Comments by "s H" (@sH-ed5yf) on "Covert Cabal" channel.

  1.  @LegaRoSS  then its still a war. It wasa war the whole time. SMO is a propaganda Tool to confuse simple minded people.
    3
  2. Because putin wants all of ukraine. Now He knows He will never be able to tske it. So He at least want to controll all those areas He annaxed
    3
  3. Nope kid its russia vs ukrsine, with some aid from the west.
    3
  4. Patriot pac3
    3
  5. The question still stands. How many of those are actually able to be brought into service after setting around for 10 years outside. And how many are already looted for parts.
    3
  6. In the history of our species 😂😂😂. The russians actuall now have less tanks than the US. The freaking french in ww2 had more. The sovjets had almost 10 times more then current russia😂
    3
  7. And how many vehicles did china so far delivered?
    3
  8. Yes. And that is why russia now asks North korea for help
    3
  9. And indeed they did. Did you see any major missle attacks in the last mounths. Their stocpiles are dry and they rely on what they can produce.
    3
  10. The question is how many of destroyed and damaged actually can be recovered. Also many spare parts are not in production anymore so they have to loot older vehicles
    3
  11. And where are these secret storages? And how do you know about them
    3
  12. It was
    3
  13.  @aniksamiurrahman6365  I do. But correct misinformstion also is nice. Dont you think
    3
  14. How do you think winning looks like.
    3
  15.  @AAAAAA-tj1nq  sure thing mate. Instead of keep the money inside the country they spend it overseas in countries which will dumb russias Reputation. Just admit russia hasng enough shells anymore. They had more than anybody else in the beginning. But now the stocks are dry and they cant keep up
    3
  16.  @Stigger1977  for some unfortunate wagner troops who were send to die in the meatgrinder with very little ammonition to serve as human shields yes. That is where the Story is from
    3
  17.  @jackkelly335  yep. We dont wish. We see
    3
  18. What are ukronazis? Like who specificly.
    3
  19. You didnt even watched the video so Sh. Up
    3
  20. ​ @usun_politics1033 that is literly the only thing He did. So stop calling it propaganda kid
    3
  21. 20 years. 😂😂😂 Wtf kid.
    3
  22. Is that so. So why dozens of defence melitias formed in donbass if all of donbass wanted independence
    3
  23. So if its done russia should have easy work right
    3
  24. Russia has lost so mich equipment that they have to pull out 70 year old gesr out of storage and ask north korea for ammo. Russia is basicly in a 1941 state.
    3
  25. Fighting on the frontline right now. Scraping thousands of russian vehicles. But ask the russians why after bakhmut they only lost territory
    3
  26. Also their military fails
    3
  27.  @anthonynicholich9654  And nowdays they struggle to make even 1 per day. nice. former glory and strenght is no indicator for present capabilities. its not like there is some special russian gene...
    3
  28. Nope. The do in fact running low. That is why they bring in t55s in. And if they wanted to mpdernize and Script their military. Why do they need a war for that. Couldnt they have done it without it
    3
  29. Right now they dont build any t14.
    3
  30. ​ @Alienisolati0nist again where sre those numbers comming from. Even russia claims to have less than 12.000 tanks pre war.
    3
  31. ​ @yap5995 can you prove any of those claims?
    3
  32. Nope 2000 tanks accourding to oryx. A open source intellegence website. And the Ghostwriter of kiew was created by the internet😂. Not the government
    3
  33. Yep confirmed by footage. And they match with the ones pulled out of storage
    3
  34. Well you dont need to. You can count.
    3
  35.  @jeffbenton6183  cause some ranks are just beyond repair and need to be scrapped. At least you can get some spare parts
    3
  36. Funny in recent footage they have still t72 and t64s so they are Not out
    3
  37. ​ @nothere4089 and beeing pretty Sure, means you know nothing. Great argument
    3
  38.  @neowuwei7851  btw. Russia doesnt have as many ballistic missles anymore. Otherwise they would use them
    3
  39.  @neowuwei7851  if its so easy for russia, they should have achieved air superiority in ukraine a long time ago. And russia doesnt have hypersonic missles. They have balistic missles which have been shot down evidently at least twice.
    3
  40.  @neowuwei7851  Scott Ritter is a pro russian shill, who predicted the russian breakthrough for 2 years now. Mocking western propaganda, while falling for russian propaganda is stunning. In actuallity. Most of Initial fighting would mean SEAD missions and air war. Something russia proved to be very bad at
    3
  41.  @neowuwei7851  USA, UK, france and to a certain extent germny. But combat experience is relative. In modern air war, you dont fight dogfights like in TOP GUN. What matters, is stealth, Radar Systems and intellegence. All of them are superior in western ircrsft. Amerika build almost a 1000 stealth 5 gen fighters, while russia did not even made dozen.
    3
  42. Nice fantasy. In actuallity, Nato would achieve air superiority within weeks and penetrant frontlines with aircraft, clearing the psth for armored forces. Russia barly can cope ukraine and the trolls still thinknthey can wistand Nato
    3
  43. Nope. Nobody said they would run out of tanks any time soon in 2022. You are a liar
    3
  44. Why wouldnt you
    3
  45. Well they did. That is why we didnt see any major missle attacks in half a year. That is why they buy drones from iran.
    3
  46. Well they did run low on shells. That is why they ask north korea for help
    3
  47. No the offensive failed cause the russians spend mounths of laying millions of mines in a certain area
    3
  48. You using russian numbers how is that better?
    3
  49. Why. They provide evidence for each vehicle.
    3
  50. Well they didnt uaed any missle waves in half a year and ask north korea for help
    3