Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Military Summary" channel.

  1. Is there actual proof that the ship was destroyed? Because the whole video looks a lot like the last fake they made up when they alked about a warship they sank, but then it showed up with no damage at all.
    17
  2. While every lost life is a tragedy, those aren't heavy losses in general at all.
    17
  3. US had sent thousands of advisors since 2014 - and before.
    17
  4. That's like saying when an enemy doesn't manage to break the castle gate, that you wouldn't have been in the need of the castlewalls in the first place. Those fortified lines ARE the reason they can't break through, since there you got all the artillery and missile systems. The first line is mainly a blocker.
    16
  5.  @centurionoomae1543  Only a small fraction fights at the front and where the Banderas Nazis fight, you got only some scout units
    16
  6. Rofl. Sorry, but Prigoshin wasn't some "military leader on the ground who could tell the truth to the people". He was a PR troll.
    15
  7. If that's true that the air defense was hacked in some way, that makes it indeed likely that the Russians did it - and is pretty horrible for the enemy when they can do that. They just shut off your defense.
    15
  8. Biggest problem is, that he talks too much out of his ass. He should focus on the facts and keep it that way and of course understand that you only see a very small fraction of what is happening on the videos. As desperate as the Banderits are, they love to seel their view successes on the internet, but Russia for example got no reason to show everything they do on the internet, what includes showing it to the enemy, since this is just counterproductive and utterly worthless.
    15
  9.  @MegaAsmodey  No, they did not. Ukrop Nazis tried to blame it on them, like the attack ton the train station or market, but it had always been themselves.
    15
  10. Sneaking in isn't a bridgehead. A bridgehead is a solidly fortified point from which you can start further operation. Sneaking in is just sneaking in.
    15
  11. You people and the words you heared. Momentum. What do you even think that is? You do get, that Ukraine taking Bakhmut back would be wonderful for Russia and they got not much need or reason to prevent this. Bakhmut is destroyed by the Nazis abusing it as cover. If they got back there with even more troops, you can just keep bombing them. Same for those areas on the map north and south. Those aren't fortified positions. You got some light scout troops there at best, the real defense lines are far behind that. What is the idea you poeple have? That where those colored areas on the map touch, that there are two frontlines with thousands of soldiers and tanks who look at each other? There is no "breakthrough", because there is nothing to break through.
    15
  12. Real question would be how you can be so stupid/fanatic to fall for such an obvious trap. If they would have manage to create a real bridgehead and continue from there, you could discuss it, but the way it wen, they just kept throwing bodies into that hole for no other reason thatn to talk about how many bodies they got in that hole. There is litereally nothing they could do from there they couldn't have done from the other side of the river. Pure insanity.
    15
  13. That blue yellow lion emblem on that video is from the SS Galicia (14th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS). Also: I don't see any bigger or secondary explosion. What exactly were those trucks?
    14
  14. There is nothing to exploit, there is LESS to exploit now.
    14
  15. Retreating only makes sense when you got a follow up plan. Else you should give up. Russia for example retreated from certain regiosn because those were without of importance and they instead strengthened the frontline by shortening and of course fortifying it. Only sacrifice they made was when trying to hold Kherson city, accepting the massive disadvantage with a river in their back to keep the city from harm. The terror attack on the dam ruined that, but in military tems it massively improved the situation of the Russian army not turning the river into an advantage.
    14
  16. Not suicide, but losses which can be avoided, so they got not need. It's even better for Ukrainian soldiers - if their fascistic regime would simply give up.
    14
  17.  @doresearchstopwhining  Child, that was an office building and if that was hit by western cruise missiles, well, then western cruise missels are garbage, if they can't even destroy such a a small building.
    14
  18.  @banhunlanglyngdohnongbri2734  The Banderites show every little thing they can, including their own destroyed tanks and sell them as Russians. And even when you take all that together you don't come even near those 200.
    13
  19.  @just_dimi3  Those were trucks, kid. And not even with ammunition on board. They drone bombed some trucks. While puting the emblem of the Ukrainian SS unit onto the video.
    13
  20. They would have to send 100s of systems for that and even that would likely not be enough.
    13
  21.  @schepvogelk5971  See: only an idiot would care for "humiliation" in warfare, it's certain way to defeat if you think like that.
    13
  22. It's still in the range of such missiles, but you got more time to intercept them this way, that's all. No need to risk it.
    13
  23. The stories he tell to it are just stupid. That's just the missuse of the word bridgehead. It's like painting some wheels on a paper box and call it a car. Also "securing the area" You can't secure an area that is in the kill zone of drones, air force, missiles and artillery. Only way to secure it would be to destroy all that, but nothing of that is in that area they jump around in.
    12
  24.  @bartolino980  The guy with the weapons got the power. Azov itself openly said they would kill Zelensky when he tries to stop them. So Zelensky became a good pro Nazi president.
    12
  25.  @geoffc1694  You do get that these 11/1 losses are Ukraine/Russia, right? The very basic of warfare is logistic and it's even worse in Kursk for the Banderites than everywhere else.
    12
  26.  @TMHYAH7  Ukraine is becoming a hole in the ground thanks to the support of NATO. Else they would just have given up and wouldn't be ultra bankrupt with hundredthousands of lost lives.
    11
  27.  @SimonH1111  Those are not gains. People must learn to understand, that those lines on the map aren't the frontline. Those are the borders of the most brutal killing zones. The fortified positions and defense lines are far behind that, especially those with the heavy weaponry, drone commanders and so on, which are 2nd line and beyond. So those "gains" are just walking right into the kill zone.
    11
  28. UK/EU = NATO...
    11
  29.  @chrisdee216  Robotyne was 500 people village, a stain on the map and that in front of the actual defense line. They liteally fought for weeks against some scout units.
    11
  30. If they don't want to attack anymore, than their action at Kherson is even more stupid, because that's an awful defense position in every way.
    11
  31.  @louise_rose  US navy losses way bigger ship to random fire in their home harbour. And not forget how some guys with knives flew a giant plane right into the Pentagon.
    11
  32.  @kapokparski4573  Most fled the Nazi regime and Nazis never fightt for their land. The Nazis attack the people in the east and south, the Nazis don't live there, it's not their home at all.
    10
  33. Well, not really. Maybe a thousands but that's still a very fictional number.
    10
  34.  @dennisg1460  If NATO attacked the Moskva, it just shows how incompetent the generals are, because it was the absolute most useless target for that single shot they got. An almost half a century old ship that didn't even take part in the SMO. The USA lost double as big and half as old ships to fire - and that right in their homeport.
    10
  35.  @Bishop46066  Retreats are since thousands of years a very succesful tactic. It's simply stupid to hold an area out of stubborness, when it's much smarter to fall back for further strikes agaist the enemy. Positioning is extremely important. If there is an extremely advantage positions, you don't want to give it up. Some open fields are never a good position.
    10
  36. It's an obvious trap and the soldiers they let get there are the bait. Those soldiers there can do nothing what couldn't be done better from the other side of the river and that without constantly losing massive amounts of troops and equipment just to keep them equipped. Utterly insane.
    10
  37.  @A31415  "You wasted millions of dollars on this crap." "I wasted much more before on other things." - "You do get, that this makes it worse?"
    10
  38.  @avratzz  Poland wouldn't even exist anymore without Russia.
    9
  39.  @edthebumblingfool  Russia buys North Korean ammunition, because North Korea has no need for it. It would have to discard it in some years, so instead they sell it to Russia, who instead of using their newer ammunition will fill their depots with that.
    9
  40.  @TimMountjoy-zy2fd  It's more a country of 20M, with many left the countr and of course no one on Crimea and in south/east Ukraine fighting for the coup regime. And they are WAY beyond the 500.000 you imagine, they already lost much more to death and injuries than that.
    9
  41.  @Daniel-vw7mw  Simply because Ukraine made a lot of old stuff ready, likely with help of NATO. NATO also sent in many of the soviet stuff the eastern European NATO countries still got.
    9
  42. It's quite normal that in case of an aggression from outside, that people tend to not take risks and stay with the old, that is something that is abused in the west often enough, when they scaremonger. In case of Russia, it's not Putin that creates that threat, but the west, constantly, openly talking about how Russia must be punhished up to destroyed and that after centuries of tries to do just that up to genocidal mass murder. The only time where a threat from the outside will create backlash for the government is when the citizens got reason to blame that government for it but either a) being the reason for that threat (and even then they might stay with them) or b) seen as too weak, what generally leads to them going for a much more brutal government, so they would vote for someone who comes up with just stomping Ukraine into the ground and going much harder on NATO. We can be glad, that Russia stays with a peaceful Putin instead of going for that, like our stupid western citizens tend to do...
    9
  43. That destroyed aicraft picture looks manipulated. By the damage that was no cluster ammunition, but in both cases a direct hit, but both airframes are destroyed in the exact same way, what is extremely unlikely.
    9
  44. Drone simply had no weapon, that's all. Many drone are like that, that's the standard use of them. And of course when you see the drone, you can also see if they are armed or not.
    9
  45.  @raysschoko  What system, kid? Those are some random trucks with not a single gram ammunition on board, obviously, since none of them explodes.
    9
  46.  @hongry-life  She actuallly called Ukraine "Kokaine". Funny enough she first started righit with ukrain... than switched to cocainian grain.
    9
  47. The whole "captured" thing is so stupid. It's like someone manages to physically get to the upper level of a company into the office of the CEO and then media writes "random guy takes over company". Just to GO there isn't the problem.
    9
  48. It's not the point. The point is the brutal losses. Warfare is about destroying the enemy's army. Doesn't matter at all who controls village A or not.
    9
  49. Роботине is a village that had an population of under 500! Why are all media treating it like they would have taken Mariupol or whatever?
    9
  50.  @daffyduck780  No, it's not, nor does the damage look like much at all. And that news report about a "2,8 earthquake" would be aroudn 20t of TNT.
    9