Comments by "Miriam Weller" (@miriamweller812) on "Military Summary" channel.

  1. They are mercenaries. It's their job to sell their fighting power to people who pay for it. So for example they could jsut work in Belarus as bodyguads or whatever or just stay a small mercenary force, just not the size of the original Wagner anymore. Wagner had a LOT of support from Russia, especially when it comes to equipment.
    6
  2.  @Torgrim5958  NATO fascism was 20 years in Afghanistan, fighting goat herders who neither got an army (well, they do now...) nor any endless billion support - and lost. Because that's what a loss looks like, when you start a war with a goal and not only reach nothing of it, but the opposite.
    6
  3. Sure, because this is some videogame, where you just put a landing ship full of soldiers on the sea for the lols. Hell, if that attack was even real, it was a not used ship with no weaponry, they love to attack these, beacuse it is something they can hit. The impact is of course borderline zero. And no, why should there have been any losses of the crew? A damaged ship doesn't kill the crew on board for no reason. Again: stop living in a videogame.
    6
  4.  @arostwocents  Kid, 2/3 of those were civilians.
    6
  5.  @arostwocents  You believe a Nazi soldier who is telling absurd lies which were all contradicted?
    6
  6. You mean that one picture where you see one tank with a Z (which by the way you can simply paint on your own tanks anyway) plus three Wehrmacht Cross tanks? And alike? Even if they would have captured 100 tanks, what would it be in comparison to the thousands they have lost? And no, they did neithe conquer nor destroy 100+ tanks, not even close. Ukraine tells us, that they got more tanks than ever since monthes, while begging NATO to send more and more and ever more.
    6
  7.  @jug5298  Yes. Easily. Starting with that western economy is a joke. Better ask about asian economy, especially China.
    6
  8. When you look at the picture, the light is very different, so this could just be odd reflections you can suddenly see. Look at the building part south of it. Looks utterly different by the light. What kind of explosive should this even be? Why should you place them like that?
    5
  9.  @cgpxae2119  You do get that the shown loot is close to nothing and a small fraction of what Ukraine loses every single day since months.
    5
  10. Russia got zero reason to show their operations. They give some examples here and there, that's it, you won't see the majority of operations. You already got example of how the helicopters works, no reason to repeat that. War is deception, so in general, you show the enemy as little as possible and if, then not something they can use against you.
    5
  11. Whole thing looks fishy. I just smokes a bit, doesn't explode and stands in the open like stupid. Looks very odd, like a fake bait.
    5
  12. The thing is, while this may work with the western slaveholder who are in the end just greedy merchants, it doesn't work at all when you talk to an actual political leader.
    5
  13. The fact that they shoot at some civilian target again just shows, how they just want a picture of something but are unable to use it fo anything worthwhile regarding warfare.
    5
  14. If you really think that NATO isn't directly involved in this...
    5
  15.  @-John-Doe-  Desert Storm was more a mass murderous beat down against someone who was a) incredible worse equipped, b) fatigued from two wars c) without any will to fight and d) no support from anyone else. So it's simply ridiculous easy to slaughter such an enemy, that's all.
    5
  16.  @bobjones-bt9bh  Yeah, guess what: they simply never stopped lying as they do since day 1. Why do peopel think that the "Snake Island" and "Ghost of Kiev" guys would suddenly be honest?
    5
  17. 266 hectar is pretty big but clearly not the biggest. Biggest in the USA is over 1000 hectar (second place in the world), biggest is in Iraq with 2200 hectar - and around 5 million graves.
    5
  18. They don't step back. What you see there is all in front of the defense lines, the Russian units who are there are scout level and constant movement is the very thing they do in general.
    5
  19. It's not about labour. North Korea got a hell lot of ammunition lay around which would at some point have to be replaced anyway. It's just economical to buy that for few bucks before it goes bad.
    5
  20. Russia shows video of destroying things: You clearly see what they destroy most of the times before and after shots. Ukraine shows video of destroying things: you see shit and just have to believe the story that in this tree line was a Russian HQ with a five generals and 20tons of ammunitions plus 5 jets (yeah, exaggerated).
    5
  21. The video of the Ukrainians look quite odd. More like high summber, not really like Oktober and the weather we go, no?
    5
  22.  @orytek1  Crimeans said they don't want to be Ukraine anymore and what they want is the only thing that matters, not what some fascistic and illegal coup regime says.
    5
  23.  @toolshed47  See, you only show that you got no clue of this. Russia never went for area gains but destruction of the NATO-sent weaponry and Nazi soldiers. They had zero need to advance for that, while the plan of the Nazis clearly is to get south (stupid idea enough) and "cut of Crimea". It's less about the little movement, but their horrendous losses, while they couldn't even get through, mostly not even to the first defense line, which is mainly just an obstacle. To have ANY success worthwhile, they would have to get through the first and second defenseline and take the third out of order. That's where a success would start.
    5
  24.  @Rolerus  Ukraine used cluster ammunition. Have neither seen much regarding Russia. The Nazi regime is using it since 9 years.
    5
  25. Actually when you see such a bridge you can leave it there, wait and watch it and strike at a moment that is far mor effective than only destroying the bridge.
    5
  26.  @napoleoncanio4996  Sure - problem is that you have to go against dozens of missile batteries, which are protected by anti air cannons and so on, creating a layered network of anti air, where you can't just fly to point A and destroy all with some missiles.
    5
  27.  @mrpocock  They literally pinpoint destroy targets 1000km away, kid.
    5
  28.  @Reinhard_Erlik  I mean, Israrel attacked Syria over and over the last years, so per se they ARE at war what Israel started.
    5
  29.  @lepetitroquet9410  1. Minsk 2 had nothing to do with Russia at all. 2. Russia didn't send anything to the Donbass, that was some BS propaganda talk to justify the slaughter, that it is actually against Russia and terrorists, not against citizens who didn't want to go alonig with the coup - and fought back against the coup regime that tried to kill them for that.
    5
  30. And all that for a patrol boat, because they are unable to damage the actual warships.
    5
  31. And still talking out of his ass. If he would just stay with the facts, this channel could be good.
    5
  32.  @that1guy_248  You don't need this ships for that.
    5
  33.  @tim_isoara6423  Warfare isn't about territory. Territory you take as you please AFTER the war. During the war, you don't go pointless area gains or defend pointless positions. Giving up territory to for example shorten your frontlines for more effective combat or as part of tactics to lure in the enemy and so on, that's nothing new, that's done since 1000s of years.
    5
  34.  @namewithoutmeaning1096  Warfare isn't about area gains, but to destroy the enemy's army. Territory you can take as you please when you are done with this.
    5
  35.  @charles8642  That's the thing about fiction, you can make up anything you want. Doesn't change reality, though.
    5
  36. Whole map thing is pointless anyway. Just red or yellow is WAY to simple to show the situation in modern warfare.
    5
  37. What I love most is media coming aroudn with "Richterskala 2,8" - what is pretty much nothing. A single FAB 3000 is already giving a 2,2. 3 would be ~30t of TNT.
    5
  38.  @Itoyokofan  No one really cares about damage vehicles. You know how much stuff Russia got and how easy they produce more and repair that? This isn't your typical US war against some thousands goat herders or bombing civilians. Ukraine had got a good millione soldies all together (if you count what they had and added to it), with billions of heavy NATO equipment and surveillance in the background. The idea that you could just roflstomp that without taking casualties is absolutely absurd. Do you know how desastrous NATO wars would look like if fighting that, even with their usual carpet bombing of the country with hundredhousands dead civilians?
    5
  39.  @horoshkoaleksandr273  Russia got incredible little losses for fighting an insane enemy with no care for its own soldies and all fed by all the NATO billions. Meanwhile the Nazi losses were horrendous even in their own build up defense.
    4
  40. Partly wonder if he gets paid for telling that shit to add to the bait that whole thing is.
    4
  41. The idea will be, that those fly from NATO countries, with NATO missiles and than the story that "Ukrainian pilots" do the flying and button pushin, so NATO is totally not part of it. Of course all this will be very limited anyway by distance alone, but they will likel play with the idea, that Russia will then destroy those airfields and US fascim can use this to send in for example Poland as next sacrifice. The whole idea of NATO is, that it's cannonfodder for the US Nazis. They would LOVE to start 3.WW with it, if Russia and China didn't made clear, that their main strike would be against the USA, not agains the cannonfodder...
    4
  42. Had your chance with Corbyn, now you get another Blair. All your own fault, so stop crying.
    4
  43.  @LevanGudadze  Israel Nazsi are like the Ukrainian Nazis, everything they hit is declared to be a valuable military target...
    4
  44.  @jeffnorris8848  Sure, on some lonely people at the most outer parts of a the frontline. Impact on the war, close to zero.
    4
  45. GRAD trucks are as cheap as it can get. It's pretty much a truck with some pipes on it. Russia got hundreds of it - and they are outdated and are replaces anyway over the least years.
    4
  46. So much talk about so little...
    4
  47. Of course you get less videos. They have less and less units to destroy.
    4
  48. What's preceise about it? It's heavy bombs causing wide destruction. Just obliterating a whole building isn't "precise".
    4
  49.  @craiggodard6419  He mainly focusses on pro Ukrainian nonsense actually. Just not to an insane level as the PR clowns.
    4
  50. In case they really stopped using FABs now, that would make me extremely nervous as a leading officer on the coup regimes side, because it feels like they lay another trap to lure you into piling up troops and equipment again for the next strike. "Oh noes, we run out of bombs and it's too dangerous to fly missions, seems we can do nothing to stop you now, please don't abuse this and amass troops there. ~wink~"
    4