Comments by "James Adams" (@ExPwner) on "David Lin " channel.

  1. Nope not even close. Wolff is the discredited one peddling Marxist garbage here
    2
  2. That’s good because he is a lying Marxist grifter who consistently gets economics wrong.
    2
  3.  dsgio7254 anyone can look this up and see that price controls do not work. Maybe if you also weren’t so busy lying you could do some basic research into the facts. Go away troll
    2
  4.  dsgio7254 no, it does not work. Pharmaceutical companies operate worldwide and make up for it in places not price controlled. Otherwise price controls create shortages.
    2
  5.  dsgio7254 in some things likely so. That is irrelevant to what I just said.
    2
  6. Nope what is weak is Wolff spewing lies all over the place. Something you wouldn’t get as a tankie clown
    2
  7. The rich already pay a larger percentage
    2
  8.  dsgio7254 I said the rich, NOT corporations
    2
  9. Glad someone else sees it. David Friedman exposed him in another debate too. Owned his ass on the economic growth claim with sources
    2
  10. Wrong. Wolff is a lying idiot and his opinions are wrong. Laffer was correcting him with actual data, which immediately disproves Wolff’s stagnant wage myth nonsense.
    2
  11. Nah he lied his ass off and got owned by an actual economist giving actual facts to refute him
    2
  12.  @quinnparle4132 capitalism is not broken and his claims are idiotic and wrong at every turn.
    2
  13. Nope. Socialism is a failure. Capitalism is a massive success
    2
  14.  @czarquetzal8344  I have and he is full of nothing but nonsense and lies.
    2
  15. There is no socialist utopia and there never will be due to economics
    2
  16.  @franciscogonzalezramirez5033  Only if you have something that works economically, which socialism doesn’t. Just saying that you want to make a change for the better and doing anything doesn’t mean that said change will be for the better.
    2
  17. The exact opposite is the case. Wolff lied and fabricated from the very opening clip. There is no stagnant wage issue. That is a lie
    2
  18. Laffer was correcting his lies. Cope harder at Wolff not getting a free pass to lie without being called out
    2
  19.  @BumbleBeeTF it’s not an assumption that Wolff was lying. This is made clear in even the opening clip with Wolff lying twice: first with the stagnant wage myth and then again with the productivity pay gap myth. Both of which can be shown to be completely false by looking at the economic data.
    2
  20. Wrong. Prices are determined by supply and demand. Corporations do not set prices nor do they jack them up. This is economically illiterate and emotional nonsense.
    2
  21.  @sls554 wrong again. Zero credible economists say this. Your idiotic talking point was debunked by economists all over the place. Read the Fed study on this
    2
  22. No it is not true. Wages are not stagnant. See St Louis Fed.
    2
  23.  @michaelmappin1830 the only one embarrassing himself is you with your made up nonsense. I already cited my source and backed it up. Shut up
    2
  24.  @brunods4560 nope wages have not stagnated and not even close. And no you have not done your research on this. If you had you wouldn’t be spewing this ignorant talking point. Wolff got it wrong and so did you. Again I cite the data on real compensation from the St Louis Fed. I will also point to an article written by economist Scott Lincicome on the matter “The Annoying Persistence of the Stagnant Wage Myth” which details why, namely the use of the wrong inflation adjustment.
    2
  25.  @michaelmappin1830 ”most Americans can no longer afford a family on a single income” Why are you making assertions you can’t back up with facts?
    2
  26.  @brunods4560 ​​⁠yes you did. There is a reason why the attempt to say that wages stagnated comes from 1973 and that is because it was at an economic peak which preceded a trough. Lincicome points this out in his article. “Real wages” is adjusted for inflation. That’s what the term means. That I have to explain it to you means you also have not done your homework. “One of the simplest and most common “income stagnation” errors is the assessment of trends over cherry‐​picked periods of time—especially ones that start at the peak of a business cycle and end in the trough.” “Another common issue is how to measure inflation in order to make an apples‐​to‐​apples comparison of nominal compensation (what your paycheck says) over time. If inflation is higher, you’ll have lower real income gains over time as the cost of living eats into any nominal (paycheck) gains. As documented by economist Scott Winship, the most common inflation gauge—the Consumer Price Index (CPI)—overstates inflation and therefore causes real wage gains to appear smaller than they actually are. (The aforementioned census tables use CPI.) Using the better “deflator”—“personal consumption expenditures” (PCE), which many other government organizations use—reveals significantly higher real income gains. So if we recalculate the aforementioned household/​personal income figures from the census, using the standard PCE deflator, the already‐​decent 30 percent (household) and 47 percent (personal) increases between 1984 and 2019 improve to 43 percent and 61 percent, respectively” That is not even touching on the benefits issue. You’re wrong and you don’t even understand why you are wrong because you did NOT do your homework on this. You babbled a talking point and repeated it over and over again instead of doing your homework.
    2
  27.  @michaelmappin1830  why did you come back to this video to spew the same lie on another thread when you couldn’t be bothered to deal with my sources in this one asswipe?
    2
  28.  @brunods4560 funny how you also ran away when your bullshit was exposed. Very similar to the Mappin behavior and with the same Marxist horse shit to boot.
    2
  29.  @michaelmappin1830 you’re not waiting for anything. All you do is run around lying and avoiding the proof and arguments given.
    2
  30.  @michaelmappin1830 ​​⁠why do you keep refusing to read proof when it is given? All you ever do is spam “you don’t give proof” and then “that just makes you look like an idiot” over and over when you get proven wrong with screenshots and sources. You never read the proof or arguments given and constantly cycle through the same dumb talking points over and over again.
    2
  31.  @michaelmappin1830 you just described yourself. All you do is run around lying and refusing to read sources when you get proven wrong and then hurl insults like a child.
    2
  32.  @michaelmappin1830 ​​⁠and just like that you ran away when your lies were exposed and you couldn’t back up your claims while you couldn’t name a single lie from me or deal with the proof I gave.
    2
  33.  @michaelmappin1830 ​​⁠​​⁠why do you keep refusing to read proof when it is given? All you ever do is spam “you don’t give proof” and then “that just makes you look like an idiot” over and over when you get proven wrong with screenshots and sources. You never read the proof or arguments given and constantly cycle through the same dumb talking points over and over again.
    2
  34. Correct
    2
  35.  dsgio7254 you don’t see anything. You are a liar and paid shill who spams the same talking points from a script over and over again
    2
  36.  dsgio7254 so you now admit to it
    2
  37.  dsgio7254 and STFU with this idiotic appeal to authority. Being part of an institution doesn’t make them credible or infallible in all that they do.
    2
  38. 😂 no he isn’t. He is spewing nonsense as always
    2
  39.  @capitalexotics no you can’t because you don’t speak for the world of economics. Your anecdote is meaningless.
    2
  40.  @capitalexotics you literally just got done resorting to an anecdote. Now you are completely changing the subject. And you are getting your facts entirely wrong because the $3.5T number is not based on what was already done but a projection of extending them to 2033.
    2
  41. 😂 this is insanely idiotic. The 30s was not a golden age, it was the Great Depression. Meanwhile the 1980s saw the break in stagflation and a beginning of the Great Moderation.
    2
  42.  @franciscoiramossalinas6549 wages did not stagnate and the federal government did not end the Depression.
    2
  43. Nothing Wolff said there is factual dumbnuts. Real wages went up. They did not stagnate.
    2
  44.  @PaxRT87 nope I am correct. Go to the BLS and FRED
    2
  45.  @PaxRT87 I am correct and I just gave data to prove it. Put up or shut up
    2
  46.  dsgio7254 STFU about “bottom wages” no one is talking about that because jobs are not people and people move up
    2
  47.  dsgio7254 I already gave you the source in half a dozen threads: Brookings Institute intergenerational income mobility figures.
    2
  48.  dsgio7254 meaning 66% move up and your talking point is entirely false
    2
  49.  dsgio7254 go straw man elsewhere. I pointed out where you got it wrong and your appeals to authority are just pathetic. The fact that the IMF puts out something does not make it credible.
    2
  50.  dsgio7254 so Pew also shows that the majority of people born into the bottom 20% do not stay there. Thanks for again proving my point that mobility is the norm and not stagnation.
    2