Comments by "Trevor Crook" (@user-ft2bt9kw7x) on "OriginalHuman" channel.

  1.  @mrgrinch837  America 20 years in Afghanistan and left in humiliation. Russia in Ukraine 2 years and winning . If the Russians are so poor and their weapons second rate why does anyone need insurance? 😆😆
    1
  2.  @mrgrinch837  Nato insurance ? If Russias Military is so poor and its weapons second rate why does anyone need insurance ?😆😆
    1
  3.  @teleguy5699  They are stifled by the fact that they are not that good . Only fighting weak defenceless countries like Iraq , Afghanistan, Libya etc in low intensity war does not prepare them for high intensity war against a peer power like Russia or China
    1
  4.  @teleguy5699  Name the nations America has built ….?
    1
  5. America only fights defenceless people and third world armies . Then acts the hero
    1
  6.  @paladinsix9285  I am talking beating a major military power. . The Phillipines , Cuba , South Korea are not major powers and those wars are years ago . And america lost to Cuba in the Bay of pigs invasion America lost badly in Vietnam , Afghanistan, Korea was a stalemate, Iraq remains unfinished
    1
  7.  @Tlyna1952  The Americans could not win in Korea and Vietnam . And they were not hampered they used every available means to destroy the enemy ( civilians mainly ) including chemical weapons. In Iraq they used shock and awe . Stop making excuses for their ineptitude Hypersonic missile, s400 s500 , nuclear submarines, most advanced nuclear forces in the world . If Russia is a joke it has a killer punchline
    1
  8.  @chrisd4432  hypersonic missiles , s400 s500 ,nuclear submarines. . If Russian army is a joke it has a killer punchline
    1
  9.  @chrisd4432  Fourth biggest economy in the world with the number one army ( rated by firepower) . That makes it a global power
    1
  10.  @chrisd4432  They have a lot more than nukes
    1
  11. @ Excuse me Wagner Is infantry only . They were ambushed by the Americans who used artillery and air strikes . Hardly a fair fight Russia is the fourth biggest economy in the world when using PPP And Russian economy is based on the commodities market which includes oil and gas. But they export many things . Oil and gas is but one aspect. Important yes but not the only thing they produce What is the American GDP based on . .? Consumerism . I’ll take oil and gas thanks very much
    1
  12.  @chrisd4432  Russia doesn’t need nukes. Their latest hypersonic missile the Oreshnik has the power of a tactical nuke but is a conventional weapon . Range 5000 kms . Try and cope with that . What’s America got ? Very sinkable aircraft carriers , aircraft like the f35 and f22 that have never been tested in real combat against advanced air defence and a rather small land army that has no experience in modern warfare
    1
  13. @ Fourth when using PPP ( purchasing power parity ) .Thats the gauge the IMF uses . Sorry to disappoint you 😁
    1
  14.  @PartOfTheGame  The US only fights weak opponents . They are not keen to go into Ukraine directly are they ? They hide behind Ukraine
    1
  15.  @Nihilianth  Look at the countries you fought . Countries without advanced weapons or air defence . In Afghanistan case not even an army Of course America took low casualties . Like any other modern army would . Try your luck in Ukraine
    1
  16.  @chugachuga9242  True hypersonic missiles have manoeuvre and are hypersonic “ within “ the atmosphere. Zircon is a hypersonic cruise missile for instance , never leaves the atmosphere . America has no such missiles Patriot never shot down a hypersonic missile. Data showing the alleged downing not released seeing that it never happened I have heard an explanation of how hypersonic glide missiles work . There is no drag it hits target at maximum speed , hence the kinetic energy . If hypersonic missiles work the way you say there would be no advantage in having them
    1
  17.  @chugachuga9242  true hypersonic missiles have manoeuvre and are hypersonic within the atmosphere. Ballistic missiles are hypersonic “ outside “ of the atmosphere only and move in a straight line only Hypersonic missiles are impossible to shoot down . Biden admitted this There is no drag hence the huge kinetic energy when they hit which is measurable
    1
  18.  @chugachuga9242  So hypersonic missiles are pointless seeing that 50 year old ballistic missiles are superior ? So why is America trying to produce one ? That makes no sense. All of your points are at odds with the physics True hypersonic missiles manoeuvre and reach speed “ within “ the atmosphere. Ballistic missiles cannot travel at hypersonic speed within the atmosphere or manoeuvre The kinetic energy when a hypersonic missile hits target is massive indicating it doesn’t slow down as it approaches target as some claim
    1
  19.  @boomman1349  No using physics which has no bias. Hypersonic missiles reach that speed “ within “ the atmosphere. Ballistic missiles cannot . Otherwise no point having them . Russia s500 the only air defence system that can shoot down hypersonic missiles Glide breaker is theory. Comparing a zircon missile to a V2 is beyond absurd
    1
  20.  @boomman1349  Obviously there is no problem with drag otherwise as you say the missiles would break apart . And they don’t
    1
  21.  @lostbutfreesoul  Americans hate being second .But they are not second . More like fourth or fifth lol
    1
  22.  @boomman1349  There is drag normally but the Russians have worked out an answer. It’s called scientific progress
    1
  23.  @boomman1349  If there is drag it would slow the missile down from Mach 9 to Mach 6 ( 4500 mph) a little faster than the tomahawk ( 500 mph
    1
  24.  @boomman1349  With drag the missile slows from Mach 9 to Mach 6 . A little faster than Tomahawk
    1
  25.  @boomman1349  The way around it possibly would be to vary speed throughout the flight . Obviously if hypersonic missiles were not superior they wouldn’t bother them . May as well stick with v2 I would like it explained by an impartial expert The Tomahawk has a top speed of 500 mph . Zircon is a little faster than that
    1
  26.  @boomman1349  the difference is the air defence systems . S400 s500 are light years ahead of anything the west has . America put is money into offensive weapons and the Russians took the much cheaper option of defensive weapons . Ukraine has been a good testing ground for Russian hypersonic missiles . They do work
    1
  27.  @boomman1349  Russia also has short range systems .eg Buk Pantzer and others . The have a multilayered defence The patriot has a success rate of 36% which is abysmal. Many patriots have been destroyed in Ukraine . All of them maybe. Two in Kiev were filmed getting it .The Ukrainians are screaming they need more . Why is that Also ammunition is very expensive and manufacturing limited The s400 uses multiple task radar and missiles by the way including short range. comparing it to binoculars😂😂 . It’s streets ahead of anything the Americans have You know little
    1
  28. Obsolete . Freedom ? 🤭
    1
  29. Who are they going to fight , the abominable snowman ?
    1
  30.  @greenhighlander7  permanent presence of US army in your country makes it permanent target . Is that improving national security ? Stupid idea
    1
  31.  @AncestorEmpire1  because they didn’t have the body
    1
  32. We will never surrender ? Yes you will
    1
  33. Russians don’t need stopping they aren’t coming . Another waste of money
    1
  34.  @Darktiger01  New rifles not much good against hypersonic missiles . Forget war . It is not a video game
    1
  35.  @Darktiger01  🤭🤭
    1
  36.  @Darktiger01  You are such an expert . You must be a General ? Here you need one of these 🧠😁
    1
  37.  @Darktiger01  Russian army at present 1.6 million plus 2 million reserves . Add 25 million inactive reserves who have had 12 months Military training . Largest number of tanks , armoured cars and artillery in the world . Largest number of missiles on earth More than all other countries combined , including America . Massive manufacturing base to produce more and a never ending supply of ammunition. America 460,000 troops . 1 million reserves . Tiny manufacturing base . Not big enough to sustain high intensity war for more than a few weeks Russia using glide bombs everyday . 150 a day . Air Dominance obvious 40 Ancient f16 s will make no difference . They will be shot down in the first week or destroyed on the ground Ukraine in retreat all across the front . Even Ukrainian maps show this Russia KIA 50,000 according to the BBC and Mediazona Ukraine KIA 500,000 according to most analysts How did you get so misinformed . You have a PHD in it lol The war is over . Get used to it
    1
  38. @ scrap metal
    1
  39. @ it was a Russian trap
    1
  40. @ Ukraine took 1500 square kms of territory. Russia 18 million square kms in size . Kursk really was a nothing burger
    1
  41. @ why do I need to cope if my side is winning ? You only have to cope when your side is losing .. Everyone is on the internet where so you get your information from The Dead Sea Scrolls ? lol
    1
  42. @ Advances ? lol . They have just lost 1000 square kms of territory out of the1500 square kms they had . And a small and temporary advance with huge losses is good . Goodness me
    1
  43. But one battle doesn’t make a war . The war is very one sided in Russias favour
    1
  44. Sweden collaborated with Nazi germany during WW2 even though they were officially neutral . A shameful history
    1
  45. The Russians aren’t coming
    1
  46.  @Ashan581  Most drones were shot down and they are pinpricks that don’t affect the battle situation at all . If my memory serves me a Chinese weather balloon defeated the entire American air defences a while back? A jet fighter a little easier to see Can you compare drone damage to Russia with what’s going on in Ukraine at the moment as far as damage goes ?
    1
  47.  @Ashan581  What happened on 9/11 ? Where were American air defence ? Nowhere
    1
  48.  @Ashan581  What damage done to kremlin ….?
    1
  49.  @Ashan581  What I’m saying is that no air defence is 100%. What damage has been done to Russia in air attacks and what damage has been done to Ukraine by comparison by the Russians ? Chalk and cheese America has a poor record in war even against weak enemies . So they are in no position to judge another countries war effort
    1
  50.  @Ashan581  drones are harder to spot on radar than aircraft because they fly low . But 99% of drones have been shot down by the Russians . On a Military level it made no difference .
    1