Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "Dr. John Campbell" channel.

  1. Has this been presented to any independent journalist? This sort of gaslighting is usually done without creating a paper trail. (It wouldn't be too quick to believe it unverified, because they rarely leave themselves open to lawsuit when they bully people.) Aaron Mate (Dr. Gabor Mate's son) is Canadian journalist he would care.
    4
  2.  @violetad487  No kidding. You must not have read what I wrote. Calm down, take it slow. Think before emoting. P. S. Kids shouldn't eat at McDonald's.
    4
  3. As soon as the side effects became known, I decided against the vaccine because I knew that if anything happened to me, I'd be on my own. I've had that experience, where people have shunned me after some tragedy occurred. No thanks. This turned out worse than I had expected. I didn't expect such cowardice.
    4
  4. ​@bioschneid8811 Who in the world would ever bother to conspire when bribery combined with debt obtain compliance from practically everyone?
    4
  5. Dr. Campbell is absolutely right. There must be an inquiry. Multivariate analysis is difficult; they must start now.
    3
  6.  @ga8410  I know that. I said the injured. Don't scare them, especially with catastrophic talk. People are recovering, especially those who declined "boosters."
    3
  7. Steven R. Gundry is a well-known cardio-thoracic surgeon who went on to promote unproven diets and supplements for personal gain. A study that commingles people who had COVID with those who had the vaccine without creating four distinct cells (+/-- COVID, +/-- mRNA vaccine) is without value. If Circulation publishes this, I would be surprised. At most, it creates a case for further research. Maybe it was withdrawn?
    3
  8. The investigative journalist Robert Whitaker, who has studied the approval and use of psychoactive medications for decades, just had an article published in the BMJ describing a new antipsychotic drug for elderly people with cognitive impairment that didn't address their issue but did increase the risk of death.
    3
  9. Please be kind to yourself. MOST people will be all right. The best thing you can do now is eat an anti-inflammatory diet and take long walks in nature. And be kind to yourself. Worrying is not good for you, and you deserve some extra kindness after all of this.
    3
  10.  @allangibson2408  No, deaths are not up because COVID patients are clogging up the hospitals, you ghoul.
    3
  11. Why are vastly fewer visible unless you use the Newest tab and scroll?
    3
  12. @godessofthemoon67  I suggest you look up the law in America. I just did. In general, they cannot keep you. The real problem is that your insurance could refuse to pay any part of your treatment, and you will be liable absent a lawsuit. It's all about the money. But even that doesn't usually happen. Just know that it's possible all right. Think about it this way: can you change hospitals? Yes, of course. Must you inform the hospital where you do not want to remain? There may be reasons you should document your decision, but you don't technically have to.
    3
  13.  @godessofthemoon67  Why would law enforcement keep you in the hospital? They won't do that in my city. You are not in jail.
    3
  14.  @victorcarbino8736  You mean you're a different species from me? That's the best news I've heard this century.
    3
  15.  @victorcarbino8736  Are apples and oranges breeds of fruit? 😂 We aren't the same species, I just know it.
    3
  16. Protection from reinfection sure looks like the protective item is an immunotherapy agent, rather than the other thing they sometimes say it is. It doesn't last very long at all. Why would anyone be required to use this?
    3
  17. ​@RogerWittekind This is a new thing. You are not alone. Try the sort by newest tab and scroll. It could be visible there.
    3
  18.  @Kenjiro5775  No one said that.
    3
  19. You know what else Pfizer did? In the multi-page fine print statement you were supposed to read before consenting to receive the shot, it attenuated its positive claims. But on the television programs Pfizer sponsored, newscasters made HUGE promises -- safe, effective, conferring full immunity, protecting your family, everything. They also greatly berated anyone skeptical of these claims.
    3
  20. ​ @boomiron 👏👏👏👏👏
    3
  21. You know, Dr. Campbell, I thought I could watch. You're right. I can't. I did give my email to obtain the pdf of this article. Thank you very much for your work. Oh, and P. S. Please take a break. Please.
    3
  22.  @amiesparkle00  They initially had a slow rollout of the vaccine, and there was not a high percentage vaccinated during the Olympics, or for the major part of this epidemic. Once they had an opportunity to get vaccinated, that was done very efficiently, yes.
    3
  23. Any of us can click the link to the Australian government website and see for ourselves that AZ was discontinued three weeks ago due to a serious side effect directly attributed to the vaccine by Australian health authorities: thrombosis with thrombocytopenia (TTS).
    3
  24. What I found: The CARES Act called for a 20% increase in reimbursement when a hospital cared for a patient with COVID-19; the increase applied only to Medicare recipients and the uninsured. The primary diagnosis could be something else. 20% could be much more than $13,000.
    3
  25. ​@@JetLi-zt5qh Is everyone reporting these events?
    3
  26. Great point.
    3
  27. ​ @shocktnc Read up on it before you make up your mind.
    3
  28. I prefer that they test. We no longer have any idea how likely it is to have an asymptomatic case, and relative to what status (vaccinated or not, prior confirmed case, prior suspected case, relative to age as well). Is this SO onerous and expensive? I thought COVID was a global emergency (!!!!!)
    3
  29. Tell that to the doctors and the PM.
    3
  30.  @caroleboudevin-hamard506  Il ne faut pas exagérer.
    3
  31. You will. Keep abreast of legitimate research. Eat better than you ever have in your life. Spend time outdoors.
    3
  32. @Veepet856  There are already countless peer-reviewed studies on SAEs of special interest. NIH's library provides pdfs for free. I am sure you know that. Looks like some people persist in three year old talking points. For some reason . . . ?
    3
  33. This Makes Me SICK I am so, so sorry.
    3
  34.  @MattHabermehl  We don't have definitive answers, and it's obvious why. Inquiry was suppressed. You are correct that circumstantial evidence showing a greater likelihood than not that the virus originated in a lab is sufficient for a lawsuit!
    3
  35. The lid is off. Stanford just had a symposium where all the participants were allowed to speak freely on every controversial issue: viral origins, vaccine safety, mitigation measures, censorship -- everything. This took place October 4. Stanford has a new president, by the way.
    3
  36. Full indemnity + full patent protection + mandates = cannot be honest
    3
  37. I never follow a video. I read the actual linked study. Yes, every time. Learned my lesson LONG ago.
    3
  38.  @mabaker  Death rates are VERY different all over the world. That could be because a major wave has not reached certain places yet. But the real issue is that we should be sharing information. People don't see that happening, and people are scared (because they have been pushed to panic), so this speculation is the result. Jeering is not a plan.
    3
  39.  @juliaparrott3655  Not evident yet. The lockdowns, lack of screening, prolonged stress, and so forth, are confounding variables. Multivariate analysis is hard and takes time.
    3
  40. @Margo5050  "We don't know yet" does not equal "no." It's called multivariate analysis, and I've had posts removed for saying those two words together. In bizarro world, mathematics causes controversy. That we know.
    3
  41. @Margo5050  That seems logical. Do you have a source? My sources are reporting in Spring 2023, with data from 2020 through early to mid-2022.
    3
  42.  @diegoharo7943  Dr. Campbell reviewed it recently, and he provided a link. I read it integrally.
    3
  43. Or YouTube. Just got _______ .
    3
  44. Not in Europe anymore. I don't think vaccination is being recommended to anyone under 50, or urged under 70.
    3
  45. ​ @escandeserge3045 Le chevre, aussi.
    3
  46. One probable serious event per 100,000 inoculations is supposed to be noted. We are up to 80? 200? What? They admit at least 20 per 100,000, so by their own measure, it should be taken off the market.
    3
  47. I frankly don't get it.
    3
  48. @shawnli4746  That's also normal. My aunt had a baby naturally 2 1/2 months before turning 47. Every year in a big country, someone has a baby naturally at 49 or 50.
    3
  49.  @lillian9221  That is rare, unless it was assisted reproduction. 50 seems to be the limit; older than that is really rare.
    3
  50.  @ibiufos  Well, unfortunately, YouTube is not in privity with the major pharmaceutical companies, so nothing they do can be construed as false advertising or suppression of vital information about a product that they have a duty to transmit. Plus Section 230 protects them. So . . . They can go ahead and do whatever they want and tough luck for us. They're not rich for nothing. :/
    3