Comments by "WhatAboutTheBee" (@WhatAboutTheBee) on "The Russian Dude"
channel.
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Let us examine russia's glorious battlefield accomplishments.
The glorious russian retreat from Kyiv. Such goodwill from russians, actually driven out.
The glorious russian retreat from Snake Island. Such goodwill from russians, actually driven out.
The glorious Moskva cruiser, bravely defending marine life from Ukrainian missiles. Stopping the missiles from landing in the water. Admirable concern for marine life.
The glorious russian retreat from Kharkiv. Such goodwill from russians, actually driven out.
The glorious russian retreat from Lyman. Such goodwill from russians, driven out.
The glorious russian retreat from Kherson. Such goodwill from russia, driven out.
The humiliating russian advance towards Bakmut. A few 100 meters in months WHICH RUSSIA STILL HASN'T TAKEN. The capture of the tiny town of Soledar, prewar population 10,490. At the cost of 20,000 Wagner dead
At this rate, it will be centuries before russian troops ever see Kyiv.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Cad6638 Suppose the Ukrainian estimate is wrong by a factor of 2. Suppose instead of 110,000 cargo 200, it is really only 55,000. That would be in less than 11 months.
russia also invaded Afghanistan, December 1979 and humiliatingly withdrew 10 years later in 1989.
About 15,000 Soviet soldiers were KIA, and about 35,000 were wounded in the invasion. Notice the 3:1 ratio is still not held. 15,000 KIA over 10 years is 1500 per year or about 125/month.
russia's burn rate in Ukraine, even with the factor of 2, is 5000/month. If we accept Ukraine's estimate, it is 110,000 / 11 months = 10,000/month.
Time for another forced conscription. Putin does not care how many russians die, what matters is that he stays in power. For now.
Glory to Ukraine!
2
-
@graemepeters5717 Let us examine russia's glorious battlefield accomplishments.
The glorious russian retreat from Kyiv. Such goodwill from russians, actually driven out.
The glorious russian retreat from Snake Island. Such goodwill from russians, actually driven out.
The glorious Moskva cruiser, bravely defending marine life from Ukrainian missiles. Stopping the missiles from landing in the water. Admirable concern for marine life.
The glorious russian retreat from Kharkiv. Such goodwill from russians, actually driven out.
The glorious russian retreat from Lyman. Such goodwill from russians, driven out.
The glorious russian retreat from Kherson. Such goodwill from russia, driven out.
The humiliating russian advance towards Bakmut. A few 100 meters in 4 months. The capture of the tiny town of Soledar, prewar population 10,490. At the cost of 20,000 Wagner dead
At this rate, it will be centuries before russian troops ever see Kyiv.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Roger_Gadd Ukraine will force russia out just like the Mujahideen forced them out of Afghanistan. You see, Ukraine doesn't have to win in the traditional sense, they just have to keep fighting until russia decides enough is enough.
In order for russia to win the war, russia needs roughly a 3:1 advantage in troop numbers. The Ukrainian Army is estimated to be ~700K, therefore, russia needs to attack with 2.1 million troops. russia has nowhere near those number of troopers, so russia can never conquer Ukraine.
Should russia miraculously conquer Ukraine, the occupation begins. Occupation is the hard part, conquering is the easy part. Conquering is the part russia seems incapable of achieving but that's the easy part. Occupation. For a docile population, such as russian sheep, military science indicates 20 troops per 1000 civilian population. With the population of Ukraine at 44 million, russia needs to occupy with 880,000 troopers. russia doesn't have those numbers. Not even close.
For a restive population, with partisan activity, such as the people of Ukraine, the military science of occupation dictates 75 troopers per 1000 of population in occupation. For a Ukrainian population of 44 million, the reality is that russia would need to field 3,300,000 troops to occupy Ukraine. For 20 years. russia has nowhere close to those numbers.
russia cannot conquer Ukraine due to insufficient numbers and russia cannot occupy Ukraine due to insufficient numbers, consequently the war will grind on and on for russia. With the concomitant casualties inherent for the attacker.
russia has lost. The fighting may not be over, but russia has lost. Never had the numbers. Never will.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@thephoenix756 Here is some military science for a russian troll. In order for russia to win the war, russia needs roughly a 3:1 advantage in troop numbers. The Ukrainian Army is estimated to be ~700K, therefore, russia needs to attack with 2.1 million troops. russia has nowhere near those number of troopers, so russia can never conquer Ukraine.
Should russia miraculously conquer Ukraine, the occupation begins. Occupation is the hard part, conquering is the easy part. Conquering is the part russia seems incapable of achieving but that's the easy part.
Occupation. For a docile population, such as russian sheep, military science indicates 20 troops per 1000 civilian population. With the population of Ukraine at 44 million, russia would need to occupy with 880,000 troopers IF THE POPULATION WAS DOCILE.
For a restive population, with partisan activity, such as the people of Ukraine, the military science of occupation dictates 75 troopers per 1000 of population in occupation. For a Ukrainian population of 44 million, the REALITY is that russia would need to field 3,300,000 troops to occupy Ukraine. russia has nowhere close to those numbers. Further, it must be generational, so 3.3M troops for a generation or 20 years. russia simply doesn't have the stamina
russia cannot conquer Ukraine due to insufficient numbers and russia cannot occupy Ukraine due to insufficient numbers, consequently the war will grind on and on for russia. With the concomitant casualties inherent for the attacker.
russia has lost. The fighting may not be over, but russia has lost. Never had the numbers. Never will.
Got that Moskal?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@jokorosich3545 Let us examine russia's glorious battlefield accomplishments.
The glorious russian retreat from Kyiv. Such goodwill from russians, actually driven out.
The glorious russian retreat from Snake Island. Such goodwill from russians, actually driven out.
The glorious Moskva cruiser, bravely defending marine life from Ukrainian missiles. Stopping the missiles from landing in the water. Admirable concern for marine life.
The glorious russian retreat from Kharkiv. Such goodwill from russians, actually driven out.
The glorious russian retreat from Lyman. Such goodwill from russians, driven out.
The glorious russian retreat from Kherson. Such goodwill from russia, driven out.
The humiliating russian advance towards Bakmut. 29 kilometers in a YEAR! A phyrric victory only exceeded by the capture of the tiny town of Soledar, prewar population 10,490. At the cost of 20,000 Wagner dead
At this rate, it will be centuries before russian troops ever see Kyiv.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2