Comments by "Tony Wilson" (@tonywilson4713) on "Triggernometry" channel.

@ironmonkey1512 I wasn't discussing efficacy I was pointing out that the very first comment in this was just another BULLSHlT lump of hyperbole in a culture war between 2 groups of M0R0NS who have completely lost site of reality. You anti-woke clowns are just as ridiculous as the woke clowns you rage about.
1
@MrAgonizomai Because anyone with a brain can spot yet another FULL of SHlT woke/anti-woke culture clown in an instant AND NONE OF THEM ARE WORTH ANYONE's TIME. AND THE ONLY PEOPLE who spend time listening to them are lDlOTIC CULTURE WARRIORS WHO HIDE BEHIND ANONYMOUS TAGS.
1
@jeffk464 Its staggering how people claim that the mainstream media should not be listened to because they have agendas and narratives AND THEN THOSE SAME PEOPLE TURN to Bloggers, Facebook, Tik Tok, YouTuber outlets as if those outlets don't have agendas or narratives.
1
@madeinengland1212 I NEVER SAID THERE WASN'T Do any of you culture war clowns EVER listen?
1
Here's something for all you culture war clowns to consider since one of you question if I am an engineer or not. According to the title of this video "Progress is Bad for Women." As an engineer let me ask all of you culture war clowns. Do you think that since progress is bad for women that us engineers should turn off the Tampax, Star Free and Libra factories? Because I know a lot of men would be grateful if they didn't have football games on TV interrupted with adds for tampons. Maybe there's another item of progress we can do away with - the washing machine. It only unburdened women enough that it allowed them to go to school and be educated. I'm fairly certain there are a lot of men out there who'd like to see women a lot less educated and they'd see putting women back in the laundry doing everything by hand for day after day would be a good start. On the other hand I tend to think the progress has been pretty good for women. Its just the some are too stupid to realise it.
1
@MrAgonizomai NEVER TRY and tell somebody what they are and what they aren't is the ultimate in arrogant hubris. But then while the woke live in their fantasy realm of delusion the anti-woke live with the comfort blanket of arrogant hubris. What's common to both is insane self righteousness. DON'T complain when people tell you and the woke clowns FK-OFF. The rest of us have real work to do.
1
@MrAgonizomai You call someone a piece of crap 20 times in a row and wonder why they want to P⋃NCH you in face and tell you to F⋃CK OFF.🤦‍♂🤦‍♂ Next time you and any other from the woke-antiwoke brigades want to call someone ignorant look in the mirror.
1
@MrAgonizomai And so we are getting through this. Being a pedantic self righteous smug arrogant ignorant M0R0N who thinks they play people like violins IS BASICALLY THE ULTIMATE in being a pedantic self righteous smug arrogant ignorant M0R0N. Psychologically speaking being someone who thinks the way you do is called SOCIOPATHIC NARCISSISM
1
@dohlecarnett1866 Then who spent €1.3 Trillion on renewables? And who chose to shut down the German nuclear power stations?
1
Its sad to say that David's acted in bad faith on this and I think its because you dented his American self superiority on a few points. Calling you guys right wing is utterly stupid on his behalf and he really should apologise. FYI - I'm Australian but went to college in America and Americans have a ridiculously skewed concept of what's right and left in politics. I did engineering but ended up in lots of political discussions surrounded by other university students as I was. Like most things American its NOT simple and my apologies for the longish answer. Due to being told for multiple generations that America is the Greatest Nation on Earth and now finding out that's NOT true. Remember they won 2 World Wars (just ask them) and have now lost or failed to win almost every conflict since. They've been humiliated in both Iraq and Afghanistan just as they were in Vietnam. They are having a hard time dealing with ANYONE from any other nation that challenges them intellectually and you guys pushed back hard and refused to concede some points. I don't think he's bad guy but I think he's acted in bad faith on this and does need to apologise. Further to trying to explain part of his reaction. Part of it comes from the very American centric education he's been brought up with. Typical of many Americans he has no real understanding of how the rest of the world views LEFT & RIGHT politics. One of his college Professors is noted teacher of Marxist Economics Richard Wolff. So David sees himself as very LEFTIST. The problem is America has no real LEFT and never did. It actually has 2 competing versions of right wing capitalism. Americans talk about left and right but they are more like opposite sides of the same coin. Like all coins no matter which way its up it still has the same value. There's American Liberalism which is based on the idea of a sound set of regulations so that everyone has a fair chance at making it rich. Then there's American Realism which is based on the concept that people are selfish and will do whatever they feel is in their best interests as in "I might as well forget rules and just do whatever makes me rich." Make no bones about it both sides of America consider being rich the #1 thing. The liberals just think they are doing it playing inside the rules they believe everyone should play by, while the realists don't care so long as they win.
1
@michaelk.jensen1611 For starters try writing clear sentences. If you go over to David's channel here on YT he has a video titled "Progressive Double-Teamed by Right-Wingers, DISASTER" ->https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_KO72BIfEU What's the disaster? There's actually no commentary by David or any of his people explaining anything about what was disastrous. What there is a 20 minute EDITED version of their discussion. If you go back a year David didn't do much click baiting, and I've been watching him for a couple of years. He's done some click baiting BUT that title is really bad as such with that title acting in bad faith. In the past he's done the occasional "it doesn't end well" title and some of those have nothing controversial, but then as far as click baiting goes David's a 1 out of 10 on a platform infested with 10 out of 10s. Do I think the guys at Triggernometry are completely innocent in this? NO - I think that whole discussion on transgender people in prison was handled badly by BOTH sides. They were BOTH trying to win points and make the other person "concede" something. It was a stupid stance by both of them because it SOLVED NOTHING. There is an idiotic behavior among some people that dictates they have to dominate others and score points. IT DOES NOTHING and IT SOLVES NOTHING. As I said I am an engineer and I see the same types of arguments between the pro-wind/solar people and the pro-nuclear people with respect to clean energy solutions. I'm tired of them. They cherry pick all sorts of information and come up with specific cases to make points that have no real basis for generating a solution. I'm tired of people making bad faith arguments or spinning arguments around in circles that SOLVE NOTHING. If you look at their transgender argument. Does David have a point that a 5'3" effeminate trans-male is likely to be brutalised in a male prison? YES, and we have only 1 other option so what do we do? Konstantin - no answer except denial. Did Konstantin have a valid point that only having that 1 other option is bad? YES, and did David conceded that only having 1 other option isn't acceptable? NO he just pushed the you must concede line. ALL BOTH of them wanted was to win a point without conceding anything. AND THEY SOLVED NOTHING. And while they continue this spat they will SOLVE NOTHNG.
1
@michaelk.jensen1611 If your going to argue points do it clearly or wait until you get to a computer. Going to your top point here about the transgender argument there is an answer, but all both wanted to do was NOT CONCEDE anything to the other side AND THAT SOLVES NOTHING. I deal with these sorts of problems all the time as an engineer. No matter what anyone wants you mostly have to do with what's available. Best example ever was Apollo 13 and the CO2 filters. Nobody cared squat about what would be best. They had to make a filter with what they had or they died. That's the bit where Konstantin's I wont accept those options was idiotic bad faith and it really was idiotic bad faith. David's point: I have this prisoner. In Prison A they will be beaten, raped and possibly murdered. In Prison B they will be alive and safe. What do we do? Konstantin I don't accept those options as if he gets to make them. That's stupid and arrogant. David's insistence on getting a concession was just stupid. Then click baiting it as a disaster was childish at best idiotically stupid at worst BECAUSE IT SOLVED NOTHING. The correct resolution (and this is taught in any basic resolution class or exercise) is: Fine we need a 3rd option but that will take time. Between now and then do I put this person in Box A where they will die or in Box B where they will be safe until Box C is ready? That gets an agreeable answer with a future even more agreeable answer.
1
@nevbarnes1034 Yes I got that but its still a ridiculous statement to label millions of people according to what one person wrote. This is one of the biggest problems with almost any public discussion these days. idiots rushing to label and box people into very tightly cramped pigeon holes. BOTH the Far Left and FAR Right are so quick to stamp labels on people and suddenly it crunches the discussion. Todays discussion is one that needs to happen and Coleman's insight is so great that suddenly trying to stamp such a stupid label on millions of people is simply idiotic. Even worse is that Konstantin is usually well above such ridiculous stuff. When Russia first invaded Ukraine he was one of a few voices anywhere in the world who spoke common sense. Its really disappointing to see someone who's normally so sharp to be so stupid.
1
@OoO-rf2gt I watched the lot. So what's your point?
1
@OoO-rf2gt What am I wrong about smartass? He's quoted a single person and attributed a grandiose generalised claim that does not hold true to millions of people and that's stupid. And what have you done other than been an arrogant clown who can't even back up his own claims except put up an emoji? Its people like you why the world is so FKD these days. You think arrogance and self righteousness is a solution when its not even an answer answer.
1
@KhorneBrzrkr Yeah but that's NOT progressive. That entire nature versus nurture thing is a psychology or sociology discussion it has NOTHING to do with anyone's politics. Its one of the worst generalisations I have seen anyone do.
1
@godsrevolver9737 Hey DlCKHEAD he said what he said and the reason why I cannot stand DlCKHEADS like you Konastantin AND the Radical Left is you all either hijack language or you wait until the other side hijacks language and then exploit it. And so you know one of Orwell's main themes in 1984 was the hijacking of language. That's what doublespeak is all about. First example - the word woke only applied to the economic state of African Americans since it was first used in the blues music in the 1950s. THEN out of nowhere the radical Left (who I can't farking stand) hijacked it. to mean anything the Social Justice warrior brigades wanted to apply it too. It had nothing to do with LGBT anything, or environmental issues or energy transitions or education. It was purely an economic term as it applied to one group of people - African Americans. Second example - the word progressive meant 1 thing and 1 thing only. It applied to anyone Left, Centrist or Right who wanted society to make progress and not just on 1 thing but across the broader spectrum of society by allowing opportunity and NOT restricting it which the radical Right do or forcing equality which the Radical Left do. The reason I hate what the Radical Left has done is they claim to be progressive but want the world to GO BACKWARDS and try again at that Marxist/Socialist/Stalinist nonsense. That's NOT progressive that's regressive because they want to GO BACKWARDS to something that already failed catastrophically. This is why the Radical Right are just as pathetic they want the world to GO BACKWARDS to some robber baron theocratic form of feudalism. This is why I hate what Konastantin has chosen to become. 2-3 years ago he was someone who wanted a better world. Now he's just another cheap punk on the payroll of the American Libertarians and there's no shortage of those DUMB PRlCKs or the money supply they feed on. If you don't like that for reasoning then FCK OFF.
1
I'm an engineer and my favorite subject is what do you have in your life that's not had an engineer involved? I'm Australian and the only product I can point at and say "that has no engineering in it at all" is traditional native Aboriginal arts and crafts. If it has metal, plastic or was in a factory of any sort then it needed engineering for you to obtain it. Even food - think about the tractors, processing machinery, refrigeration,.... etc. The thing is ALL OF THAT STUFF involves blue collar workers, building, maintaining and operating the machinery. I'm one of those people who truly hates the rest of the White Collar classes. In particular the PMC (Professional Managerial Class) who I see as nothing more than worthless, arrogant, ignorant scum who actually think they know what makes modern developed societies FUNCTION. If we took most of the Lawyers, Accountants, PMCs (especially HR) and other similar types and loaded them onto the SS Titanic 2 and sailed it straight towards the nearest iceberg it would be a good start.
1
I get the sentiment but one of the fact is that many of the people who preach free speech and rage against cancel culture also cancel people or call for them to be cancelled. Another fact is to many producers allow themselves to be used by people to preach utter garbage WITHOUT IT BEING CHALLENGED. Just remember that there are time when people in your position MUST CHALLENGE the person you have allowed on your channel or all you are is a vehicle for certain people to preach their garbage. Never forget that there are people who will seek any opportunity for publicity to promote their views. If there is one massive fault with all of the media these days its all those outlets that NEVER CHALLENGE or allow anyone to challenge the narrative of that media outlet. And they exist in every variation of politics and public discussion.
1
@biocykle AS I have said to others its just another chunk of worthless hyperbole in a BULLSHlT public discussion where BOTH SIDES seem to think that if they scream louder with worthless hyperbole they are somehow champions. I'm tired of BOTH SIDES in this worthless woke garbage pile of crap. There's some real issues to deal with that are worth discussing. You know just some minor things like: The Energy Crisis The Climate Crisis The Refugee Crisis The start of World War 3
1
@priapulida Yeah well WTF is your qualification on energy issues? I'm actually an engineer by the way and just so that we are clear I started with a degree in aerospace but work in industrial control systems and automation which includes a lot of dealing with energy systems. So take your ignorance and shove it, because its the ignorant clowns LIKE YOU who keep these culture shitfests going WHO ARE THE PROBLEM.
1
@priapulida When people are as ignorant as you are there's no point in discussing anything BUT FOR EVERYONE ELSE HERE'S WHY YOUR ENERGY BILLS ARE WHAT THEY ARE. So everyone knows the main reason I hate the culture war nonsense is that it sucks all the oxygen out of public discussion on everything else and nobody can discuss REAL ISSUES - LIKE ENERGY OR ARE YOU ALL HAPPY WITH YOUR POWER BILLS? IF YOU WANT TO HEAR THE TRUTH SORRY IF THIS IS LONG. I first became aware of the real energy issue about 7 years ago while working on a small consulting project for a Taiwanese solar company. They wanted an Australian engineer to explain the Australian situation and what I found shocked me. When I looked around I found ITS THE SAME BASIC PROBLEM EVERYWHERE and we aren't discussing what needs to be done because culture war clowns like wont STF⋃. HERE'S WHAT HAPPENED When governments built power stations they built them with future population in mind. By the time more was needed the next power station was ready. So there was always an OVER SUPPLY of energy to drive growth. Anyone who's ever done even a basic economics class (and yes I did one) knows If supply is ahead of demand (even when its growing) the prices go down and/or stay down. That's how energy prices were reliable from 1945 until the early 2000s and IT DROVE GROWTH. Mega projects like Tennessee Valley, Britain's nuclear industry and Snowy Hydro are examples where national governments drove growth through energy investment. Then the world got the Milton Freidman inspired Reaganomics and Thatcherism that we now call neoliberalism. Part of that was privatising energy infrastructure. A privatised energy sector doesn't exist to provide national growth its there to provide profit to share holders.*Milton Freidman* made it perfectly clear. “There is one and only one social responsibility of business—to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits.” The private sector BUYS power stations, they rarely build them and the ones they build are either small or highly subsidised. For example, in Britain, Hinckley Point C took 7 years to approve and will take 10 more to construct with first power planned for 2028 at a cost of £26 Billion and they will not see actual returns on investment until at least 2045. Do you think any of the private investors are going to wait another 20+ years before they break even or do you think the British Government is funding their profits already? This is where Milton Freidman was utterly wrong. Governments don't have to care about financial returns from specific investments because their metric is GDP not profit. HERE'S THE PROBLEM RIGHT NOW Nations now have a lot of very old power stations and basically no replacement strategy. These are not easy to replace because they take years to build. Don't bother me with various technologies because they *ALL HAVE ISSUES. For this there is no quick or easy fix. Nations are going to suffer horribly. It will be like Ukraine but stuff will just fail instead of a maniac blowing it up. The main hold up has been the constant culture wars that have raged for the past 25+ years. ALL OF THE SIDES involved say time and again that they "don't want that in my backyard." Irrespective of whatever "that" is there's always some culture warrior screaming about it with some absurd "whataboutism." Anytime engineers do speak we get screamed at by clowns claiming we are unqualified. 3 Weeks ago this channel hosted Michael Schellenberger going on about world domination with Davos and the WEF. Sure there is a case to say that but Michael is also another culture warrior except his preferred platform is TEDx and through it he has said some ridiculous stuff masked behind a few truths. Either these culture war shitfests STOP and people start LISTENING or one day you will flip the light switch and nothing will happen OR if it does turn on it will cost you a fortune to keep it on. You have a choice you can listen to clowns like Mary Harrington, Michael Schellenberger and Pria Pulida or you can have the lights work. EITHER WAY DON'T COMPLAIN BECAUSE YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD.
1
@squoblat Its not so much pie in the sky but willful ignorance. People like Zubrin have enough background and education that they should know better. That's what I don't like about him and I know others don't like him for similar reasons. I get he wants to raise money for his Mars Society but not this way because its so misleading. Just look at some of the comments on this page to see how badly they have sucked in some people. There is way too much of that in technology fields already and the media are just brainless dupes. I feel like about 80% of all media stories about technologies are PR stunts trying to raise money. At least Zubrin's not the complete charlatan that Bas Lansdorp (Founder of Mars One) was. When that collapsed he somehow walked away with about $10 million.
1
@trajan098117 Look through the comments. Its almost diametric opposites between the people who can't tell the difference between science and science fiction.
1
To andrew joyner I don't know if you found it, but the comment starts at 1:08:20 where Konstantin says I have cut and pasted this from the transcript. The italics, punctuation and bold text are mine. _"The thing is that philosophically speaking the progressive ideology doesn't believe in the existence of bad people. There are no bad people in the Progressive mindset there are people who've been failed by the system."_ Its a statement about social psychology that he's attached a political label to. Yes it can be related to politics, but to suddenly claim that anyone who believes "we need to make progress" believes in this philosophical nonsense about good and bad is ridiculous. I get that Konstantin doesn't like people on the left and I can't blame him. David Pakman (who claims to be a progressive) took a real cheap shot at both Konstantin and Francis recently, after he was on Triggernometry. It was a really cheap shot and I (and others) vented on Pakman's channel. I watch Pakman quite a lot and it was by far his worst ever video. He's normally good but on couple of times he's tried to click bait the "Progressive ...... it didn't go well" theme and its backfired every time. And that time it didn't just backfire it was just pure shite.
1
@wessexmom I just noticed that 8 months ago the guys interviewed a real POS named Christopher Rufo. He's the guy who set of the whole CR thing in America. John Oliver did a video on CRT recently and he pointed out how this guy just chose a topic to dog whistle and ignite a storm. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EICp1vGlh_U It doesn't matter if they are from the LEFT or RIGHT we need to get all of these radicals out of the schools everywhere. Not just America but everywhere.
1
@BasedYoga Thanks I am getting so tired of the politicians and commentators screaming at the "other side" for doing the same things they do. This is why no matter how people vote the same stuff keeps happening. They call in the consultants to justify how they will cut services, sell anything and privatise everything while spending more and more on the military.
1
Go watched the other video where Konstantin Kisin sits opposite his mate Francis and explains Putin's speech where Putin claimed that Ukraine should not even exist. Nigel Farage as usual showed he actually hasn't a damn clue. Remember back when he won his precious Brexit vote. Forgetting if it was right or wrong, the FACT is he immediately resigned from the team. What that meant was that (1st) he didn't expect to win and (2nd) he had NO idea what to do if they won. He had no plan, no ideas and simply threw 67million Brits under his Brexit bus. Like Trump he's another walking talking lump of populist garbage who has no solutions to ANYTHING and creates disasters for other people to clean up.
1
WTF has happened to this channel. 2 years ago you had the label "Interesting conversations with interesting people." Now you just another pair of clowns playing and endless stream of culture war crap. Do I think there are people on the Left who have completely lost the plot and hijacked public discussions on fairness and equality and opportunity? ABSOLUTELY there are people on the Left who are so idiotic that nobody should listen to a word they have to say, but screaming "woke" at everything is equally stupid and equally pathetic.
1
@haroldpearson6025 HEY SHIT4BRAINS NOBODY anywhere is trying to flip any western nation into a Marxist state or impose Marxist economics. Yes there's a few incredibly ignorant clowns who ignore what Pol Pot, The Kim's of North Korea, Stalin, Mao... did and saying some damn stupid stuff. AND YES I will agree with you any day of the week that those people are incredibly ignorant of history. AND YES I will agree with you any day of the week there are some incredibly disgusting bad faith clowns who have hijacked public discussion on things like gender, education and the environment. BUT for FARK SAKE will you people just stop screaming and screeching "socialism," "Marxism" and "woke" at EVERYTHING you don't like. People have had enough of BOTH the Far Left and the Far Right.
1
@brettcohen2832 If you are a right wing neoliberal clown who thinks Ronald Reagan was a genius and Margret Thatcher was a goddess then I'd agree its one of the best interviews of the past decade. On the other hand IF you know a few things like where this guy has worked for the past 20 years as in The CATO Institute and you know who funds that place and what their goals are you'd realise this guy is a snake. I actually agree with about 90% of what he says. Its that other 10% that's an issue. He's one of these people who's adept at hiding 1 lie among 9 facts. He's 100% correct that the energy crisis is the result of bad government policy. He's 100% right that the Greenies have an unrealistic view of nuclear power. HOWEVER the bad government policies that have caused the energy crisis have come from people like Charles Koch and Robert Mercer funding campaigns and lobbying through places like the CATO Institute to stall and interfere in government energy policies. They have also been double funding the nuclear issue. On one side they get people like Marion to say its not so bad and then through back channels fund radical Greenies to scream yell and rant BECAUSE that prevents any sensible public discussion on the subject. Marion's also 100% right that there has been no proper planning for the energy transition, but then the billionaires funding him have prevented any sensible planning through political lobbying to protect the fossil fuel assets. Sorry mate but this guy is incredibly good at telling 9 facts to hide 1 lie.
1
@guidedmeditation2396 Can people like you just STOP LYING. I MEAN REALLY JUST STOP LYING the average CO2 is over 415 PPM. There is no discussion on that. There are monitoring sites all over the world. Just like it was with tobacco we have had enough of the lies. I am an aerospace engineer and NASA sets their CO2 limits by partial pressure not parts per million PPM https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/co2_technical_brief_ochmo.pdf NASA like NOA is quite clear on the current state of CO2 in earths atmosphere. https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/
1
@philsandele Go do a background check on Tupy. He has a reputation for being very selective some data, ignoring other data and out right lying. He is by his own admission at the start of this and employee of the CATO Institute a Right Wing Libertarian Think Tank. That's actually an understatement. CATO is one of the big 3 of billionaire funded RWL Think Tanks. The other 2 are the Heritage Foundation which is famous for running the tobacco cancer denial campaign for Phillip Morris and the Federalist Society famous for funding the promotion of RWL judges throughout the American Federal court system. I'm actually very annoyed with both Konstantin and Francis because they never challenged this guy at all, which makes me wonder how much they were paid for this.
1
That's a good way to put it because the one grievance I have with Konstantin's argument is that one is worse than the other AND THAT'S INCREDIBLY DANGEROUS because that feeds the "we aren't as bad as them" mantra that fanatics OF ALL TYPES have used through history to justify atrocities. I'm somebody who cannot stand it when people let their ideology (political or religious) override logic and common sense and deny the evidence that's right in front of them. I have that issue with Lefties as much as with Right wingers - they both do it. They like to talk about nuance and then throw nuance out the door like Konstantin did with this argument. There's a great line in the film "Enemy at the Gates" where Joseph Fiennes character says something like "Does it matter if our men are shot with German or Russian bullets?" It was in reply to the fact the Russians machinegunned any of their troops who retreated. There is no worse between Facism and Communism or any other "ism" when you let it go unchallenged because when it goes unchallenged you get the maniacs like Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, Mao, Pol Pot,.... etc. and all the misery they bring.
1
@guest4888 Professor Mark Blyth (Brown U.) who is someone these guys need to interview on a regular basis, often refers to a paper written by Michael Kalecki in 1943 "Political Aspects of Full Employment." I finally got round to looking at it this morning while the Internet was down. Its an odd paper by any discipline. It has no graphs, no charts and no formulas it just explains some concepts regarding economics, employment and politics. Its mainly observations and one of them is "But obstinate ignorance is usually a manifestation of underlying political motives." So when you compare these guys and others to main stream media. What you have these guys NOT pushing a political agenda versus main stream media owned by billionaires ALWAYS pushing political agendas. So you have these guys being open and enquiring versus the pig headed obstinance of main stream media that ignores anything they don't like. Your comment struck me as "I was just reading about this a few hours ago" because its right in line with what a Kalecki wrote almost 80 years ago during WW2 about public information and political agendas.
1
@pippo-1073 Its amazing how idiotic people like you are. You point the finger at anyone and everyone you can accusing them OF WHAT YOU DO. Trump politicized EVERYHTING. The Dems politicized EVERYHTING. The GOP politicized EVERYHTING. MSNC, FOX, CNN, OAN they all politicized EVERYHTING you ignorant moron As for Hunters laptop - Where is it? Simple as that who's got it? How nobody including Rudy Giuliani has stepped forward INFRONT of TV camera and said "See, here it is." and shown everyone the serial number and proved its actually Hunters laptop. Its called EVIDENCE moron.
1
@benzemamumba I agree to a point that they are at least at times partisan hacks. But the question is are they doing it deliberately like the "opinion as fact" hacks at MSNBC, CNN, FOX, OAN,... etc. He's definitely failed here by trying to be a serious journalist and simplify a complex problem. I know how complex it is because one of the worlds leading experts talked about this in detail this time LAST YEAR. Dr. Michael Osterholm (who Joe Rogan interviewed right at the start of the pandemic) did a great explanation on mandates and hesitancy. Rogan's interview with him was gold, because Rogan kept his opinions out of the discussion. He asked questions and listened to the answers. Why Rogan hasn't had him back defies logic in my mind. Anyway what Dr. Osterholm described is that there are actually 3 main groups. 1) the pro-vaccine people who just get vaccinated as soon as they can. 2) the anti-vaxxers who just won't and can't be reasoned with. 3) the hesitant who can have an array of reasons and degrees of hesitancy making it a complex subject. Dr. O has decades of experience explained that mandates are meaningless to the first 2 groups. They're simple because their minds are made up, but the hesitant aren't a simple answer and mandates are an added pressure that doesn't help. Often leading to them being even more hesitant. Konstantin has put this all down to 1 simple answer of failed trust, which is just plain WRONG. Good to see someone else spotted it for the failure it is.
1
@menzicosce I found this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDDzR2zSgsM
1
Of course England is less English. The Royal family are German, the only smart guy in this conversation was born in Russia and the Scots actually want to leave. I'm grateful my great great grandparents left this madhouse behind and moved to Australia.
1
That's simply idiotic Right Wing BS. That's exactly the sort of tribal partisan stick a label on something and start screaming garbage she's talking about. Biden's issues are simply that he's part of the political establishment that wants nothing to change. Both Obama and Trump campaigned on change, but in different ways. Obama was "Hope & Change" Trump was MAGA and BOTH FAILED. Obama never really delivered and Trump was simply a wrecking ball when America needs rebuilding. The real issue America has is breaking the control of the establishment and that's not just an American issue its across the entire Western Developed world. We all have these monstrous political establishments that are failing us all. Its why I call COVID "Acid Flu" because its stripped away the veneers we all have and exposed the underlying issues of wealth division, environment, education costs, job & financial security,.... etc. and that list is damn long.
1