Comments by "Trevor Crook" (@user-ft2bt9kw7x) on "OriginalHuman" channel.

  1.  @sseltrek1a2b American weapons eg Himar , patriot , Bradley , Abram. in Ukraine were supposed to be “ game changers “ They performed poorly
    18
  2.  @MichaelScheele The su57 air to air missiles have double the range and speed of the f22 Aim130. Do you seriously think any aircraft can just fly around the combat zone without being noticed ..? They will be noticed very early and shot down by either the su57 or the s400
    12
  3.  @sseltrek1a2b Do you think the f22 is stealth ? A 20 year old fighter ( f22 ) with obsolete air to air missiles isn’t going to cut it against advanced air defence
    11
  4. If you compare six su57 to six f22 the su57 with its much better weapons systems eg faster ,longer range would win . Especially if supported by ground air defences s400
    10
  5.  @DrenoshGaming  Russia well ahead of the west now in so many departments . Eg missiles , air defense , and tactics. You need to research more . You are basing your view on old information
    10
  6.  @DrenoshGaming  Stealth does not exist . S400 s500 can track any aircraft . They have been doing it in the Middle East in regard to f35 F22 is obsolete though a good aircraft when fighting inferior opponents. But Russian missiles are far superior in speed and range F22 and f35 will not be entering any war with Russia .
    9
  7. Trident 2 is obsolete . Ballistic and doesn’t manoeuvre . Predictable path . Advanced air defence can shoot it down . Sarmat ( Russian ) range 18,000 kms . New technology .hypersonic . Unstoppable That clip is old Ballistic missiles only reach hypersonic speed “ outside “ of the atmosphere. Hypersonic like Sarmat and zircon reach that speed “ within” the atmosphere and hit target at full speed , hence the huge kinetic energy they create on impact which has been measured . There is no drag as some misinformed people think Biden admitted that American has no defence against hypersonic missiles . They have never been shot down though there was an unverified claim one had . Which has since been debunked
    6
  8. Very old tank but still has a big gun . Ukraines losses are many times higher than Russias BTW
    6
  9.  @MichaelScheele  How do you know the su57 cant get a target lock on a f22…..? Perhaps Research the subject more
    6
  10.  @hitmixhyepock9405  Russian hypersonic missiles can hit anywhere against any target and easily out distances any missile the Americans have . The f22 and f35 can be seen by Russian radar .
    6
  11.  @ethanashley2141  Russia was dropping 150 glide bombs a day and hundreds of sorties . There was no fly zone except the one created by Russia
    6
  12.  @procommunistdestruction2318  Four days for everything ? It took you 20 years to fight and lose to the Taliban
    5
  13.  @loftiestchaf423  They are using them in Ukraine . A lot more than one with more coming
    5
  14.  @MichaelScheele  Don’t worry they can do it .Do the airfields and carriers the f22 uses stealthy ? Because they will be the first things targeted in a war. Fighting Iraq or Libya is not like fighting Russia . Nato made a huge mistake
    5
  15. Yes they are using it in Ukraine . The question is has the f22 and f35 been tested in high intensity war ? No America makes weapons for profit Russia makes them to work . Russian weapons manufacturing capacity inherited from the Soviet Union is massive . Manufacturing in the west is tiny by comparison. eg . American production of artillery shells 200,000 a year . Russian production of shells 4.5 million
    5
  16. America is way behind in missile technology
    5
  17. Russian missiles and air defence systems s400 s400 more than 10 years ahead . In Vietnam the Vietcong were using Russia air defence . End result America lost 10,000 aircraft . Ukraine had an airforce of 300 planes before the war . How many now ? 0
    4
  18. It didn’t work in Afghanistan
    4
  19.  @Nihilianth  America lost few troops because the enemy was weak with no serious weapons . No air defence ! Airforce , navy , tanks , missiles etc Ukraine is different . The biggest nato army in Europe . With every conceivable type of weapon , full support of 40 countries including AWAC And satellite intelligence And in two years of high intensity conflict Russia has lost 60,000 troops according to the pentagon while inflicting massive losses in men and equipment on the Ukrainians while using only a fraction of its army and with great restraint You need to reassess your position
    4
  20. The f22 uses the Aim120 air to air missile . Speed Mach 1. Range 160 kms SU57. Uses R37m. Speed . Mach 6. Range 400 kms The f22 won’t even get close
    4
  21.  @DrenoshGaming How do you know if they are superior ?
    4
  22.  @hitmixhyepock9405  The f22 will not reach the battle field . S400 s500 will see it
    4
  23. Russia is years ahead in missile technology and air defence technology
    3
  24. The Ukrainians have ( or had ) Russian air defence the s300 .A very capable system even though it’s old . If su57 had problems with the s300 and it’s possible . So would the f22 and f35
    3
  25. This is all stemming from the 2014 Maiden coup .
    3
  26.  @hitmixhyepock9405  How do you “ sneek up “ up on an aircraft with double the range . And ground air defence with even longer range
    3
  27.  @chugachuga9242  Sarmat and zircon are way ahead technologically . Who’s your source Walt Disney ..
    3
  28.  @procommunistdestruction2318  Not that good ? Military experts disagree
    2
  29.  @procommunistdestruction2318  Poor analogy
    2
  30.  @gawainethefirst  it absolutely did work ? 😆😆😆
    2
  31.  @arcadiusdrathalas6007  Ukraine is not quite a rump state yet . It still has access to the Black Sea . But not for long
    2
  32.  @teleguy5699  They are not a weak enemy . They have or had thousands of tanks , 600,000 troops, hundreds of air defence systems , missiles and fighting In very fortified area . And supported by 40 countries , trained , armed and given targeting information and satellite intelligence They were not the Taliban Russia could also have gone in with maximum power obliterated Ukraine killed a million people . But they chose a limited operation to limit infrastructure damage and casualties on both sides You know nothing about the subject
    2
  33.  @chugachuga9242  So hypersonic missiles are the same as ballistic. .?Why are countries including America spending millions trying to develop them then ?
    2
  34.  @Darktiger01  Russia has the biggest land army in the world. Plenty of troops . And Russia is not “ occupying Ukraine . What they have taken is now theirs by the will of the people in a referendum. Best if nato gets off the Russian border that’s what is fuelling the conflict
    2
  35. Most Abrams sent to Ukraine are no more . An old tank
    2
  36. The British military is not ready for a “ minor “ war
    2
  37. Because the propaganda is actually based on reality and physics not wishful thinking. The reality is that Russia has better weapons and a better army than America . Americans are butt hurt over that but probably recognise that fact
    2
  38.  @boomman1349  what laws of physics have I got wrong .? One thing is for sure the Russians haven’t got it wrong
    2
  39. Forget what Ukrainians say about shoot downs . They never substantiate anything . Fantasists
    2
  40.  @willracer1jz  but fiction
    2
  41.  @Texas.T  What wars? Wars against countries eg Afghanistan , Iraq , Libya with no air defences
    2
  42.  @chugachuga9242  Who were the f15 flying against ? We are talking fifth generation versus fifth generation . In 2023 Russia produced 230 aircraft . How many did America produce ? American doctrine is all about fighting low intensity war . A war with Russia will not be low intensity. America totally unprepared for such war
    2
  43.  @pooferfish2850  the f22 and f35 have never been tested against quality air defence . Su57 not needed in Ukraine same for Russian advanced weapons . That is why they are not used much . Any American aircraft fifth generation or fourth will not survive against advanced air defence . And their platforms airfields and carriers easily targeted by missiles .
    2
  44.  @pooferfish2850  Who have the American fighters fought of late ? Countries with no air defence and in most cases no airforce either So what is you get a 100 to 0 kill rate against a poor opponent. Proves nothing Russia fighting a country ( Ukraine ) that has good air defence . America has never done that . During the Vietnam war America lost 10,000 aircraft
    2
  45. Overhyped over priced and carries below par weapons like the Aim120 air to air missile . It won’t get close to its target against any Russian aircraft ( su57 ) or air defence ( s400 s500 ) another PR exercise
    1
  46.  @dpelpal  how can it be a threat then, as we are constantly told . If Russia is so weak no need for nato eh? See the inconsistency In your statement ?
    1
  47.  @arcadiusdrathalas6007  It’s not a rump state of the Soviet Union . Different politics , different economic system and a leading world power in if’s own right After the war Ukraine will be cut off from the sea its economy in ruins 50% of the population gone . That is the definition of a rump state
    1
  48.  @mrgrinch837  Nato is insurance of disaster . Look at the disaster that is Ukraine Now let’s talk of Americas military record when fighting wars against fourth rate armies and never winning .Incompetence on steroids As far as equipment goes all of western equipment sent to Ukraine had no effect. Most was either destroyed or paraded in Moscow The proof in Ukraine seems to show Russia winning
    1
  49.  @mrgrinch837  America isn’t very good at either historically . Drew with North Korea in conventional war . Lost to insurgents in Vietnam And Afghanistan. Their proxy wars in Syria , Georgia and Ukraine were and are disasters . As for weapons , Americas are the most expensive
    1
  50.  @mrgrinch837  America uses proxies to fight their wars these days. Syria Libya ,Georgia and now Ukraine . They seem to lack confidence With good reason I think
    1