Comments by "chf gbp" (@chfgbp6098) on "Dr. John Campbell" channel.

  1.  @ashyosings5089  that in itself is not surprising. antiviral is antiviral. my sis works on viral meningistis. non of these are strange. for perspective, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_flu_pandemic Perspective: 2009 H1N1 world pandemic, started in America via Mexico: lasted 2 years. Killed, final agreed number 284,500 globally. Infected 10s of millions. Vs now: 50 odd in the West. Havent channged for days. Mostly Chinese travellers. None died. Almost all AT Risk population locked down in that city and province in China.
    1
  2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_flu_pandemic compare and contrast. Gives one some perspective on the current hysteria. That was the H1N1 Pandemic.
    1
  3.  @s._3560  u r trying to reason with people with the mentality of a spoiled medicore 6 year old...
    1
  4.  @johnwhite626  =a spoiled slow 7 year old in the body of a middle aged couchpotato. Just a guess :)
    1
  5. In vitro, strong detergent would kill the virus also....too many biotechs with the wrong incentives. They dont need an actual successful End product. They jsut need to boost their equity price and get out before the end.
    1
  6. Switzerland has been criminally negligent...
    1
  7. Cause 'everyone' has no skin in the game, no responsibility, is generally mindless and fond of parroting stuff that makes them feel 'alive'. There r literally hundreds of thousands of experts working on this for real. And official meassages from any sizable Country and UN Organisation are on record forever in public. That vs. The average joe pontificating about life and the world between scratching his arse and stuffing his face? What s so hard to understand?
    1
  8. Those poor people on the ship. vicitms of the hysteria generated i d say. They should have been Tested and let off on day one, instead of being locked in waiting to be infected. Wtf! 2020 and this is allowed to happen and no one in the world is speaking on their behalf. Humanity is cowardly and meanspirited. They should collectively sue someone. Although am not sure. Whom. The rest of humanity i guess.
    1
  9. Where have u been? Under the cover, along with most the european authorities? What an absurd accusation against WHO!
    1
  10. Worse than that. Listening to Bob M? Nope. Smoking and concocting stories and misinformation to make the crisis worse...mainly because the world thinks it s a Chinese Problem...soon i fear the safest place from this outbreak would be China. I d say within 6 months maybe.
    1
  11. Same ole Same ole... :(
    1
  12. Believe anti-chicom yellow Chinaman at your own peril. They ve been misinforming the world on Chicom's China for 70 years...extremely successfully. Why do u think chicom always seems to do better than expected over any 5 year period? On this viral outbreak, i doubt it d be different. Remember this in a few months and see, if yet again, reality has left their lies behind.
    1
  13. Why treat them as special at all? Death Rate outside of Wuhan and outside of China are tiny. <= 0.5 percent? It s jsut a bit worse than a flu. Not sure what s going on in the city, probably all the old and sick stayed behind and the infected numebrs are far higher than offically detected.
    1
  14.  @Campbellteaching  that s true. Sorry. I didnt mean to mimimise. Just felt there s been too much hype, news media practically hoping it gets worse.
    1
  15. I ve been wondering the same. Only rational explanation, and i dont like conspiracy Theories as anything goes once u abandon basic premises, i can see is that there IS self Selection at work. Most of the infected are from the city or visited the city. So those caught outside tend to be those healthy enough to make long trips. While those who stayed behind tend to be those already ill or old or having existing medical conditions. This is consistent with the fact that most deaths occur in people who r old or with existing conditions. Alternatively, as many would, one can assume that China and WHO are lying big time. Time will tell. I dont see what benefits the liars hope to gain given that time will tell extremely quickly in an viral outbreak.
    1
  16.  To Release is To Resolve  to what end? Viral outbreak is not soemthing anyone can hide, not even chicom. Or r u one of those who habe been saying for the last 50 years that China has been lying about its population, its GDP and all the chinese money....and tourists, students and busineses/individuals buying up Western properties are all fake...if so, yes then u r being self-consistent. But time will tell, as usual, if u r consistent with reality or not.
    1
  17.  @radovanprezmetsky585  the ratio in Wuhan has been steady and settling well as the numebrs grow. The infected populations outside of that province are, as far as i can gather, people from that place or visited that place. So the only difference i can see between the two cohorts is the ability to travel. Hence my theory. This is also consistent what s what s observed from those caught outside of China. 2 death both very near China. No death, depsite larger base number, further afield. All jsut working theories. Data can change. Theory can change.
    1
  18. R0 2.2? Discuss. Wasn it supposed to be 3-4?
    1
  19.  @ChiDraconis  OK. Thanks. Would be interesting to See an update next week.
    1
  20. The swedish industrial animal husbandry approach to the virus is simply unrealistic to countries with more people or more diverse sociopolitical agendas.
    1
  21. Let s hope it stays that Way. But the numbers from outside that province and outside China have been pointing this Way consistently EVER since the the beginning...death rate <= 0.5 percent , mainly in the elderly and the chronically ill. But hey that s boring. People much prefer to be fed scary Stuff while knowing they are safe. Much Like enjoying a horror film. Except that this IS real life and people are actually dying albeit far away and of another country. the whole thing so far tells me that humanity is basically cowardly, cruel and irrational. The worst combo. People like the good doctor here and all those experts working to resolve and stop the crisis are very few and far between indeed.
    1
  22.  @lestatangel  lol. I dont even know i have a channel. Am pretty tech ignorant. Look in the mirror in a few months' time, and ask yourself the hard question...
    1
  23. 👍
    1
  24. It s ironic. At what point is the cure worse than the disease? If u behave as if it s ebola , does it matter what the disease actually is any more? Does it matter if the disease is not ebola but by all the numbers around the world some kind of infecticious but non-fatal severe flu?
    1
  25. Exactly. Collective mania.
    1
  26. If infection has been under counted then death Rate is even lower, as data outside China shows, and world data is consistent with data outside Wuhan and its province.important silver lining.
    1
  27. Italy...the weakest link. :(:(
    1
  28. Europe has an older population ....take that into account please.
    1
  29. U got my vote for best question of the day. Lol.
    1
  30. Any comment on the phenomenon that people who blame the WHO/China the most tend to be the same people who favour the relaxed 'herd immunity' approach? In the West anyway. Not sure about other countries.
    1
  31. Mmmm...still more chances of being run over in the street...life s a risk. It s about prioritising and rank ordering the risks correctly. No non-chinese death after over a month of this big bad frightening ultra infectious plague taking over the world...silver lining anyone?
    1
  32. Still only 300 odd in Asia and 80 in non-asia. And no deaths. Outside aisa. Only 2 in non-china Asia. After nearly a month. Can we draw any statistically valid conclusions based on these?
    1
  33. death seems to occur overwhelmingly in the origin city. almost none outside of that region. it a been a while and there have been enough cases outside of the region to have statiatical significance. so why the huge imblance? given that the dead were mostly the old and the weak, might we draw the conclusion that if one is robust enough to travel long distances than one is robust enough not to die from the virus? if so, what should the world do? it s infectious, no doubt. but it doesnt kill much. what should public policy be?
    1
  34. How reliable are the Tests? Different countries seem to be using different tests and there seems no standard reliable tests. What s the latest and it st Info on this issue?
    1