Comments by "TJ Marx" (@tjmarx) on "Nate The Lawyer" channel.

  1. All international sporting bodies are going this route. None of these laws will matter if Roxanne Tickle wins his federal case out of Australia because it involves the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) it would create international legal precedent. If Roxanne Tickle wins his case it will force the legal definition of sex to be redefined to that of gender identity in all 168 signatory countries. Look the case up.
    1
  2. Weak spoilt child, and a power hungry helicopter mum in a position of authority. You think this started at some awards ceremony? Come on, how do you think the kid got the award in the first place?
    1
  3. In Australia the civil SERVICE must be impartial and politically agnostic by law. Is that not the case in yankville?
    1
  4. Wade is corrupt to the hills, and Fani Willis too. But debtors jails should be illegal. Not one should be behind bars for failure to pay child support or alimony. Especially when the child support relates to adult children. You can't fight corruption with more corruption.
    1
  5. Remember when claiming to be something you aren't in order to gain benefits you aren't entitled to was called fraud? If "trans women" were actually women, they wouldn't need to put "trans" in front of it, nor need to invent terms like "cis" to describe actual men and women.
    1
  6. I hope Trump takes the high road and doesn't use this to justify doing anything. I hope he doesn't do anything that would further erode the integrity of the office. I hope he sets an example even as the subversives howl like animals at his door, on how the office should be occupied. All this revenge and retribution people are calling for is folly. An empty minded race to the bottom that only harms everyone. It takes a real leader with integrity to see the mistake in revenge and push forward a future for all. I hope that person is Trump, because all the countries yankville exported this wokey subversive culture too need to heal.
    1
  7. @gfys756  No mate. That you feel justified, doesn't make something justice. It makes it revenge. I think you need to learn the difference
    1
  8. Love it. Systemic incompetence. I'm going to use this term going forward. Whenever someone starts harming on about "systemic racism" they're really telling you about THEIR systemic incompetence. Perfect.
    1
  9. I think it's interesting that the immigrants exploiting this all come from the same geographical area known for telephone scams. Perhaps if more scrutiny were put on country of origin things like this scam wouldn't happen. The shooter should not be charged in relation to the shooting. However, he was on probation and should not have had that weapon. So whatever the consequences of having it are in his probation should apply. Yes it was self defence, but imo that's irrelevant to what you are supposed to possess in the first place.
    1
  10. Because, no one can identify a LAW she has broken WITH EVIDENCE she has broken that law. Is she corrupt? Absolutely. Is she harming her community? Absolutely. Is she incompetent? Absolutely. But that's all that can be demonstrated so far and those things aren't criminal offences, let alone punishable with prison. You have to understand that just because someone does something wrong, doesn't mean they go to prison.
    1
  11. Only 4432 people voted? That's only a ~22% turnout. Not even a quarter of residents cared enough to vote even though they had weeks to do it. Think about that.
    1
  12. @shabeki  No. Apparently, you have no brain. 78% of residents did not care enough about who is the mayor or all the nonsense the mayor was doing to vote. 78%.
    1
  13. It's almost as if forensics isn't actual science and shouldn't be admissible in court. It's almost as if actual scientists have been saying this for decades, and that even the forensics people admit their failings. You think Missy Woods is unique? You think people in her department didn't know what she was doing? That it wasn't just common procedure? 😂😂😂
    1
  14. This video felt low effort. It was just a bunch of news clips and no real commentary.
    1
  15. See it's like this. The courts were allowed to become political entities with political appointees because judges are appointed by general election from the lay public or nomination and approval from whoever is in government. So the judiciary is not destroyed ans is no longer an independent third branch of government. Instead they're an extension of the second branch of government.
    1
  16. This is some falling down
    1
  17. I think you have a governor and a mayor who were virtue signalling. They didn't really ever believe the things they were saying, they just said the things necessary to get elected. Now the voter base has shifted their position, the mayor and governor are shifting there's too. The corporate media are not left or right, they're pro ratings dollars and pro getting paid to run campaigns. They're a for profit business and no one should ever forget that. There will be a sizeable percentage of CNNs audience however who will not be happy with these announcements. Because those people are pro criminal anarchists who wanted the migrant crisis to be doing what it's doing. They wanted the city to be destroyed. That was the point. Just like it's the point behind all the soft on crime DAs, and corrupt officials like in Dolton. They want the place to be run by the gangs and cartels. AOC is one of those people who wants those things
    1
  18. You mean the type of person who would drive drunk and try to get out of it when caught, would also be the type of person to make false SA claims to try and avoid accountability, and then lie about her lawyer? Wow, colour me shocked.
    1
  19. This isn't just a yankville first amendment issue, because they censored the same content across their platforms regardless of which country you are in. I was banned from Facebook because I made posts with medical information and slides of the actual virus and I'm in Australia. They recently deleted my account before I could get back into it. Facebook and the Biden administration have some serious explaining to do.
    1
  20. I'm at the start of the video and I already agree it should have been thrown out. I never thought there was a case against Harvey, because there in fact wasn't. It isn't a crime to gatekeep a role in a production behind personal favours. What Harvey is accused of is what EVERY major producer in the entertainment and fashion industry does. All of them. Even the women. These industries run on personal favours and recreational substances. The Weinstein conviction was a power play to overthrow him to massive way for new management. After his conviction, what happened to films? White men got essentially banned and DEI came rolling through full force. Next we need to see the floyd case cops released. They were railroaded in the same way.
    1
  21. It's hardly a situation unique to NY. This junk is happening everywhere with bail reform. It's a bad policy, but what are you going to do? The criminals and the mentally ill are in charge now.
    1
  22. And this is why abortion needs to always remain a legal option through the first trimester. Or you get this kind of thing happening increasingly from unwanted pregnancies.
    1
  23. So this woman called the police out and invited them into her home. She then proceeded to draw them close to the stove where she had boiling water with the intent of throwing it on the officers. Sounds like premeditation to me. Both cops clearly clocked something was wrong. So now there is an investigation. If they had walked out and she had poured the water on herself, or left and done it to someone else all the criticisers would be out here blaming the officers for that too. "Why did they walk outside instead of controlling the situation". You know that's exactly what would be said. She went down behind the counter and PRETENDED to be submitting. The officer goes in to detain her to get the scene under control and find out what's going down. She throws boiling water on him from a pot she had just concealed. His weapon discharging seems justified to me. Could the two cops have handled the situation better? No idea, I wasn't there and neither were you. What the second body cam should tell you is that video is not a substitute for actually being there, and that video can lie. In the UK right now there's a case in the public domain involving proportional force, where police kicked a man in the head, after he, his brother and other members of his group started throwing punches. Similarly it first started out with a video hiding the punches from the perps and only showing the police force. People were outaged. Now they see the full video, people see it was justified. Same thing here. Police carry weapons. If you do not want to be harmed by police, don't try to harm them first? Seems pretty simple.
    1
  24. Bro, you forgot to mention the crazy testimony from Fani's dad, evidence from the ex-governor that he refused the work because he knew it wouldn't pay much and was surprised at how much Wade got. And most crazy, that Bradley left the legal partnership because he was accused of multiple sx assaults and PAID HIS ACCUSERS OFF. Everyone in this case, all 4 of them are crooked. They've all been exposed as crooks who belong in prison. I don't think this is a case of trusting anyone because I don't think any of them can be believed. I think it's more a balance of what fits behaviour more likely. They should just move the trial already.
    1
  25. Always? That's not true. It's very rarely brought to the light. Corruption is rampant.
    1
  26. ...but ironically now you need to pay tax on that $5K or the IRS will come after you. 😂
    1
  27. Wait. "Miss love"? As in the prosecutor in the YSL case?
    1
  28. If you hire based on the colour of skin or genitalia, even if you find someone qualified, you are not only discriminating but you are leaving others who are more highly qualified locked out. You didn't get the best person for the job, you got a qualified person for the job who has X race or gender. We know they aren't best for the job, otherwise they wouldn't need to be hired on the basis of immutable characteristics. Can you point to someone who was a better fit for the job than Justice Thomas? I can't. I don't think his appointment had to do with anything beyond the fact he was the best person for the job. Equality is a level playing field where everyone can compete equally without regard to immutable characteristics.
    1
  29. P pass. Reverse the gender and he'd have been found guilty on all counts.
    1
  30. They are not models. They are sx workers. Stop legitimising what they do. Edit: Even the media articles are calling them what they are. Why aren't you? Make shame great again.
    1
  31. Think about what it tells you about thornton township that the democrats had to play silly games to get her off the ballot. Which isn't resolved yet, she could still end up on the ballot as a candidate. But just think about that for a moment. You don't need to do that unless you're worried people will still vote for her en masse and she might win an election. That tells you she has way more support in thornton township than Fox32 and others admit to. I'm not sure she's embattled at all. I think most of the voters like all the corruption, and if given the chance will vote for it again. I wonder if that cares to Dolton too. We've certainly seen significantly more opposition for her in Dolton, but I'm not sure that translates into her being voted out if she's on the ticket either. This is why elected public office position salaries should always be linked to the average earnings of the electorate. Poverty breeds stupidity so they're easy to fleece if you aren't careful on what you make the cash and prizes for doing so.
    1
  32. Because a bank says "please don't rob us" where as 84% of Dolton asked her to do this.
    1
  33. I don't think it's possible to make any kind of credible determination from the information we have here. I'm sure you could find others in the same department making big bucks in overtime. Male and female. I'm sure you can find others in different departments making big bucks in overtime. Male and female. That's why the council were upset. But it's what happens when you "defund" police. Maybe they should try funding police adequately again, ironically in order to save money. With the information we have, it's entirely possible the chef did nothing wrong and this woman is just trying to get out of trouble. It's also entirely possible he was paying her for sx. Who knows. Also, the Dolton cop on security detail absolutely could have worked 303 hours in a fortnight. Body guards get paid to sleep if they're on duty. So do firefighters. So do care home workers. So do doctors at hospitals. So do many other roles. He was essentially being paid to live at Henyards house. Did he actually do that? I don't know. But it's absolutely possible and plausible given what he was behaving as a body guard for the mayor. If you look down the list, you can see similar hours are logged by multiple people, and by him on multiple fortnights. That makes it more plausible.
    1
  34. Hold on, the US court case didn't clear him of abuse. He first hand admitted to abuse. They both admitted first hand to physically and mentally abusing each other. Third parties agreed that they were abusive to each other. The verdict in the US case was that each had defamed the other and following the case they both agreed to withdraw their claims. The fact is it was a dysfunctional and abusive relationship on both sides, they both agree on that. They should just stay as far away from each other as physically possible. When Dan says he shouldn't have gotten involved in their toxic relationship he isn't saying anything either of them wouldn't agree with. Indeed it's what Depp wanted from him all along.
    1
  35. I genuinely doubt she'll get arrested at all over anything related to her time as mayor of dolton.
    1
  36. @stayfaded69  No she isn't 🤣🤦‍♂️ She's the mayor of Dolton and the Supervisor of Thornton Township. Supervisor is the equivalent of Mayor to the Township.
    1
  37. I enjoyed that she was dunking on how bad BEVs are and that normal rain destroys them, whilst forcing ordinary people to buy these things if they want a private vehicle remains democrat policy. That was just a bit of a mask slip about the real socialist agenda going on.
    1
  38. A year? Fox32 have been covering the problems in dolton for 2 years... But yes, you are being too hard on the comptroller. Not because of her skin colour, that should never even be brought up or be a factor. But because a comptroller, like all positions of authority, must have evidence to pursue action against someone or an entity. The same is true for FBI, state police, the governor or anyone else. It's often said the wheels of justice turn slowly. But they do so to avoid persecution of innocent people. I'd expect a lawyer to understand these concepts and their importance. I still believe it's unlikely that Henyard does even a day in prison. The FBI are trying to flip her inner circle, that tells you they don't have a case without those people.
    1
  39. It's almost as if positions should be filled based on the merits and character of the individual, not the colour of their skin...
    1
  40. I disagree that Ashley is a quality attorney. I find her naive and unprofessional. But I think that's important. It's precisely that lack of professionalism that I would humbly suggest is the root of her finding out this information from Bradley. To understand what happened we need to remember some important points to contextualise. Please remember, Bradley wasn't just Wade's attorney. He testified that he and Wade had been friends since middle school, that's his childhood friend. The law offices were 3 childhood best friends working together. It wasn't just some professionals who met as lawyers and came together to form a law office for mutual benefit. They were best friends. We're talking people who went to each others weddings, had dinners together as couples, hung out at eat others houses, saw their kids grow up. They have history and over that many years Bradley is going to become just as loyal to Joycelyn as to Wade himself. Think about your best friend and his wife you like, would you be upset if your friend stiffed her? Bradley tried to claim privilege but the judge said no it's not. Because he got the information through friendship and not as an attorney. We need to really understand Bradley and Wade are trying very hard to blur the lines of their friendship into a professional attorney client relationship. But they were just being friends. He was Wade's attorney only really in name. Because remember Wade is himself an attorney, I guarantee Wade wrote many of the filings in the divorce himself and just had Bradley file. They're friends, he's just helping his friend. We also need to put in context that this is happening right after the allegation against Bradley and the dissolving of the partnership. Their friendship was also falling apart at that time, they weren't on good terms. So Bradley is mad over how one friend is treating another in a divorce, and he's mad his friend isn't backing him up in an allegation he claims is false. Willis didn't just call Bradley like some clandestine entity and say "they're investigating us" then hang up. She clearly brought up the allegations against him, that they may be revealed during the open access or that they had already been revealed by the open access. That's why he's calling Ashley to see if he needs representation. Ok, so we have him worried for his own freedom and reputation, mad at his childhood friend for not having his back in an allegation he denies and upset with the same friend at how he behaved in his divorce and wronged Joycelyn his other friend. It's in that context, with all of those emotions going on inside Bradley that you then get 4 lawyers in a conference room chatting while they wait for pleadings. 4 lawyers who are professional acquaintances, work friends really and one of which was a long term actual friend of Bradley whom had socialised with him outside of their professional relationship. The presence of that friend in particular in the room is immediately going to change Bradley's mindset. He isn't a lawyer sitting with opposing counsel. He's sitting in a room with his friend and 2 other work friends. He feels more relaxed and open. Then you have Ashley, this school girl-esque, naive and talkative person you just know is a gossip queen. So she starts yabbering away and its in that context that Bradley starts spilling the beans. I don't think he meant to on the record, I think he just viewed it as gossip between friends with the aforementioned factors in his mind. He has also testified in subsequent interactions he did not wish to be relied upon as a source or testify, and Ashley has confirmed that, as have the text exchange in record. I suspect he got caught up in a conversation, said some things with anger in his heart that he later regretted saying, then either had a sunk cost fallacy or felt compelled to keep giving information. We see evidence of this in how strongly he fought not to testify and how evasive he has been on the stand. I do not believe for a moment that Ashley Merchant created a honeypot for Bradley and used herself as bait. You might make an argument that the naivety and lack of professionalism is all an act and she uses it to throw people off guard and extract information. But a honeypot? I see no evidence of that. What I see evidence of is someone who should only be a junior lawyer being thrust into a case out of her depth and getting lucky on some information due to coincidence and circumstance. P.S. Bradley testified it was $20K and it went to the employee making the allegation. He also testified that it was brokered by Wade.
    1
  41.  @MamaMOB  No. The option only exists in some people's minds. Specifically, dishonest criminal types. Have a great day.
    1
  42. @jonWilk8156  Why do you have a license? Apparently you think they aren't necessary and anyone sensible enough to disagree with your stupidity is apparently a coward. 😂
    1
  43. @jonWilk8156  Why do you have a license, apparently you don't believe they're necessary...
    1
  44.  @Fecker_Carlson  🤣🤡
    1
  45. You can't fault cambridge. The job of dictionaries isn't to define words themselves, it's to report how words are defined in common use.
    1
  46. 15:44 Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding of what Lightfoot was saying isn't that the cheques were printed and thd money in the cheques taken without being given to vendors. My understanding is that she was saying at the time the cheque was printed the town did not have enough money in the bank to cover the cheque, so the town printed the cheque but did not issue it to the venue. So my understanding is she's saying there are $6M of unissued cheques in town hall somewhere, because money was being spent from the general fund at a rate beyond income so there wasn't enough money to pay everyone. It doesn't appear to me she was claiming the money is unaccounted for.
    1
  47. When you say "Thursday at 6" what US timezone is that? I'm in Australia so I'm trying to figure out how many hours back I need to go.
    1
  48. They expected wealth beyond their wildest dreams handed to them on a silver platter. Not because of something any particular party said, but because that's the exact fantasy image all movies and television shows coming out of yankville, about yankville portray. It's the propaganda yankville sends out into the world about the nature of the country, its power, its lifestyle, that cause this exact problem. Yes, border controls can help stem a tide, but it's a bit like damming a creek that you're diverting an ocean to.
    1
  49. I see no evidence Henyard will serve a single day in prison for any of this. There's incompetence, there's corruption, and then there's criminal incompetence. Those are different things, and I just don't see the hard evidence to make a case that something criminal has happened. When they start trying to flip people, that tells you they don't think they have the evidence either. Happy to be wrong on this, but I won't hold my breath. Be she gets voted back in to Thornton township.
    1
  50. She's been elected and re-elected how many times? Over what period? And in Florida? That's not DEI, the concept wasn't even mainstream when she first got elected in 2013. BLM was though. And we know BLM is a pro-crime organisation, all about getting criminals elected into positions of power and removing criminal consequence.
    1