Comments by "TJ Marx" (@tjmarx) on "Nate The Lawyer" channel.

  1. I really would like to get ground news, but they appear to be US focused. That's a shame, they seem like a great service.
    2
  2. Unlikely she's go to jail
    2
  3. I don't really care about trump and I try to avoid this story. But what I do find interesting interesting is that after denying reality for many years now and making a clown world, the woke believe that a conviction against trump will prevent his election. Maybe in a rational world from just a few years ago it would have. But they turned to world upside down so now being convicted increases his chances of being elected. At some point society has to stop pandering to a group of crying adult-children threatening to throw a temper tantrum if they don't get their way. Until then, things like this will happen
    2
  4. Funny I was wondering during this video why no one calls her out for her cultural appropriation with that hair colour and style?
    2
  5. @darksuns7384  uh oh, someone had a grounded, reality based comment that doesn't satiate the appetite of the mob. 🤣🤣 Grow up drongo.
    2
  6.  @NightWhisper8462  We aren't in the 1600s
    2
  7. @oinkytheink1228  ...which is why you should... what? No source of information outside of your own first-hand observation should be both the beginning and end of your knowledge on a subject. If you have only watched youtubers in this case, then you're missing HUGE and critical sections of information.
    1
  8.  @im2yys4u81  Just youtubers? So you do the equivalent of asking strangers in the street what they read in the news, and then you "make up your own mind"? 🤣 Ok champ. Get something like grounded news, nate advertises it, it's perfect for someone like you to get actual information from reliable sources
    1
  9.  @oinkytheink1228  Fair. My misunderstanding
    1
  10. What you haven't considered in this video is, that the mum intended from the outset for this to turn into a controversy in order to further advertise her page. This video further advertises it because you show the full URL more than a dozen times. Your take is an obvious mainstream take, a fact reflected in this comment section. It added nothing. So why help her advertise her OF even further by covering it and showing the full URL? At least blur the URL which is something you can do in YT Studio without affecting the upload.
    1
  11.  @triamaria  No mate, we're not.
    1
  12.  @MrBulldog855  it's 4 hours and 45 minutes. Mr Bradley did give testimony in that period but he wasn't the only witness. The state gave away evidence and strengthened the defences case during that period. That period is also where they discussed evidence, entering these cellphone records, on camera questioning of Bradley in chambers by the judge, how deliberations would go, etc.
    1
  13.  @triamaria  What are you "tuning in" to exactly? The hearing is over assuming the on camera interview for Bradley by the judge doesn't warrant a half day. Again, these phone records were expected. Evidence is now closed following their submission. What "phase 2" are you talking about? What are you "tuning in" to? There's nothing to watch. We're just waiting to hear the deliberations of the judge.
    1
  14. That subway driver was good being able to stop in time to not injure any of those morons who jumped on the tracks. In Australia, our QR guys would have tried to stop but at least half of those idiots would have gone under the train. Maybe more. Those who didn't get squisjed would have been fined $500 for being on the tracks, and depending how the dpp was feeling, potentially charged with terrorism of transport infrastructure. I wonder if NYC fined or charged any of those morons. Not worth commenting on the case, the outcome is obvious.
    1
  15. For what? You do understand you need to have evidence of a crime suitable for conviction, not just a feeling of injustice.
    1
  16. Sounds like a rigged cuacus. Will you do coverage of the lawsuit she files? Sounds like the story isn't over.
    1
  17. Come on Nate, as a lawyer you should understand the game she's playing. She wants to be a white collar gangster so badly, but doesn't really understand the rules of the game. She's watched a bunch of movies and thinks all she has to do is not have her name on the foundation to rid herself of liability.
    1
  18. There are other candidates too, than just house and henyard. Genuinely hope one of the other candidates wins so this drama can be over. FBI interest in Henyard will evaporate the moment she loses. As predicted she isn't going to jail or being charged.
    1
  19. 11:06 Did he just say that "gas" prices are the lowest they've been since Biden took office and that happened under Biden? Surely not.
    1
  20. But this is what they wanted, it was always the plan. You really think all the prison abolitionists think that if there are no police and no prisons, everyone will just hold hands and be happy? Come on now, they might be a lot of things, but they aren't that stupid. They are the family members of career criminals. They are gang members themselves. They are anarchists. The point of these policies is to hand the country to the cartels and the gangs. The problem is that anyone takes them even remotely seriously.
    1
  21. Crime was down, SO they defunded police.
    1
  22. All the BLM garbage is political justice. Derek Chauvin went to prison as a scapegoat in political justice. I have a question though. If this Fani Willis thing with Trump and Co finds she perjured herself, does that change anything about this case? Can a new DA come in and prosecute?
    1
  23. Bit behind on this one Nate. The repo demand from the bank was last week. They had until Friday and didn't pay. Repo should be any day now. Fox32 confirmed today that the FBI are investigating. They listed the charges. I disagree that she doesn't know what she's doing. She knows exactly what she's doing. You don't do all of these things by accident. She was a trustee for 8 years, she understands the score. She's just simply trying to embezzle money through her dodgy charity and she's gotten others in on it
    1
  24. For the record, the controversy taking place is precisely what Unilever want. Controversy sells. Unilever doesn't just own Dove in the hygiene product category, they own 80% of the brands, and 100% of the popular brands. When you boycott Dove, you buy another Unilever brand and pick up that brands sales. The people on the other side of the issue start buying Dove buy it to counter the boycott and pick up Dove's sales. You're being worked over, they're doing this stuff on purpose.
    1
  25. Without knowing what was in those 3 previous filings, which you didn't show, it's impossible to gauge whether she has shown cause.. What is insane is that you glossed over that this started because the mayor thought she was a rival candidate or campaigning for a rival candidate. No, she wasn't actually doing that but so what if she was. Is El Monte under a Putin'esk rule? Opponents to incumbents in elections have a right to campaign safely without harassment. That in and of itself is a significant problem that deserves proper investigation. If she's harassing and intimidating political opponents, she should be charged and barred from holding office. If she's going after citizens for criticising her, she should be charged and barred from holding office. If she has connections to federal cop killer street gangs, she should be doing time in federal prison.
    1
  26. You guys really need to review how you select judges. Voting through the general citizenry is continually creating situations like this with people who have no business being on the bench. In Australia you ascend to the bench as a promotion from being a lawyer. You need to have a noteable legal career, then have people nominate you for the bench, then the law society votes on your suitability after doing a discovery process. This ensures only people of good quality, standing and character in line with the spirit of the law become magistrates.
    1
  27. @sueallen8188  The consequences absolutely should not include paying for your own confinement. The community wants to make things illegal. The community should pay for the programs they utilise as penalties for those things they deem as crimes. Many crimes, particularly those eligible for home confinement, are arbitrary at best and temporarily crimes most frequently.
    1
  28. 5:15 "We will stop at nothing, to keep you safe" I can think of few more chilling words.
    1
  29. Still no one is talking about the key election driver, the economy. If immigration were high, but prices were low and people could still afford amazing lifestyles no one would care about immigration. If crime was high, but prices were so low that replacing things stolen was trivial, no one would care. The problem they actually care about and actually are identifying is the hit their hip pockets have undergone since covid. Harris was involved in making prices go up and had no well communicated plan to bring them back down. Trump promised to bring prices back down. And he promised to get thjngs under control that push prices up. It's really that simple. The driver was the economy. 10:35 "The main role of government is to protect its citizens" What a disgusting thing to say. The role of government is not and never has been to maternalise the populus. The role of government is to administer public funds in such a way as to support and enable capitalism to take place such that the economy grows. That's it. We don't have laws to protect individuals, we have laws to protect the economy and to create the kinds of conditions where productivity goes up. Schools exist to train employees. Hospitals exist to get people back to peak productivity as quickly as possible. The concept of retirement was invented to get the old, slower workers out of the workplaces in order to increase productivity with a younger, faster workforce. That's how capitalism works. It's an economy that centres society around privately owned economic output. It's also why it succeeds over communism which centres society around government control of economic output. Capitalism and communism are mostly the same system, only in communism it takes the fate of the individual out of their own hands and places it into the hands of the anointed, which tanks productivity. Prop 6 wasn't about slavery. It was about forced labour in prison. Very different. That's why it failed because people understood it and want prisoners to do forced labour. You know, justice.
    1
  30. Sounds like it was always an unconstitutional law that violates the very foundational principles of the legal system. Law should be overturned. All cases that were ruled against an accused under the law should be struck down, and any restitution already paid, returned. Settlements shouldn't be affected.
    1
  31. Not all corruption is criminal. Just because something is wrong in government, doesn't mean anyone is going to get arrested. This is IL we're talking about. Come on. Even where a type of corruption is illegal, you don't just need to demonstrate the corruption happened, you need to demonstrate it happened purposefully as opposed to incompetence. We've seen Henyard, she has a strong case for incompetence. It's an entertaining show, but I really doubt she'll see prison.
    1
  32. No. The FACTS with Floyd are not on his side. The only people still claiming they are, have the same mentality about a "win for my side" as the CNN guy. It's all smoke and mirrors. Floyd OD'd from the massive amount of fent in his system.
    1
  33.  @indogyrsimdead  To be clear, I didn't mention the mayor once... maybe learn how to read, I dunno what to tell you
    1
  34.  @indogyrsimdead  So, you in fact can't read, didn't understand what I previously wrote and don't understand basic punctuation. Gotcha. "I don't know what to tell you" is with regards to the strawman absurdity you are still continuing with. You are making things up and looking like a clown while doing it. Have a nice day
    1
  35.  @paulghignon4092  I mean that's a good try at strawman. Certainly a better job than the last guy. But, strawman is strawman champ. You're arguing against something I never said.
    1
  36.  @paulghignon4092  Now read the first line of the paragraph above that. Come back when you have an argument to something I actually said.
    1
  37.  @paulghignon4092  So, still no argument about anything I actually said? Cool. 🤣 Have a great day.
    1
  38.  @paulghignon4092  You still are strawmanning...
    1
  39.  @mrtodddelaroderie  OP didn't say anything about Hollywood.
    1
  40. If you discriminate against a white person because of the colour of their skin, by saying that because they are white, they must be racist, that is, in fact racism.
    1
  41. In your opinion nate, what law(s) would she have broken? There's no law requiring politicians in Illinois to tell the truth or to be good at their jobs. Personally, I don't see any charges being filed. Lightfood might use her dark sith mind control powers to get the documents (or at claim to have) as a positive PR spin for Henyard. The point of Lightfoot is damage control/PR. Specifically to "clear" Henyard of wrongdoing to improve her public image and kill the story of her corruption.
    1
  42. Cool we finally got the cellphone records. They'd been waiting on those. We're just waiting on the judges' interview of Mr Bradley on camera for the testimony he claims is privileged now so the judge can determine if it actually is or not. Mr Bradley was caught out during cross by the state that at least some of the answers he claimed we privileged to the defence actually weren't. So the judge will now determine what is and is not privileged in private chambers and on video. We may get another half day of the hearing, the on video testimony may be sufficient, or it may actually be privileged. The latter is unlikely, however. Then, the judge will deliberate. He said he's looking at a 1 week timeline for deliberations after evidence closes, which it did with the submission of these cellphone records. Remember Wade was already asked about these records during questioning by Trunps lawyer. He has already claimed during his testimony that he may have gone to "the porshe experience," out to eat, or to play basketball. That's why Trumps lawyer has made such a big deal about these two specific events because no one is out doing those things at that time of day. He's got him.
    1
  43. If the senator doesn't see a problem with the kickbacks based on their value, the state auditor might want to look into that senators dealings.
    1
  44. In many ways I don't think it was a vote for trump, so much as it was a vote against Kamala and the Democrats. I think the biggest driver was the transparent prosecution of a political opponent, and the equally transparent lying. I think that rallied more people to vote than otherwise would have simply because they rejected the prosecution of opponents. I think the next biggest factor was minority politics. Lots of people refer to it as identity politics but it doesn't encompass all of minority politics nor identify the real issue. Being called names is annoying but no one is changing president over it. The president can't stop individuals calling you names. What matters is the LAWS that are passed which grant minority groups greater rights than the majority. This was the majority reasserting their power that they matter more than any minority group. That democracy is for the majority. But mostly what lost the election was people hurting in the hip pocket. Historically, and this applies across every country, if while in office you hurt peoples hip pockets over a sustained period, you have lost the next election unless you can demonstrate a realistic plan to make people's hip pockets great again, and have that plan in action and at least starting to work. Kamala didn't have that. She didn't even campaign on economic policy. Trump did, and he whispered sweet nothings (particularly to blacks and latinos) about how he would make their bank accounts grow. It's that simple. For Kamala to win she needed strong economic policy that would lower prices, lower taxes and increase earnings for the average person. Or at very least she needed to pork barrel by handing out cash to everyone. Instead they focused on a gendered RH issue and name calling Trump. That's a weak leader and the electorate rejected her as a result.
    1
  45. We need to be exceptionally clear here, there are problems with DNA as evidence in general beyond the integrity of the work of the technician. There are a number of studies on how DNA evidence has led to wrongful convictions, and the criminology institute of Australia has a 2012 report highlighting all 20 major issues with using DNA evidence. Any case that rests solely on DNA evidence is a conviction without suitable evidence. If a crime lab mistesting dna in 3K cases puts those cases in jeopardy they never had sufficient evidence to begin with and there thus should be no conviction. There is factually no forensic evidence that is currently without serious flaws. It's not real science, it's mostly feelings.
    1
  46. Can I file for the Chrome Incognito mode if I'm in Australia? Went to the website, cleared the screening but couldn't progress because it didn't lole my phone number?
    1
  47. MSNBC is a network jointly owned by Microsoft (that's the MS part) and Comcast (through its subsidy NBCUniversal.) It's still running because it turns a multibillion dollar profit. The view is a show on a network, not a network itself. So they aren't the same thing. It's still on the air because it has high ratings and turns a substantial profit as a result. All media organisations have some bias, it's unavoidable. In yankville, they lean into it though and align themselves along ideological extremes of a political nature. There are no centrist aligned corporate media stations, and no public broadcaster to fill that spot either. All news in yankville is for-profit. Apparently yankvillians like it that way, because when Chris Licht took over control of CNN he tried to shift the network back toward the centre and real journalism. This upset their audience substantially and they fled the network, causing Licht to be fired and the network to return it left leaning bias. Millennials and Zoomers in yankville have no context for news that isn't an echo chamber for their pre-existent ideas and ideological stance. They can't handle ideas that challenge them and may contradict their opinions.
    1
  48. They knew this would happen. It's part of the plan. What powers do state of emergency orders give them? Seriously, take a look at the NYC Executive Law subsection 24. How much money do you think is going into their own pockets while they roll out these programs. What liberties are given up? 170K migrants is only 2% of the population of NYC. Spread over a year it's enough to make people believe something needs to be done and that state of emergency is justified but small enough that they can actually absorb the people with ease when they choose to. Right now they're making purposefully bad decisions they know will upset people because that in fact justifies the state of emergency order. Stop believing democrat politicians are naive. They aren't. They know what these policies will do, they do them anyway. Ask yourself why.
    1
  49. See, what you don't understand is the class warfare. The elites look down on you, they feel you are beneath them. They see no difference between you and a criminal. But they also acknowledge that if you're spending your time being harrassed by criminals you won't revolt. The Mises Institute has some very good talks here on youtube that explain what is happening from a historical, ideological, and economic standpoint. Also, remember when being called a red anything meant you were a commie. The irony of the doublespeak is insane. They've got you and there's no way out even when you resist you're playing for them.
    1
  50. This video rushed through so much it felt like it exists just to push the sponsor spot
    1