Comments by "" (@craigkdillon) on "CaspianReport"
channel.
-
1
-
China will not have it easy.
1. India's navy now has porting rights at Cam Rahn Bay.
2. India is selling Brahmos & Akash missiles to Vietnam.
3. India is training Vietnam's navy on using its Russian made subs. India is selling naval ships to V.
4. Vietnam, India, US, Japan, and Australia hold joint naval exercises regularly.
5. Xi's military bullying is causing regional countries to lower their trading relationship with China. China's export economy will be hurt by this, especially long term, IMO.
China will find that bullying and threatening is not a way to establish healthy relationships in the region.
Xi seems to be operating as if China is the Middle Kingdom, and all countries are supposed to allow hegemony and dominion to China. Well, all those countries are proud too, and there will be push back.
Japan, India, and Vietnam are already increasing their military budgets. So, China's new military assets will bring the advantage it seeks. Remember, it takes a lot more money and assets to project power, especially over the sea.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Excellent analysis, as usual.
However, it must be kept in mind the declining geoeconomic influence of oil
Renewable energy and electric vehicles are just beginning to ramp up. Their increase will NOT be linear, but exponential or even logarithmic.
The ONLY reason the world cares about the wars, rivalries and conflicts of the Middle East is oil. Notice - no one cares about conflicts in Africa. No troops went on the ground to rescue Sudan. No one cares about Yemen, since it has no oil. Same with South America.
As oil declines in significance, at some point Saudi regime may not be rescued if it comes under threat. The US quickly came to Saudi's defense when Hussein threatened. In 5, 10, or 15 years, the Suadi regime may be overthrown because no one lands an army to prevent it.
Also, Saudi Arabia's medieval government will become increasingly incapable of governing a nation of over 40 million. The strains of the modern world will be too much for the family monarchy. Plus, the average Arab will likely become resentful of the lazy Saudi family that suck up the money, while contributing little.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Excellent analysis. However, all the issues you mentioned will be affected by continuing trends. For instance....
1) Russia's financial power is decreasing compared to Europe and US. Russia's economy is not innovative, nor supporting of trade. IMO, Russia will have less and less to offer Belarus in loans, and other supports.
2) The reverberation of the Soviet bell will diminish over time, both in Belarus and in Russia itself. As both nations become more open and aware of the outside world through trade and travel, their cultures will change. This process has been happening around the world, and it will happen there as well.
3) As the world shifts to renewable energy, the geostrategic power of oil will shrink, and eventually disappear. Russia's reliance on the power of oil will cause Russia to lose almost all power. The only power Russia will have is military, and even that will decline as Russia's economy declines and cannot support a robust military industrial complex.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You throw around numbers as if they mean the same thing.
Chinese numbers, IMO, are not the same as US numbers.
For instance, you mentioned a factory being built by China as "infrastructure". Huh??
A factory is NOT infrastructure. From US, such a thing would be built by a company for itself or a partner, and would NOT be deemed infrastructure.
You also mention China is better at building than US. WTF??
Yes, our infrastructure needs help -- but that is by OUR standards, which are very high.
In China, bridges and dams fail all the time. It is SOP for them.
Considering that Bechtel & Halliburton are two of the biggest and most respected building firms in the world, and based in the US, what you said is both insulting and extremely incorrect.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Again, the elephant is the room is ignored. --- Siberia.
China has been challenging the borders of its neighbors - India, Japan, Vietnam.
But, not Russia --- yet.
In fact, China has more real claim to Siberia than its spurious claims to the SCS, Japan's islands, Kashmir, etc. Also, Siberia is empty. More people could be used to exploit its resources, which are great. Moreover, Siberia borders the Arctic and could be a way for China to become an Arctic country.
Will China begin pressuring Russia to return Siberia to it??
I wonder.....
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I am sick and tired of supposed super powers, Russia & China, saying they have to threaten military action
because we are insecure. We might be attacked, and then, oh what should we do??
YET - both Russia and China create the problem they say they don't want.
China has created enemies. 10 years ago, no one was thinking of interfering with China's maritime trade through the Mallaccas.
Now, however, India, Vietnam, and others are making sure they can, just in case China attacks them.
The EU thought it had a deal with Russia, to keep Ukraine as a neutral buffer.
No one was thinking of attacking Russia.
But, now, Russia is threatening Europe and the Middle East, so everyone has to prepare for ways to attack Russia, if they end up having to do that.,
Russia & China create the problem they say they don't want.
If they don't want to be attacked, why don't they just STOP threatening others??
Why don't they stop making everyone nervous??
1
-
Whoa, wait a minute. You have Portugal claiming the depths of the Atlantic Ocean --- beyond the extent of the Eurasian continent.
For instance, look at the North Sea -- it is all continental shelf. Britain, Norway, and the Netherlands would have claims to all of it.
Or look at Iceland. It gets the 200 mi EEZ, but nothing beyond that because there is little continental shelf for it, as I see it.
So, I doubt very much that Portugal will get the "abyssal plains" of the Atlantic Ocean.
It that happens, then the US will also greatly increase in size as we would do the same thing to Hawaiian Islannds, Wake, Guam, Aleutians, and Marshall Islands. Imagine how much ocean territory we would get.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@fasoooli2751 Correct. Democracy is merely a process of counting votes. The majority can often be wrong. Very wrong.
BUT -- the other option is to have a person who decides what is right and wrong for everyone.
That is ALWAYS subject to abuse.
If you don't have democracy, then you will have some kind of autocracy.
Sure, you can have wise kings.
But, you can also have crazy cruel ones -- see Caligula, Hitler, Ottoman Sultans, Stalin, etc.
A democracy will reflect the people that have it. That i why Vermont is a very different place from Mississippi. The people are different, so the democratic results are different.
A democracy in a Muslim country will be different from US or Denmark.
HOWEVER, if a democracy oppresses selected people within the society, then injustice is created. See American slavery, or South African Apartheid.
Such a democracy will eventually have a crisis.
A democracy that is not fair and just to all its people violates the basic principles of democracy.
Unlike a monarchy, which assumes an aristocracy, that are privileged and special under the law. See Saudi Arabia.
Or a Theocracy, where clerics are privileged and special under the law. See Iran.
Anytime some people are privileged, you will have abuse and injustice.
Such a system is doomed to unrest and collapse, though it could exist for many years or decades.
1
-
1
-
1
-
BTW, I do not accept the common assertion that China's South China Sea grab is to ensure its trade routes. No one threatens its trade routes.
IMO, the grab of the South China Sea is an attempt to control trade in the region and to intimidate everyone who uses it. China wants to use South China Sea trade access as a means of leverage and control over Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Philippines, and Vietnam.
I think Xi and his backers dream of re-establishing China's middle kingdom relationships with its neighbors, and even the world.
This will fail of course. The world has moved on from the days when Empires dominated the world. All power comes from economic power ultimately - after all, it takes a lot of money to sustain a military. Note how economic power also creates social power. Look at how American rap has gone global. As India develops, Bollywood is a growing cultural influence. The world knows Korean K-Pop. So, power has many facets. Xi's focus on confrontation and bullying will have severe blowback, I expect.
Also, China's debt colonization of countries will also fail miserably. England took over Egypt that way. It didn't last. The world community will not allow China to put colonizing troops into Africa or India Ocean countries. Without occupying troops, nothing prevents those countries from merely defaulting on their debts to China. Remember how the US ended Britain's influence in Egypt in the 1950's by stopping its military???
What do you think will happen when China tries to enforce its domination with military force??? It will be stopped, I believe.
China is at the apex of its power, IMO. Xi's policies have started a process that will degrade China's economy and power. Once its veneer of power is stripped away, its decline will be swift.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Shervan, may I suggest that you select some important videos to do regular periodic updates.
I think annual reviews of China's economy, China's military issues, Middle East, UK, EU, Russia, Ukraine, and India should all be considered. Maybe Ethiopia and Nigeria should be looked at regularly. Issues might need periodic updating -- global warming, world economy, world trade + tariffs, world military spending.
I find that you will have done a great analysis, but its several years old, and I want to know your take on developments since your analysis was done.
Thanks.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1