Comments by "WhatAboutTheBee" (@WhatAboutTheBee) on "The Russian Dude" channel.

  1. ​ @kelvinapted7032 Почему я должен быть вежливым. Геноцидные москвичи вторглись к мирному соседу. ваши войска совершают военные преступления. Самому Путину в Гааге были предъявлены уголовные обвинения. скатайте свой русский мир в крохотный шарик и засуньте его себе в сфинктер, так он будет рядом с головой Got that vatnik? Lol
    2
  2. At 0:41, you can hear vestiges. Artem says "What's up investors?"
    2
  3. Perhaps you should recall the 4 years AFTER the great conflict of WW2, when Ukrainian nationalists fought on against the entire might of the CCCP. 4 years, without any Western support. Glory to Ukraine!!
    2
  4. No chance of russian air defense hitting him. Too much fluttering. russian air defense needs a straight and level flight path, at a constant velocity, with the transponder on. When the target meets that criteria, all bets are off. Shoigu flutters too much.
    2
  5. When someone talks about the Ukrainian counteroffensive, commenting about the speed, the directions or efficiency and confidently states that something is "definitely not going according to plan," the main thing to remember is that before the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the Russian army was seriously called the "second army in the world", hysterically feared and not even imagined to be effectively fought against. The second thing to understand is that the person who makes this comment has NO access to the plan and is therefore incapable of assessing if it is ahead or behind.
    2
  6. russians assume that, no matter what, russia will win. There is no thought in their heads that russia could lose. This is a ridiculous assumption of course. This disconnect is just hubris, a pathetic sense of self worth brought about by the Great Patriotic War. I will not disparage the great effort put forth by the CCCP. But let us not forget the 11 billion USD of Lend Lease that was provided to the CCCP. What did Stalin say about this? "I want to tell you what, from the Russian point of view, the president and the United States have done for victory in this war," Stalin said. "The most important things in this war are the machines.... The United States is a country of machines. Without the machines we received through Lend-Lease, we would have lost the war."
    1
  7. Artem is definitely of russian ethnic stock but escaped the sh♤thole and now lives in Canada.
    1
  8. The CCCP pilots were flying the jets "donated" to the North Vietnamese.
    1
  9. Afghanistan February 1989.
    1
  10. 🎵 moscow-stan greatest country in the world 🎶 🎵 All other countries run by little girls 🎶 - putin ~~~ How long will Victory take? Western resolve, Ukrainian resolve is for the long haul. Who cares how long it takes. 1 year, 5 years, 20 years? It does not matter. russia will be driven out of Ukraine.
    1
  11. ​ @thibault2288 How can we be informed that russia is losing the war? Comments by idiotic russians about a negotiated settlement. If the russians are doing so well, why do they want to negotiate so hard? No need for that if you can achieve outright victory. But russia hasn't achieved victory. russia hasn't achieved ANYTHING of any merit in months. Instead, russians bleat for a negotiated settlement. russia has lost the war. It will grind on and on.
    1
  12. Battle Babushkas? I don't care what they say. The Battle Babushkas are quite irrelevant. Yet the minute they step over the internationally recognized border, they become an invader. That is the moment they become cargo 200 qualified.
    1
  13. How can we be informed that russia is losing the war? Comments by idiotic russian trolls about a negotiated settlement. If the russians are doing so well, why do they want to negotiate so hard? No need for that if you can achieve outright victory. Isn't that right Dmitry? But russia hasn't achieved victory. russia hasn't achieved ANYTHING of any merit in months. Instead, russian trolls bleat for a negotiated settlement. russia has lost the war. It will grind on and on. How long will Victory take? Western resolve, Ukrainian resolve is for the long haul. Who cares how long it takes. 1 year, 5 years, 20 years? It does not matter. russia will be driven out of Ukraine.
    1
  14.  @Cad6638  no sir, we are not. The tally is not "casualties" in the Western sense of KIA and WIA summed. The tally published is for KIA only and specifically does not include WIA. The tally includes troops from the LPR, DPR, Chechens, Wagner, etc. The Ukrainians aren't sorting them by category of who is fighting for the russians. If the trooper is fighting for russia, that counts. I will suggest that the ratio of 3:1 of WIA to KIA recognizes proper medevac. The russians do not offer Western style medevac. This drives the WIA numbers down and frankly, the KIA numbers up. A wounded trooper who does not receive treatment dies. Further, the figure of 900K quoted above is for all units and not the number of regular russian army, which is far smaller. Additionally, russia cannot strip every soldier from every location other than Ukraine, just to send them to die in Ukraine. russia has commitments in Syria, for example, and also must maintain forces in the far east. Western estimates, supported by satellite surveillance, showed that russia invaded with 190,000 troops, with a large portion of that being Rosgvardia packing parade uniforms.
    1
  15.  @johnallen6945  you are quite welcome John. There are further points of interest. Let us start with force concentration. The analysis you provided above suggests that the forces are uniformly distributed. In general, the analysis is true, a 3:1 advantage is required. In specific, it is where the force is applied that is of interest. Focusing 10,000 troops against one kilometee, against 10,000 spread out over 100 kilometers is going to be well in excess of 3:1 Yet we can use the ratio to suggest russia never had the numbers to invade. Russia invaded with 190,000. If we add in Wagner, LPR, DPR, Chechens and Wagner, we get north of 300K, but certainly less than 400K. They faced a Ukrainian Army estimated to be, at the time 200K. This is less than the 3:1 ratio. Winning the fight is one thing. Occupying the ground is another. You have to hold the ground and suppress resistance. Nominally, that is 20 troopers per 1000 population. This means russia needed 880,000 troops to occupy Ukraine. They never gad that number. Further, that is for a passive population. A restive population, which engages in partisan activities (ahem, Ukrainians are actively engaging in this now, in occupied territories) requires ~75 per 1000. This implies a russian force of 3,300,000. Never had the numbers
    1
  16.  @johnallen6945  apologies for the typographical errors
    1
  17.  @augustinbelza2418  their revisionist history is simply fantasy.
    1
  18. ​ @bigboy9693  is that the russian excuse for committing GENOCIDE in Ukraine? Corruption?
    1
  19.  @bigboy9693  Вы получили 23 рубля за это глупое замечание? Не забудьте выставить счет быстро, ФСБ не заплатит в случае проигрыша.
    1
  20.  @bigboy9693  don't you speak the language of your genocidal masters? Remember to bow your head and get on your knees when a russian comes. You wouldn't want to offend your masters. А теперь вернитесь в выгребную яму, известную как Россия, и посчитайте своих цыплят. Притворись, что никто не видит твоей бедности. Притворитесь, что у вас есть релевантность. делать вид, что у россии есть власть.
    1
  21.  @bigboy9693  Since you simp for russia, but don't even speak the language, here are some English words for you. Let us see if your monkey-brain can comprehend these President Biden: We will continue our efforts to ensure Russia pays for Ukraine’s long-term reconstruction. Russia bears full responsibility for the war and the damage it has caused, including to Ukraine’s critical infrastructure. We collectively reaffirm the need for an international mechanism to register the damages Russia has inflicted. We are determined, consistent with our respective legal systems, that Russia’s sovereign assets in our jurisdictions will remain immobilized until there is a resolution to the conflict that addresses Russia’s violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty and integrity. Any resolution to the conflict must ensure Russia pays for the damage it has caused. We will work with partners beyond the G7 which hold those Russian sovereign assets to build the broadest coalition possible to advance these objectives. коррупция. Как это может оправдать геноцид и вторжение. Вы, сэр, полный и полный идиот
    1
  22.  @bigboy9693  You keep mentioning NATO, as an excuse why russia is losing. Maybe russia can turn to its allies to make up the 22:1 shortfall in economic power. Maybe Belarus and Lukashenka can bail russia out. russia should go begging to Eritria for weapons. Perhaps that economic powerhouse known as North Korea can supply russia. You know, the fabulous russian allies at the UN. Ukraine has lots of allies. One of them is the USA. The USA is providing lend lease to Ukraine this time. Not to the sh♤thole. Good luck Dmitry. Learn to swallow when Ukraine shoots.
    1
  23.  @bigboy9693  here are some more english words for you, simp Let us examine russia's glorious battlefield accomplishments. The glorious russian retreat from Kyiv. Such goodwill from russians, actually driven out. The glorious russian retreat from Snake Island. Such goodwill from russians, actually driven out. The glorious Moskva cruiser, bravely defending marine life from Ukrainian missiles. Stopping the missiles from landing in the water. Admirable concern for marine life. The glorious russian retreat from Kharkiv. Such goodwill from russians, actually driven out. The glorious russian retreat from Lyman. Such goodwill from russians, driven out. The glorious russian retreat from Kherson. Such goodwill from russia, driven out. The humiliating russian advance towards Bakmut. 29 kilometers in a YEAR! A phyrric victory only exceeded by the capture of the tiny town of Soledar, prewar population 10,490. At the cost of 20,000 Wagner dead At this rate, it will be centuries before russian troops ever see Kyiv.
    1
  24.  @bigboy9693  В следующий раз просто мямли свое враньё по-русски. Так будет казаться более нормальным.
    1
  25.  @bigboy9693  Лучше убирайтесь из Украины, пока Москва и Санкт-Петербург не превратились в руины, как Алеппо, Грозный и Мариуполь. Россия должна делать то, что у нее получается лучше всего, убегать от боя
    1
  26.  @bigboy9693  make sure to swallow when putin shoots
    1
  27.  @bigboy9693  simp 🤡
    1
  28.  @bigboy9693  You know how to win wars Dmitry? Logistics and raw economic power, industrial output wins wars, not sending cruise missiles into apartment buildings. The West has sent a bunch of HIMARS launchers and innumerable GMLRS munitions to fire from them. How many HIMARS launchers will Ukraine require to win? 32, but that's not how many Ukraine will use. They will use more. Lots more. Russia hasn't been able to succesfully target one launcher, but the West will continue to supply new launchers. Good luck with that Dmitry. It is not the quantity of launchers that is important, it is the quantity of missiles. The next NDAA 2023 includes 106,000 GMLRS missiles in the authorization. Open wide! Learn how to swallow russia. GLSDB are now authorized, as well as Western tanks. Are you feeling lucky russia? How long until jets? ATACMS? Kerch Strait bridge go boom. How long will Victory take? Western resolve, Ukrainian resolve is for the long haul. Who cares how long it takes. 1 year, 5 years, 20 years? It does not matter. russia will be driven out of Ukraine. 115,00 russian dead so far. That is in 11 months, roughly 11.5K/month. At this rate, russia will incur 690,000 cargo 200 in 5 years. Makes me smile! 🙂 Remember that bit about economic power winning wars? russian GDP is ~1.8T USD. The countries supplying Ukraine have a combined GDP of 40T USD. Long term war is completely about logistics. Not firing the gun once, but firing over and over, but most importantly keeping it supplied. The economic advantage of the West to russia is 40 to 1.8 or a 22:1 advantage. If all things remain the same, russia has a 22:1 shortfall. But things aren't going to remain the same. Dear leader putin cut off European gas (meaning no income from Europe). Europe put a price cap on russian oil (meaning no profit from Europe). So go ahead russia, try to sell your shite elsewhere. Watch the Chinese and Indians negotiate russia on price into a hole. Which they have. The cap is $60, current trading in Ural Crude is ~$50/barrel. So the russian petro-economy will slowly implode, making the 22:1 economic ratio even steeper. The sanctions continue to constrict the russian economy. Even the russian central bank is declaring that the russian economy is shrinking. The state bank lies of course, the russian economy is collapsing.
    1
  29.  @bigboy9693  Here is some military science for a russian troll. In order for russia to win the war, russia needs roughly a 3:1 advantage in troop numbers. The Ukrainian Army is estimated to be ~700K, therefore, russia needs to attack with 2.1 million troops. russia has nowhere near those number of troopers, so russia can never conquer Ukraine. Should russia miraculously conquer Ukraine, the occupation begins. Occupation is the hard part, conquering is the easy part. Conquering is the part russia seems incapable of achieving but that's the easy part. Occupation. For a docile population, such as russian sheep, military science indicates 20 troops per 1000 civilian population. With the population of Ukraine at 44 million, russia would need to occupy with 880,000 troopers IF THE POPULATION WAS DOCILE. For a restive population, with partisan activity, such as the people of Ukraine, the military science of occupation dictates 75 troopers per 1000 of population in occupation. For a Ukrainian population of 44 million, the REALITY is that russia would need to field 3,300,000 troops to occupy Ukraine. russia has nowhere close to those numbers. Further, it must be generational, so 3.3M troops for a generation or 20 years. russia simply doesn't have the stamina russia cannot conquer Ukraine due to insufficient numbers and russia cannot occupy Ukraine due to insufficient numbers, consequently the war will grind on and on for russia. With the concomitant casualties inherent for the attacker. russia has lost. The fighting may not be over, but russia has lost. Never had the numbers. Never will. Got that Moskal?
    1
  30.  @bigboy9693  Что не так с москвичом? Я думал, тебе нравится унижаться, пресмыкаясь перед карликом, который носит женскую одежду? ваш драгоценный путин, который финансирует свою войну, один акт фелляции за раз.
    1
  31.  @bigboy9693  вы сочувствуете геноциду. Я не твой друг и даже не тот, с кем можно спорить. Россия проиграла войну, а ты просто идиот. А теперь вернитесь в выгребную яму, известную как Россия, и посчитайте своих цыплят. Притворись, что никто не видит твоей бедности. Притворитесь, что у вас есть релевантность. делать вид, что у россии есть власть.
    1
  32.  @bigboy9693  did you understand anything moskal sympathizer? Learn the language of your new masters
    1
  33.  @graemepeters5717  The narrative by russian trolls is that NATO weapons are prolonging the battle. If it wasn't for NATO weapons, russia could win. This is a tacit russian admission of failure. They know that Western military support is boundless and endless. Lend Lease is just kicking into high gear. The russians know now that they have lost the war and are merely looking for a scapegoat to blame for their inevitable defeat. Thus the current narrative by russian trolls.
    1
  34.  @graemepeters5717  You know how to win wars Dmitry? Logistics and raw economic power, industrial output wins wars, not sending cruise missiles into apartment buildings. The West has sent a bunch of HIMARS launchers and innumerable GMLRS munitions to fire from them. How many HIMARS launchers will Ukraine require to win? 32, but that's not how many Ukraine will use. They will use more. Lots more. Russia hasn't been able to succesfully target one launcher, but the West will continue to supply new launchers. Good luck with that Dmitry. It is not the quantity of launchers that is important, it is the quantity of missiles. The next NDAA 2023 includes 106,000 GMLRS missiles in the authorization. Open wide! Learn how to swallow russia. GLSDB are now authorized, as well as Western tanks. Are you feeling lucky russia? How long until jets? ATACMS? Kerch Strait bridge go boom. How long will Victory take? Western resolve, Ukrainian resolve is for the long haul. Who cares how long it takes. 1 year, 5 years, 20 years? It does not matter. russia will be driven out of Ukraine. 115,00 russian dead so far. That is in 11 months, roughly 11.5K/month. At this rate, russia will incur 690,000 cargo 200 in 5 years. Makes me smile! 🙂 Remember that bit about economic power winning wars? russian GDP is ~1.8T USD. The countries supplying Ukraine have a combined GDP of 40T USD. Long term war is completely about logistics. Not firing the gun once, but firing over and over, but most importantly keeping it supplied. The economic advantage of the West to russia is 40 to 1.8 or a 22:1 advantage. If all things remain the same, russia has a 22:1 shortfall. But things aren't going to remain the same. Dear leader putin cut off European gas (meaning no income from Europe). Europe put a price cap on russian oil (meaning no profit from Europe). So go ahead russia, try to sell your shite elsewhere. Watch the Chinese and Indians negotiate russia on price into a hole. Which they have. The cap is $60, current trading in Ural Crude is ~$50/barrel. So the russian petro-economy will slowly implode, making the 22:1 economic ratio even steeper. The sanctions continue to constrict the russian economy. Even the russian central bank is declaring that the russian economy is shrinking. The state bank lies of course, the russian economy is collapsing.
    1
  35.  @graemepeters5717  В следующий раз просто мямли свое враньё по-русски. Так будет казаться более нормальным.
    1
  36.  @graemepeters5717  Here is some military science for a russian troll. In order for russia to win the war, russia needs roughly a 3:1 advantage in troop numbers. The Ukrainian Army is estimated to be ~700K, therefore, russia needs to attack with 2.1 million troops. russia has nowhere near those number of troopers, so russia can never conquer Ukraine. Should russia miraculously conquer Ukraine, the occupation begins. Occupation is the hard part, conquering is the easy part. Conquering is the part russia seems incapable of achieving but that's the easy part. Occupation. For a docile population, such as russian sheep, military science indicates 20 troops per 1000 civilian population. With the population of Ukraine at 44 million, russia would need to occupy with 880,000 troopers IF THE POPULATION WAS DOCILE. For a restive population, with partisan activity, such as the people of Ukraine, the military science of occupation dictates 75 troopers per 1000 of population in occupation. For a Ukrainian population of 44 million, the REALITY is that russia would need to field 3,300,000 troops to occupy Ukraine. russia has nowhere close to those numbers. Further, it must be generational, so 3.3M troops for a generation or 20 years. russia simply doesn't have the stamina russia cannot conquer Ukraine due to insufficient numbers and russia cannot occupy Ukraine due to insufficient numbers, consequently the war will grind on and on for russia. With the concomitant casualties inherent for the attacker. russia has lost. The fighting may not be over, but russia has lost. Never had the numbers. Never will. Got that Moskal?
    1
  37.  @graemepeters5717  Лучше убирайтесь из Украины, пока Москва и Санкт-Петербург не превратились в руины, как Алеппо, Грозный и Мариуполь. Россия должна делать то, что у нее получается лучше всего, убегать от боя
    1
  38.  @graemepeters5717  russians say Kyiv isn't important. russians say Kherson isn't important. russians say Kharkiv isn't important. russians say Lyman isn't important. All those withdrawals and retreats are meaningless, so the russians say But that village of Soledar, prewar population 10,490, that is important. 🤡 Keep huffing the copium russian troll. Bakmut is the place russians come to die, in their tens of thousands. All for a few hundred meters of dirt. At this rate, it will be centuries before russian troops enter Kyiv. Better get out of Ukraine, before moscow and st. petersburg are turned into rubble, just like Aleppo and Grozny. Phvk rvssia
    1
  39.  @graemepeters5717  If I was russia, I would zwallow my horrific loses, and depose the cross dressing dwarf putin. Say it was all his fault and withdraw. The fighting may not be over, but russia has lost.
    1
  40.  @graemepeters5717  President Zelenskyy is an excellent comedian. He made a complete laughing stock of russia's pitiful military power, turning it into a very funny joke. The russian military organization is woefully inadequate except for herding the sheep that live in the sh♤thole known as russia. The russian military is so bad, russia's inept leadership hired mercenaries to fight instead of the russian army. Yes sir, a terrific joke, what a comedian that Zelenskyy is!! Would you like to hear another? Wagner forces are future corpses. Did you get the joke Dmitry? No? Then look in the mirror 🤡
    1
  41.  @graemepeters5717  maybe you should take off your russian colored glasses. russians assume that, no matter what, russia will win. There is no thought in their heads that russia could lose. This is a ridiculous assumption of course. This disconnect is just hubris, a pathetic sense of self worth brought about by the Great Patriotic War. I will not disparage the great effort put forth by the CCCP. But let us not forget the 11 billion USD of Lend Lease that was provided to the CCCP. What did Stalin say about this? "I want to tell you what, from the Russian point of view, the president and the United States have done for victory in this war," Stalin said. "The most important things in this war are the machines.... The United States is a country of machines. Without the machines we received through Lend-Lease, we would have lost the war."
    1
  42.  @graemepeters5717  your response is pathetic. Mimicking that horsepuckey about Ukraine and Nazis. The only Nazis in Ukraine are russian. If the russians want to eliminate nazis in Ukraine, they should just leave and go home. Лучше убирайтесь из Украины, пока Москва и Санкт-Петербург не превратились в руины, как Алеппо, Грозный и Мариуполь. Россия должна делать то, что у нее получается лучше всего, убегать от боя.
    1
  43.  @graemepeters5717  the only thing you have displayed is your willful ignorance and utter disregard for the truth. The purest definition of a russian troll is a liar, that when confronted by their lies, use the "nuh-uh" defense, or to switch the topic. russia hasn't won a battle in 8 months. EIGHT MONTHS of russian ineptitude. Western weapons are pouring in to Ukraine, and your best response is "oops, ....". What kind of mindless twit are you? A russian one. 300,000 conscripted additional soldiers, and the best russia can claim is Soledar, pre war population 10,490. Inept. Oops? It will be hysterically funny watching you explain the next russian failure. Where will the next 'good will' gesture be, er, flagrant military failure. Solovyov is threatening Europe. russia cannot even handle Ukraine and russia wants to take on NATO. How ridiculous. russia cannot advance against Ukraine with the handmedowm kit provided. Soon, they will have much better kit, western tanks, western jets, ATACMS. Kerch Strait Bridge go boom.
    1
  44.  @graemepeters5717  Hahahaha those tiny areas? Those miniscule gains! Wow russia. 2nd greatest army in the world. Do go on fvckwit. Name the massive gains. I'll start you off. Soledar.....
    1
  45.  @graemepeters5717  Ooops! I forgot about the massive victory of the sh♤thole known as russia taking the garbage dump at Bakhmut. Not the entire village of Bakhmut, mind you, just the garbage dump
    1
  46.  @graemepeters5717  How long will Victory take? Western resolve, Ukrainian resolve is for the long haul. Who cares how long it takes. 1 year, 5 years, 20 years? It does not matter. russia will be driven out of Ukraine. 133,00 russian dead so far. That is in 12 months, roughly 11K/month. At this rate, russia will incur 665,000 cargo 200 in 5 years. Makes me smile! 🙂 think of the fertilizer!
    1
  47.  @graemepeters5717  hahahahaha you claim great territorial victories, about the ever expanding russian control, but the very second you are to name the areas, you claim "its not about territorial control" . This is the precise behavior of a propagandist, who expects to bullspit people. Please do tell me of the glorious city block the russians took in Marinka over the last 6 months! Ooops, didn't even accomplish that, even with 300,000 additional soldiers. Do you hear yourself?????
    1
  48.  @graemepeters5717  Chechen sources confirm that putin puts on ladies clothing, and hangs around in bars. Gotta keep russian troops happy after all
    1
  49.  @graemepeters5717  I do wish to congratulate russia on successfully reducing Ukrainian armed forces from 200K to 700K. That is a reduction of negative 500k. Those HIMARS that Ukrainian forces use to great effect (russia has no answer), another fantastic demilitarization in reverse! Shall we speak of all the tanks the russians have provided to Ukraine? What a fantastic demilitarization
    1
  50. Likely because they do not care about the monetization from youTube and want to promote their news organization. Artem has a choice, do all this work for free or play by youTube's rules
    1