Comments by "iggle" (@iggle6448) on "The New Culture Forum" channel.

  1. ​ @telephassarose3501  Quite. I have to hope that the original concept was good and beautiful. Though the execution was utterly abominable. IMHO, it's not about romanticising Diana but simply about presenting her as she actually was. Queen Victoria's statues, without variance as far as I'm aware, look just like her photos. How did the Victorian sculptors manage that? And, as you say, how did this present sculptor, with myriad forms of technology available to him, go so badly wrong? I can think of three deliberate reasons: 1. The RF didn't want such a beautiful, alluring statue that would become a Diana shrine, which I think is still a possibility, given her enduring popularity. 2. Diana's sons, remembering her with childish memories only saw Diana as 'mumsie' and not the extraordinarily attractive, feminine, elegant and captivating woman that she was. Thus, they approved all the sculptor's drawings and photos as he progressed his work, and perhaps made suggestions for tweaks to make it more mumsie according to their memories of her. 3. The sculptor is simply not into women. His male forms are striking and beautiful. Maybe he's gay and Diana's beauty and allure simply didn't touch him - this is, after all, a depiction of her that reduces her to that of an almost comedic weekend M>F crossdresser with bad wigs and a penchant for Primark end of line bargains. Perhaps he's had more practice at creating male art forms. Perhaps he's not all that good at sculpture.And perhaps those who were in charge of selecting sculptors deliberately bore all this in mind. Whatever, this piece is a total travesty and nothing like it could very easily have been if done by a sympathetic sculptor. (What also bothers me is all the many people trying to turn themselves inside out and upside down, trying to wipe the evidence of their own eyes and cognition, to find something good, something of Diana in this leaden scowling, lumpen hausfrau.)
    6
  2. 6
  3. 6
  4. 6
  5. 6
  6. 6
  7. 6
  8. 6
  9. 6
  10. 6
  11. 6
  12. 6
  13. 6
  14. 6
  15. 6
  16. 6
  17. 6
  18. 5
  19. 5
  20. 5
  21. 5
  22. 5
  23. 5
  24. 5
  25. 5
  26. 5
  27. 5
  28. 5
  29. 5
  30. 5
  31.  @rogerwoodhouse7945  Yes, I can see that's one layer of joining the dots though it looks to me that there are other layers. Like very limited voting choices - now it's very clear that we have a uniparty which means no choice at all. They've been converging for decades and leaving behind their original bases. Not being contentious, I just don't remember the last 4 decades anyone in Westminster seriously saying that we deserve more. My recollections are more like 'the country needs austerity', 'we need to reduce welfare spending', 'we need to get people back to work'.... Another layer is that wages have been declining in real terms since the early 70s. We never had food banks until Osborne's austerity and now they've exploded so many working people live in poverty, 1 child in 3 lives in a poor family. This are all direct results of gov fiscal strategy. Such poverty isn't just about money - it brings a shedload of other problems with it. What are people to do if their wages are low and taxes are rising? We know that now the tax burden is the highest it's been in 60-70 years! So it's fuelled a need for all sorts of 'helping agencies' that are a huge draw on the public purse with little to benefit to people. A couple of years back I was doing a piece of research that brought me into contact with some of these agencies. One manager told me, in a head-in-his-hands sort of way 'I don't know why the government just doesn't give money direct to low income people instead of contracting organisations like ours to try and help....mostly all the problems start from too little income. People need money to sort out their problems, we're the middleman that top slices most of the available funding...and there's not much that we can really do under our contract for a lot of people that need help.'
    5
  32. 5
  33. 5
  34. 5
  35. 5
  36. 5
  37. 5
  38. 5
  39. 5
  40. 5
  41. 5
  42. 5
  43. 5
  44. 5
  45. 5
  46. 5
  47. 5
  48. 5
  49. 5
  50. 4