Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Military Summary" channel.

  1. Oh, they did defend it and could have done further, the thing with the attack on the dam made it too high risk. Of course Ukraine simply does not have the skills nor weaponry to do the same.
    9
  2. Why peopel even care about what piece of area belongs to whom? It's unimportant. That town is just a bunch of ruins and not even past the first defenseline. It's a nothing burger.
    9
  3. They haven't even reached the first line, which is a pure obstacle.
    8
  4.  @Bishop46066  Ukraine lost several armies. Without the gigantic debt it was put in by NATO fascism, it would be done for since a year and still is. NATO fascism just keeps throwing wood into the fire.
    8
  5.  @arostwocents  Bloggers are some social media guys = random people on the internet.
    8
  6.  @AlfaOmega-mz7hw  Not a jail, a slaughterhouse.
    8
  7. That's not a S-300 "division". Do you know what the word division means? It's one system at best. Russia got around 2000 S-300 launcher, 800 of them active. Means they got 1200 as replacement standing around.
    8
  8. As the evil queen?
    8
  9.  @edthebumblingfool  Move from Kherson? If you mean that going on the other side of the river: that was because the Nazis bombarded the dam. Too high risk to hold that position in that case and they had to evacuate the civilians anyway because of this. After that there was simply no reason to fight with a river in your back (= massive disadvantage) instead of using it as natural barrier (= advantage).
    8
  10.  @lloads642  Doesn't matter. There are overall several commanders anyway and you let the one lead who is best at what you currently need, what changes over the course of a long operation. Nothing special.
    8
  11.  @AA-hm9cg  Russia isn't known for that at all, it's just what NATO PR says. Meanwhile NATO PR also says, that they provide false data for their own weapons, but of course the are much better in reality.
    8
  12. Heared that two helicopters are beyond repair, rest only damaged and those who are there joke about how this again was made some big thing from social media warriors... ~shrug~
    8
  13. Pretty absurd to start nuclear escelation with a strike against Kalininigrad.
    7
  14. Best tactic of Ukraine would be to travel back in time to 2014 and not suicide.
    7
  15. Progress in sacrificing their people for nothing and wasting billions of dollars they don't have.
    7
  16.  @klangartberlin  Seems you are of of the germans with the Nazi gen...
    7
  17.  @unknownkw  Russia does not want Kiev...
    7
  18.  @edthebumblingfool  Not at all. Russia isn't known for using gas. The USA/NATO is - what by the way includes Saddam's gas. NATO gave it to him.
    7
  19. Don't insult weasels, they are awesome, brave and cute.
    7
  20.  @RobinHarris-nf4yv  There is no evidence at all, child. And you know what is funny? When you praise your missiles so much and are utterly unable even damage the actual warships which blow up billions of your gear day in and out.
    7
  21. The whole talk is so stupid. "They control Роботине!" Yeah... that's not videogame. You don't get points for that or a respawn flag or whatever, no resources, nothing. That they send units like insane there is just that... insane. Wouldn't surprise me if at one point Russia just drops a FOAB onto it... That <500 peopel village is not even behind the first defense line = to pile up your troops there isn't something you should do at all, especially not taking so long. For an attack like that you need to push as hard and fast as possible through all defense lines. When you fool around in front of the first one, that's pretty much the worst you can do.
    7
  22. Ukrop Nazis fire on the city, so why shouldn't you help civilians who don't want to stay there as long as this lasts?
    7
  23.  @funny_money_ad_infinitum  You don't get infos about over 90% of the strikes make. You think those few videos you see are the only ones happening?
    7
  24.  @useyourbrain1539  Thing is, you can't hit someone where they are not. Abusing a weakpoint only makes sense, if you can abuse this for an actual strike, not punching air.
    7
  25. You never only have a one layered plan. Simply jsut falling back with the idea of making a cauldrons sounds fine, but gives you little room to react. Instead they now play a heavy defense tactic - and the cauldron looms over that on top.
    7
  26.  @insomniacresurrected1000  Pointless to try understanding fascists, you would have to be as fanatic and insane as them for that.
    7
  27. Russia showed more than once that they can remote control tanks. Overall wouldn't surprise if they use bait tactics, especially when you got suppossed systems standing in the open withotu any cover, begging to be detected and shot at.
    7
  28. Hell, how shall they create a "VERY POWERFUL STRONGHOLD!" there with infantery? And for what even?
    7
  29. Just absurd to come up with something over 100 years ago with completely different situations, technology, the whole system (that was still monarchy times).
    7
  30. You neither see big destruction nor do the explosions or fires (any forest fire looks like that). If you want so see a big ammunition depot being blown up, there were some during the time after 2014 in Ukraine. That's a "big ammunition depot blowing up" explosion.
    7
  31. Because it's just some random trucks with nothing military worthwhile on board? Do you see a single bigger or secondary explosion? No? Because none of these trucks carry ammunition. So why even attack them?
    7
  32.  @garylines5755  The thing is, that only idiots or crazies compare war with shopping.
    6
  33. Low range and overall vulnerable to Russians electronical counter meassure.
    6
  34. Hell, it's the reason why this channel is most of the time a waste of time. Taking internet BS seriously and being dramatic about it, oh my...
    6
  35. The first mistake is to think that the USSR collapsed. Russia didn't want all these eastern Europeasn countries from the start and only hold them as blockers. The collapsing part is at best the process, which did not work out as clean as it should - and NATO has its part in that, too.
    6
  36. That alone would be around 5 billion dollars, just those 1000 missiles.
    6
  37. For years? So a satellite weapon. Only way to stay in air that long, to get into an orbit. Of course not impossible to achieve.
    6
  38.  @craiggodard6419  They are likely smaller than reality, because Russian MOD only gives known destroyed targets, not when for example stuff gets destroyed by Kalibr missiles and alike without the possibility to tell how much.
    6
  39. The less remains, the lesser you can lose every day.
    6
  40. Sorry, but what got the Azov guys to do with the grain deal? Absolutely nothing.
    6
  41. The Ukrop Nazis got massive problem with hitting thins on Russian territory, becaue they got close to no system to do it. Something here and there doesn't help you, when on the other side you got hit 10-20 times more.
    6
  42. Child, they surrounded that most armed stronghold of the Banderites, what shows that they dominate them.
    6
  43.  @Chon-c  Only a fraction of it is used in Ukraine. Russia didn't even have a single full mobilisation. The Nazi regime got over 10 rounds of conscription meanwhile.
    6
  44.  @drencrum  It's no race. Russia's focus is clearly on limiting own losses and the risk for the lives of its soldiers. Yes, you can always go faster, but this massively increases the risks. If you got an enemy that is that fanatically stupid to just keep coming, there is really no need to hurry and just welcome this and exploit it.
    6
  45.  @wolfgangohmer3518  Well, Ukraine IS ultra bankrupt, why do you think NATO has to pay ALL the bills?
    6
  46. 266 hectar (or 2,66 square km), is below half the size of Arlington with 639 hectar. It started at 200 hectar, but that's the today's size. Arlington is place 8 in the list of biggest cemeteries on the planet and not even the biggest in the USA, that would be that one: Calverton National Cemetery Area: 1,045 Acres Buried: 212,000 (as of 2008) Established: 1978 Location: Calverton, NY, United States Regarding the number of graves: that depends a lot on the size of it. While over 50% bigger than Arlington, Calverto got only half the graves.
    6
  47.  @kapokparski4573  "The Defence Intelligence of Ukraine has confirmed " - would be more believeable if you wrote that your dog confirmed it.
    6
  48. The whole "under control" thing is nonsense talk anyway. Under control means, that this zone is save and you can't be attacked there. If you can be attacked there, you are not under control. By that: pretty much whole Ukraine isn't "under control" of Ukraine, for sure not the frontlines. You can argue, that some attacks here and there are acceptable, but for sure not when the enemy can just obliterate you with bombs and missiles.
    6
  49. That would take 1 second of thought, how dare you to demand that?
    6
  50. All their actual warships are undamaged, what are you talking about?
    6