Comments by "" (@TheArklyte) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1.  @indieWellie  love it when people can recall things like Vela, but can't comprehend written text. Let me repeat it, Israel has all the same promises as Iran printed out on the same paper as Iran. Said paper being a toilet one. Have a nice day:D
    3
  2. Почему ты еще не на фронте? Неужто опять отказали такому идейному и инициативному добровольцу?
    3
  3. How many of them do you need stacked on top of each other to cross the Atlantic and invade US?😅
    3
  4. Those are bombs, not missiles. Meaning we're talking about ships without AA defense or escorts. So, what is a game changer in this scenario? Unrestricted warfare on civilian and trade vessels? Is that what you propose?:D
    3
  5. Yeah, lol, sadly at you:D Google the meaning of tactics and simulation at least, blind exlusively Gaijin pseudoelitist fanboy.
    3
  6. Counterpoint: T-72 isn't a casemate design ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯
    3
  7. ​ @Paul-qk3wr  do you see billionaires taking the lead on animal conservation or climate change?😅 Poland knows it's first target if push comes to shove. So it's proactive. And yes, it's bad that bigger wealthier countries rely on others to solve the issues.
    3
  8. Zixiang He Barely trained soldiers and officers vs the elite that had crushed all of Europe under the command of people whose actions to this day are studied by modern officers? Hmm...
    3
  9. Can you at least watch the video before commenting, Overused Stereotypes-Man?
    3
  10. Also known as WWIII. Because Pakistan is chinese ally and indian enemy. As a result you get the same result as Serbia starting WWI. China, Pakistan, PDRK and likely USA on one side with Iran, India and Russia on the other side. And the rest of NATO abstaining to plunge EU into war over USA interests.
    3
  11.  @YorkerEli  you can't mass produce top of the line MBTs. Opto-electronic components and FCS in general are just too big of a bottleneck. So every T-90M, Leo 2A7, K2, M1A2 Sep 3 or whatever your country is proud of is not coming back. You can somewhat produce or rather return to service previous gen MBTs like Russia did with T-62 with thermals. And guess what? Those are technically better then their own T-72B's as those T-62's can at least see something and are just as useless in combat against modern MBTs and just as weak against ATGMs and aviation. But for much lower price. So the name of the game looks to be dirt cheap "infantry"/recon tanks that are easy to replace which are used on the whole front to probe and to support infantry, but which fall back and call REAL tanks when situation starts getting hot. Even if calling these tanks expendable is ducked up. You don't want to hear that you're in expendable tank, do you?;)
    3
  12. ​ @dominicjohnson307  tss, that guy haven't decided which one PRC had access to because [InsertPartyHeDoesn'tSupport] sold all the secrets to China. It's based on neither beyond trying to emulate them from photos and open sources. In fact russians are now claiming that China copied J-20 from MiG-1.44 just so that they can claim to be involved in this story too😅
    3
  13.  @plebius  yep, Kessler Syndrome is a b..tch. Hence me ridiculing what I heard back then and even sometimes nowadays;)
    3
  14. Not unless Japan wins. That would be real victory for China.
    3
  15. 1)which technological breakthrough? 2)where's the mass production of naval academies?
    3
  16. What the... why?
    3
  17. Alberto Amoruso you're right, picking the worst NATO tank against any T-90 was unfair. Should have been newest variants of Leo2 vs same of T-90. Or just Leclerc vs Armata.
    2
  18. Hi there, account created in 2014 and fanboying for Russia in every comment. How is your russian made smartphone doing? What about russian made 3/4G equipment you use to post these comments? Well, sorry to break it to you, but sometimes capability has a price and going below it means simply NOT having said capability.
    2
  19. So far only Turkey(supplies weapons to Ukraine, supports Azerbaijan, deals with russian oil and gas) and China(sells arms to Ukraine through Pakistan and to Russia through North Korea) are winning:(
    2
  20. They will have higher chances to sell to other NATO members, but would (maybe) lose customers like China... to whom they weren't selling anyway(unlike France). The real gain is in ability to get into joint development projects and get a cut of that US military budget pie.
    2
  21.  @johndododoe1411  have you seen the spike in Rafalle sales?!
    2
  22.  @OhNotThat  he means in comparison to WWII state of soviet military, specifically with how it was during invasion of Finland(which was a belated wake up call that saved the country during Barbarossa). Obviously late 70's - early 80's soviet military was much better. However those days are long gone. Equipment remained the same though...
    2
  23.  @opex9979  давай уж по русски раз иностранные ты так и не осилил, милок. Ничего, "загнивающий" Гугл за тебя тоже перевести сможет
    2
  24. @Ajx, you do realize that people can see other comments you've made by opening your profile, right?
    2
  25. So, how many naval pilots and carrier personnel were they able to train with their 2 Kuznetsov clones? Will they scrap those to crew this one? IJN also had impressive in SIZE ships.
    2
  26.  @Zachomara  speaking as someone born in USSR - if you take our military as an example, you're bound to have a lot of trouble when you try to change the course to something we never had, were shitty at when tried and never attempted again. IE Carrier operations. I indeed lack info about PLA capabilities as there isn't much info around. But when they buy our equipment and parade it as state of the art, I get all the answers I need. Which problems they copied, what problems they have, what is the real state of that circus.
    2
  27.  @sztypettto  the tone and nature of the question dictates the ones for the answer. Don't ask fantasy questions if you don't like getting joke answers \/(-_-)\/ But it's nice to see you have a degree of self critique in knowing exactly where such questions belong;)
    2
  28. ​ @kolerick  "one must imagine roman legions as Redcoats"
    2
  29. Specify "we" and "this country", please, dear tourist. Or at least write in a way people can understand your schizorant
    2
  30. Bill who said that Abrams is anywhere near the best? On the contrary, it might be the WORST NATO tank:P
    2
  31. I would actually argue about astounding propaganda and censorship capability to manipulate the data flow being greatest asset.
    2
  32. Helpless against real soviets? No, just no. Helpless against Hollywood version of soviets? 50/50 Helpless against soviets from CIA reports asking for funding? Hell yeah!
    2
  33. Как там твоя "трехдневная спецоперация"? Еще не сказали идти садиться в Т-55?😂
    2
  34. By making russian tankies remember or write down all the more equipment types they'd need to try to claim to be inferior and maximize their time spent on wikipedia instead of annoying other people on the web? Though it's not like they ever engage in the argument in the first place, hmm... 🤔
    2
  35. ​ @tetraxis3011  Ukraine is a nuclear power with many active nuclear power stations that make up serious part of their power grid. They support those by their own efforts. They agreed not to develop their own nukes too, but they could. Or are you claiming that North Korea is an example of massive prosperous economy? Are you? P.S.: to use a nuke you don't need a launch code. Launch code is needed for ICBMs. Nuke is a warhead that is removable from it and which can be used by gravity bomb on a plane(Ukraine also had to give up strategic bomber aircraft), transported by a truck or even used as a mine. Or put into different missile since Ukraine is producing orbital launch vehicles.
    2
  36. @tetraxis3011  said the guy, who can't even google ADMs🤣
    2
  37.  @crayonsukrou913  you're correct, it's really shameful that EU members considered US a partner, often at a loss to EU and NATO overall instead of trying to be more independent. This is a discussion about how that can be fixed. Why does that idea of self sufficient alliance not relying on US insulting you so much to provoke comments?
    2
  38.  @msvh-l9616  yep, mostly the same shit.... with periodically added genocide on top on behalf of our western buddies. There's an old joke that being in center of Europe means that all armies in history has raped, killed and pillaged on your territory while just passing through to their actual enemies:D
    2
  39. If you people dislike CCP so much, why are you so afraid to sell weapons to Taiwan? Even sails of f//cking M60 is a problem. Or actually do something to replace chinese components en masse instead of flashing news articles about moving production and banking to India and then reverting decision the next week? All bark, but when push comes to shove all you do is repeat catchphrases from media that is owned by same corporations that s//ck chinese meat flute. That's not even pathetic, that's treasonous and you support it:D
    2
  40. "the best Flanker" Judging by how many insults I have gotten from certain people every time I mention how China decided against continuing relationship with russian aircraft engines, this would be a bit controversial... at least to them😅
    2
  41. Liam Baynon don't embarass yourself with such statements. It was only the first who coined the term "assault rifle"... which is basically a translation of it's name. Claiming that it was first AR though is like claiming that Colt invented the revolver. There were dozens if not hundreds of prototypes of similar weapons, some of which were even mass produced and saw limited service. Such terms like "battle rifle", "PDW" and some others were born because of difficulty at classyfiying those. Two most famous examples are BAR(machine rifle/LMG/SAW/automatic rifle/battle rifle) and Fyodorov Avtomat(LMG/SAW/automatic rifle/battle rifle/avtomat) which were both mass produced and used by military. And while BAR used full sized .30-06 rifle round, 6.5x50 Arisaka round used by FA actually has the same bullet mass, power and velocity as some cartridges that classify as intermediate, specifically czech 7.62x45 vz.52. If you want to find first assault rifle ever, you're searching time period of wrong World War:P
    2
  42. Houston Snelbaker WWII ended in september of 1945, T-55 have entered production only in 1956! It was T-44 that was ready by the end of 1944 and saw some limited production in 1945 without being used in combat. And it would have made no difference as it had the same gun as T-34-85. T-44-100 prototype that later resulted in first T-54 model is late 1945, long after german surrender. Go get some sleep and return when you're sober.
    2
  43.  @Janshevik  иронично, но в отличии от тебя он это знает. А вот у вас есть только две позиции "они врут" и "ну они же врут!" :))
    2
  44.  @Janshevik  зачем ты притворяешься словеном, если фанатеешь от действий сербов и Путина? Или у тебя все еще подростковый максимализм играет в одном месте?:D
    2
  45. And then plans will somehow end up in Beijing again...
    2
  46.  @yopiee8342  Germany ordered 144 Maus tanks. And? So, 12 Su-57, 1 per year of the project. Against a 1996 plane that will leave the scene in a decade. Don't know about you, but it looks more like Russia is trying to "outwait" its "enemies"(enemies in quotations because for some reason Putin calls China a friend). You know, just a few decades more and things will get better. On their own. После нас хоть Потоп...
    2
  47.  @lovehawks2814  pretty much. And said market is India, country with money, but without proper military industry and sharing same potential enemy on the continent as Russia - China. However the plan is to advertise in to New Delhi so they'd bankroll development of REAL equipment for Russia... and indians aren't happy with that arrangement. So nothing gets done. Putin doesn't want equal cooperation because he views India below himself and indians don't want to be dependent on seller, who doesn't want to contribute themselves.
    2
  48.  @jonaliboro8052  problem is HOW they got it. Selling russian newest weaponry to China has treason written all over it. Not surprising given the corrupt state, but come on, it's like as if USSR started selling battle ready tanks instead of oil to Germany in 1940. There are limits after which you're just "too stupid to live". I can get selling resources or components or idea, but not bleeding edge tech you developed to counter this very same guys.
    2
  49. I hope this video has brought up fake targets we include in our ICBMs alongside proper warheads and how the whole point of stealth irl is to make planes indistinguishable from chaff and flares in presence of active electronic countermeasures.
    2
  50. China is still trying to 1)grow an actual usable navy; 2)just buy out taiwanese politicians and exploit corruption. And DPRK(isn't it PDRK?) is a good doggy and won't do anything until daddy in Beijing says so. Right now PRC is much more likely to start prospecting Afghanistan for mining under the cover of Taliban and Pakistan. After all, they bankrolled it. On the other hand, they may likewise just be interested in keeping it chaotic to keep chinese high percentage on rare Earth metals market intact.
    2