Comments by "" (@random6809) on "The Mirror" channel.

  1.  @teddyturner6859  Yes I know, hence why I'd have to read the washing machine instructions!
    2
  2. Those having a go at the police for releasing the information didn't bother to check first that it was the FAMILY who wanted the information out there. It was due to their fear that somebody was about to sell the story to the papers.
    2
  3. "yet no one on holiday walking the riverbank ,and countryside has ever fell in the water before." Except the two year old that you obviously don't know about?
    2
  4. What if your house was about to be flooded with your baby sleeping downstairs?
    2
  5. He was very good at claiming that he was very good.
    2
  6. STFU it was proved from the start that he was home.
    2
  7. @escodo The major reason the tories got in was due to left-wing right-on trendies crying about losing Brexit and calling Brexit voters "gammons" and "r@cists" etc. Calling your traditional voters that is no way to get votes from them!
    2
  8.  @dalebenton3354  It is possible that they don't even know that they have been witnessed there, if what the witness states is true of course.
    2
  9. @JESUS IS MY KING ELIJAH CHRONICLES 3 GLORY TO GOD If he had a bike, he would have used it.
    2
  10. They searched that section of river not all of it. You have no idea what state the river is in. Something can float a long way in an hour.
    2
  11. She also missing the point that the family wanted the information release because somebody was going to sell it to the very media she is a part of, who would have then printed it!
    2
  12. Unfortunately (or fortunately for the family) the police are in the media spotlight on this one.
    2
  13. It is literally a ping from your local cell tower to a feature that your smartphone has had for years. Nobody is gaining control of your phone...
    2
  14. Yes we do have wild fires and extreme flooding in the UK. If a local river is about to flood, I want to be alerted. I am sure that those living in rural areas would like to be alerted to wildfires too.
    2
  15. The word r@ce no longer means what you think it means. English evolves, you need to buy a new dictionary.
    2
  16. Because you are an expert at underwater searches.
    2
  17. He's full of sh!te.
    2
  18.  @cherylsapcote7327  The owner is a waste management company, the land may not be of value to them for building something! They may have no wish to use it for an actual building but for some other purpose.
    2
  19.  @PrivateEye121  The partner was home.
    2
  20. You wouldn't happen to know the hex head size of the bolts? Asking for a friend.
    2
  21. Willow running back and forth is nothing to do with the gate. The dog can go under the fence right next to it! The reason Willow was at the bench was due to that being the last place the scent was. The actions of the dog were caused by anxiety due to it not knowing what to do. Stop jumping to insane conclusions based on your lack of understanding!
    2
  22. @Pilkington Archive 🟠 "Other than the fact that he clearly stated yesterday they are doing all of this FREE OF CHARGE. " Of course national TV coverage for his company and its services is nothing to do with him doing it "free of charge".
    2
  23. You are suggesting that it is impossible for somebody next to a river to fall into the river?
    2
  24. I read that his Ring doorbell shows that he was home at the time.
    2
  25. @mr wpg The Stasi and Gestapo were so successful because it was your neighbour that was making the accusation.
    2
  26. The current is strong enough. A body in heavy winter clothing sinks until it decomposes and then maybe floats, since the water is freezing it would take some time to decompose.
    1
  27. Fell, panicked/unconscious, drown. Simple.
    1
  28.  @mikebarratt9627  Yeah because it makes perfect sense to go back with a body when the police and public are there.
    1
  29.  @luluah1198  You think it unusual for Labour to react this way when cleaning up their history of anti-Semitism?
    1
  30.  @goldensoul1842  The partner was at home, it has been proved you m0r0n.
    1
  31. "The police shouldn't just focus on one avenue but explore all avenues" It's fortunate then that they have 40 detectives doing that, why on Earth do you think they aren't? The "flood guy" does not know that river. We know for a fact that a body can go over the weir into the tidal part.
    1
  32.  @patricialee7919  Her partner is desperate to cling on to her being alive. She is in the water, it is that simple.
    1
  33. Knowledge of her mental state is for those officially taking part in the investigation. It is not the fault of police that the internet crazies latched onto this case after an idiot "expert" told them that she is definitely not in the river. Had it not been for him then the focus would have remained on the river and a bunch of armchair m0r0ns would not be demanding personal medical history. What the public think is irrelevant, if they have information they only need to offer it and let the police determine its relevance.
    1
  34.  @acechadwick  "Nicola's husband kept insisting there was no way she would be in the river. " Because of the "expert" Peter Faulding. He was the trigger. Without his comments it would have been a mundane search with the body turning up weeks later as usual, zero need for any information being released by the police. One f00l claimed she was abducted by helicopter!
    1
  35. FFS STOP
    1
  36. Wrap your head in cardboard too. It's the only way to stop "them" getting to you.
    1
  37. Heavy winter clothing would drag her down like a stone. Soak a load of clothes and a heavy winter coat, then try picking it up! Now in addition to that weight, imagine being freezing cold and wet with slippery slopes.
    1
  38. You really don't understand how this works, do you. "They" don't know anything using this alerting technology.
    1
  39. It is LOCAL cell towers alerting LOCAL phones.
    1
  40. "He said the body would be floating within like 8 days." He's clearly full of sh!te. We know for a fact that a body can remain below the surface for weeks as it depends on water temperature affecting decomposition and the clothing worn. We know this because bodies not being found happens plenty of times.
    1
  41. Bodies have not been found for weeks, or ever. We know this as a fact. The decomposed body taking 6 to 8 days is clearly what sometimes, but not always, happens. It is pointless quoting it. She will appear in the water somewhere eventually.
    1
  42. A beach doesn't know how to behave?
    1
  43. She did not leave her phone behind, it is likely that she placed her phone down to attend to her dog or whatever. It was in a Teams meeting so if sat at the bench you would simply place it on the bench to do something, like get the dog or a ball or whatever.
    1
  44.  @damprotek  No, read my comment properly
    1
  45. It doesn't.
    1
  46. Because you are the expert on pulling 3 week old decomposed bodies out of a river.
    1
  47.  @hummerstattoo9769  So not an expert on pulling decomposed bodies out of a river then.
    1
  48.  @hummerstattoo9769  I made no claim, you did.
    1
  49. It isn't shallow, it is 15ft in places.
    1
  50. Because the bench is literally at the bank of a river that slopes down to a vertical drop. It's not rocket science!
    1