Comments by "Tony Wilson" (@tonywilson4713) on "Secular Talk" channel.

  1. 13
  2. 13
  3. 13
  4. 12
  5. 12
  6. 12
  7. 12
  8. 11
  9. Australian here and I went to college in America - sadly you are wrong. Bernie would have been slaughtered in a US Presidential Election for the simple reason that the US Presidential election does not follow common sense. The very system itself has now morphed into an unusual form of popularity contest where logic, reason and sensibility are meaningless. Its not that other elections in other countries have similar aspects to them. Its just that the US Presidential election does it at another level. I'm old enough to remember the Carter-Reagan elections and nobody in the world could believe someone as stupid as Reagan clearly was, got elected. The exception were the business leaders because they knew it was the start of a new economic model that greatly favored them. I was actually in America (1987) at college when the 1988 election season was starting. The Dem front-runner was Gary Hart. He was charismatic like Reagan but far more intelligent. Then he was accused of extra-marital affairs and his campaign was done. His wife came out and publicly declared that although their marriage had struggled it was now doing well and she believed her husband was still the best man for the job. THAT DID NOT MATTER and his policies did not matter, because there were Americans who's great fear was the Russians sending girls over to "suck the secrets out of American leaders" AND YES THEY SAID IT LIKE THAT. And this is the point of me telling you why Bernie would never have won a US Presidential election. The Republicans have operated on FEAR for decades. Its their only policy at times. They find something for people to be scared of and wind the volume up to 11. In Bernie's case that fear is socialism. Forget that Bernie's brand of socialism would get every American health care and an education. The fear to America is that he'd tax the rich to pay for it and if you tax the rich they'd stop investing in jobs for average Americans. The GOP sell that as "Forget what you'd get and embrace the fear of what you'd lose." Sorry, but its an incredibly easy tactic and the Republicans have decades of experience using it. They either scare people into NOT voting for a person who wants to make their life better or they scare people into the arms of the guy who says he will protect American values.
    11
  10. 11
  11. 11
  12. 11
  13. 11
  14. 11
  15. 11
  16. 11
  17. 11
  18. 11
  19. 11
  20. 11
  21. 11
  22. 10
  23. 10
  24. About the same for me. A while back I watched a couple of his lectures that were from a few years back (from before his got into the political stuff) and he was a pretty good college professor who knew his subject and handled questions from students really well. I just watched one of his podcasts on climate change with Dr. Richard Lindzen. Its not a podcast I'd recommend to anyone unless they understand various topics especially complex system modelling. because its not so much what they say BUT WHAT THEY LEAVE OUT. I studied aerospace engineering and got trained in complex modelling and complex systems analysis. Stuff like aerodynamics, complex structures and spacecraft dynamics. They were both very right about the issues with research funding at universities. But then Lindzen is also incredibly dishonest in a few times. He does NOT lie about anything but he LEAVES OUT information on complex system modelling. Unless you have a background in that stuff you'd never spot it. Where Peterson really shows his colors is in his repeated references to people like Alex Epstein and Bjorn Lomberg who are 2 of the most dishonest people on the planet. They're first class gold medal cherry pickers with data & information and both are very sneaky how they present it. They aren't alone but the same sorts of discredited people keep turning up on podcasts (like the one Peterson hosts) where they know they WONT be challenged. I noted Peterson also had on Dr. Jay Bhattacharya who's been totally discredited and yet keeps turning up on these sorts of podcasts which profess to be honest public discussions but just aren't. I watched Bhattacharya and Economist Gigi Foster on Jon Anderson's (Former Australian Deputy Prime Minister) podcast and they STRAIGHT OUT LIED about Australia's COVID response. And I don't mean they made a mistake they outright lied. Especially Foster who's just a disgusting liar. It was some of her information that Saagar Enjeti made an clown out of himself last week.
    10
  25.  @EhThisIsAGoodName  Good points but as to nations considering America as a threat to peace, that's not so clear. I'm Australian and certainly there would be Australians who consider that right, but as a nation that's not strictly true. The one thing that has dramatically changed is America's reputation. Prior to 9/11 POTUS was often introduced as "The leader of the Free World." Most Westerners took that with a grain of salt considering it more hubris that fact. But these days if anyone tried to introduce POTUS with that expression they would be laughed from the room. I actually went to college in America (late 80s) and was there during the time of Iran-Contra. My girlfriend at the time lamented one day about the "damage being done to the office of the President." It was an odd expression that took years for me to grasp. There was a time in America when the OFFICE not the person occupying it was a semi-sacred place that deserved RESPECT. My girlfriend was lamenting the damage being done to the office and not Reagan. I'd now contend that every President since has continued to erode that respect. Bush 1 with "read my lips no new taxes" and then came new taxes. Clinton - blowjob (say no more). Bush 2 started a war based on a lie, opened a gulag in Cuba and then signed off on torture as he threw out the Geneva Convention. Obama promised "hope & change" and was hopeless at bringing any change. What ever was left after Obama Trump simply obliterated. If there is any perception of threat its more in the "what if a worse version of Trump gets elected in future?" Almost a bigger question is - what does that even mean? Australia (like a few others) has backed the F35 as a key part of its future security. What might another Trumpist who sucks up to dictators mean for that or any other long standing cooperation or treaty. I was in Canada when Trump tore up NAFTA. I was there among Canadians as Trump literally told them to F--K OFF. Its hard to describe what that moment was like. For an Australian it was like - what's he going to do to us. We found out when China retaliated against Australian exports. So I wouldn't yet describe America as a threat to world peace, BUT I would have no hesitation in calling America an UNRELIABLE PARTNER. And that's a scary thought considering the Chinese plans for domination.
    10
  26. 10
  27. 10
  28. 10
  29. 10
  30. 10
  31. 9
  32. 9
  33. 9
  34. 9
  35. 9
  36. 9
  37. 9
  38. 9
  39. 9
  40. 9
  41. 9
  42. 9
  43. 9
  44. 9
  45. 9
  46. 8
  47. I'm Australian and looking from the outside in YOU are 100% CORRECT. This will change ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. One of my old bosses here in Australia is a 100% Trumpist. He's NOT American, he's Australian and NOTHING, not any fact no matter how irrefutable will change his mind. It all comes from the fact that his support base comes from the Bottom 50% of developed society that has been left behind. In late 2022 I became aware of a Congressional Budget Office report on Family WEALTH. Kyle is one of the very few people to ever comment on that report. I emphasis that its on WEALTH and is about what people gain over time. It simply says that the Bottom 50% of America society has gone NOWHERE since that late 70s. They have basically gained NOTHING while the Middle 40% have gained some but the Top 10% have gained double digit Trillions. During Obama's last 3 years in office (less than 10 years after causing the GFC and getting bailed out) the Top 10% gained $18.3 TRILLION. The Bottom 50% of America gained $0.4 Trillion ($400 Million) over the same 3 years. I checked what I can of Australia's data and it tells the same story. I watch British Economist Gary Stevenson's channel here on YT and he says the same about Britain. These people just don't car about any of these stories. They see Trump as their wrecking ball and bulldozer who's just going to tear the system apart. They don't care what comes afterwards just so long as the system that's wrecked and squeezed their lives into oblivion gets torn apart. I can't blame them for hating the system and wanting it ripped to shreds as its totally understandable, but they need to care about what comes afterwards because we all have to live with it.
    8
  48. 8
  49. 8
  50. 8