General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Trevor Sutherland
Sky News
comments
Comments by "Trevor Sutherland" (@trevorsutherland5263) on "Sky News" channel.
Previous
8
Next
...
All
it may just take longer. one of mine didn't show up at first but then 5 mins later it was there
2
SKY is basically openly full of lies on this one. Even Ukraine has acknowledged there were NATO mercenaries that were the target of this missile strike. Mostly British ones and none of whom have any legitimate business in Ukraine other than to help kill Russians. Challengers are next; and if Sunak still doesn't get the message, maybe a Zircon strike on a Daring-class will make it stick.
2
US/UK trying to draw Iran into open war. Houthis have missiles in the air before the smoke from the last US/UK attack even cleared....this isn't about them.
2
So basically its "victory or death" for her? Good luck with that, I'm sure Russia will be happy to accommodate her dream. We however are out of it; their problem to solve. If they are too stupid or intransigent to see they are beaten then let them be wiped out. Their choice.
2
Then Ukraine don't need our money and very expensive long range missiles. About time the "welfare queen of the world" starts standing on her own..."
2
North Korean KN-25 heavy MLRS confirmed heading to Russia. The largest tactical rocket system by diameter in the world. 600mm shovels incoming 😂
2
The next person to whine and cry about "bots" because they hear an opinion different from their own, is going to get his isht pushed in.
2
Biden did the honorable thing (after some prodding to overcome his ego). Credit to him for that; there is no shame in aging. Also credit to him for going right to endorsing Harris with zero prevarication. She is the VP; any hesitation regarding her sliding in now is a slap to her face politically speaking (and would have serious consequences for Biden and the party). Nobody knows her; she has four months to stand or fall on her own efforts.
2
So Russia has turned NATO's Wunderwaffe into scrap metal? Deutsch panzer sind besser, eh?
2
 @Swish-x7b They have no "wokeism" ; that counts for a lot....
2
All be over soon ...
2
Russia announced that starting Sept. 1 they are cracking down on all video sent by RU soldiers from the front. Many soldier post to Telegram video from their phones or the equipment they operate and this is how so much information (and misinformation) shows up online. Of course humans being humans some will try to get around it but look for vids to get very scarce next month. Ukraine did exactly the same for the same reason in June just before their offensive .That Russia is suddenly doing it on Sept. 1st can mean only one thing...
2
Russia is sending waves of Kalibr, Kinzhal, and Kh-101s into Ukraine, just pummeling them day and night. Ukraine intelligence said that Kh-101 parts they recovered show the missile was manufactured in 2023. Sky/BBC/CNN said a year ago Russia was running out of missiles.
2
He flat out admits there is no point to this other than to cause a ruckus. His last words are "....AFU must keep their rear open so they can withdraw at some point in good order..." So the whole thing is a meaningless PR show.
2
Wow. I'm shocked. Like. Totally.
2
Sounds exactly like a Hillary voter from 2016 (and a Trump voter from 2020).... I heard rumours the CIA is involved, the fact the losers are using American terminology just confirms it...
2
A people should know when they have been defeated...
2
or to Syria where the US just bombed 112 people?
2
Iskander in English is "Alexander" as in the Greek conqueror. The name means "Protector of Men", so when Russia puts an Iskander down the throat of Ukraine they are protecting themselves. 😂😂😂
2
The truly powerful do not have to fight. A King constantly challenged by even the smallest and weakest of Lords, is no King...
2
I do wonder, a few years after this war ends, how so many of these Western "experts" will defend the setting aside of their brains for the sake of the media paycheck?? "...only a pontoon bridge..." Pontoon bridges are all Russia needs to supply and support their soldiers in this area. So what they can't bring up heavy tanks? AFU don't have that many themselves. This new NATO army has hundreds of light wheeled vehicles...Strykers/Maxxpros/Mastiffs/Senators, etc. The weak border guards are long gone; AFU been facing Spetznaz/Akhmat/VDV/Marines/Storm-Z now for a week; that's why all their attacks but for a few measly gains near Sudzha have been stopped cold. These are tough, experienced men who are the perfect counter to fast mobile / guerilla tactics. Whatever few tanks AFU has will just get a Lancet welcome like the Challenger 2 did; bridge or no bridge, AFU aint goin anywhere...."
2
No one really knows. Theories abound; to take and hold ZNPP, to draw troops away from Donbas, to blackmail EU by controlling the LNG metering station. Who knows? Maybe all three; only the second one was confirmed by Syrsky. The only thing everyone pro-Ukraine and pro-Russia alike agree on is that Kursk was a tactical disaster.... Maybe strategically it will do something positive as time passes, but in a tactical sense---one of the greatest blunders in military history..."
2
YT deleting every comment I make when I point out Moscow airport working just fine..." THAT is the measure of how pathetically weak the Western Media has become. The mere mention of Russia must be suppressed as too hurtful to our feelings..."
2
Shark licking its chops after just devouring a seal...
2
Then Iran will respond again, then Israel, then Iran, then Israel....
2
Help add to Russia's collection of NATO trophies is all...
2
Yesterday, a group of German Mayors are demanding the Federal Government release money to update WW2-era bomb shelters that haven't been maintained in 75 years. Just a coincidence a week after German Marders invaded Russia??"
2
I'd bet every bridge in Ukraine wide enough for 2 or more people is going to be dropped over the next few weeks...
2
Not really. He was forced to say all that stuff. No military expert ever believed Ukraine could win this war. How the fucc does the country with 100 old combat planes beat the country with 1500 new ones??
2
If Ukraine blew it up, they were smart to do so as now Russia can't attack them through Kherson while they are on the offensive in Zaporizhzhia. If Russia blew it up, it does seem stupid to flood your own defensive lines, but maybe that was a calculated risk and they WANTED Ukraine to have only one realistic option: to attack in Zaporizhzhia (where the Russian defenses are the strongest). Who knows? Who cares? Judging by the shattered Leopards, Bradleys, and MRAPs the past few days, it wouldn't matter where Ukraine attacks, it is hopeless for them.
2
Boris Johnson yesterday: "...if Ukraine falls it will be a catastrophe...it will be the end of Western Hegemony..." Rishi Sunak today: "...growing threats from Russia, Iran, and China.." Growing threats of our own making, because our elites cannot accept the natural decline of Hegemony
2
The last shipment of ammo from the US was in January, and typically the "pipeline" of ammo is about two months deep. So how they run out of ammo in just a few weeks??
2
At this point this whole debacle is a laugher. The Russians are going through the Donbas like a hot knife through butter, even Syrsky admits Kursk has failed, there is not a single front in the whole war where AFU has the initiative, a 40,000 strong army menaces in Belarus preventing Ukraine from moving their troops there to another place they are needed, effectively removing them from the entire war. RU rules the sky; the pathetic little trio of F-16s can only fly near Lviv and only shoot down $20K drones. None of these facts are in dispute. NATO has lost, Zelensky has lost, Ukraine has lost. Only a fool believes otherwise..."
2
...and this little place called Bakhmut, Sky? What about that? The spin and deflection is laughably absurd. Putin just said "no frozen war" like the Americans are thinking----no surprise as Russia is winning.
2
That's nice. Putin says "NO". Back to the table Napolensky to try again...
2
It is coming apart; Zelensky is clearly showing his desperation at the situation. The crushing defeats of Ukraines army the past week and the announcement today by Russia that their Lyman Offensive has begun is starting to bring reality to him. The Chechens posted pictures of Ukrainian soldiers they took prisoner today and they look like Grandpa's... I'm not even sure Putin would pick up the phone today for Armistice talks. I wouldn't-----because I know tomorrow I'll have even more than I do today.
2
so, Shahed-131 goes 1500km....
2
The only reason RU would need to "go there" is if USA goes in and USA aint going in. They hardly need strategic stuff for the likes of AFU...."
2
The air bombardment news is covering up an even bigger disaster. Pokrovsk, a city of 60,000 and key to the Donbas, is on the verge of being taken. The Battle of Kursk 2024, just as I and others said 3 weeks ago, has turned out just like the Battle of Kursk 1943 for the invaders...."
2
These old F-16s may not inspire much fear, but the missiles they can carry are not to be discounted. Biden would give Zelensky every tactical bomb or missile in the US arsenal if they had a plane that could carry them. Its the long range stuff to bomb Moscow that Biden is reluctant to give because he knows if US/UK gives Ukraine a weapon to drop a skyscraper in Moscow, Russia will turn Kyiv into Bakhmut. Tactical stuff however, no problem. NATO vehicles haven't really been much of a threat, but one thing the US MIC is good at is bombs and missiles. The Russians will take the F-16 threat seriously; they'll bomb every base in Ukraine 24/7 if necessary.
2
When the goddam US and UK stop thinking they can win by donating their latest "wunderwaffe". Russia is kicking Ukraines azz all over the front, blasting them behind the line every day even worse than what they are inflicting upon them at the front. Its over.
2
If its the ones with Balkenkruez on their vehicles, good riddance...
2
 @BLUEWAVE2024-k4f yes, moving back toward Ukraine, while RU is inside Ukraine moving towards more of Ukraine..." 🤣🤣🤣
2
Starting Monday, any news channel or 'tuber that says "Ukraine is winning" is getting reported for misinformation. It is time to stop accepting blatant lies and prepare people to accept that Ukraine has been defeated...."
2
Poles in 1612. Swedes in 1708. French in 1812. Germans in 1941. Now, the AmeriBrits in 2024 (whose proxy army contains Poles, Swedes, French, and Germans). I'm not European so this pattern makes no sense to me; what is the major malfunction Europeans have with Russians? Is there a reason Europeans keep trying to invade Russia???"
2
The essence of ignorance. RU has 600K troops deployed, AFU 400K at this very moment; this is from Western estimates. AFU doesn't even have any "preserves" (RESERVES) while RU has enough to amount to half the Ukrainian army.
2
Western Propaganda to keep hopes up (and the taxpayer money flowing).
2
I'm absolutely shocked that the entire first minute this guy actually told the pure, unadulterated truth!! No spin, no lies, no propaganda about who blew up the dam, just the hard truth that no one can attack through there for weeks or months. Because of this Russia can move forces (just as Ukraine did a few days ago) to Zaporizhzhia and Donetsk where the main battle is. Such a simple thing, the truth; sad that it has become so rare in Western Media we take note when it happens.
2
Russia already countered the Storm Shadow, and annihilated UK depleted uranium shells in a massive cataclysmic explosion. Russia is fighting 30 countries with combined GDP 20 times her size to a stalemate. Amazing....
2
Trump and his incoming Admin. are said to be furious about this. Biden only had one purpose: kneecap Trump and make it more difficult for him to end the war and get that "W" early in his term.
2
Previous
8
Next
...
All