we should also not forget everybody has their moment in time, to look at one country in a microcosm off the last few decades and not realise what got them there smacks of a lack of understanding that all people have experienced the same things and no govt has been innocent of atrocities.
1
@kwakkers68 Ps As far as worldwide, it is around the world, isn't it?
1
@Pinkdam Didn't ask your opinion on my delivery and not really interested in C H Douglas, it was more push back you seem to think laissez-faire is the same thing as democracy or even morals.
1
@Pinkdam Sorry, I don't know, what did I get other than an opinion and still don't know how I was educated but...thanks??
1
More a global hegemony and financial system of debt that never stopped when Rome "fell".
1
@ As every single cent is bank dent define prosper.
1
Not when they killed leaders of change in the 60's?
1
@snowiecat456 We use oil every day that other people have been removed from living. Don't think it is other people, your actions if they continue to drive, use roads, any nylon, any oil product, we talk of compassion while wearing the oil and resources that has happened through war since time began, this computer is from that oil, then we talk about how compassionate we can be, is hypocrisy and guilt over understanding why things are done for us, our system, that we try to excel in. How many people will stop using the products before compassion?
1
Yes, the debt is money where did he say different? The debt issued by banks has to be created first, as soon as it hits an account it is then called money. He was talking about peoples deposits is not what banks use for loans.
1
stopit, you don't know what you are talking about and are now spamming
1
@ People drive everyday using oil other people have been killed over and every single dollar is just bank debt, , that always loses value the longer you hold it. govt or public debt, which we use as a means of exchange and money does not build up in society, prices for house etc are an indication of how much debt went through it and the money for all the houses doesn't exist in society, as all money is based on someone's debt. Once that loan is paid off the money is gone too.
1
The myth of the last 80 years, that "we" won the war.
1
What is the debate you are proposing because I don't see one in your comment, I see someone say the mmt model has no argument against it and if they did it would be like talking to a flat earther so at the risk of that I would like put to forward one or two. It costs around 4 cents per hundred dollars to create this debt, we pay it back full value, with our lives and efforts. The issue with creating debt out of thin air and calling it money and other people think it is valuable is if the world says I don't want to hold American money anymore or UK and like Brics, will take value for value of goods and in a world where goods may be the only things valuable, that holding something that is just a means of exchange, backed by nothing but our belief, that can have issues. The other issue is this debt is being created, it enters the economy as money spent by govts, where we have no choice where that spending goes, we are supposed to wait for the trickle down and be happy, that money or energy could have been directed in any way, it doesn't really matter if we all stood on our heads, as long as the money enters it must leave again but to say all this effort from us the public to be forced to earn bank debt, to exchange it to live has issues that need to be discussed more than it's the economy, nothing to see here, let's move on. I think it would surprise a lot of people that money doesn't build up in the system, that taxes make money disappear, the public education system teaches people to get a job, just to earn debt. For all the value of the property in the Uk, there isn't the money to buy it. Most people think they have to just get some money because there's so much of it, they don't realise for new money to come, new debt must be made, give people that belief that all money is bank debt, I doubt as many people would steal it. There's certainly debates to be held around this term what we call money and the lack of understanding amongst the public and why we should let that continue without directing that energy towards sustainability or the health service but surely we could do better than war and real estate.
1
@danciagar Do you mind explaining how you think your comment pertains to mine? "The business of government is business and would you vote for someone on a platform of "Less Job's""
1
@foxmoongaze No because the stupidity of what you are saying is probably recognised, stop with your stupidity, please.
1
@foxmoongaze You understand facts aren't about narrative? 0.00005% is how much hydrogen is in the atmosphere but it's about 11% when drinking water, the percentages mean something there right but saying it's 0.04% or whatever of the total atmosphere is just silly and you should stop, it makes no sense if the mass is closer. It's a very out dated denialists attitude.
1
@foxmoongaze May the camel fart forever be downwind, may you realise that big tobacco couldn't disprove cancer so all they could do to continue sales was create confusion through disinformation, you are no better than them.
1
@NoMoreVoxPops Oh ok, so reading your words it sounds like you are saying piss off and read more you dummy, you know how you put : I find it's important to read. Not sure if that is your intention or an example of good education? "The Programme of International Student Assessment (PISA) has instigated domestic policy debate aimed at improving education systems’ quality and efficiency. Its high performers are often described as knowledge-based legitimation tools that have become reference societies. This article analyses if and the extent to which PISA affects the choice of reference societies used in education policy. We conducted a systematic literature review of scholarly peer-reviewed journal articles. We identify two ways in which PISA affects the reference societies chosen: it builds but also triggers the collapse of the reference societies used in domestic education policy. However, there are also cases in which PISA has little influence on which countries or regions are used as references. " Thanks for sharing.
1
@NoMoreVoxPops "The Programme of International Student Assessment (PISA) has instigated domestic policy debate aimed at improving education systems’ quality and efficiency. Its high performers are often described as knowledge-based legitimation tools that have become reference societies. This article analyses if and the extent to which PISA affects the choice of reference societies used in education policy. We conducted a systematic literature review of scholarly peer-reviewed journal articles. We identify two ways in which PISA affects the reference societies chosen: it builds but also triggers the collapse of the reference societies used in domestic education policy. However, there are also cases in which PISA has little influence on which countries or regions are used as references. " Thanks for sharing.
1
@NoMoreVoxPops There were 14 different messages after you jibe, they and the jibe seemed unwarranted, not sure why you needed to be facetious or spam reply to me about Scandinavian schooling system which I am doubtful you are. Your unhinged reply makes me think you are American os messed up on drugs. Cheers
1
It's the same two party system around the world, why not talk of how the system works? Who are you to tell anybody who has their own channel what to stick to?
1
More than now, and false promises before elections, I doubt if anything would change.
1
@theolddog5129 What critical thinking is there in science or maths that you see in society? Science is corrupted by money and nothing we do seems to add up.
1
@keithshippey230 10,000 years ago they told the peasants to collect the flesh of RA the sun god from creeks, this was gold, and they might get an extra sheaf of wheat, we now have money, the level of control of the masses goes much further back than Cameron.
1
@MrBallynally2 You can not add energy to a system without it meaning something, stop promoting the death of the world as you know it.
1
As a pensioner you are a debt instrument and therefore a way for money to enter the system through the money the govt borrows, by spending all that they give you, then you are doing your fair share already. The money you spend of the rich, does not help the government input money into the system and would be detrimental to the economy in your instance.
1
If all money has a corresponding amount of debt as all money is debt based and if all debts were paid back there would be no money in the system, how is this not a zero sum game? Edit : If all banks and govts are always negative zero and we are always trying to stay above it, and the resting place is zero, how again is it not?
1
@charlesw852 Did you upvote your own comment? " But they are dispelling the rather silly fallacy that there HAS to be a ‘winner’ and a ‘loser’ to every transaction." If somebody has to be in debt before other people can hold money could you dispel the notion for me because calling it silly or what you described is not what a zero sum game means as far as the system is concerned, which is a zero sun=m game afaik and your explanation hasn't dispelled that.
1
@sososoprano1 Chales or OP is wrong and has not proven anything and Richard is right in that it is a zero sum game imo.
1
@charlesw852 We are talking about two different things. You are talking about the benefits to each, I am talking about the zero sum of the debts, that money does not build up in society, that prices are not an indication of the amount of money in society, merely an indication of how much debt has passed through it, that all debt being paid back there would be zero money in the economy, hence a zero sum game. You saying there is benefits to each would mean they cancel each other out.
1
not saying ev's are the answer but on one hand we have change or the other hand we have the chance of 90% of all species dying out like the last time the earth went to the temps we are going too. Are you sure you are being as flexible as you can to resist a heat pump that might have a 600% efficiency rating...? 3..2...1.".heat pumps can't be 600% efficient ", "that's impossible" well, because of the gas exchange they use one unit of electricity and give out 6 units of heating or cooling energy. Saying heat can only work in a highly insulated house has to be the dumbest thing I have heard yet..edit : as electricity is mostly gas, the efficiency rating shouldn't be taken as the final rating. But are you sure you are 67, you sound as though you are younger but acting old
1
@Withnail1969 You are trolling and posting so many comments in the negative, little comments that can easily be disproven, why, what goal are you achieving, considering you are able to be wrong?
1
@ China is one of those countries that will lose half, that is 5-600 million people gone, if the gross domestic value stays the same, say with inflation in that time, the GDP per capita will double while they produce zero growth in overall value so in this case GDP per capita could be deceptive. We need to have, in my opinion, growth mean that every single person has food, shelter and medical care, in the world and stop looking at how much a country increases production in a world that has stopped growing, almost. If the world is a business and the next 80 years there is 40% growth rate of customers instead of 400% over 80 years, then growth during a great settling that humanity seems to have coming is a wrong goal.
1