Comments by "Trevor Crook" (@user-ft2bt9kw7x) on "OriginalHuman" channel.

  1.  @Ashan581  But if America was at war the Chinese weather balloon could have been something more sinister . And the incompetence by American air defence on 9/11 was way worse than a tiny drone flying over the kremlin .
    1
  2.  @Ashan581  America lost 10,000 aircraft in Vietnam to an enemy with no airforce . The British lost 6 warships in ten weeks in the Falklands war . America just lost a war in Afghanistan to an enemy with virtually no weapons at all
    1
  3.  @thatonecrackhead2728  War is politics . You fight a war to achieve a political goal . If you don’t achieve that you have lost. The Americans were also there to protect poppy fields The retreat from Afghanistan by the Americans chaos and Disaster with troops being killed . It looked like military defeat to me
    1
  4. You will be in for a shock in a real war . You are basing your view on war games lol . When you have hypersonic missiles no need for stealth They can’t be stopped .zircon Sarmat are not hypersonic ballistic missiles ,wrong Pinocchio
    1
  5.  @dominickleonardi  True hypersonic missiles don’t leave the atmosphere . So they are not ballistic arch. But Russia has zircon , Sarmat that are not ballistic hypersonic . They are new technology true hypersonic . More advanced than anything America has . Kinzhal is more advanced than anything America has. It is classified as hypersonic by other countries too
    1
  6. If they were patriotic they wouldn’t have joined NATO. It will ruin their country
    1
  7.  @callsigndisciple626  You can work it out easily . Main deaths are from artillery . Russia has a 10 to 1 advantage in artillery. Plus Russia has air power . Russia has mobilised once in 2022. If they had serious losses they would have to have mobilised more than once . Ukraine by Comparison has mobilised many times and have serious manpower shortages . There are other indicators but the ones I mentioned are enough to paint a picture BTW Ukraine never had nuclear weapons . They were Russian nukes deployed to Ukraine by the soviets. The nuclear codes were in Moscow not Kiev
    1
  8.  @dennissvitak5475  They never had nuclear weapons . They were Russian nukes deployed to Ukraine . The codes were in Moscow Part of the Budapest memorandum was that Ukraine be Militarily neutral . Nato has been in Ukraine since 2014. That was a breach of Ukraines neutrality
    1
  9.  @dennissvitak5475  Nato has been in Ukraine since 2014. That was a breach of the memorandum
    1
  10. @ Russia had lease on the port in Crimea until 2043 with the previous government . .
    1
  11. @ Modern day Russia is a different animal than the Soviet Union . Advanced weapons the soviets didn’t have , satellites , hypersonic missiles , advanced air defence etc . Russia doesn’t have an incompetent military and uses contract soldiers not conscripts . They are well trained and use 21st century tactics that you know nothing about. You are very short on facts and evidence
    1
  12.  @callsigndisciple626  Russia doesn’t use conscripts on the front line. They use professional volunteers and they are well trained in modern warfare . And are hardly incompetent . Your view is misinformed
    1
  13.  @chugachuga9242  No one is stealthy .. all aircraft can be seen by modern Russian radar
    1
  14. V2 was hypersonic only when outside of atmosphere. True hypersonic missiles reach that Speed “ within” the atmosphere. Laughing doesn’t help you . Best get more informed
    1
  15. Ukraine occupied 1500 square kms of territory several months ago . They now occupy less than 500 square kms of territory . And the area they have is getting smaller by the day
    1
  16. Nato is the threat not the solution. Increasing the chances of WW3 not a smart idea
    1
  17. There’s two military super powers lol if Sweden hadn’t joined nato no need for more military spending . Russia has no intention of invading Europe . No benefit . Massive propaganda
    1
  18. No evidence he was killed . No body no case
    1
  19.  @bevinboulder5039  that doesn’t prove the story only that they had contact with him . If the DNA claim is true and I doubt it The evidence point to him not even being involved in the attack . The whole narrative doesn’t add up No one believes the official 9/11 story anymore
    1
  20. The twin towers could not have collapsed that way without help. The third law of motion makes the official explanation impossible .
    1
  21.  @Onezmhu  Russian missiles still faster Mach 6 . And far longer range. S400 range 400 kms s500 600 kms also . F22 and f35 won’t get close to target . And the platforms they use eg airfields and carriers will be targets Stealth is overrated . The Russians have been tracking f22 or f35 in the Middle East for some time . Stealth is a sales pitch
    1
  22.  @Texas.T  The s300 is still very capable . Whatever the su57 is vulnerable too all other fighters would be as well .
    1
  23.  @chugachuga9242  Russian radar would pick up the f22 very quickly . When Israel f35=flies near Russian bases in Syria they are easily tracked . Stealth is nonsense when flying against advanced air systems
    1
  24.  @Ashan581  su57 air to air missiles Mach 6 . And 400 kms range . F22 good but will get taken out from a distance . Luck not needed
    1
  25.  @thatonecrackhead2728  Russia has way more advanced air systems than s300 . But it was saying that even an old soviet system from the 80s can still be effective
    1
  26.  @pacmon5285  why don’t you argue with my numbers ? You can’t so you have to resort to name calling
    1
  27.  @loftiestchaf423  You are wrong and going on old information . Russia uses Russian made parts including computer chips What else it needs it get from China . You don’t think Russia would launch an operation while being dependent on the west for anything militarily, economically do you ? No one is that stupid A true winning army doesn’t take more losses than the opposition . You are correct . That is why you know russia is taking less losses . Because they are winning
    1
  28. The US military fight weak enemies . And lose every war
    1
  29.  @MJ19438  Did America keep the gloves on when they killed one million Iraqis , three million Vietnamese , three million North Koreans Americans have scant regard for human life They fight countries that can’t defend themselves like Iraq or Libya and then play the hero . Pathetic America cannot sustain wars with Russia or China . No manufacturing base to make weapons and ammunition. Not enough troops without bringing in conscription . No way to ship weapons across the oceans to the war theatres without their convoys being sunk by Russian or Chinese long range hypersonic missiles . And not enough raw materials . You live in a movie .
    1
  30.  @Nihilianth  But America doesn’t have to seize territory. They use bases , economic war , colour revolution, assassinations and the UN to control their interests globally . No need to physically be in countries
    1
  31. I can’t believe Americans boast about winning this war ( only the first part of it ) Iraq was an army of poorly trained conscripts With old soviet tanks that had no night vision no reactive armour . Iraq had no air defence , navy , airforce , satellite targeting or reconnaissance , no allies Goodness me it was like beating up a child
    1
  32. The Asovs are actual neonazis complete with swastikas . It shows how morally decayed the west is to support them
    1
  33. America is 34 trillion in debt . They can’t afford a bicycle in reality . Just print money while they are bankrupt
    1
  34. Never been tested against advanced air defence . Now the f22 is pretty old
    1
  35. Wagner is only infantry . American forces had artillery and air power . And it Syrian soldiers who died not Russian
    1
  36.  @Onezmhu  Su57 longer range and faster air to air missiles . Will take out the f22 at long distance The days of dog fights are over
    1
  37.  @Ashan581  A few drones which were shot down in most cases are irrelevant . Most of the damage ( insignificant damage ) was downed drones hitting residential areas . No Military significant at all . America lost 10,000 aircraft in Vietnam war . And the Serbs brought down an American supposed stealth bomber with an old s200 in 1999 People in glass houses
    1
  38.  @pooferfish2850  let’s face it America chooses it enemies eg Iraq , Afghanistan ,Libya . And always chooses countries that can’t fight back They have made a big mistake with Russia
    1
  39.  @maeckknox6535  The f22 would have to worry about getting past the s400 first . Which it won’t
    1
  40.  @maeckknox6535  The f22 will be noticed early on by the s400 and s500 . The su57 will not be needed
    1
  41.  @chugachuga9242  You need to learn more about Russian weapons . They are superior on many levels . The platforms the f22s use ( airfields and carriers are not stealthy . They will be easily seen and destroyed .
    1
  42.  @chugachuga9242  The American airfields and carriers the f22 take off from are not stealth and can been seen well enough to destroy . Which will be the case in a war . If Russia sinks a carrier it will destroy dozens of f22s and f35s in one hit
    1
  43.  @chugachuga9242  . But Russia has far superior air defence and are fighting on their own land . A massive advantage . How do you think the woke American people will take to being under direct attack for the first time in their history . It will make 9/11 look like a tiff
    1
  44. People forget that Russia has hypersonic stealth missiles like the Khinzhal. The west has no match for these missiles . Many more variants too.
    1
  45.  @Onezmhu  out of those 1000 f35s only 300 are serviceable . Su57 long range high speed Mach 6 ) air to air missiles easily outperform any air to air missiles in speed and range the f22 f35 have .. max range for aim120 is 160 kms. Longest range for r37m that the su57 carries is 400 kms F22 f35 have to fly 240 kms to even get within range . All the time wide open to attack from Russias s400 and s500 on the ground If I was an American pilot I would refuse to fly . Pure suicide
    1
  46.  @chugachuga9242  Khinzhal 10 Mach . Iskander 6 Mach . Not the same missile
    1
  47.  @chugachuga9242  what study ? You are making things up . The patriot the Saudis had couldn’t shoot down old scuds fired from Yemen .let alone hypersonic missile . Patriot success rate 36% . Very poor Where as it proven itself ? Certainly not in Ukraine the Russians are bombing the hell out of it
    1
  48.  @chugachuga9242  I looked it up . Propaganda . No evidence to prove it was a Khinzhal . They showed wreckage of the supposed Kinzhal shot down on CNN . It was clearly not a Khinzhal The war between Saudi Arabia and Yemen was quite recently not in the 70s Hundreds of successful intercepts ? Where . Most countries America has fought in the last decades have had no missiles . The odd scud maybe . America is still using old rubbish like tomahawk cruise missiles and minute man missiles from the 60s. They are way behind Russia in the missile technology
    1
  49.  @chugachuga9242  The patriots are brilliant.Goodness knows how the Russians are able to bomb the hell out of Ukraine . I don’t get it
    1
  50.  @chugachuga9242  Yes the patriot is brilliant . And I know it shot down a hypersonic missile because CNN told me . And they never lie 🤣🤣
    1