Comments by "Dylan Vogler" (@dylanvogler2165) on "UATV English" channel.

  1.  @Apjooz  there is no point talking to him. He is an brainwashed fool. Even if his entire country would be burning, he'd still be talking about this one thing that they think is the truth (because Führer Putin told them). As you and I know, we'll be fine, as we don't have Siberian winters lol, but give him this. It is the only thing Russians can be happy about nowadays, the perceived, in this case false, suffering of others. Tells you enough about what kind of society they have turned into under Putin.
    1
  2.  @margaret9314  I support Ukraine, but that statement is false. Let's stay realistic. They lost Luhansk oblast for a reason. Lets keep supporting them so they can turn the tide and push the Russians out
    1
  3.  @margaret9314  hahaha this comment is completely irrelevant to your earlier statement which I answered too. About the no match part. It is well known that the Ukrainian army is better trained, not referring to any recent conscripts, than the Russian and separatist armies. But the Russians have a considerable advantage in both men and material in the region. Nothing to do with being better fighters. About Lviv conscripts, well everyone fights better in their home region than they would be halfway across the country.
    1
  4. Ugh there is the Russian propaganda bs again. Russian is not banned in Ukraine. It is just not a recognized minority language. Zelensky's first language is Russian.... as is the case with many Ukrainians who speak it every day as again, speaking it is not banned. It is just, that Ukrainian is the language of education and government etc. As it is the official language of Ukraine. Russian for all intense and purposes is considered a foreign language, which you can study there just like English and you're also free to speak it. If you want to actually know what banning a language looks like, you should read about Alexander III's policies in regards to Ukrainian.
    1
  5.  @leninha5549  mate that is honestly the most ignorant response ever. Many of my Ukrainian friends, extremely patriotic and extremely anti Russian due to the war, are Russian speaking Ukrainians. Who know Ukrainian but prefer Russian. The language spoken by a person, doesn't determine which country they love, nor is Russian property of the Russian state. Russian speaking people are not immediately pro Russian. Most people that are being shelled every day by the orcs, are Russian speaking.
    1
  6.  @АлександрБондарь-ю8ь  hahaha you know how bad things is for the Russians when they start with their adorable nuclear threats. Like the spoiled little child that doesn't get what it wants.
    1
  7. Whilst I am no fan of the USSR, especially Stalin's USSR, and Russia.. I don't think a nazi dominated Eastern Europe, including the planned genocide of the slavs there, would have been such a great outcome.
    1
  8.  @ha-zi  he said the Americans should never have landleased the USSR. Considering even Stalin admitted that US landlease was reason they managed to survive and eventually win, you can see what happens if the US wouldn't have done so
    1
  9. *Kyiv, also yeah the country is at war, obviously men need to stay.
    1
  10.  @BolshevikCarpetbagger1917  dude why aren't you fighting for the Russians. Same logic mr. Keyboard warrior
    1
  11. I would say ban tourists. All those that support Putin and hate the West can stay in Russia. I mean why would we let them visit us while they see us as the enemy and hate us? Those that are actually against Putin and his war, well they're welcome and can apply for other visa or assylum.
    1
  12.  @margaret9314  Maybe you should learn geography when you try to be a smart ass. Then again I am sure you're Russian. So I shouldn't judge you to hard for have been educated poorly. As after all, you're just canon fodder for your government so why would they properly educate you. There is one oblast in the east completely occupied, Luhansk oblast. Which I already visited before the orcs came. There is two partly occupied in the east, Kharkiv Oblast (only a small part) and Donetsk Oblast (about half) which I both visited as well btw. Then there are 2 partly occupied oblasts is the south, Kherson and Zaporizhia oblast. With Nikolaev oblast being completely liberated and parts of Kherson oblast as well and therefore not under complete Russian control. Then there is the autonomous Republic (not oblast, but again I don't blame you. You're not at fault for the poor education in your country) of Crimea and the city of Sevastapol (which had/has a separate status from Crimea). So there is 1 fully occupied oblast and 2 partly occupied oblasts in the east. 2 partly occupied oblasts in the south. When you try to be a smart ass and show the Russian arrogance, atleast get your facts straight, because you look incredibly dumb now.
    1
  13.  @margaret9314  also you really should visit the tanks. Especially since these are the coffins of your fascist countrymen )).
    1
  14.  @margaret9314  self determination works both ways mate. Especially considering Russia violated Chechnya's right of self determination and the current Russian invasion is a breach not only of Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity but also it's right of self determination. As "All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development." Which also means that Ukraine has the right to chose its future, including joining NATO and EU. Also I personally think the right of self determination should be exercised politically, not militarily. The Ukraine bombed Donbass for eight years... yeah they did, which is horrible. But the separatist were not innocent either during that time, neither was Russia. But it is a Russian trait to blame all on others. Be it "the West", Ukraine or your favourites: the Americans.
    1
  15.  @margaret9314  we don't blame Russia for anything because we don't care about Russia at all. If you wouldn't bring war back to our continent we would not even think about you. It is not whataboutism as I don't try to use the situation in Chechnya to accuse Russia of having done something. I am using it in the context of the right of self determination also applying to Russia. Aka it works both ways. Also the right of self determination is not the same as a right of independence. They don't have a right of independence, and let's be honest they won't ever be independent as Russia will annex them. They're no different than Manchuria under the Japanese or Slovakia under the Germans. They have a right to have their opinions heard within Ukraine. In which any potential independence should then be gained to referendums gained via political, not military means. Again a point I try to make is that you are pointing to a right of self determination whilst at the same time your country has threatend to retake Alaska (with a population that doesn't want that), end it's recognition of Lithuanian independence (again violation of the right you point too) and to nuke/bomb London as well as Rotterdam. Not to mention threatend with retaliation on Sweden and Finland on exercising their sovereignty as independent states by choosing their own future. The point I am trying to make is I support the right of self determination and the west should not ignore said right. But I think Russia is the last place on earth to advocate for this right as it seems to cherry pick when and when it doesn't want this right to exist.
    1
  16.  @margaret9314  why would he need to disprove about the four eastern oblasts being occupied, I literally already did.
    1
  17.  @margaret9314  lol your statement is ad hominem. Also if the American people would vote this way, then they would have the right to do so. Because that is the right of self determination. The right for a people to decide it's own political status. Independence being one of these political statuses. So right of self determination =/= right of independence. Gibraltar expressing the will to remain part of the UK is also the right of self determination. I don't think it's hard to grasp now is it? Why you mentioned the UK and USA specifically, I don't know as I am neither nationality but eh whatever.
    1
  18.  @margaret9314  first off I never said they didn't. I pointed you to the fact that self determination is not just the right of independence (which doesn't exist). Which is what seems to be what Russians think it is. Secondly the separatists are not recognized by the international community. What they do is not the proper way to exercise the right of self determination. A proper example of this, is Scotland. Any referendum held during military occupation, and yes that is the case with Crimea, DNR and LNR, are invalid, because of obvious reasons. Especially considering the fact that international observers were not allowed. Imagine if you lived in Kaliningrad and Germany decides that it wants it back. It invades, then holds his troops on the streets and calls for a referendum about joining Germany. While you want to vote there are soldiers outside and you know your vote won't be anonymous. What would you do mate? Exactly the reason why a referendum in occupied territories is not worth nothing. Then there is the ally part... well if they were proper countries, they could do so. They're not, they're an rebellion. It would be like if we caused trouble in Russia and then use it as an excuse to invade. Because let's call it what it is, just a fabricated casus belli. About the US/UK part no you can write about them, but use the dumbest possible example. Especially since there are good examples of the right of self determination in regards to Scotland, Northern Ireland as well as the Spanish region of Catalonia. But then again I shouldn't expect you to know about these things.
    1
  19. And how should we do that?
    1
  20.  @abrahamdozer6273  I don't know if becoming a EU member is that popular in Belarus. Unlike the revolution of dignity, the protests against Lukachenko were just that, protests against him. They weren't pto European or anti Russian in nature at all.
    1
  21. Those that are against Putin can come here as assylum seekers. But I don't see a reason why we should people that hate us with their very being, come to our countries as tourists.
    1
  22.  @ion282  yeah I get what you mean. A friend from Ufa also asked me if we all hate the Russians now. I explained her that we don't hate the common people. Well most of us don't. But that we very much hate Putin. But yeah she also told me that in Russia, in particular those older than 30, see us as the "rotten west" with her mom being glad that we have gas problems. My friend is very much anti war btw.
    1
  23. You kinda proof Ukraine's claims of Russification with your own comments lol. Ukrainian had been banned for a long time in Ukraine, by the Russians. Situation in Belarus with their native language is even worse. Also I would say that most Ukrainians speak Ukrainian as a first or second language. It is just that whilst MOST know Ukrainian to a certain degree, EVERYONE knows Russian. The legacy of the Russification policies in the Russian Empire and USSR. Also the Russian language is not Russia's property and the fact these people speak Russian, doesn't mean they're Russian.
    1
  24. Yup, but I doubt he'll care. People with ego's like them will do mental gymnastics to convince themselves that they aren't isolated internationally
    1
  25. ​ @SunriseLAW  lol no. a few might, but the majority want a independent Ukraine. Has they have the right to. don't believe all propaganda. About the pow, these are the good stories, we have also heard about how the Russians typically threat their pow's which isn't as good as you describe. however it would be unfair to say that all Ukrainians threat their pow's good, as there have been instances of executions by Ukrainian forces of surrendering Russians.
    1
  26.  @SunriseLAW  So in your twisted mind it's okay to force other countries (and people) to do what you want because you are stronger? So we could force Russia what to do because it's not even a fraction of our power? Does this sound right to you? You my friend, are a sick person. And no NATO isn't worth that much to them, independence and freedom is though. Nobody wants to live under a facist regime. The whole idea that Ukraine just wants independence and that Russia leaves them alone, is something the Russian mind can't comprehend. You are like the stalker ex. "If I can't have her, nobody can". Let Ukraine go, she has the right to chose her own future. She can decide herself if she wants to be part of the western world or the corrupt, poor and rotten Russian world. They are no threat to you, they just want a better future and for you to leave them alone.
    1
  27.  @JacobD-tn1pi  «Most Europeans» that's bad English, you imply that the majority of European people fight in Ukraine. Which is wrong obviously. Also they mentioned Serbs too, aren't Serbs, European anymore? The difference however is, that the Europeans fighting for either side, mostly do so from ideological reasons and not money. As most would earn more money in their home countries.
    1
  28. I believe Ukraine contested Russia's claim of being the sole successor to the USSR from the start.
    1
  29. Indonesia is in an impossible situation though. If they would have barred Putin from participating, they antagonize China and Russia and by letting him participate they piss off the West. Either way someone would have been offended by Indonesia's decision. So I think it is a diplomatically genius move to invite Zelensky. As this is kinda the threading the middle ground.
    1
  30. What are you on about?
    1
  31. ​@Kaloyan Rosenov ah look its an orc starting about nukes. What a surprise. The question is Moskal, are you willing to die for your führer? As you know, NATO has nukes too. So if Russia uses them, NATO does too )). Both have enough to destroy the world multiple times over so eh, you willing to die for an old man in the Kremlin?
    1
  32. ​​​​​ @louisecorchevolle9241 eah terrible event. What you forget to mention however, is that the pro Russians came to the building armed with guns and molotov cocktails, so specifically to kill people. What you also forget to mention is that the fire started internally. So due to the people occupying the building. So the Pro Russians themselves, accidentally, started the fire due to the fuel they had with them to make more molotov cocktails. What you also forget to mention, is that alot of them were saved by pro Ukrainian people who started helping them. Nice try spreading fake news Vatnik.
    1
  33.  @mysterious_21  lol do you really believe this Fascist? I will only answer you, which country has freedom of speech? which country has a democratically elected leader and which has an old men ruling for more than 20 years.. exactly. Not to mention the appalling "Z" symbol which you yourself use which is nothing more than a modern swastika.
    1
  34. My family fled Donetsk in 2014, I am afraid of what has happend, in terms of being subjected to Russian propaganda, to those that stayed there or who were born there during the occupation.
    1
  35.  @samsungtap4183  it is Ukrainian since Khrushchev transferred it. Just like how other territories were transferred from the Ukrainian SSR to the RSFSR and are not claimed by Ukraine nowadays. Russia itself also recognized the internationally recognized borders of Ukraine in 1991, that includes Crimea that indeed also voted for Ukrainian independence. Mate learn history you're full off Russian propaganda to the point that I think you're incapable of using your own brain. About cutting of water, I don't support it. But can understand the Ukrainian viewpoint on it. Why help the occupier of your territory. Also it clearly shows you have no idea how democracies work, as well as politics and history, as Zelensky wasn't president of Ukraine at the time the water supply was cut off....
    1
  36. ​ @Thereyougo2 look a Vatnik.
    1
  37. ​@tonyyau6867 lol no. I live in Kyiv, and I can tell you, ofcourse the Ukrainians also use propaganda. Not as much and blatant as the Russians, but ofcourse there is propaganda.
    1
  38. Azov has changed alot since 2014, which you could have known if you actually did research. Instead you just believe propaganda
    1
  39. Easy reform. If a permanent member of the security council vetoes a resolution, give the general assembly the power to vote on a binding resolution. Or remove the right to veto a resolution involving yourself.
    1
  40.  @tomfoolery617  I advocate for not giving a country the power to veto that which is targeting it specifically. So Russia now and the US with their bussiness in Iraq. As their veto can be used to make them immune from the world community and international law, whilst the rest of us has to abide by it. In every other case the veto right can remain. Or we give the general assembly the right to circumvent a veto with a majority vote. As this would mean, that a majority of the world's countries support the resolution. You could even make it a requirement to have an 2/3 majority instead of 1/2 +1. It would stop shenanigans like the Iraq war en this current war.
    1
  41.  @DezorianGuy  to be clear I say Russia is involved, not that it is at fault or the reason for what happens ))
    1
  42.  @DezorianGuy  either way sorry if I called you a Putin fanboy, you clearly aren't. And saying this what you just said seems to me that you're reasonable too. People saying it was a good move by NATO aren't correct either btw. It was done for the right intentions as there was a genuine risk of genocide by Serbian troops on the Albanian population in an attempt to either kill or force them to leave. So ethnically cleansing the area essentially. However the way it was done was crude, even hitting the Chinese embassy. It was illegal by international law, that is a fact. And it set a precedent that it is okay to intervene and violate a country's sovereignty and territorial integrity for humanitarian reasons, which is exactly why Russia is using bs claims about genocide being committed in Donbass for a casus belli. But what we need to becareful is not to equate situations with each other. There are similarities but there are differences too. It is the same as people calling Putin , Hitler. Whilst there are similarities in their conduct, there are just as many differences. So they are similar to the point of both being facist, but that's about it. People say that history repeats itself, and on the artificial level if you only look at similarities, then yes it does. But when you actually analysis situations you will find just as many differences as every situation is in the end it's own with it's own nuances. I would therefore say that history doesn't repeat it self but that history is more like "dejavu".
    1
  43.  @adithepr  you don't know Eurovision? It is a European song contest. It's held yearly , hosted by the country that won the last edition. This year being an example, being hosted in the United Kingdom (who finished second) instead of Ukraine (who won it) due to the war. However I believe the official host of the event is still Ukraine.
    1
  44. They can't. They are neutral in their constitution as well as the fact that they have a territorial dispute (same reason Cyprus, Ukraine and Georgia aren't able to join)
    1
  45.  @urbanurchin5930  grammar Nazi ugh
    1
  46.  @vittoriosecreto6346  Kremlin bot. It's funny how you call them nazi's while they have had multiple democratically elected governments since 2014. The narrative of having had different parties and presidents being voted into power doesn't really match the way the nazis, and facists overall, work. I'd say look at Russia if you want to see an actual example of a facist state.
    1
  47.  @albo8404  the agreement torpedoed by the Russians from the start? Yeah..
    1
  48.  @albo8404  what's with Instanbul? If you meant it like Turkey which is disagreering, you should say Ankara, as that is the capital. Also Turkey is not really part of Europe and under Erdogan I would say it is not really part of the Western World anymore either. So what was your point?
    1
  49.  @albo8404  your reaction says all. Difference between you and I is that I do my own research and not just believe anything either Russian or Ukrainian and Western media tells me. Lavrov is a liar and I don't trust anything he says as he has on multiple occasions blatantly lied or contradicted reality with his statements. Blindly following a leader and just believing all he said is the path the Germans followed in the 30's and 40's. See what that brought them and the world. The fact you immediately defend with the "Ukraine is winning" stuff says more about you than me. As no Ukraine isn't winning right now, the war is tactically currently a statement as both sides win and lose ground, but with a slight advantage to the Russians. Strategically the war is a loss for the Russians, which doesn't necessarily mean a victory for Ukraine. Russia is in a strategically in a much worse position than it was in before the war, even if it would take all of Ukraine. Its international reputation has been damaged and will take a long time recovering. Economically it has become much more reliant of China (which in the long run might be a bad thing for Russia in the might makes right world it has ushered in again) and military its shown to be extremely incompetent and the myth of Russian power is broken. We see this in the EU (even small Lithuania) and US taking much more hostile actions towards Russia than they would have a few months ago. Not to mention Finland and Sweden that will join NATO, which means actually extending the NATO-Russian border and threatening Murmansk and Saint Petersburg and effectively cutting of Kaliningrad in case of hostilities. The war was a strategic blunder, just like how Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan were for the US.
    1
  50.  @albo8404  that's assuming. I don't think I have all right but I don't believe old men with revisionist and revanchist views and have delusions of grandeur. When old men send young men to die for dreams of imperialism, that's a big red flag to me tbh ))
    1