Comments by "Tony Wilson" (@tonywilson4713) on "Secular Talk" channel.

  1. 573
  2. 73
  3. 60
  4. 57
  5. 41
  6. 36
  7. 36
  8. 33
  9. 33
  10. 32
  11. 30
  12. 30
  13. 30
  14. HEY KYLE - Can you please get it right. NOBODY is sending money to Ukraine they are sending equipment, most of which has been excess stock pile or older stockpile that was dues for disposal anyway. The actual money is being spent in the countries aiding Ukraine. I'm Australian and all of our assistance ahs been in equipment (mostly vehicles and cannons). All of the vehicles we sent have had to be replaced which has meant jobs. Its very much like exporting product except the country to where you are exporting is NOT PAYING because you're gifting the hardware. SECONDLY: As to the GOP. They are quickly becoming a very serious issue to EVERY NATION that does business with America. Here's a couple of serious questions we are now starting to ask. How do we do business with America when none of us can be certain of the deal being honored? How does international trade continue reliably when most of it is based on the US Dollar? Do any of you Americans realise what the Breton Woods agreement actually did to world trade when the allies all agreed to use the US Dollar as the World's reserve currency? Even though Breton Woods is no longer the effects are still there. Almost all international oil is traded in USD with the exception of Russian oil. Most of the cars and many other products traded across international borders is all done in USD. Even when a dela does NOT involve America at all the deal often involves USD. Either the deal is directly done in USD or the currency exchanges involve backing from the USD. That's what being the Worlds Reserve Currency means. Simply put NOBODY on the planet can afford to have the US Dollar destabilize with maybe the exceptions of Russia, North Korea and Iran AND even they can't really let it happen because they have billions tied up in American assets or hidden away in American banks in places like Idaho. YES Idaho, which has become one the best places on the planet to hide money along with Delaware and Texas.
    26
  15. 22
  16. I'm an Australian engineer but actually graduated from U. Illinois (late 80s - aerospace). Ironically this and many other issues is all the fault of one of Chicago person. Sorry for the longish answer. A couple years ago I started to take more serious look at economics. I'd done Econ 101 as an option and regarded the whole subject as a joke. But eventually I had to accept that Economists have incredible influence. As an engineer I got tired of being asked "What's the business case for that?" or "Who's going to pay for that?" and no matter the answer its never enough. I eventually realised its always from people with economics backgrounds. Even those with business degrees have a core of economics education and certain things are hardwired into that education. So I chose to learn about them so I might have a chance of dealing with them. The person at fault is Milton Freidman the famous University of Chicago Professor, who's theories became the foundation of Reaganomics and Thatcherism that we now call neoliberalism. Its been adopted across the entire Western World. His solution to every problem was free market capitalism combined with small government. Its been preached without challenge (or so little its irrelevant) to 4 generations of Western civilisation - boomers, gen -x, millennials and Zoomers. I say preach not teach quite deliberately because anyone who questions free market capitalism is treated like a heretic. If you look at almost any Western Nation right now there are serious issues with basic services and infrastructure. It varies from place to place, but its the same root cause - Milton Freidman's ideology. He had some great lines like "Greed is good" but his line about "Corporations have no other obligation but to deliver profits to owners" that's at the center of these problems. Don't forget that energy, water, waste water, roads, bridges, transportation,... etc are all engineered systems. All the rest of you just assume that us engineers can just deliver this stuff. People are so accustomed to turning on a tap or flipping a light switch they never consider what it takes to make that happen. You all assume we are listened to by management, but we aren't. We constantly get pushback with those 2 questions "What's the business case for that?" or "Who's going to pay for that?" and no answer is ever good enough. Remember Ronald Reagans famous catch cry "Government isn't the solution. Government is the problem." That was pure Milton Friedman philosophy. Another of his lines is "free markets are the most efficient way to run society" has shaped many government decisions IRRESPECTIVE of the the political ideology of those in charge. Don't forget that all the basic economics classes are the same with text books out of Harvard, Yale, Princeton,... etc. So even the most lefty government is riddled with economists all trained in free market economics. In my home state of Victoria it was a Left Wing government that sold off the train system and the power stations. They told us the same line everyone hears: "free market competition will provide better services and lower costs to consumers." * BUT how can that be true when the corporations who have just bought those public assets have "no other obligation than to deliver profits to their owners?"* We now have to subsidise those corporations who bought our rail system. Our power bills are up over 400% and we have our own version of the energy crisis. The problem is Milton Freidman was WRONG and it should have been obvious that he was WRONG, but to question his ideology and its offspring of Reaganomics and Thatcherism is to labelled a heretic. I hate to see this happen to Chicago but it was a Chitown native who brought this shite down upon us all. Sorry for the long answer.
    22
  17. 21
  18. 21
  19. 21
  20. I'm Australian and been to Texas a few times and it was always great. So it saddens me to see Greg Abbott NOT get tossed out on his ass. BUT what it highlights is this bizarre thing that EVERY society in history does. People actually chose to ignore the FACTS regarding political leaders no matter what we know they do and will do again. I hate to admit it but we not only have Greg Abbott types in Oz but we keep re-electing them. We have our crass billionaire Trumpist in Clive Palmer who even ran the same election strategy as Trump. We have a clown named Pauline Hanson who you'd swear is Marjorie Greene's long lost crazy Australian aunt. We have a guy named Craig Kelly who walks, talks, and acts like a hybrid between Ron Johnson & Joe Manchin with an Australian voice track. We have our version of Andrew Cuomo a guy named John Barilaro. Look at the similarities. He's from our biggest East coast city - Sydney. He's corrupt and had to be removed from office. He even tried to move to New York and have the government pay for it. Although it's not a reflection of Italian people, like Cuomo he's of Italian descent. Whatever you have in America, everyone else has them too. The only difference is how much noise they make. If you look at Britain they have a guy named Nigel Farage who led the Brexit campaign. There's famous footage of him (with supporters) proclaiming how the British "got the country back!" Almost immediately after the Brexit vote he resigned his official posts and refused calls to help negotiate the exit. Forget whether Brexit is good or bad, he created the greatest mess in recent British history and then dumped it onto others to clean up the mess. So you might ask how would anyone give a clown like Nigel Farage any time other than to tell him to FK-OFF? Farage just did a tour of Australia and people actually PAID MONEY to listen to him talk. Steve Bannon does talks all over the world and people PAY MONEY to hear him talk. Never underestimate human stupidity or ignorance.
    20
  21. 20
  22. Its not due to blatant corruption its blatant mismanagement that stems from idiotic economics policies. I'm an engineer and this is the shite we are trapped in. Across every industry and area that we operate in there a clowns with business, accounting and economics degrees who interfere in everything. It stems from a couple of things. First is there own self importance. They think that titles like manager mean they have to micromanage everyone and everything. Second They are trained to avoid spending and costs and it unbelievably pervasive. Have you ever heard how the Left have infiltrated universities and education??? Well its true, stone cold motherless true and most noticeable in humanities. Its also just as stone motherless true that the Right have infiltrated business and law schools. Its a system where they certain sacrosanct principles are to be leant NOT questioned. One of those is the principle of lowering costs. That gets practised as "spend as little as possible and delay everything possible to future dates when they are someone else's problem." This is also known as "kicking the can down the road" and it is practiced EVERYWHERE. No joke, they go to college and for 4 years they are told - lower costs & cut spending, lower costs & cut spending, lower costs & cut spending,..... as if it is some form of mystic mantra that will fix the world. And the easiest way to do that is DELAY & DELAY until its someone else's problem. I'm Australian but did my degree in America, I live in Oz but have worked in Canada and I can watch the news from anywhere these days. ITS THE SAME STORY EVERYWHERE and in EVERY INDUSTRY. Failures through spending cuts to maintenance.
    19
  23. 19
  24. Lets be crystal clear about this. It involves CERTAIN people who are neither representative of bulk of Israeli people or the bulk of Jewish society world wide and that's evident by the number of Jewish people speaking out AGAINST what the Netanyahu government is doing. I'm NOT Jewish, I'm Australian, but went to college in America in the LATE 80s and had several Jewish friends. After an incident at a party where I was accosted and threatened by a couple of Jewish students one of my Jewish friends explained it to me. Note - This was ~35 years ago and he referred to them as Ultra-Zionists. He did NOT call them Zionists but was very specific about the term Ultra, which these days we generally use with the term *Ultra-nationalist. Like we have with certain people in Russia and Ukraine. Back in the 90s we used similar terminology with certain elements within the Serb and Croat communities as well as in Rwanda. 35 Years ago that friend told me something very important. EVERY tribe, cultural group and nation has these people. We just don't like admitting it. They are most easily identified by their claims to be "protecting their culture" or "protecting their cultural heritage." We saw that with the Nazis and their claims of protecting Aryan culture. We see it with Putin and his claims of protecting Russian culture. We saw it during the late 90s with the Serbs, Croats and Albanians in the former Yugoslavia. We saw it with the Hutu and Tutsi in Rwanda. We have people here in Australia who claim time and time again they want to protect Australian Culture from immigration. Occasionally we even elect them to Parliament. What we are seeing right no in Gaza is what happens when Ultra-Nationalists get enough political power to unleash on who they blame or identify as the threat to their culture.
    19
  25. Lets be crystal clear about this. It involves CERTAIN people who are neither representative of bulk of Israeli people or the bulk of Jewish society world wide and that's evident by the number of Jewish people speaking out AGAINST what the Netanyahu government is doing. I'm NOT Jewish, I'm Australian, but went to college in America in the LATE 80s and had several Jewish friends. After an incident at a party where I was accosted and threatened by a couple of Jewish students one of my Jewish friends explained it to me. Note - This was ~35 years ago and he referred to them as Ultra-Zionists. He did NOT call them Zionists but was very specific about the term Ultra, which these days we generally use with the term *Ultra-nationalist. Like we have with certain people in Russia and Ukraine. Back in the 90s we used similar terminology with certain elements within the Serb and Croat communities as well as in Rwanda. 35 Years ago that friend told me something very important. EVERY tribe, cultural group and nation has these people. We just don't like admitting it. They are most easily identified by their claims to be "protecting their culture" or "protecting their cultural heritage." We saw that with the Nazis and their claims of protecting Aryan culture. We see it with Putin and his claims of protecting Russian culture. We saw it during the late 90s with the Serbs, Croats and Albanians in the former Yugoslavia. We saw it with the Hutu and Tutsi in Rwanda. We have people here in Australia who claim time and time again they want to protect Australian Culture from immigration. Occasionally we even elect them to Parliament. What we are seeing right no in Gaza is what happens when Ultra-Nationalists get enough political power to unleash on who they blame or identify as the threat to their culture.
    18
  26. 17
  27. 17
  28. 17
  29. 16
  30. 16
  31. 16
  32. AUSTRALIAN HERE: I have been trying to ell Americans for over 35 years they they DO NOT have an actual Left like the rest of the Western World does. What you actually have are 2 right wing parties with one of them being MORE to the right than the other. You DO NOT have a party like Britain's Labor Party or the similarly named parties in Australia, New Zealand and a few other places that STARTED out of their Labor Union movements. Here in Australia the Labor Party was the political wing of the ACTU (Australian Council of Trade Unions). You do NOT have anything like the Socialist parties in mainland Europe. The American Democrats started in the American South and were the party of the Confederacy and the Klux Klux Klan were a militant offshoot of the Southern Democrats. It was the Republicans under Lincoln who were the progressive party and freed the slaves. How do I know this never having taken a single class in political science or American History? I went to college in America in the late 80s in a time when they still taught CIVICS and I was surrounded by 100s of other WELL EDUCATED intelligent students who KNEW American History and HOW the American Governmental system worked and they explained it to me time at great length. What staggers me more than anything these days is how little American's seem to know or understand of their own history and how their government actually works. THAT USED to be one of America's GREAT STRENGTHS. It blew my mind a couple of years ago when I asked someone what changed and found out Bush had defunded Civics in American High Schools. Years later having seen the pro's of teaching Civics and the cons of NOT teaching civics I am absolutely convinced that ANY Democratic society, INCLUDING Australia, that wants long term stability should tech their version of it and that it should made available to EVERY citizen so that they can go back and check or review things. I remember moments of feeling embarrassed that I didn't know as much about HOW Australia functions as my American classmates did about America. I think American's should now feel embarrassed for what they have thrown away.
    16
  33. 15
  34. 15
  35. 15
  36. 15
  37. 15
  38. 15
  39. 15
  40. 14
  41. I'm Australian but went to college in America. So I have a fairly reasonable understanding of both American politics and its effects on the rest of the world AND YOU HAVE SUMMED IT UP PERFECTLY. Hilary lost because of her own stupid arrogance. Maybe I could see it because I was on the outside looking in, but to me it was so damn obvious. And the fact she is still around being idiotically arrogant is a blight on the human race not just American politics. For those interested here's an explanation of what I saw from the outside looking in. America is unusual in that it has voluntary voting, in that you can chose NOT to vote at all. In Australia we have compulsory voting. You have to be on the electoral role and you have to show up, but because we also have preferential voting rather than first past the post we tend to get fairly decent results (but not always). America's problem is that you can basically vote DNC, RNC or NOT at all and if you chose to NOT vote then the selection is left to those who are politically motivated to either the DNC or RNC. So its incredibly important that candidates motivate people TO TURN UP AND VOTE. I told people here in Australia months out from the 2016 election Hilary was going to lose because I knew she'd lost the rust belt. There was that moment when she said she didn't need to campaign in Michigan because they'd vote Blue anyway and instead she stayed in New York doing campaign dinners to raise money. She completely forgot that it was those same New York elites at those dinners who'd made the decisions to shut down the rust belt and send their jobs to China, Mexico, Texas,.....etc. So rather than motivating people Hilary discouraged people across the rust belt. Go and look at the results and Hilary became the first Democrat to lose all 3 of Michigan, Ohio and Penn since Dukakis lost all 3 to Bush Snr. Even Gore and Kerry each won 2 of those states. She lost all 3 and it was all because of her arrogant dismissal of people. If she'd won those 3 states she'd have won. It might have been easier to see form the outside looking in but from my perspective it was obvious that Hilary waving the middle finger to Michigan was idiotic.
    14
  42. 14
  43. 14
  44. 14
  45. 13
  46. 13
  47. 13
  48. 13
  49. 13
  50. 13