Comments by "Grim Affiliations" (@grimaffiliations3671) on "Styxhexenhammer666" channel.

  1. damn she got almost 40, trump might be in more trouble than i thought
    1
  2.  @HBFTimmahh  where does it say that in the constitution or case law?
    1
  3.  @joannleichliter4308  A president can only be threatened with future prosecution if they acted criminally outside of their official duties like Trump is alleged to have done. So future president's would not be vulnerable to prosecution
    1
  4.  @debanydoombringer1385  it wouldn't turn us into a banana republic to make presidents who act criminally outside of their official duties vulnerable to prosecution. It's a much needed check on executive power
    1
  5. you just made that up
    1
  6. if they find you to have shown partisan opinions on social media you'll be removed
    1
  7. Adams is close with the powerful police union. They gave him a heads up before the raid
    1
  8. Nah, trump covetts power above all else, he's always going to take the easiet route to it. He's running as a republican
    1
  9. inflation is that rate of increase, so thats the only way to measure it
    1
  10.  @settame1  which case did they misinterpret?
    1
  11.  @goji059  i did, but it was inacurate. We can see multiple job havers, and they're around 5% where they always are. And part time jobs aren't even included in the U3 numbers so that doesn't work either
    1
  12.  @Bullfrog-pk6pl  According to the polls economic sentiment is actually turning around big in Biden;s favor. It's up 29% in the last 2 months alone, the biggest jump since 91. And it's up over 60% from the 2022 lows
    1
  13.  @monkeygraborange  only accepting numbers that agree with your world view is pretty childish
    1
  14.  @monkeygraborange  i don't, i accepted government numbers under Trump and i still do now
    1
  15.  @alanakafang6143  that isn't a record deficit at all is it? you miss 2020,21?
    1
  16.  @FrankS111  source for the -8k?
    1
  17.  @FrankS111  source?
    1
  18.  @darienford860  jobs posted doesn't mean employed 😅
    1
  19.  @edwardfala7723  im talking about econmic sentiment, as in peoples thoughts about the economy going forward. They've jumped up considerably over the past two months and are way up over 2022
    1
  20.  @edwardfala7723  multiple job havers are obviously distorted by the fact that unemployment was almost 7% when Biden took over. Compare it to where they were before the pandemic in 2019 and the number of multiple job havers are actually lower now than back then when Trump supposedly had the best economy of all time
    1
  21.  @edwardfala7723  unemployment was near 7% no matter whose fault it was, that obviously distorts the numbers. It's not disputable that multipe job havers are currently lower than they were in 2019 prior to the pandemic. The share of part time jobs is also lower now than it was in 2019, and U3 numbers don't even include part time numbers, so yout gig economy claim wouldn't make sense anyway
    1
  22.  @Penguinzero1  read above comment
    1
  23. did it to himself how?
    1
  24.  @kelleymcbride4633  can't keep up with something you won't elaborate on
    1
  25. we wont crash as long as the government continues to support private sector balance sheets with deficit spending. Crashes tend to happen when the govenrment tries to "balance the budget"
    1
  26.  @robertsmith4681  lol why would the government fail to make a payment due in its own currency?
    1
  27.  @Soundsinthevoid  yeah, the corporations have spent over a hundred years convincing people through propoganda that market fundementalism was a key part of the american dream and that any involvemnet from government was wrong. They rebranded private enterprise to "free enterprise" and used it as part of the "tripod of freedom" on which america was built
    1
  28.  @janbo8331  True but i doubt that government will be in power for long given the mass strikes in the country
    1
  29. have you seen the polling? they knew
    1
  30.  @DigitalApex probablt will do something in the general tho
    1
  31. Not to mention Biden just got one of the best midterm results ever. That being said, Desantis won't have much of a shot either, he can only get the nomination after an ugly primary, people don't win after ugly primaries
    1
  32.  @paulgarduno2867  pray tell
    1
  33.  @nmmeswey3584  This is quite obviously not true. We saw deficits explode during world war 2 and inflation remained at the 2% target. Same thing happened throughout the 2010's and inflation didn't elevate beyond target then either. Japan raked up a debt to gdp ratio over twice the size of it's entire economy and they never saw excessive inflation. In fact they were struggling with deflation for much of that time. New money is only inflationary if it enters an economy already at full capacity. And no, im not liking my own comments
    1
  34.  @nmmeswey3584  If your claim that new spending inherently devalues dollars already in circulation is true, then all deficit spending would be inflationary, which it isn't. Not sure what distinction you're making between deficit spending and debt spending, deficit spending is debt spending as it adds to the national debt. Also the national debt is not supposed to be paid off over time through tax increases. Taxes do not fund anything the government does on the federal level. They're debited out of existence at the IRS, the government only makes us pay them to create demand for the dollar. If you don't believe me, try to pay your federal taxes in cash at a physical IRS location, they'll literally throw your money in a shredder
    1
  35. if your claim that every new dollar in circulation devalues existing money is true, then all deficit spending would be inflationary, which it isn't. Not sure what distinction you're trying to make between debt spending and deficit spending, they're they same. And no, taxes would not be increased to pay for the national debt because taxes do not pay for anything the federal government does. They're debited out of existence upon payment at the IRS
    1
  36.  @nmmeswey3584  You've got that wrong. Deficit spending is debt spending, because the fed sells bonds equivalent to that deficit. If the government deficit spends by a hundred bucks, the fed will sell a hundred bucks worth of bonds thus adding 100 bucks to the national debt. "Borrowing" is the process of selling bonds. By "taxes don't pay for spending" i literally mean taxes don't pay for anything the federal government does. Taxes are debited out of existence at the IRS, they're deleted. You can test this out yourself by paying your federal taxes in cash at a physical IRS location. They'll actually throw your tax money in a shredder. They make us pay federal taxes to create demand for the dollar, not because they need our money. The money we're using to pay taxes came from them in the first place
    1
  37. You got that wrong, deficit spending is debt spending because whenever the government deficits spends, the fed matches that deficit with bond sales. If they deficit spend by a hundred, the fed will sell a hundred dollars worth of bonds thus adding a hundred to the national debt. By "taxes don't pay for anything the government does" i mean taxes literally don't pay for anything they do. Taxes are debited out of existence at the IRS, they're deleted. If you pay in cash at a physical IRS location, they';; throw your money in a shredder. I've seen it myself. The federal government taxes us to create demand for the dollar, not because they need our money
    1
  38. Dems have better policies tho. All Republicans seem to care about is tax cuts for rich corporations and cutting people's fixed incomes
    1
  39. Whose aggressive?
    1
  40. the dollar is backed by production and taxes
    1
  41.  @circlestarranch3761  production + taxes
    1
  42. according to polls people are doing really well personally, but they still think the economy's bad because that's what the media reports
    1
  43.  @TheSulross  nothing unconstitutional about jack smith's appointment. Challenging that would reek of desperation
    1
  44.  @CoffeeEnjoyer117  better than tyranny
    1
  45. If they believe Trump is inelgible to run, they have no choice but to take him to court.
    1
  46.  @10011110011  So your argument is that we should just start with tyranny?
    1
  47.  @10011110011  no i said democracy is better than tyranny, you seem to think since it leads to oligarchy (debatable) that justifies skipping straight to tyranny
    1
  48.  @10011110011  not sure how that would work as tyranny and democracy are incompatible
    1
  49. nah, biden will stay on because of incumbent advantage + hes doing better against trump than any other dem
    1
  50. whaddya like about him?
    1