Comments by "Tony Wilson" (@tonywilson4713) on "Secular Talk" channel.

  1. 3
  2. 3
  3. 3
  4. 3
  5. 3
  6. 3
  7. 3
  8. 3
  9. 3
  10. Well pointed out this is a matter of definition. I'm an aerospace engineer who did post graduate research. What angers me so much with this argument is that we are NOT getting a clear picture of what the NIH was doing in Wuhan. I remember that May 11 confrontation, because it was just after the Wade Nichols article, and yes I know there's been some debunking of that article. -> https://thebulletin.org/2021/05/the-origin-of-covid-did-people-or-nature-open-pandoras-box-at-wuhan/ But following on from that article others posted links to these NIH project reports which clearly show NIH funding to Ecohealth Alliance and managed by Peter Daszak for Corona virus research in China. https://reporter.nih.gov/search/xQW6UJmWfUuOV01ntGvLwQ/project-details/9491676 https://reporter.nih.gov/search/xQW6UJmWfUuOV01ntGvLwQ/project-details/9819304 I'm not a virologist or epidemiologist (an most of us aren't). I do know what researchers can be like. At times very fine details and definitions are incredibly important because they can be doing work that is right at the balance point between 1 definition and another. For anyone who has never done research or development that's more common than you think. I did a water treatment plant a couple of years back where we had to be EXTREMELY careful about everything we said or wrote in emails and reports because there were 2 competing companies, both with patents pending that were very, very close in what they claimed as original work. Its quite possible that how researchers define Gain of Function and where they draw the line between it and other methods might not make sense to the rest of us but makes perfect sense to them. We DO NEED is clarity from an expert in the field as to why certain research is regarded as Gain of Function and some is NOT. I don't want to hear from any more commentators or politicians about this - I WANT TO HEAR FROM AN EXPERT.
    3
  11. 3
  12. 3
  13. 3
  14. Its what you have in democracies where there is NOT a clear mandate by one party having a clear majority OR you don't have strong leadership. When parties only have a slender majority they're always at risk having a small faction within them with the BALANCE OF POWER and those who hold it can often hold their nation to ransom. I'm Australian and we have had this problem here at times. Countries like Israel, Greece and Italy are notorious for having minor parties wield enormous power this way. The Tea Party were the last to do this in a big way in America, but more recently we saw it with Kirsten Sinema and Joe Manchin all through Joe Biden's first 2 years. The only way to get past it is with STRONG LEADERSHIP. Sorry but neither Joe Biden or Kevin McCarthy are strong leaders, they got where they are through sweetheart deals. Its grating to say it but Trump was and still is a person who's strong enough to bully and muscle his way in politics and get people to do what he wants. Think of how they all folded - Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham,... etc. One of the few exceptions was when Mike Pence refused to delay the vote counting. I hate to say it but this is why people tend to vote for scum like Trump. YES they know he's scum but they don't care because all they know he can bully all the other spineless clowns and get stuff done. Tragic as it was a lot of people around the world predicted Trump would beat Hilary, but what it also did was motivate millions of American's to get off their asses for a change and vote against him. The next POTUS is going to decide the fate of the western world. Either they will be strong enough to drag clowns like Sinema and Manchin and just roll right over idiots like Gaetz and MTG or the next 2-3 decades are going to be very rough for ALL OF US.
    3
  15. 3
  16. 3
  17. 3
  18. 3
  19. 3
  20. 3
  21. 3
  22. 3
  23. 3
  24. 3
  25. 3
  26. 3
  27.  @conorhealy2763  On the left v right. I consider myself a true neutral. So I can can understand why I seem like a bit of both, but that's also got a lot to do with 2 particular people. My grandmother was a card carrying member of the Australian Liberal party (our centre right party). Her daughter (my mother) was a teacher and unionist, who fought and won a battle over "equal pay for equal experience" in the mid 1970s. Both were incredibly honest about the faults of their own sides. My grandmother hated that many on the right just wanted girls to stay home, cook, clean and make babies. My grandmother ran businesses and was one of the first women in the state of Victoria to have a drivers license and own her own car and she was a farm girl. She hated the clowns on the right because they used to tell her to go home, be a good girl and cook dinner. My mother was what many would call a socialist but she utterly hated most leftists and particularly feminists. She saw them as nothing but clowns who endlessly complained while she believed in getting things done. After the team she was on won that wage claim and got all the women teachers equal pay for equal experience, the feminists went crazy. It shouldn't make sense, BUT by winning that claim they took away one of the soap boxes the feminists loved to stand on and howl at the world. So I have this quite odd background where I got educated in BOTH sides including their negatives. It took me years to work it out but what my grandmother and mother hated most of all were career politicians.
    3
  28. 3
  29. 3
  30. 3
  31. 3
  32. 3
  33. 3
  34. 3
  35. 3
  36. 3
  37. 3
  38. 3
  39. That's a very similar argument that's been raging here in Australia for most of the last 30 years. Under the mantra (and its only a mantra) "ALL FOREIGN investment is good" because its CASH coming into the economy. The banks love it because they get the currency transfer fees. Where this has been a disaster for us is that we have become a great place for people to hide money in housing properties (both houses and apartments). That has jacked up the price of housing to insane levels. The banks love it (as said) BUT - so do the real estate agents because they get bigger fees. - so do the people who are selling especially retirees who are cashing out their investment properties. - so do the developers of large apartment complexes. For everyone else its a farking nightmare because BOTH rental prices are soaring and house prices are soaring. The catastrophe that' snow beginning to unwind is that people can NO LONGER take out loans because they just can't afford them. Then there's 1,000s of people who bought when interest rates were low but they bought at premium prices and now that interest rates are rising they many of them are under immense mortgage stress. PLUS we have between 5 and 25% increase in electricity due to 20+ years of stupidity (FYI - I'm an engineer) that's hammering every part of the economy because every house and every business (largest to smallest) need electricity. This stupid policy of "All foreign investment is good" is killing my country just like its killing other countries.
    3
  40. 3
  41. 3
  42. 3
  43. 3
  44. 3
  45. 3
  46. 3
  47. 3
  48. 3
  49. 3
  50. 3