Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Military Summary" channel.

  1. Knife attack is if course about being silent and by that not alarming others. The cape, black as it is on that thermo cam, was likely used for just that until that point or if any drone would show up. They obviously got drone support and were led by that. So all superhero jokes aside, that was more James Bond level, if you want to compare it to fiction.
    143
  2. You can be 100% sure if someone tried to do that "destabilize the Muslim region of Russia", it was the USA, not Ukraine...
    122
  3. That boat is likely 5% of the price of that drone.
    94
  4. Those ship attacks just ensure, that Russia won't leave Ukraine any port. Congrats.
    87
  5. Ever seen NATO wars? You pretty much almost got more dead civilians than combatans.
    78
  6. It's some random trucks, you don't even see any kind of explosions = there was no ammunition on board, nothing. Just a random terror attack by guys who proudly use the emblem of the Waffen SS Galicia. Militarywise absolutely worthless. This is not like a strike of Russia these days where they blew up a truck that clearly had tons of ammunition on board. At best these trucks had some building material for trenches or whatever.
    72
  7. It's a patrol boat. If you look at the fleet, all the real warships are undamage. It overall shows that NATO can try all their terrorist tactics as they like, they are unable to even damage the not even very important Black Sea Fleet in a real way. They go after low value targets for PR, because they can't do anything else.
    64
  8. What an absurd idea, that someone would use trenches and alike directly at the frontline as supply roads.
    55
  9.  @ussindianapolis487  You mean oryx where NAFO triple posts destroyed Ukrainian tanks as Russian ones?
    55
  10. IRIS T is good enough against drones - still too expensive with 200.000$ and more per missile. Range ist also limited, but at least it's not 5.000.000$ per shot as Patriot.
    47
  11. "Sir, sir, the enemy attacked!" "They breached the castlewall?!" "No, Sir!." "They attack the gate?" "No, Sir!" "God damn, tell me, boy!" "They took control over that pit latrine at the border of the forest!" That's how most of this feels...
    44
  12.  @mikaeljansson149  Never heared of 5 million, but with some hunrdredthousands dead, overall casualties including wounded being 1,5 million plus isn't far fetched and goes along well with reality. Russia is dominating in absolut every regard, when it comes to drones, artillery, missiles and of course pretty much the only one able to use aviation. A single FAB is doing more damage than hundreds of drones (majority of those getting destroyed anyway, you just only see the few % of succeeding drones, not the hundredsthousands which are destroyed) and Russia is using hundreds of those week by week. And that's just the FABs.
    43
  13. First thought: wait 50k in three monthes is more than 35k in just one month (per month), but they mean 50k every month for three monthes? Is it so bad meanwhile that they need 50k to replace the losses, not just those 20k as before? And 35k is still massive. We talk about 465k people in a year.
    40
  14. Look at Greece and what EU fascists did with it. Now imagine what they gonna do with Ukraine...
    35
  15. Was there any secondary explosion? Was there actually any military stuff on those trucks? By the way: that blue yellow lion emblem on that video is from the SS Galicia (14th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS). Look it up.
    33
  16.  @andrew30m  Until 2014 Ukraine had a government that trade well with Russia and the west. An illegal coup pushed by NATO destroyed that, followed by the illegal coup regime starting a civili war against its own people. You got zero clue what you are talking about.
    32
  17.  @jug5298  History tells us that the Banderas Nazis loved to kill otehr Ukrainians since a 2. WW at least and especially again in the last 9 years.
    32
  18. They tell such BS stories since start, what's new about it?
    31
  19.  @clydelouis5956  Ukraine used cluster munition since 2014 - not against soldiers, though, they fire against cities with them.
    31
  20. By the explosioini that was no ammuntion depot. Russia is by the way taking much care for civilians regarding food, water, medicine. So quite likely that they just blew up some food end medicine.
    31
  21. Imaging wasting 12 expensive cruise missiles to make a little, easy to repair hole in a bridge. 12 Storm Shadow missiles = 36 million dollars.
    28
  22. Iskander got a 800kg warhead. That building would look VERY different...
    26
  23.  @edthebumblingfool  Funny enough as soon as you Nazis saw the chance, that Wagne may switch sides, you instantly forgot about all these losses. Wagner was never big to begin with. And the whole medial focus on them was mainly one thing: distraction.
    26
  24. Not even dominance. Randomly attacking something because it's the only thing you can manage it deadly stupid.
    26
  25. Utterly insane 'bridgehead' in modern times. No space, enemy knows where you are, if not firing now than clearly waitin till you bring more stuff there to blow up.
    26
  26.  @Marlene-ou5ol  Having some guys with knives flying a plane into your Pentagon is embarassing.
    25
  27. That Ukraine is now willing to talk with Russia without Russia just giving up completely, that's on the level of Monty Phyton, when the Black Knights without arms and legs is willing to call it a draw.
    24
  28. Yeah, the northern European countries somehow always got a thing for fascists, nothing new.
    24
  29. Uuuuh, that situation at the river is a typical trap scenario - and the Banderites they let go there are the bait. To keep that awful position, they have to keep sending troops and equipment, what is simply wasted there with ease. Only chance to get out of that trap is to retreat, but even that will likely not be possible without Russia stricking down on them. They could crush them, but then Ukraine may likely stop sending more troops and equipment to destroy. In contrast, letting them stay there forces the regime to keep sending more.
    24
  30.  @lockeboss502  Because those are pretty much free fall, you got very little time, they are small, fast, got very low signature. Anti air was overall never designed to intercept bombs and while the gliding makes it a bit more possible it's still not enough. Drawback is the low range so overall what you would intercept is the actual bomber. If you can't do that, well, you are fucked.
    23
  31. Bad weather is bad for everyone equally. Russia steps back because there is simply no need to push with the higher risk bad weather brings, that's all. If Ukraine is doing this, it just shows why they lose to brutally.
    22
  32.  @fabianschrotter  There are many different red lines, child.
    22
  33.  @zarhun7  Biggest reason HIMARS survives long is Ukraine hiding it very well and sparsely use it for quite random attacks. Overall the impact of it is minimal.
    21
  34.  @erikjacobsen9021  Nazis could have followed Minsk 2 and stop their genocide, but no...
    21
  35.  @chrissmith7669  You mean reality?
    20
  36. "and claims that he will show absolutely everything" Yuck... thanks for that mental picture....
    20
  37. It's mainly about North Korea having so many shells which will never be needed, so you just use something that would be thrown away else. And of course North Korea gets more from having bigger powers protecting it against US fascism.
    19
  38.  @Cottam89  Russia never tried to take Kiev. Only a complete idiot would think that, because the idea that Russia would send a few thousands soldiers to conquer a 3 million city like Kiev is absolute absurd.
    19
  39. Those lone tans send in are bait. They are tanks and made to take hits, that's their main reason to exist. A single tank will never be able to do much, but sending them in forces the enemy to act - and then this is used to reveal the troops of the enemy, to be attacked by artillery, drones, aviation and so on.
    19
  40. Iskander got a firing range of around 500km. Why the frick should Russia have a warehouse with Iskander missiles a few km away from the frontline? Ever seen an Iskander launcher there? So why should missiles be?
    19
  41. That's no bridgehead, that's a cauldron they create for themselves = insane.
    18
  42.  @Jamicaman516  Kid, the poijt of the Iran drones is not that they are super duper high tech, but that they are super duper low tech, cheap and still effective. They mainly show how shit the western systems are.
    18
  43. Shouldn't forget to put a Svastika on their flag and some "Heil Maui!" or alike.
    18
  44. Reason why the Russians went out of the city was the attacking of the dam, not those fire cracker attacks on the bridge.
    18
  45.  @LevanGudadze  What is utterly unimportant, since it's just that, transport aircraft. Only interesting part is, that this likely came from NATO territory, but that's also nothing new, overall this whole war is a a 100% NATO war since a year, without NATO fascism Ukraine wouldn't be able to do shit - and many Ukrainians wouldn't be dead today.
    18
  46. Crimea is the main ship. You can control the whole Black Sea from there.
    18
  47. If you send drones or drones and missiles in waves, it only makes sense when you do this at the same time, so the first wave can saturate the air defense with the second wave getting through thanks to that. Else you just warn the enemy and make it even less lightly that your main wave gets throuth.
    17
  48.  @andrew30m  Moskva didn't even take part in the SMO. If you think your Nazis shot at it with NATO weapons, then you call them even more stupid, because they obviously had this one shot (since you never saw anything like that again) and wasted it to attack an absolute unimportant way over 40 year old ship. And who cares if they manage to damage a small, damaged submarine in the dry dock. Again: an absolute pointless hit with zero miitary impact = a stupid target. But likely the only thing they can hit. Like sneaking into Mike Tysons bedroom to punch him in the face when he sleeps, then brag about how you beat Mike Tyson.
    17
  49.  @ptitemerde1  Russia never gave any time line. This aside: they would have done just that, without NATO pumping in good 200% of the Urkainian GDP into their Banderites and the coup regime absolutely willing to sacrifice Ukraine's population to just keep this going.
    17
  50. sigh That position across the river isn't a problem for the Russians but the Ukrainians. It's a horrible position, especially in case of Ukraine, with the river right in their back and zero room for movement.
    17