General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Debany Doombringer
Actual Justice Warrior
comments
Comments by "Debany Doombringer" (@debanydoombringer1385) on "Actual Justice Warrior" channel.
Previous
2
Next
...
All
So he's really a capitalist. Otherwise he'd do it all for free or at the lowest fee a speaker makes in the US. His books would also only be priced at the point there is zero profit.
13
@twistedinnocence8617 They aren't coming from those areas. Those areas aren't seeing the population decline cities are. This entire video is about people fleeing these cities.
13
They're intentionally framing it backwards. Private property rights is one of the foundations of western countries and the right to defend it. Everyone should be well aware that a person has the right to defend their property. It's the person trying to take your property that's decided it's worth the risk to their life. They should be fully aware that the property owner can end them.
13
In the comics his origin story is now he was somehow created by 2 women. So yeah they’re just destroying it where they can.
12
So all the big gas stations near the interstate can stay open, but all the little ones will have to close. I've seen this before.
12
@spearfisherman308 There are lots of different dates people assign the party "switch" to. However, there is zero evidence of any major party switch. You'll have one or two, but no massive switch. Trying to put significance to a couple switching out of thousands in office is creating a mountain out of a molehill in an attempt to try to score some type of political points. It's like saying Ronald Reagan switching shows a party switch.
12
They shouldn't give you a contract like you know nothing about them. Edit because it changed nothing to North for some reason.
12
The claim that Crowder didn't send a counter offer was from Jeremy's video. He said Steven said that he couldn't accept any of it and to send a new. Jeremy said they never did. Crowder never said he didn't send a counter offer. He said it's not about the money and got offered more from another place to make his point. Crowder never said anything about how many offers were sent, how long he'd talked with DW or anything. His first video was general and didn't get into specifics except the terms and penalties. Said he'd received several offers like the one he showed in his first 30 minute video. Jeremy's hour long video is where Crowder made no counter came from and that DW didn't send another offer. Crowder's second video was short and didn't say anything about how many offers. So if Crowder did send a counter offer, Jeremy's lying too.
12
@justinortiz9350 Not true. What do you think most domestic calls are? There are also calls when someone is acting erratically as is the case with this. They do indeed respond to those calls. They have to make sure the subject isn't a danger so they can be taken in to receive the help they need. The police should respond if you are in imminent danger regardless if the threats were only verbal. 911 isn't going to listen to your recording of being threatened. That's only if the person threatening isn't currently near you for you to take to the police to show a pattern. That's not for when you're in danger of imminent harm as was clearly the case here. What you're describing is a slow escalation of a threat, what she's describing is imminent danger. Completely different things.
11
Yeah. You don't replace an entire fence because one board broke. The learning, though, is a completely different issue. That means it does need to be replaced. It's likely rotted below the surface. The house we bought 5 years ago had the original fence from when it was built in the 90s. We're slowly replacing it because it's rotting.
11
They did do good documentaries at one time. Really gritty investigative stuff. Then they went nuts.
11
He'll get a copyright strike for that. You can only show a few seconds and then commentary to avoid it.
11
@gmarounf7472 So you don't like guns and gay marriage? Nobody is threatening gay marriage. If you don't like other people being able to own guns the only fix is changing the Constitution and good luck with that. As for abortion, the majority of the country believes it should be legal but severely restricted and limited. Only 2 states have out right banned it. All the others just put in what the majority believe would be those reasonable restrictions.
11
This is what's been happening in European countries. Especially the UK. These are voters and politicians that will say they want the US to be more like Europe so making these benefits available to illegal migrants isn't surprising at all. Just like there, you won't be attracting the people that just want a chance at a better life. You'll attract the young men looking for adventure who don't want to work. They're not going to get a job once their allowed to because there's no incentive to do so. The opposite. They're being incentivized not to work. The politicans who wrote these bills believe that because they're minorities the US is to blame for the circumstances in their home country and that the US taxpayers (mostly yt people) owe them for oppressing them and their country. You need to understand the mindset that is underpinning all this. It's why the border is open, that and Democrats playing the long game trying to create a future large voter base. It's seriously messed up but it's why they've done and continue to do what's going on and why they're putting these people above citizens.
11
@echobase6372 Then they can't afford to bring in a bunch of Visa holders either. Which they're begging to be able to do.
10
Always to an extent, but it got markedly much worse under Obama. Then I started seeing a lot more pushing of editorials as fact or "the news" and fewer and fewer real news articles in publications. It went completely off the rails with Trump. When news outlets stopped covering his addresses to the nation during the lockdowns was when any hope they'd eventually turn around was lost.
10
He wasn't lying. Asians tend to run small businesses. Rent is cheap in that area because crime is high. The high crime rate is why prices are higher. It's to make up the cost of lost inventory from thefts. The people living in those areas don't understand how to run a business, but are fully aware of the crimes. They are mad because the prices are higher and attribute it to what they grew up being told, everything is due to their skin color.
10
@@itzryder8409It was never only 6 months. In my state it’s 10 years. Given that much of my state is still very rural it still makes sense. Lots of abandoned properties in secluded areas. Edit: It’s also misleading because a lot of these aren’t squatters rights but instead using renters rights.
10
@ripley4601 Sorry, Hector isn't wrong. You're the one that set the bar of burning churches is alt right if it's done to protect culture. You're the one that said protecting culture at any cost like that is alt right. You can't create that definition and then withdraw it when the same action is coming from a minority. If them burning churches in Norway because Christianity was replacing paganism and their culture is alt right ( per you're own example) , that would hold true regardless of where or when the same or similar actions occurred. The reason you just got so defensive is because you're trying to put something in the alt right column that doesn't really belong there and got called out on it. You need to learn the difference between a strawman and a supposition based on the current set of criteria that YOU set forth.
10
@Dorkeydaze So to recap. In another post, you admit he acted in self defense. That's not illegal. Yet here you are under another comment claiming he should go to prison. You're a troll plain and simple. You're now on ignore because nothing you type is worth wasting my time on.
10
@AnthonySopran0 No they don’t. My son worked at a place that was open to hiring ex-cons. Most didn’t last long because they got arrested again.
10
That's not why. They'll just stand there and film someone drowning too. It's because we created a culture of people only caring about going viral online and one that doesn't prioritize victims over criminals.
10
@AppleseedVending Why are saying if the officers lied before they can do it again, but dismissing the lie told by the documentary? The same thing applies to them. They hide his conviction of trying to kill his cousin because it made him look bad. It shows he was willing to commit serious acts of violence. So he didn't commit r@pe, but he DID try to kill someone. So it's not a stretch for him to be capable of doing it again.
10
@BimmerBros It's not. Especially if there's a detailed description of the character's appearance and it's from a specific culture. It might not be such a big deal if it was fine to do the other way, but it isn't. If we're going to create the standard that only Asians can play an Asian character, Latino play Latino, gay play gay, etc it should apply across the board. It doesn't though and only one is allowed to be changed. That's called discrimination and if you're fine with that okay, but others aren't.
10
I've had the exact same accusations when I dare to say I'm a housewife. It was supposed to be about choice and now them trying to remove that choice is misogynist on their part.
9
Oh dang! Good point!
9
The problem with showing evidence to viewers is that the evidence being presented hasn't gone through rigorous review by the other side and it hasn't been argued in court as to whether it meets the legal criteria to be considered evidence for the trial. I can call anything evidence but that doesn't mean it really is.
9
That train thing is basic sociology/psychology. The less a behavior is challenged by society the more often it will occur and the more likely it is that it will progress further. This is why when people try to claim it used to be acceptable to hit your wife I know that's not true. It was never acceptable within society to do that. Legal or not isn't as relevant as what society allows. If it was, you would have seen a lot more wives being killed than you did. That's more likely to occur now with an abusive spouse than it was then because even though it may not have gotten you jail time, it got you beaten up by her male relatives and/or other men in society. Now it's actually punished less than it was then because a night in jail isn't near the deterrent getting beaten to a pulp by a bunch of men is. That's what I call "social justice". To me laws are for actions above what society can correct. Then it's a crime against the state rather than just a violation of society.
9
The judge called her out several times and was getting snippy with her on occasion too. I guess none of you watched the Rittenhouse trial and the crap the prosecution got away with.
9
I've tried to explain this to so many people crying about the homeless and wanting to fix it. Most of them want to live like that and refuse to even use shelters except in bad weather conditions because they don't want to have to follow rules. That the people that end up homeless due to a bad economic situation rarely remain in that situation for very long. This group of people have always existed on the fringes of society just what we call them has changed. They used to be called hobos that road the railway (some still do that). Even the nordic countries all these types point to as the best and what the US should be, have homeless. Even if they are drug addicts, they have to want to change or no amount of intervention or help is going to do anything.
9
@TheVideoLounge Also most likely he wasn't holding the bike. They were most likely a couple of steps away waiting to see if it reset or who had reserved it. Once they saw her, they most likely thought they could just intimidate her long enough to lose her reservation and then grab it real quick. I think her putting up resistance never occurred to them. The filming was more likely to send to their group to brag about intimating this huwhite woman. That's judging by the family response.
9
@matthewthompson9902 It's also the school policies. I've had the misfortune of being a worker in an elementary school that didn't believe in punishment and the kids ran things. I got knocked in the head by one of them intentionally and nothing happened. I watched kids that had serious potential to be good kids being pushed to the brink by other students while the teachers did nothing to try to protect any of them. I quit after 3 months. Edit: The school was closed 2 school years later and the children distributed throughout the other elementary schools. Most of them had huge changes in their behavior after that and only about half a dozen ended up needing to be removed completely and expelled in the following years. It's the environment and policies of a particular area that causes it.
9
It skirts the political donation regulations.
9
This started when she defended Contrapoints. Since then a small group has been being mean to her. That's why there was the part about defending people In her farewell letter. Based on her letter I believe she just doesn't want to make content anymore and this is a way for her to blame others for it and play victim. That way she can get people to still pay her through Patreon without having to make anything because they'll feel like they are supporting her from the mob. The fact she has employees she hadn't told and still blamed cis, white men in her letter just shows she has no integrity and doesn't deserve the attention this has brought her.
9
@lukesalazar9283 It's hard to gauge. China sets their poverty level at $1.90 US per day. However that is the base amount used for lower GDP countries that are low in development. The minimum for China should be set at around $5.50 per day. By that metric, it would be around the 50% area or more. They have announced they have eliminated poverty, but it cost them $880 billion and isn't sustainable. That doesn't matter to the CCP though. Only being able to say it matters even if it's only reality for a month. If you didn't grow up understanding how communist propaganda works, it's nearly impossible to explain the depths of it. The only thing you can almost 100% count on is what they are saying is false because they do things like lower what is "poverty" to look good.
9
Those are donated by hairstylists in the area. They LOVE posting about it.
9
@thomasbuchovecky171 He's not advocating for Civil war. He's pointing out how the violence he's seeing is very similar to what's occurred in other countries. He's not telling right wing people to stockpile weapons and ammo either. The majority of his audience isn't even right wing. It's libertarian. People using their rights isn't illegal either. I have the right to purchase as many firearms legally as I choose and as much ammo as I choose. You go through a lot of ammo at a normal day of firearms training at the range. I imagine you're idea of "stockpiling" ammo is 100 rounds which you can purchase a single box of depending on the round. What constitutes stockpiling firearms? 5? 10? I own more than that because we hunt and different game requires different guns and calibers and all 4 of us hunt meaning we each have a gun. So am I "stockpiling"? You're making assumptions about why someone owns a certain number of weapons with no idea who they are, how they live, or why they'd have them none of which is even required because it's a right protected by the Constitution. You want to set limits on that, fine. Then we'll also be allowed to require a test before you can vote.
9
@anjolatope-babalola2338 That doesn’t make sense because a lot of lawyers would have done it pro bono or taken a cut of the settlement. Especially one politically motivated.
9
You can get carpet made in tiles now to do that with. Create a pattern. They just stick on the floor.
9
I love the rewriting of what it was. "All lives matter" was seen as racist when it was plainly stating what she now claims BLM means. If it meant too, there'd have been a too on it. They had people believing thousands were being ended by police when it was 9.
9
@TheGloryXros No one that I'm aware of, but he get accused of a lot of the things that aren't true. CNN and many journalists have doxxed several individuals though by printing their address or showing up outside their house. I was shocked the first time I saw them go after an individual like that.
8
@richardunderwood9683 No they really didn't. Stalin courted Hitler. He even fired Jews in his cabinet to try to draw his attention. It worked because they reached an agreement to invade Poland after 3 days of having just met. Don't try to push Putin's revisionist history and not expect pushback. Had Stalin not been infatuated with Hitler and his power, WWII could have never been. It was that treaty that allowed Germany to focus on Europe because he didn't have to worry about Russia. Stalin took Germany's invasion on a personal level because he thought they were friends. It was the last time he trusted anyone.
8
The thing is, this is supported and baked into the National Teacher's Unions. They can't strike because it's their Unions insisting and pushing it.
8
How did the DA get the job? Oh that’s right! They VOTED him in. It’s the voters fault either way.
8
That letter also addressed to only look at the financial side of a possible show. They had too many people greenlighting shows, not based on if it would bring in viewers, but based on a message. So they've ended up with really expensive shows nobody wants to watch. Look at what up coming shows they've cancelled and you'll see it. When they decided to not make a season 2 of Dark Crystals, it was clear they had clueless people in positions they shouldn't be. It was a very popular show. Some people got offended by the depiction of some characters that were in the original movie and that's why they did it. So it's not just that they had people inside the company complaining. It's that they listened to them. I'm pretty sure Chapelle was the first time they didn't get their way and that's why there was a massive meltdown and they felt it was perfectly acceptable to barge into meetings and do a walkout. The only reason they didn't get their way then was because they were going to pay for the content anyway and some higher ups already knew they were starting to get in trouble financially. Edit: It absolutely is a case of go woke, go broke. They were producing good original content that could have kept them afloat. They catered to sensitive employees and pulled successful shows and greenlit crap because they focused on diverse voices. They allowed their writers and stars to argue with and insult fans. They allowed that culture to grow and thrive within their company.
8
Saying what countries and how many people are crossing the border illegally is saying "nothing"?
8
I’m upset about Storm. Her and Gambit were my favorites. She was always so composed, regal, and feminine despite how kickass she was. They gave her the side shave. I just know they’re going to change Gambit’s personality too. Can’t have a flirty strong masculine character.
8
@commonsenseisntcommon1776 This entire video is about a politician. A single comment about the officers doing her bidding instead of following the law and you act like this and several other videos about this politician magically disappeared.
8
@sallysue8176 Did you watch the video? If you did, you'd know that's BS. If you'd been paying attention during the virus you'd know that's not true. Teachers told the CDC what guidelines to implement for them allowing them to continue to teach remotely even though they knew it was harming the kids. An organization with enough power to do that isn't "lowest in the ladder".
8
It's so annoying calling it a ban. Next time somebody needs to bring up all the books they've " banned". Like To Kill a Mockingbird, Huckleberry Finn, etc. It's insane to me that they're complaining about books being removed that are listed as 18+ on Amazon because it's illegal to expose minors to pr0n.
8
Previous
2
Next
...
All