Comments by "" (@tomk3732) on "Global News" channel.

  1. Well they have no choice now - Trump forced a war.
    1
  2. Yeah but by that definition most of Ukraine should go back to previous owners of the land.
    1
  3. Government will need to give $ support for children. Isn't it communist way anyways - to offer support to these in need?
    1
  4. Nazi news also reported all OK until 1945 when it become difficult to continue once their HQ started getting shelled.
    1
  5.  De G  In 30 years China will be about double economy of USA. India is not a Scandinavian country - that is northern Europe and they are mostly quite rich or even richer then Canada so no need to develop them. Since China is very populous we will see a lot of viruses and other stuff coming from them and/or India. Are you also willing to punish UK as well as others for producing some potent mutations? If it was bio weapon I am sure it would be a bit more lethal :) China will not hold to #1 - no one can - it is certain through that in 100-200 year span as things are going the future of humanity is in Asia - i.e. Star Trek will contain mostly Asians.
    1
  6. Excellent idea - this would go well towards balancing US - Chinese trade. Trump will win big with just one request.
    1
  7. Church does not have endless purse like the government does. Its more of a "private corporation".
    1
  8. No people cannot do anything they want in their free time. They still have to follow laws.
    1
  9. What? Seriously? Decisions were made in Moscow and Berlin. No one even asked Warsaw for opinion. Deal was signed between Germany and Belarus in which Poland had zero to say. If anything it has shown that Poland has no say in EU & US is a useless allay.
    1
  10. They want election now to stop investigation into WE charity - they were stopping it in other comities but cannot stop it now - so they are wlling to kill government to continue the coverup. Liberals should dump JT.
    1
  11.  @Grant_S_M  So you are happy with like 50th place in the world?
    1
  12.  @Grant_S_M  I am. So I am not the reason. Our PM is the reason. He was the one that did not get vaccine procured in time. He is the one that build zero factories (UK got 3 brand new ones). He is the one that build zero facilities for testing. He is the one that created travel restrictions that are unknown in detail to 99.99% of Canadian population and lead to a lot of interesting scenarios - such as the one in which you can make quarantine disappear if US lets you through the border, who knew talking to Americans == no need to stay for 14 days at home. So the question is, why would anyone vote for our current PM after such epic failures all over the place. I don't even mention little things, just major ones. We need to punish him at the voting booth - anyone but JT.
    1
  13. But it would ensure JT - which is far worse.
    1
  14.  @redmapleleafwanderer  But they are not exactly doing that! You have lots of "groups" hiding behind truckers - some of these may be paid by the government that do some "nasty" stuff.
    1
  15.  @joaquinluceromusic  Truckers certainly have political cover. Truckers are right now only in Ottawa and blocking JT view from parliament. Other then that not much is going on.
    1
  16.  @MrStrangechange  Homeless people are only removed by force from private property. I never seen them removed from public property by force - usually they are given notice / tickets etc. nothing immediate. Different cities have different bylaws so it is difficult to make general statement. For example, in Calgary it can take over 30 days to clear an illegal campsite. In Toronto there are up to 10000 homeless living on the streets.
    1
  17.  @MrStrangechange  Vast majority of homeless do not build tent cities. They drift between shelters and sleeping outside. If they were removed - there would be no one left - unless you suggest homeless are produced in large numbers.
    1
  18. The right thing is to keep measly 88 tanks in Canada. We went from 1000s of tanks, to 100s of tanks and now to less than 100 and you want to give away these as well?
    1
  19. Zielinski?
    1
  20. Lavrov said that he may be right or wrong but Hitler may have had some Jewish blood in him yet he killed so many. Statement checks out to be 100% true. Hitler was so paranoid about this he even excluded himself from racial laws (and Jesus Christ) I am 90% certain his paternal grandfather was Jewish. Genetical testing says person from ME or north Africa. Not too many non Jews in Germany 200 years ago from the area. He also said that many Jews participated in Holocaust and were anti-Semitic. Main issue here is quantification of "many". Is 100 many? If we ignore the "many" again 100% true, there were Jews or at least people with Jewish heritage that participated in the Holocaust. Lavrov is 100% correct in suggesting Jews can be Nazi. Too many pp associated Nazi with identical ideology to Nazi Germany in WWII - Nazi were / are practical. Heck, Germans trained Chinese and later on were friends with Japanese calling them Arians of Asia. I can mention what US though of Japanese (huge racism) and even today Chinese are frequently deemed "inferior". To think Nazis actually... liked these pp!
    1
  21. Probably the same place former Afghan leader landed his cash filled plane!
    1
  22. And make sure the tank has SS on it as well as a clear red-black Nazi flag - just so Russians know whom they are dealing with.
    1
  23. Moze agresywny to on jednak troch byl ale US pokazalo 100x taka agresje i zmusza Iran do wojny. Wojny ktora Trump pare miesiecy temy zatrzymal pomimo tego ze drona zestrzelili... co sie zmienilo? Trzeba zobaczyc senat USA i wybory 2020.
    1
  24.  @JuraMalopolska  Kiedy byl dron sestrzelony US nie dalo odpowiedzi. Teraz dalo odpowiedz za niby "plany" ktora jest 100x wiekrza niz odpowiedz planowana na dron. Nie jest to normalne - Trump nie chcial zrobic nawet malego kroku kilka miesiecy temu a teraz wykonal skok na ktory 2 innch prezydentow sie nie zdecydowalo oraz Israel kilka razy tez. W czerwcu Trump byl bardzo ostrozny - dzisiaj Trump jest super ryzykant. Dlaczego - co sie zmienilo ze sie zmienil tak bardzo w zachowaniu - to nie jest mala zmiana - to jest super wielka zmiana - prawie o 180 stopni.
    1
  25.  @JuraMalopolska  Wytlumaczenie jest proste - demokracja jest dal USA i jej obywateli, dla innych go nie ma.
    1
  26. There are a lot of Ukrainian Nazi living in Canada. They even have monument to SS in Ontario, on private ground.
    1
  27. If Russia wanted to not deliver gas to Germany they would have created more reversible problems then blowing a pipeline under the sea. Such act creates damage that is difficult to reverse even if one wants it. Much easier is say sabotage of pumping turbine etc. Also why would Russia take out pipeline NOT in operation??? NS 2 is dead - why damage that???
    1
  28. This is bigger then Saigon. Taliban are going to shell the airport with their new artillery and prevent easy evacuation. Either US makes a deal or it would be forced to re-invade. Epic failure. The size of this thing is so big it is hard to see how Biden can have something else as his legacy.
    1
  29. Our PM knew what he is doing when he authorized US request. Our two Ms need to wait till US elections. New US president may not be Trump and he may wish to normalize US - China relations or at least reset them. This could be done by getting Canada to release Meng. Canada should never have arrested her and deflected the issue with for example not letting her into Canada... through US would have found someone else to replace her. Remember that US loves to send both Canada and Australia against China & when China retaliates with blockades US offers China their own goods!
    1
  30. Certainly with weakened Iran and her Shia fighters as well as Iraq in total disarray IS will be allowed to rise up again.
    1
  31. The problem is that the UN double standard - in Kosovo people were allowed to decide but in NK people were ignored (80% of UN did not vote). UN should end with double standards. Either we go Kosovo way or not.
    1
  32. @Level 70 And where is the war going on, in Russia or Ukraine? Even if Russia were to loose 100% of their territorial gains.... so what? Ukraine still lost. Even if Russia were to loose all of Crimea and Donbass and Ukraine regained all of its land, temporarily, Ukraine still lost. Why? Russia can simply retake the land. Land is only of use if it servers a purpose in war - i.e. if it brings you to your goal. There is no need for "extra land". The war is not about land after all. Russia is flexible, the can move out, they can move in etc. Take Bakhmut - Ukraine holds to the city like there was gold there. 20 brigades are stationed in and around the city. Russia is inflicting massive losses. Why such a death grip? Stalin was known for such "no step back" strategy followed by Hitler. This infuriated command around Hitler so much they tried to blow him up in a bunker & Stalin wised up after multiple failures.
    1
  33.  @rv2167  Well, same can be said about Zielinski and Kiev regime. Clearly they don't want to negotiate so they need to go they way of their pal, Hitler.
    1
  34.  @ElectroPunkpl  LOL, not at all - the war is between US expansion to remove Russian influence & to remove it as an important country while at the same time supporting "questionable" elements (not for the first time - US would support the devil to support their goal - see the Taliban). Europe is a victim of such manipulation. If Ukraine looses - which it will - its a win for United Nations human charter. All people have the right to determine their future, be it in Donbass or Taiwan. If these are not the right of Europe - than shame on them and their luck of moral values. What union the sick idea to destroy Poland by saddling it with 3rd world Ukraine in a union? What Union without Germany - it is Germany that holds together the current union - without Germans it would quickly roll out. Besides, Poland is against "Federal state" which is the next step for EU.
    1
  35.  @southernstablesauto  I fail to see how US experience thought anyone to be the last man standing. US lost at least 4x less troops than Ukraine currently lost, adjusted or by total percentage. My grandfather fought in WWII since September 1939. He was captured, escaped from Germany, thanks to NKVD Jew captured again by the reds, escaped, spent six months as a slave for a farmer till he finally was able to join AK sometime in 1942. His less is to not die for your country but make the other guy die for his. I.e. lesson of Poland is NOT to be last man standing, as standing alone makes your victory pyrrhic. With your thinking I guess Japan should have stood firm after two nukes were dropped on it - they should have fought on. Good thing even before the nukes Emperor of Japan told his government to make peace. Or shall we say like in Polish anthem, "Jeszcze Polska nie zginela poki my zyjemy." - "Poland did not die yet till we are alive" - i.e. when we are dead there is no Poland - Poland and any other country is made by the people. This also flows into German idea of ethnic cleansing & destruction of intelligentsia - once people are gone - at least smart ones, there is no country.
    1
  36.  @ElectroPunkpl  So if you are so sure that Donbass wants to be part of Ukraine why not allow UN sponsored referendum? You know, like a normal person would suggest. Say Musk suggested no NATO expansion and referendums in all areas Russia claims. Under UN flag with verification of residency. People were wiser after great war - they had referendums - not perfect but good idea. Why not now? If you are so sure Donbass wants to be part of Ukraine, why such resistance to a free vote??!!
    1
  37.  @zzmmz3789  Sure, everyone killed everyone else - but I do not see monuments to Jew killers in Europe! Point me to a monument of Hitler in Europe - or monument to any major person that is know to have killed Jews. How many monuments to Bandera in Ukraine? Over 200.
    1
  38.  @itsyaboimirage3473  Its not random statistics - you can google, can you "Nazi collaborator monuments in Ukraine" or "Bandera mythologies and their traps for Ukraine" - no one knows exact number - same as how many statues of say Lenin were removed. But above are interesting reads to open your eyes to Nazism in Ukraine. BTW, these are western sources, first one is Jewish - well they do not like Nazi, second one is British.
    1
  39. Why? They are winning the war, no need for nukes. They can always partially mobilize.
    1
  40. Umm, and do you think the Taliban care about it? No. Does anyone else? No. Do pp care he brings Canadians in one piece back? Yes. Does he care? No. JT cares about one thing only - himself. And himself is defined by power he holds - above anything else. Remember that when voting!
    1
  41. LOL - I am sure this is what they would not mind in the US - as soon as they can remove Chinese students from Canada the sooner they can come to the US.
    1
  42.  @user-ji8ll1qn6o  LOL, when Australia did restrictions US immediately told China "we can sell you this" - when Canada kicks Chinese students out US is guaranteed to immediately say "we take them with open arms" - its good for trade balance after all.
    1
  43.  @thevirusfactory2332  Olympics should be above politics. Boycotting them was idiotic in the past and will be so in the future. It also hurts athletes of the nation boycotting.
    1
  44.  De G  In their view we are doing a lot of wrong. This is against the spirit of the Olympics. It was done before and was proven as terrible idea.
    1
  45.  @user-ji8ll1qn6o  Canada and US are not the whole world. We are not even 5% of the population.
    1
  46.  De G  Not really - the world is quickly evening out - just look at where poor countries were 20 years ago, 40 years ago and 60 vs today. I.e. your assertion of consumerism is false. All you need to give people is technology - which China is totally fine with giving. Thus in 30 years the western countries such as EU and US / Canada etc will account for less then 1/3 of global market - Heck China alone will be greater then all of the current west combined (!) Once we finally get India into the program as well as rest of Asia I am sure that even you can see it. Problem is that the west arguably accounts for no more 1/8 of world population - thus even with 1/3 factor we are giving everyone still a huge edge. In 50-60 years this will even out more and in 100 there will be very few differences.
    1
  47.  De G  Well, we can see today that it is not correct view - we see that a lot of countries - including China have reached quite high levels. You have a theory that was correct in colonial times when world economy could be compared to a balloon - if you pinched it in the right spot you got far bigger share then others - if no one were to pinch it all would be poor (vs some very poor and some rich) - this is how British Empire functioned. However, we are not longer in so much of scarcity of resources phase - i.e. our economies are mostly services with tiny pinch of manufacturing - with exception of say Saudi Arabia and Australia our wealth can be limitless and unbound by some limited resource. India brought the issue on themselves with some poorly calculated moves - they wanted Goa - a small Portuguese colony in India. Instead of waiting few years they decided to have a little tiny war. This gave China legitimate reason to settle border dispute in their region also by force & win another war with India. To this day India and China have disputes in the region - as does a lot of others. India is behind China a LOT - its people are far less educated, it has archaic systems of governance and its democracy is quite flawed. Being both in India and China I can guarantee that India will be one of the last countries on Earth to reach prosperity - many countries in Africa if they control birth rate will beat them. As for China thinking the world is going to remain the same - I think that is more US thinking then Chinese - China is very future and change oriented - they are building more railways and highways then the rest of the planet combined. They invest heavily in latest technologies and education. I do not see China limiting some technology at all - I do see US trying all sorts of sanctions to limit spread of technology - for example US coerced with sanctions EU to not export latest chips to Hauwei. All this did was for China to invest even more to jump the gate and within few years it will have capacity to produce all latest chips for its phones (it does 10% currently) - give it few years and it will exceed technologically its competitors. Then we see whatever they will limit technology - so far I see only US doing limiting. I doubt 3D printing is as magical as you think - it is just another process - additive - similar to current common processes which are subtractive. I.e. 3D printing just wastes less material and in some cases it is cheaper and faster. It does not fundamentally remove anything from the manufacturing process - its just another tool. The problem with manufacturing in say Canada is not luck of some magic but luck of people / machinery / investment / high pay to even contemplate competing with China. Let me put it this way, when I make a part out of steel the material to make the part + energy + cutting costs etc. is roughly in line with the cost of the part in China mainland. I.e. in your 3D world, the cost for 3D printer in Canada to make widget X will be roughly the same in material cost as ready made good in China or maybe even on eBay. With current shipping rates in Canada there is NO WAY you can compete 1:1 with China - it costs at least 3x as much to mail it in Canada then China to Canada. So even with no profit and no wages we cannot compete. Let that sink in.
    1
  48.  @codysaunders7348  I am less Chinese then you are ;)
    1
  49.  @codysaunders7348  OK, whatever you say, but why 50 cent?
    1
  50.  @codysaunders7348  So how much is western propaganda worth? More or less?
    1