Comments by "" (@NotSoGood-765) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1.  @unduloid  No, I am really curious where I did not make my homework. Really. I do not even know for what you made your comment. But as I am in this area for a while, I am curious, so please do not run away from a debate. Maybe I am wrong on something.
    1
  2.  @unduloid  No, you did nothing like that. As I wrote I do not even know with what you argue.
    1
  3.  @unduloid  But what I think you realized you were wrong and just trying to get away.
    1
  4.  @unduloid  Right on what? What was my comment you reacted?
    1
  5.  @unduloid  I still do not know what comment you reacted to, but i watched the video partially. I do not know who made it. but had no overview on military development, geopolitics or anything overall, even the prices were a joke. there is no F35 alternative for Europe and F35 is cheaper than typical European 4th gens. South Korean, US co-development and israeli weapon system are flawed in the same way: US knows everything about them, also controls 3rd party manufacturers. Gripen is partially US btw. So yeah, as I thought you have no idea.
    1
  6.  @smartin_b5314  Russia has 5th gen, just not enough.The 6th gen is not even specified correctly by experts, its requirements are under debates. Ongoing developments happen all over the world, but seeing how joint developments worked in the past in the EU I have strong doubts how will it end.
    1
  7.  @yannduchnock  Gosh, that was enermous amount of .... lets say politely not knowing things.Rafale is a great 4-4.5 gen fighter, but not a stealth fighter. In air combat it cannot detect the F35 while it could see and aim it. Nothing matters then. But at least costs more than F35 wirh less advancement. The only area it is better when it comes to hourly flying cost.
    1
  8.  @smartin_b5314  China as far as we know got top secret docs about f35 through spying. Still the J20 is not in pair with F35 as far as we know. And money does not solve everything. Germany will not make huge spenditure on military, they already suffer on economic level because of their own stu.pedity. Big words as always and no guts for anything. Germany in a few words.
    1
  9.  @smartin_b5314  And I state that in Europe there us no real security threat, we are used by fearmongering to put more money on US accounts on longer term. There will be no massive rearmament in Europe as there is no reason to do that. Even our dum.b leaders know that, that is why they did almost nothing in the last 3 years. Now they say things, but words are cheap. Russia HAS 5th gen fighters, we saw them on various occasions. Not as sophisticated as F22 or F35, but there are some. On the other hand we do not know if they were used in Ukraine or not. They claim they were used, we cannot prove or disprove it. Stealth is about this. Also they do not need to risk them as regular planes just do the jobs well.
    1
  10.  @smartin_b5314  It seems YT dele.ted my comment again.
    1
  11.  @smartin_b5314  So. Turkish development timeline is questionable for me. Compare the timeline with F 35 dev while the US had experience with not just F22, but earlier stealth planes. Shape is a thing, sensor fusion, metallurgy, composites are a different thing. And F35 is still not perfect and suffers a lot, almost every year they discover something. I do not think for a moment Europe would do better.
    1
  12.  @smartin_b5314  European joint project typically failures. Happened with MBTs. Happened with Eurofighter and Eurocopter. France and Germany simple cannot work well together in the most of the cases. Even when it is not a complete failure like Typhoon, it results terrible pricing with less capabilities compared to competition. There are successful projects like the Meteor will be (probably), but Europe is divided like hell. It means terrible logistics, conflicting national interests, etc. You want artillery? From which European manufacturer? Which should give up its profit and make boots instead of sophisticated weapon systems?
    1
  13.  @smartin_b5314  Also including UK to project means sharing dev data with the US. Not a great way of independency, when US knows literally everything about your systems. And where is nuclear deterrence? UK nukes are US nukes, French nukes belong to France, whatever Micron says. After struggles in De Gaulle era France will never sacrifice Paris for Warsaw.
    1
  14.  @smartin_b5314  I test if I could reply wit.out del.etion.
    1
  15. ​ @jorgenlarsen775 Europe will not. There is no country called Europe. An no threaths in Europe.
    1
  16. @billalumni9142  China is not a problem at all. USA just want to be the hegemon forever. Well. all empires fall sooner or later.
    1
  17.  @Lawrence-lj5jz  No, Trump just did what puppet masters wanted. Russia will lick its wounds, Ukraine is demolished, but mosg importantly Europe cut ties with Russia, what weakened Europe in every aspect, so no more competition from there. US now has left only China to deal with.
    1
  18.  @jorgenlarsen775  I know too much. Unfortunately. For Europe.
    1
  19.  @JaZy-0_0  No, I live in CEE. No security threats were here, except from US side regime change attempts..
    1
  20.  @dethtongue945  Completely wrong. The only thing is what more overpriced than a US military hardware is the European equivalent. Except that the European one is typically half as capable.
    1
  21.  @TuckFrump-AAB463  The US never loved Europe. Are you living in some alternative universe? Western Europe was a US interest, handled that way.
    1
  22.  @francescoguzzetta  My nation is surely not EU as no nation called EU exists. And EU cannot save Ukraine.
    1
  23.  @francescoguzzetta  :d
    1
  24.  @aimformyheadplease  You are clearly have no idea what top tier means in 2025.
    1
  25.  @aimformyheadplease  God, why guys who has no view on military comment about military?
    1
  26.  @gameburn178  That is ridiculous. Gripen. God save me. That is partially US made, too,
    1
  27.  @sardo.numspa  UK is not a major power, just the 51th state of the US without voting rights.
    1
  28.  @SteveLoughran  Ukraine is not building stuff. Assembling stuff mostly.
    1
  29.  @Qwerty-jy9mj  Because 15 years ago there was no military threat in Europe and the corrupt politicians on US payroll were active in destroying European military industry.
    1
  30.  @Slavic_Goblin  Us does what is its interest.
    1
  31.  @TomEugelink  No own CPUs, no own OS, no own satellite coverage and no nations could working together without permanent tensions. Take a look on past joint developments. Nearly all failed or resulted a failed product with a higher price tag than an american one.
    1
  32.  @markbkjaer  On which issue?
    1
  33.  @mag-s7  More like a joke.
    1
  34.  @angusgow1887  They sent their junk because it was cheaper if Russia disassembles them. ;) But funnily before that they were called superior western game changer wonder weapons.
    1
  35.  @dethtongue945  Eurocopter Tiger? Eurofighter?
    1
  36. @sardo.numspa  And your reply clearly defines your skills.
    1
  37.  @dethtongue945  Check your numbers, please. F35 exists in 3 different versions. And that 5th generation plane costs less than a Eurofighter or Gripen which are 4-4.5 gen. Also from manufacturing aspect the cost of a weapon program does not matter at all. The per unit price matters.
    1
  38. @sardo.numspa Still no arguments. Nafo Macbook Air Battalion?
    1
  39. @gameburn178  You somehow think Trump rules the USA. No. America is ruled from behind the curtain. And the ruling elite will always keep the interests of the US in mind. US will never let Europe to be independent. It took decades to cut it from Russia completely, very old project. And in a multipolar world US needs Europe even more as an asset. So no, USA just wants Europe to pay more for the US military complex. And that will happen. Also US - who is behind the war in Ukraine - will put as much cost of rebuilding on Europe as possible. That makes Europe even more weaker.
    1
  40. @dethtongue945  You just wrote: the scale of production matters. I do not know you want to argue or you are really interested. But example: make your own smartphone, just 1 piece. Develop everything for that phone. Screens, cpu, ram, etc. Everything from zero. It will cost enermous amount. But it will cost less than a full iPhone factory where the same happened and makes millions of the same phone. And that phone is in your price range because all dev and manufacturing cost paid divided on million pieces. Aviation is similar. F35 by its capabilities should be more expensive than Eurofighter. But so many F35 was ordered and delivered and so few Eurofighter that the less capable costs more at the end. Funny, but this is how 'mass production' works. Development cost does not matter. What matters how many plane manufactured to cover that development cost with a proper profit margin outside the manufacturing cost.
    1
  41. @grahamstrouse1165  In what?
    1
  42. @dethtongue945  I give up then as basic logic does not work for you. For others: F35A is better then Eurofighter Tranch 4 (simplification) F35A price in 2024 is about 80-85 million USD. Eurofighter Tranch 4 price is about 110+ million USD in 2024. Everything depends of course on the magnitude of the order, the buyer, the training, the accessories, etc., the political background, were they part of the development or not..Many factors.
    1
  43.  @gbosman5874  Airbus makes great civilian aircrafts.
    1
  44.  @TomEugelink  Yes, we have the theoretical potential. Making it work requires decades. BTW I did not thought for navigation satellites, I thought of recon satellites with global coverage. AI based drones require high end chip manufacturing. Linux is the simplest solution, afaik Russia uses a Linux for their stuff, too. But check joint development programs in the past.... total headache. MBTs, fighters...where France and Germany have to work together...pain. And eveything is crazily pricey, what kills export compared to US assets where the size of the internal market and the heavily war-dependent politics together makes a more viable business. And US will do everything to reduce the competition, it is a miracle that Airbus was able to beat Boeing in airliners.
    1
  45.  @mag-s7  They offer outstanding products fot competitive prices like....oops, they do not.
    1
  46.  @v8pilot  De Gaulle was a pita, but he knew US would never sacrifice Washington for Paris.
    1
  47.  @aimformyheadplease  Not really a word meets facts, but hey, who cares.
    1
  48. i cannot stop laughing on the circus we get, while nothing changes....
    1
  49. @rogerkarlsson3996  Gripen is a joke in 2025. Whatever you put in it, it is still 4th generation. Europe has no top level military aviation products at all, not even a dam.ned attack helicopter what works properly. See the Chinese, they do real development. And South Korea... they allied to the US and on the opposite side of Eurasia. Good luck with that distance.
    1
  50. Not even mentioning internal tensions made all joint development crazy in the last many decades and the leaders happy to sell out national interests as US vas.sals.
    1