Comments by "chris sonofpear1" (@chrissonofpear1384) on "Jubilee" channel.

  1. Why would they do whatever they want? IS it a choice? Has anyone since Adam and Eve EVER made a completely free choice? What does being sent 'strong delusion' mean?
    3
  2.  @SummerzOG  Seems like many were good at hating each other, though - or hating Jews, in some major historical denominations. All, most, distressing.
    3
  3. @RedTape Slavery, dude. Beaten very NEAR to death, plus owned, for life, and bequeathed, to relatives - ala Leviticus 25. Maybe more background reading, will aid you? It certainly COULD perhaps have aided much medieval clergy, senior clerics, and law makers.
    3
  4. What is a REAL Christian? Which variation, of some 400 plus, is correct? And how do people tell?
    3
  5. I cannot accept RAPE either, Victoria, so please clarify Numbers 31:17 for me?
    3
  6. From who, though? Himself, ourselves, Satan, or God? And why was Satan owed access to this world?
    3
  7. What was Numbers 5:11, precisely about though, @Blast ?
    3
  8. And it has many OMISSIONS...
    3
  9. @Megatronix Why can't this God, do the same - or cancel Leviticus 25, before it becomes a weapon, in the hands of many priests, bishops, popes et al - you'll no doubt disown, despite saying that ALL Christianity is the same...
    3
  10. And of gaps in it, also? And is rap£ som£tim£s ok in it, or not?
    3
  11.  @PrintOfLife  Also, why was Satan owed access to Eden? With powers of any kind, well, kept?
    3
  12. Were you Omega yesterday? If so, must remind you, Numbers 31 - sexual consent - hi?
    3
  13.  @ItsAndy__  That's a massive stereotype, right there. And what makes you think animals have no ethics of their own? Would they buy slaves and bequeath any?
    3
  14.  @ijustfarted9605  Good, although it seems to ME there's a constant identity crisis on what Christianity even IS (a religion, a creed, a relationship, sometimes a cult, levels of yet to be revealed knowledge/meat and milk, dark sayings etc etc) and that many Christians are often in major dispute as to who even, ah, 'counts' as true ones. But at least there is not currently sectarian violence, over it.
    3
  15. Define what Paul mean't be 'Natural man'.
    3
  16. Starting countdown...
    3
  17.  @jocelynrd1171  It does, of course, depend somewhat on which model of God, and if that God ever makes themselves unhappy.
    3
  18. Ah, so sex is between one man and one women - unless it is Solomon, and his wives, right. And it's consensual - unless it's with captured Canaanite women, the only ones spared from death, and preferably virginal? I... see.
    3
  19.  @icommentoncringeyvideos1233  How different, precisely? That YHWH has favourites, I guess. Also, heard of, hyperbole? And see also Numbers 31:17...
    3
  20. And how much did Satan have to do with it? CAN he alter nature to some degree, or not? Wish they'd make up their minds.
    3
  21. Well, we don't even know if it was a global scale flood anyway. Unless it was in the Ice age, it may have been no larger than the Black Sea.
    3
  22. Some do. As an agnostic, I try to be patient. But some Christians can also get very agitated, or resort to strawmen. Not always, but some.
    3
  23. Well, we get, ah, MIXED messages on that. And Paul and Timothy seemed determined to tack stuff on?
    3
  24. Of course we heard, you twerp. You need to listen to the feedback, too. And why were medieval Jews given more death, than life, in your past religion, @Emz E. ?
    3
  25.  @Karen-ih2mt  Rubbish. Why does He CARE what a demented, deranged angel thinks of anything, who could never be convinced anyway? Let alone of how most humans will 'chose God' if given a choice, as many explain Genesis for us? By Luke 13:24, that 'most' has become hardly any, by implication, and no angels ever had to go through such a charade, before choosing their own loyalties.
    2
  26. And it says so MANY other things. But it often skimps on CONTEXT
    2
  27. What does that even mean, and why was the OLD creation so flawed, that even heaven itself must be remade, per Revelations, @rachhh ?
    2
  28. @Beardsman Why were ANY in danger at all? And you don't KNOW ANYTHING about this realm (which Revelations says people will NOT live in, anyway - at least at first) other than it either WASN'T perfect, or angels were often ignorant and delusional, in that realm. And I'm NOT helping some bipolar, sketchy being wipe out half or more of humanity on vague claims, thanks. And if you don't have powers, how does ANYONE know if you're saved, or not, either.
    2
  29. @PartyCrasher The womb that was deliberately sabotaged by chucking crazy angels at it? Also, what happens to reproduction once everyone lives FOREVER and where will they live? Would Adam and Eve have lived forever, originally? And their kids? And their kid's kids, kid's of their kids, and more, all together - alongside each other?
    2
  30. Patriarchy worked quite well, for a long time. Now many want to share the power more. I believe much could be gained from that. There are risks involved, however. Or politicians can weaponize extreme views.
    2
  31. On how they tell others to live, or vote, rather.
    2
  32. Well, that does define it a BIT better, yes. Wish she could say the same for why 1/3 of angels would become suicidally prideful (unless - maybe, heaven was NOT perfect...?)
    2
  33. Corinthians 2:14 - about the ways of God being seen as 'foolishness to the "natural" man'... By which he presumably mean't to have a 'carnal' nature...
    2
  34. Unaffected, as yet, by assorted guilts. Although, true, we need SOME protective instincts...
    2
  35. The impression I get is that they claim both are strong forms of DESIRE, that do not seem 'normal'. What normal is with Numbers 11:19 in existence, I really couldn't say...
    2
  36. @Çaesar Whether volitional marriage, or not...?
    2
  37. Maybe... can you repeat, the question...?
    2
  38. And given many churches are afraid to teach the spiritual or the esoteric...?
    2
  39. I don't mind them being happy. I mind when they are being smug and using fear on others, whilst dodging other questions.
    2
  40.  @naria2224  Also, why should these Jews TRUST this indolent, hammock slumbering new god, when He just turned a BLIND EYE, to atrocities, across half of His churches (assuming not disavowed, I suppose) against medieval Jews, and others? If WE DID that, would we be evil, or encouraging, evil? But hey, Isaiah 45:7 - and if it's in a city, and the Lord had done it, that too, eh? (Amos 3:6) And 'rise up' - you haven't told me where and how, and how far, and by what route, this demented, ignorant, suicidal rebel angel 'fell' first - or why he kept his powers. Was he owed, to?
    2
  41. ​ @mv4004  How many ruddy peasants got to ENJOY THAT LIFE within Christendom, then, amidst CONSTANT wars, either feudal, sectarian, or national, which invariably saw them fight EACH OTHER over mostly TRIVIAL differences, and even resolving antisemitism took CENTURIES to resolve, and was at times, for some churches, borderline official POLICY too? What kind of PRIORITIES are these? What, to prove that humans are flawed? I think we GOT that. So what is CHRISTENDOM itself supposed to stand for, if it can be as errant, divisive, hands off and unsupervised, as any other form of polity in medieval times, through to the 1800s? How EQUAL is this gift, really? And when did ANY ANGEL ever 'chose' for other angels, to make them spiritually dead, before their birth, too.
    2
  42. Supposedly because both claim to experience an 'uncontrollable attraction' to people others are not always attracted to...
    2
  43. Thank you. Talking of new ideas, how many have directly asked WHY God would let fallen angels set foot upon Earth at all...
    2
  44. And which are those? Many churches vary quite a lot in interpretations. And they Reform, and Renew?
    2
  45. I read a lot of it. Why are there gaps, Bradley H.?
    2
  46. 'questioning', apparently.
    2
  47. Thanks. Ps, any thoughts on Corinthians 2:14 Tyler?
    2
  48. Can we hear what He is saying, NOW then, and not, 2000 years ago, by oral histories adapted, varyingly, into several different varieties, of Bible, Joshua?
    2
  49. Well, it has SOME concessions to science, but often only approximations...
    2
  50. Agreed, @JS - most of them have NO IDEA of true progress, and wasted centuries fighting and killing each other, or doing so to Jews, left inadequately protected by a disinterested or sleeping in Jesus. It would seem.
    2