Comments by "Hasan Al-habbobi" (@hasanal-habbobi4018) on "Doug DeMuro" channel.

  1. Alviniscute I don't care if he doesn't like the Mercedes but he is a hypocrite. If he doesn't like it then fine but he should alteast be consistent with his criticism. The exact same thing he hated the g wagon for he praised for the jeep. That's some really low double standards especially from Doug.
    4
  2. Hungover Garage its not a pos!
    4
  3. for the v10 segment yes.... best sounding car you are looking at the Lamborghini murceilago..... porshe 917....Ferrari enzo fxxk.... pagani cinque....
    3
  4. Protector of the Republic you don't have to be old to desire merc
    3
  5. Sapher no it isn't
    3
  6. TheLegend 27​​​​​​​​​ first of all there are no plastics in the s class, and if there are then they are in hidden places that you wouldn't even know unless you did a whole search of the car. And no it doesn't cost as much as a house it is around the 100k mark. And especially if you option it up there are no plastics. This is where maybach comes into play, it takes the already luxurious and more technologically advanced s class and ups the quality of the materials even more to be just as good if not better than rr. And yet still it's 2x cheaper than the rr despite being just as luxurious and more comfortable and technologocally advanced and has better interior design Furthermore maybach is limited production which makes the car more rare and exclusive and hence it won't take as much of a hit in depreciation as a rr or regular s class will. Yes interior design is a big deal and can make or break the difference of buying or not buying a car. The reality is that rr interior looks outdated and ugly. Sure build quality is good, but what good is that if its ugly? Furthermore s class offers more features than rr like ambient lighting and perfume dispenser to name a few which set the tone of the cabin. And yes technology is also a big deal, that is not an excuse for rr and bentely to be stuck in the past. Mercedes has autopilot for example which is a luxury in of itself allowing the driver the luxury to take his feet, eyes and hands of the car and road and relax. So technology is there to provide luxurious convinience as well as safety. Rr doesn't even have simple technology like park assist and brake assist that even a ford has! That's pretty pathetic for a car that costs as much as a house to be so far behind on even basic technology. And yes many people who buy these cars look for differentiating factors one if which is technology because it improves the safety of the car while provding convenience. It also reflects how Mercedes is a technology leader rather than a follower while rr struggles to even follow So no the quality of materials are just as good as bently and rr when considering the price and whether or not you option it up to have more leather than normal for example. Maybach however comes with all the luxury the s class has and takes it an ultra step further to be right on par if not better than rr and bentley quality And Mercedes can go even further with the s class Pullman limo and emperor, and even include alligator skin if you really wanted. No rr can touch those kinds of s classes
    3
  7. Trey Perry​ Don't know how credible your story is since you can say anything on YouTube but "feels special" is so relative and subjective. When you drive the amg gt r it will feel much more special because it will have a much better interior that not only feels more special but is better in every way as well as a Much more special feel while driving thanks to it's better handling and exciting performance
    3
  8. johnnyXXX 1.yes if you spec it that way 2. Yes Mercedes has many seat adjustments. And it does have a massage function. Even stone massage in fact 3.yes Mercedes c class has ambient lighting.. Way before Lincoln in fact. 4.yes it does have the navigation functions. Not all of them... However the new c class will get Mercedes's new In house infotainment system with a significantly improved navigation. 5.yes it has the 360 camera if you spec it that way. The c class has practically all of those things... And keep in mind you guys are comparing an entry level Mercedes sedan to a top of the line Lincoln SUV. That alone speaks for itself how even the small Mercedes has such high quality that its able to be compared with the big cars of Lincoln. Having said that I absolutely adore the Lincoln and think its the best SUV in the segment right now but to pretend like a Mercedes c class is worse couldn't be farther than the truth. The c class does have practically all the features you talked about. And especially the e class. With Mercedes they give you total control and flexibility... So thats why things are optional.. Because not everyone wants to spend money on a feature they don't want. Mercedes is not plastic all over. That's is absolutely false. One the plastic that is there is hidden and not obvious. You would have to search the entire car to find. All manufacturers do this one way or another. Two.... Again as I said you get to choose the spec qne quality you want to have hence so if there's plastics that can only be your fault and own decision. Not just s class. Even e class blows this Lincoln out of the water in terms of interior luxury and quality. And also remember that the s class and c class came out nearly 4 years ago and still top of their game interior wise. Again... Having said that Lincoln really hit it out of the park with the navigator and its definitely a lot more special than the equivalent Mercedes SUV. But the s class is leagues above the navigator so don't even bother comparing it. And don't even get me started on maybach which would blow the navigator out of the water even more. So don't get me wrong the navigator is superb but don't get too carried away.
    3
  9. Christoph S. You're blind of you think all Mercedes look the same.
    3
  10. blackcountryme your an utter moron than for generalizing a whole company off of one car. The amg gt r, the e63 the s class etc etc are all cars worth their price tag and then some.
    3
  11. Yup. The rs7 is too long just like the m6 and cls63 and these cars are not as nimble as the e63 m5 or rs6. Its a weird thing..... M5 only comes as a sedan.... Rs6 only comes as an estate and e63 comes as either. And rs6 is not available in north America so as a result people end up very confused about what it competes with but here is the deal. So like you said... the rs7 is designed to compete with the cls63 and m6... Just as the non sport versions.... Cls and a7 and 6 series would compete with each other. Only difference is that a7/rs7 comes in a hatch back like design.... Which there is also a cls shooting break I believe as well that comes as a hatchback....these are cars designed to be 4 doors but with a coupe like profile.... They are long luxury sedans with a sporty edge to them. But they are more of authobahn cruising rockets rather than nimble sports cars. That's where the rs6 m5 and e63 come in. Not only can they accelerate well but they are also nimble and good around corners... So you are right. Having said that though... Because the rs6 is not available in north America... In that respect only you can say the e63 and m5 can still compete with the rs7 even though they aren't really designed to.
    3
  12. Thomas Fährmann a station wagon with supercar like acceleration and power is boring? The only thong that's crap is your comment. It has the practically of a family car and acceleration of a supercar.... Its a super family car! It's the best of both worlds. That's anything but boring. And its the non amg models that are taxis. Furthermore... If anything being a taxi is a compliment. It shows that out of all the other car companies... Audi bmw etc they choose Mercedes e clas largely because it is way more reliable/durable and way more luxirious and comfortable than them. So it's not a shifty car. You're just a shitty person who's desperate to hate.
    3
  13. Tehgziz Lauw no they aren't. They are incredibly rare so in fact if anything they are underated
    3
  14. Alex Bramm thats in your opinion. Imo e63 wagon (especially the new one) looks much better rhan the rs6 (even better than the avant). So the audi is one of the best looking not the best looking. There is also the v90 which looks awesome. The e63 is not outdated especially not the new one...... The new e63s wagon not only looks better on the outside but is light years better looking on the inside. So much so that it makes the Audi interior look hidiously outdated. Not to mention far more technologically advanced than the rs6 with many more features. Either way the rs6 is not sold in north American markets due to the fact that most Americans do Not like wagons
    3
  15. Pieter Post no he is right. The rs7 is too long just like the m6 and cls63 and these cars are not as nimble as the e63 m5 or rs6. Its a weird thing..... M5 only comes as a sedan.... Rs6 only comes as an estate and e63 comes as either. And rs6 is not available in north America so as a result people end up very confused about what it competes with but here is the deal. As the original commenter said the rs7 is designed to compete with the cls63 and m6... Just as the non sport versions.... Cls and a7 and 6 series would compete with each other. Only difference is that a7/rs7 comes in a hatch back like design.... Which there is also a cls shooting break I believe as well that comes as a hatchback....these are cars designed to be 4 doors but with a coupe like profile.... They are long luxury sedans with a sporty edge to them. But they are more of authobahn cruising rockets rather than nimble sports cars. That's where the rs6 m5 and e63 come in. Not only can they accelerate well but they are also nimble and good around corners... So the original commenter is right. Having said that though... Because the rs6 is not available in north America... In that respect only you can say the e63 and m5 can still compete with the rs7 even though they aren't really designed to.
    3
  16. It doesn't have AWD. There is an e63S and e63. the e63S has awd and e63 has rwd. Doug has the e63 not the e63s.
    3
  17. For future videos he should film a pov and set up other go pros during his drive to give us different angles.
    3
  18. MrWoodii If it sells so well then its not pointless. Period. Don't fix what isn't broken. So its not outdated. Its a simple clean timeless boxy design. Doug doesn't get it. He makes valid criticisms but fails to realize that its these same very criticms that make it a success. Its crazy. Its stupid. Its pointless. Its ridiculous. And its supposed to be like that. Its because it makes no sense that it makes perfect sense! Of course to you and me its outrageously overpriced. But if you really think about it. The people who buy these cars sleep on millions so to them this is pocket change. To them its an investment... The g wagons keep their value very well..... They have a lot of road presence... Since their really is no veichle out there on this same level that exists on the road. And if you go for the 4x4 or 6x6 then you also get incredible off road capabilities. So he is right to be angry... J also wouldn't buy this even if I had all the money in the world. But he is overreacting as he fails to understand that its the same reasons he hates it that people like it... And why a market for these viechles exists at all... And why it sells like hot cakes.
    3
  19. To us yes it makes sense to say its overpriced. But basic economics tells us its not. It sells extremely well and if people are willing to buy it... Especially to such a high degree... then its price is justifiable. Not to us but to the market it has. Its a one of kind niche veichle. There is nothing like it on he road. I would never buy one but it doea have a market for itself and in that respect is not completely overpriced. It depends on how you look at it.
    3
  20. AlexBFresh they do change it. Subtle changes but still changes never the less.
    3
  21. +Luke Kazimierz Its actually a lot of car just in a different way. instead of comfort and features its reliability, durability and utility.....these vans will last long and take a lot of abuse. to a family they are too much money but to a company they are not only pocket change but an investment ....sine this van will end up making these companies 10 times the cost of the van and more in profit. So its not much money at all in that respect.
    3
  22. WheatSnackBread looks are subjective. Its not a turd at all. And its not overpriced considering how even at that price it sells like hot cakes. And Doug is no one to call it overpriced when he bought an iPhone x which is the definition of overpriced. And you would buy a g wagon because it looks much better seats more people for a smaller size, has way more road presence, better engine, better interior, etc etc.
    3
  23. Michał 77​​​​ intentionally made to be broken!?!?! No, they have more technology, so they may be more prone to being broken but that doesn't mean they break often, they are actually quite reliable from my experience and of many others. And even if we awesome they are unreliable (which they aren't) the luxury and technologies they offer more than makes up for it.
    2
  24. Ross MK​ haha that is so not true, and BMW is not only less reliable but costs much more to maintain too. And there are also merc police cars in Germany as well as sprinter ambulances and fire trucks across the world so you proved nothing there And my other point also valid how merc is the most luxurious of the German brands
    2
  25. Michał 77​​​ haha no you just have to stop being a German car hater, you have zero evidence for your bs, you are just a hater of German master piece engineering... plain and simple.and like I said, EVEN IF WE ASSUME (for sake of argument) that that they aren't reliable....they more than make up for it for their top craftsmanship in luxury and sport performance. Cuz if you wanna go this route I can easily ask you Who built the first car genius?? Mercedes did, Karl Benz...For that alone Germans deserve tons of respect from the car world.
    2
  26. *****​ ahaha that's funny joke man, Mercedes have much more tech than Alfa does, besides lane keeping and brake assist which I don't even think the Alfa has, Mercedes has distrinic plus (essentially auto drive for stop and go traffic) magic body control that absorbs all the bumps in the road and scans the road ahead to prepare the suspension ahead of time, smart head lights that allow you to use high beam without harming on coming drivers, that also turn in the direction you are turning...etc I could go on and on, Alfa can't touch Mercedes' technology
    2
  27. BokiXI haha e class is taxi cuz it's WAY MORE LUXURIOUS AND WAY MORE RELIABLE than any BMW! And it's not just for old people, that stereotype is old itself ironically, it's 5 year old logic BMW fanboys use because they have no real argument, Mercedes is for anyone with the money that desires to buy a merc... tons of going celebrities and entrepreneurs biy Mercedes so you can stick that old bs up you r ass otherwise I can say bkw are for douchy teens who don't know how to drive properly and shouldn't even have a drivers license and who can't even use their blinkers properly.
    2
  28. BokiXI​ I disgaree on the not for young people part ....amg gt r and c63 and practically whole amg line up say no to that. They are very appealing to young buyers who have the money..... as young celebrities and entrepreneurs have demonstrated
    2
  29. Croo ookie when was he not?
    2
  30. kingwindie ikr
    2
  31. flyingphoenix113 Well said
    2
  32. Suboptimus Lime exactly, exactly!
    2
  33. Trey Perry alright ;)
    2
  34. Mewzyc nah I like the looks of the amg gt r better much more athletic and aggressive and mean looking. How many times have you seen an amg gt r. Normal gt sure, but gt r will is a better car in every way then the sls bs
    2
  35. Mewzyc​ I think you should know that the amg gt was never meant to replace the sls, just as the sls was never meant to replace the slr nor the slr replace the clk gtr.... The point of the amg gt is to compete with the porshe 911 market which makes good money, so this is Mercedes' key into the game. Yet despite not being a replacement to the sls black series the amg gt r has a better interior, better looks IMO and miles better performance without compromising on exhaust note or being a gaz guzzler and harm to the environment. For these reasons the amg gtr is the better car in almost every way
    2
  36. Keny J.​ Sure it's not going to suit everyone but there is definitely a market for it. Some people enjoy it's stiffness and simplicity... Its more of a status symbol or offroad machine. Especially the 6x6 which is an offroad killer. But ya totally understand where you are coming from
    2
  37. Ya bmw x5 is badass looking suv
    2
  38. camdog it's not loaded with features. And Mercedes do make reliable cars you ignorant moron. In fact they have tool...there cars are used as taxis and they also have trucks like the actress and unimaginative and other working vans and veichles....and these industries rely and depend heavily on reliability .....so you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Keep feeding yourself ironically false stereotypes when reality says otherwise.
    2
  39. johnnyXXX says the one that can't read himself ironically. You're point is flawed. Yes the c class interior does match the navigator especially when you take price and year the two came out. They are available as options actually ... Including the 360 cam too. https://youtu.be/7pRDsx_T1ck Led lights don't need to be standard. Again I told you Mercedes let's the customer have control and flexibility over what they want and don't want. Not everyone wants to pay for leds and other features they don't need... Especially on an entry level merc. Its not wrong. If you consider that the c class came out nearly 3 years before the navigator and costs less than half of the navigator then yah it is better than a navigator. When you factor in these then its entirely fair to make that proposition. Otherwise yes obviously the navigator has a slightly better interior... It had better. But considering the price etc then its fair to say the c class is on par if not better than the navigator.
    2
  40. WobblePizza lmao look at yourself hating on car that's so good that you are jealous of! Its not just marketing... Its legit genuine innovations, inventions and engineering. And I did evaluate the car... Hence why I was able to give so many points and arguments and evaluations. And you couldn't counter a single one! Can't say I'm surprised there since you never had an argument to begin with! You're just a pathetic hater.
    2
  41. Its not ugly, its classy. The facelift imo looks a lot better tho
    2
  42. MTB Addict they are very similar actually. Especially with the metris. In fact there are many metris with over a million miles on them. They are very reliable if you take care of them. Mercedes are especially notorious for their bullet proof engines. You're just ignorant.
    2
  43. FruitablyPlayz YT its not overpriced considering that it sells like hot cakes even at that price. Its got way more precense than a jeep right from the factory, much better build quality and craftsmanship, better interior, better exterior, better engine. Better offroading. I could go on and on. So expensive no doubt but significantly better than the jeep wrangler.
    2
  44. Coopnazty 997 no they are not. Quit talking out of your ass. Look at the s class and 2014 e63 they have still held on to their value incredibly well even after 4 years. And amg gt r recks the mcleran on so many levels. It's half the price yet sounds way better with a proper growling v8 compared to the mcleran a vacuum cleaner of an engine sound...and actually the amg got r reclaim the mcleran I terms of performance too despite costing less. It has rear wheel steering 9 stage traction control....and it obliterated the crap out of the mcleran on the track....as the amg gt r is the fastest rwd car in production to lap the ring especially for it's price. That's a heck ton of value. You are completely clueless. Costs half the price for more than 2 times better sound and performance. And it's maintenance is actually far better than a mcleran. Not only less expensive but more reliable too. I fact Mercedes are especially notorious for their bullet proof engines,
    2
  45. +blackcountryme speak for yourself. Look in the mirror before you call anyone a twat, you're the definition of one! Mercedes are better than ever. They won f1 world championship and they have a whole variety of awesome cars like the project one, amg gt r, amg gt63, s class e class c class etc 6x6 4x4 etc etc. Not cheap at all. And they are not pimp mobiles. They have models that are taxis because out of all the companies they choose Mercedes they are the most comfortable and luxurious while also being reliable etc. So you're the clueless twat. And rather than counter a single one of my arguments you could only ignore it like the looser you are. Go ahead, you're only proving my point.
    2
  46. WS 88 chill the frik out. I'm talking about the same line that Doug is complaining about (which he has every right to complain about). I'm just saying that the way he showed it... its not visible on one side like it is on the other side he showed. This could be because of the car itself or because the angle in which he showed the car had sunlight reflecting off the car to make the line not be as visible. Thick as a brick? Says the triggered snowflake ironically! I'm saying that at a distance its not as noticeable. I know that it exists but its not as noticeable when far away whereas on the side where he should it close up it became more noticeable.
    2
  47. WS 88 I'm not a troll, you're just a moron. In the very beginning of the video the line is not very noticable.... Because in the beginning he shows the car from a distance and there is sunlight reflecting off of the car SK where there is a panel gap instead you see a white reflection and since the car is white it makes it hard to notice that the gap exists at all. Of course if you look below that you can see a line which is the panel gap but its very tiny. Hence why its hard to notice the panel gap. But that flew right over your your thick triggered snowflake ass unsurprisingly. You idiot just because the gaps are identical doesn't mean crap because I am talking about he showed them FROM DIFFERENT ANGLES. In the first angle he shot it so that the sunlight is facing the car and also from a distance. So at this angle and distance its harder to notice the panel gap. In comparison when he reviews the gap close up its more noticeable. That's what I mean by its more noticeable on one side than the other. I am talking about the way Doug showed the sides of the car in the video. Look in the mirror before you calk anyone a dumb tool when your the definition of one!
    2
  48. WS 88 keep being an idiot and utter moron. So what if I edit comments? I am adding new information and correcting for spelling mistakes moron. It doesn't change my actual argument. Keep living in your fantasy land. Rather than actually counter anything I said you can only complain about me editing my comments as if you have never in your life edited comments! Can't say I'm surprised since you never had an argument to begin with!
    2
  49. Doug won't pin this comment. /°\__/°\ \_____/ Its about average
    2
  50. Sorry e63s is better in every way. It has a faster acceleration, better looking interior, far more features, is light years ahead in technology of the audi, sounds way better, can be drifted, and I am not even scratching the surface! Not to mention it's not even sold in america! So its a major double no!
    2