Comments by "Jennifer Lawrence" (@jenniferlawrence2701) on "The New Culture Forum" channel.

  1. Leftists have an egotistical need to see themselves as heroes for the least-fortunate, and as gallant fighters against the powerful. They can never be satisfied with the working people they have in their own countries because there is always someone somewhere in the world less fortunate (and powerful) than White Europeans. Leftists are on a never-ending quest to find people more deserving of their solidarity.
    1
  2. "Free Market Capitalism" in practice mean mass-immigration and relinquishing control of culture to mega-rich corporations (usually American ones) who push woke values.
    1
  3.  @skymanifest8339  You are entirely correct.
    1
  4. As long as we pretend the problem is only extremism and not Islam itself this will continue. Remigration must be part of the conversation. If migration can be incentivized, then so too can emigration.
    1
  5. looks like a garage, and possibly is
    1
  6. I'd argue it isn't really guilt, but vanity, pride, ego. The apologetic white person casts themselves as "one of the good ones," a morally righteous defender of non-white people in need of their generous help (or so they like to think).
    1
  7. You're going to be seen (and treated) as "White" regardless if you use the word or not. Atomized individuals cannot defeat an opponent that is tribal.
    1
  8.  @helloagain6243  Where's the lie? Are black people going to stop referring to themselves as "black" and drop identity politics anytime soon? Of course not. Tribalism is what humans inevitably do, and it is foolish to think it will go away if European ("white") people just sit it out while everyone else carries on doing it.
    1
  9. I must admit I've never really understood why there is a distinction made between "the culture war" and anything else that is a matter of political debate. Surely all politics is cultural?
    1
  10.  @ulissesbraga-neto2123  Yes, people do survive that particular form of restraint because although it may look painful, it doesn't restrict breathing. There are videos out there of people having it done to them. The coroner testified at the trial that Floyd did not die of asphyxiation. He died of heart failure. The contributing factors in that heart failure were listed as (1) the dangerous and often lethal amount of drugs he had taken, (2) his underlying chronic heart condition (dangerously clogged arteries), and (3) the physical stress of struggling with police and then being restrained. The last bit (the restraint) was used to convict Chauvin of murder. We'll never know, but it seems likely that had the trial taken place in a less politically charged climate - one in which jurors could be certain they could offer any judgment without the threat of personal repercussions later - he may have been convicted only of lesser charges, or perhaps even acquitted. Why? Because it can't actually be proven beyond reasonable doubt that Floyd wouldn't also have died had Chauvin's knee been nowhere near his neck. The drugs and the stress of the fight with police (that Floyd himself chose to engage in) on his chronically ill heart could have been enough on their own to kill him. Had Chauvin's knee been on Floyd's shoulder we might not be having this discussion, but Floyd would likely still be dead.
    1
  11. You're ignorant of voting patterns. From 1945 until 2017, more women voted Right-Wing than men. Secondly you might want to look at which sex the majority of Prime Ministers and other government ministers have been.
    1
  12. Tate is barely worth discussing. He seems to appeal only to the lowest-IQ teenage boys, and their adult equivalent. "Dude, just shag lots of chicks and buy expensive toys" - eternal adolescent. One of these guys comes around every few years. Before it was someone calling himself Roosh. Eventually they have some epiphany and convert to Islam, or something, renouncing their former lifestyle.
    1
  13. The BBC cannot be reformed. It will never be neutral because it will always be staffed by metropolitan cosmopolites. Get rid of it. There is zero reason to continue allowing our cultural enemies to use public money.
    1
  14. @microfarming8583 Varoufakis is a self-described communist, so it is funny seeing him getting a dose of his own medicine.
    1
  15. Education campaigns have (in concert with other measures) been able to reduce cigarette smoking. A similar thing could be useful for increasing birthrates.
    1
  16. White People. Not "British Identity". It is an attack on White People - Europeans.
    1
  17.  @hendilman  all the more reason not to import more men from the places you mentioned, I'd have thought
    1
  18.  @MC-nu9dv  what's SWI?
    1
  19.  @louislemar796  Nationalism is NOT the theory that a society needs a nation state Yes it is. Or rather, it is one form of nationalism. There are multiple. At it's most basic, a belief in the value of nation-states is nationalist, as is the desire to create or uphold one. One cannot desire to create a nation-state without being a variety of nationalist. I disagree entirely, If Iceland had a set of founding fathers, who held the same ideas and implemented them in the same way then Iceland would be as successful. Impossible. Iceland does not have the size, location, population, or resources as the USA. The argument is not over whether Iceland would have any success at all. It is that Iceland would not be anywhere near as successful as the USA (because the USA's success depends on more than just a set of ideas). Hong Kong was not unsuccessful. But Hong Kong was/is nowhere near as successful as the USA. Europe destroying itself was also a massive hindrance to the USA Not when it came to becoming the world's dominant superpower. The previous holder of that crown was the British Empire, which destroyed itself in two world wars. Had that not happened, the USA would have to contend with a world in which the British were still at least as powerful, if not more so, than them.
    1
  20.  @wolfgangvonlichtenstein5222  Free Market Capitalists believe that more migrants = higher GDP, lower inflation (incl. lower wages). People voted to leave the EU in the hope that a British government would reduce immigration once they had complete sovereign control of Britain's borders. Instead the government has just used Brexit as an excuse to bump up the numbers of migrants from outside Europe.
    1
  21. A little misleading. For many decades per-capita violent crime in Western countries has been trending down because we have aging populations. Most violent crimes are committed by men under 30, so an aging population means a relatively smaller pool of such men. However, bringing in young men from certain parts of the world results in higher rates of crime than we otherwise would have without that immigration, in places that otherwise would be more peaceful and pleasant to live. That's the issue here: the crime rates we have versus the ones we could have if we weren't so intent on importing large amounts of low-skilled young men from parts of the world with even worse attitudes to women than our men generally have. There are many examples from the Nordic countries where we can see previously peaceful areas become worse due to such immigration.
    1
  22. Man in his natural state has abilities. Rights are an abstraction. We can choose to believe that we are endowed with Rights, but this is a utilitarian argument. We can't know if God does (or doesn't) exist. It requires a leap of faith.
    1
  23. Excellent speech, Harrison.
    1
  24. British women consistently voted Conservative more than men did from 1945 to 2015. What you're describing is a very recent phenomenon, probably due to the influence of social media.
    1
  25. Well then the chickens must be dealt with.
    1
  26.  @GRIMVEL  So you acknowledge that affluent immigrants are less of a crime-burden but still want to import masses of non-affluent immigrants anyway? As for economics, only certain kinds of immigration is economically beneficial, and much of what we (and other European countries) have been getting is economically detrimental. Let's say we do blame billionaires (among others) for mass-immigration. Now what? Is the Left ever going to reduce immigration, even if we significantly raise taxes on billionaires? (no) For the Left, immigration is ideological. For the Tories it is business.
    1
  27. People are going to conclude that democracy is useless.
    1
  28. RCN President Sheila Sobrany's comments were (like Sadiq Khan's) racist towards white people.
    1
  29. Nonsense. It is unhelpful to blame one sex for the mass-immigration into Britain, but if you really want to go down that road, search for voting patterns in Britain going all the way back to 1945. You'll see that most women voted Conservative in every election until 2017, while more men often voted Labour (including in 1997 when Blair won). Then you could look at which sex the vast majority of government ministers have been, and so on.... You're right that most female feminists are Left-Wing, and therefore mostly supportive of the Left's immigration and diversity ideology. But that ignores all the men who are Left-Wing and supportive of the same ideology. It would be ludicrous to suggest that Germaine Greer had more influence on immigration levels than Tony Blair did, for example.
    1
  30. "Anti-Racism" and "Social Justice" in reality just mean trying to get as much as possible out of white people - their money, their land, the fruits of their labour, and ultimately their countries.
    1
  31. the "they will assimilate in a generation or two" argument only makes sense if you have a small amount of initial immigration and then halt further immigration for decades. By definition it cannot work if instead you have a constant, steady stream of 1st generation migrants.
    1
  32.  @genghisthegreat2034  The immigration doesn't sustain services, it strains them.
    1
  33. I have always strongly disliked Russell Brand and could easily see him being guilty. However it is alarming that a government is, on the basis of anonymous accusations, essentially going after someone who has not yet been charged with anything let alone convicted, pushing for him to be de-platformed and attacking his livelihood. Shades of East Germany. We must defend due process even for unsympathetic characters.
    1
  34. Saying something for decades doesn't make it true.
    1
  35.  @josevictorribeirolisboa7576  It is worth caring about your ancestors in this sense: if by their actions you have inherited something good worth cherishing and passing on to your children. "Pride" can have different meanings. If you use the word to mean a personal feeling of achievement for the actions of people long dead who may only be very vaguely related to you anyway, I agree it is foolish. However that isn't quite what a lot of people mean. To take pride in something can be to understand its worth. I can feel proud of my parents without taking personal credit for their achievements, or blame for their misdeeds. I can take pride in what they passed down. This is, I think, what many people mean by the term - feelings of appreciation, gratitude, admiration.
    1
  36. not a particularly pleasant comment
    1
  37. That's the "two wrongs make a right" argument. Also the dubious idea of inter-genrational punishment, in which grandchildren deserve punishment for the sins of...not even necessarily their grandfathers, but often just people who looked like their grandfathers, are of the same ethnic groups. These standards seem only ever to be applied to white people, oddly.  @nomxhosapekani7966 
    1
  38. So when can you be punished for the sins of your ancestors? I didn't colonize anyone and you were never colonized. You're talking about people who are long-dead. You use this "justice" argument to mask your own self-interest: You personally benefit from being in majority-white countries. Justice isn't your motivation, self-interest is.  @user-wm2tw 
    1
  39. Political parties don't have to voluntarily associate with someone if they think it will hurt their electoral chances.
    1
  40. Good to know. The IQ debate should be fun then.
    1
  41. Karma doesn't exist. It's just a concept spiteful people use to justify things they agree with. @selvamthiagarajan8152 
    1
  42.  @ЯрославЛ-ф1ж  I doubt the OP is committing any genocides from his council house.
    1
  43. don't be fooled. they both want unlimited immigration.
    1
  44. From 1945 until 2017, British women voted more conservatively than men.
    1
  45. Which subject are those cultural lessons taking place in?
    1
  46. Could large scale entryism work in the Conservative party? Corbyn's supporters managed to wrestle control of Labour for a while.
    1
  47. 'cos he's working class Labour innit
    1
  48. Notice how asserting your white identity prompts certain people to immediately try to dissuade you with childish insults about genitalia.
    1
  49.  @NG-dc2pk  Stop spamming that comment. We've all seen it now.
    1
  50. Correct.
    1