Comments by "Oblithian" (@Oblithian) on "Nate The Lawyer" channel.

  1. 6:25 Yeah I learned about this in school but modern history loves to be revisionist to try to perpetuate a narrative.
    1
  2. Honestly most of the stuff I see I note spinns and things they neglect to mention with the intent of sensationalizing things. But I don't know anything about this, So I thought I would watch the video. (Since it's a legal video my guess is that the law makes specific statements on certain actions).
    1
  3. Ah yes, implied presumption of guilt in language, I was wondering if that was a factor.
    1
  4. Let's not flatter their egos by calling them 'gods'.
    1
  5. What I would argue is that this is no different than any other judge having prejudices. But, that's always inappropriate. The difference is, we can see the evidence of it.
    1
  6. I have heard this before in Canada, but looking at the likes and shares on the local missing persons reports, this is untrue.
    1
  7. Or a religious hate crime
    1
  8. That's a good point we don't want to play into this stupid divisive labeling and antagonization game.
    1
  9. Note the TONE is completely different here. Look at how Rittenhouse was treated. Maybe because he was a male, maybe because he had a bigger 'scarrier' gun. Maybe because BLM narrative. But this woman shot a guy on a regular old day. And Rittenhouse defended himself against attackers during a riot. But was villified. Plus no r@c3 riots here, the man almost certainly needed medical assistance, at the very least for shock. He wasn't even a criminal (not that you can murder criminals either). Where I live, you don't even have to stay on the scene after an accident so long as you get your photos, exchange information and file your reports (as long as no one died). Yet, the news is speaking gently like she accidentally drove over the neighbour's cat. I am not saying outrage is the way to go, but her conduct was unacceptable. The 'news' is just biased garbage.
    1
  10. We rarely get all the facts so, you never know.
    1
  11. I do agree life may be a bit much but I assume she will get early parole.
    1
  12. Considering the brand IS selling people on looking better than themselves... The dumb thing is, VS wasn't excluding people before. Marketing in the most appealing way, then offering products to everyone IS being inclusive, and is the logical approach. You want to sell to as many as you can, not to the niche. *6 years, wow
    1
  13. Ok is NOT a white power symbol. They are immitating trump speaking, who looks dumb btw.
    1
  14.  @davruck1  And the people determine what the government can do.
    1
  15. 2 months!!!? What about financial compensation? *Ahhh, she had a cop boyfriend. **ah 175,000 wow... such a gift for 4 years of having most rights stripped.
    1
  16. I am glad they are calling this out but... it's always the situations we aren't hearing about. We know Trump and other politicians have under the table deals. All politicians concern me.
    1
  17. They need a paycut if anything.
    1
  18. It amazes me that people don't see how this happens every day, now it's an anti-trump issue suddenly they pay attention to diversions and non-answers. Fox 'News' is still garbage CNN, and the rest of the major channels are also still garbage. I give this reporter credit for sticking to the questions, but... Let's see if tomorrow he goes along with it, just because it's someone or something he or the channel supports. Integrity is lacking in the world.
    1
  19. I do suspect we aren't getting the full story, or any story from the other sides. So there is undoubtedly other factors at play. But, at the end of the day they are the parents, if the kid wants to filenfor emancipation then transition, go for it.
    1
  20. You are living in bizarro world.
    1
  21. 'Racism Guru' as in spreader of racism? I feel bad for some of the people I know who got defrauded. Their heart was largely in the right place, but they were effectively conned during a stressful period of isolation. George floyd was not even a 'perfect narrative' there are plenty of people, who die under similar circumstances, who were of more 'upstanding' character. But the news just decided to run a misinformation and fear-mongering campaign to incite mistrust and disorder. Just for watch time and ad revenue. Even the news outlets who wanted to argue against it, drummed it up to make it a huge point of contention. If you were going to make the narrative there were far better excamples. Even if they were still going to falsely insert racism (though I bet they could have found one that was actually a case of police brutality and racism).
    1
  22. Where does the defamation come in? I thought it was more substantial than, "I didn't see her at all". *ok at about 4:10 Nate summarizes it.
    1
  23. "a first is a first" except when it isn't they throw so many hoops everything becomes a 'first'. "First ever" "first in the country" "first in the city" "first in the district" "First who has a hat" "First who has a hat with a buckle"....
    1
  24. Regardless of how much I disagree I can't support the mob justice of 'cancellation'. Though in this case it just seems like logical contract termination based on actions that violated the terms. Not like, "I support X president", "what!? You will never work again!".
    1
  25. Objectively, no. 'Feminism' (as it stands today), yes.
    1
  26. I think the pause was that the interviewer didn't give her any response like she was hoping for and there is a moment of being taken aback.
    1
  27. Several is not quite large enough for... 39.
    1
  28. If they lived in San Diego, maybe??
    1
  29. 'Cabaret' isn't exclusive to drag shows that's misleading right off the bat. *And it specifies "adult".
    1
  30. Wait so it's racism because someone mixed up someone's name in a text?
    1
  31. I would buy he is getting a conviction, I doubt he's going to jail. But we'll see.
    1
  32. Because while I watch a lot of your videos right now. Most of the time I only watch like 1 in 10 which not only prevents me from seeing other videos in YouTube's poorly designed subscriber feed. But it also, eventually causes all your videos to be dropped from said feed. This way I think to check, get you some of that SEO ranking, and don't work against your subscriber viewership average.
    1
  33. It isn't as funny as it is horrible and disappointing.
    1
  34. People are acting like testosterone is the only factor because it's easier to affect. It's not though, genetically men will have a physically different structure due to their genes even if given hormone therapy from birth (which would be scientifically unethical, the health repercussions are terrible even if 'naturally occurring' due to a disease causinghormone imbalance. It's like trying to splice a human with a cat, or trying to replace a heart with a lawnmower engine. Barbaric and unsafe. Even later in life there are big risks and that's the harsh reality they face).
    1
  35. Can I just say, those artist hat things always look super pompus and absurd.
    1
  36. Well, the police seemed to at least conduct themselves professionally while in the home. (Perhaps they knew there was a camera) But as we have no real information, who is to say? Am I skeptical of the police? Absolutely. But I also don't trust every newspaper or journalist.
    1
  37. Wait can we talk about those shoulder pads? If they're trying to bring those back in... don't.
    1
  38. To be fair on one aspect we keep seeing people tout statistics changes from 2020 to now and have used it to misconstrue whatever they are trying to promote or criticize. Meanwhile the are just returning to normal or resulting from the fallout of the pandemic and economic conditions. The thing we should be focusing on is comparing pre 2020 numbers with current numbers to get a more acurate perspective. Still an increase in many crimes here. But remember a couple years ago governments were talking about 'unprecedented job growth'... when it was just job recovery, and only partial because we have seen more of the big picture now (and it's not pretty).
    1
  39. Always something to be conscious of, definitely. In this example though, we unfortunately don't know that was the case.🤷‍♀️ If true, justice should be served; If a blatantly false accusation was made, justice should be served.
    1
  40. It's obviously not entirely nonsense, but whether or not they can evade the statute of limitations or fulfill the burdens of the crimes, let alone get a conviction, is obviously another story. The broader issue this raises, is how laws should be changed to prevent any actual unconvicted criminals from taking office to evade trial, and to hold politicians better accountable for committing crimes. If the president robbed a bank while in office, or committed provable SA, etc. you should be able to arrest the person. Like if Biden committed massive fraud and stole federal pensions. Because as of right now it seems like the president can do no wrong while in office. Pillage, plunder, murder, genocide, identity theft, insider trading, they have free reign while in office. While a person elected president might be expected to be upstanding, history shows very bad people can be elected. Countries need better precautions in the event heads of state start committing real crime.
    1
  41. *Supports. There are hypothetically other possibilities for the decision. As unlikely or as poorly thought out as they may be. But the needle is certainly indicating that direction.
    1
  42. Players can get a bigger percentage... If they buy a bigger percentage with some of their money. imagine if an employee walked up and expected you to give them your share of the company. (assuming you paid them and they aren't giving you exceptional profit).
    1
  43. What's with so many criminals becoming celebrities and politicians? And I don't mean past criminals, people can change. But people who actively participate in serious crimes (not just self harming crimes like drugs).
    1
  44. This is partly why here, even if you are evicted your stuff has to be stored for a month or two before they then send it to auction. If you want to collect it you have to pay the storage fees.
    1
  45. It isn't really a ban but adherence to it's foundational tenants.
    1
  46. At least, the law is citizens have the right to vote, and so long as that is the law it should be upheld. But in this case it's basically gerrymandering, and was unethical as hell.
    1
  47. I don't know, as an external party it appears as though Trump attempted or did a lot of highly improper conduct and the system of checks and balances failed. Then the following presidency just reinforced that the government is corrupt and has insufficient accountability.
    1
  48. I had never heard the full tape before. Only the last bit. All politicians should be held appropriately accountable with due process. But just because we let it slide before doesn't mean we shouldn't now. That excuse can be used indefinitely, at some point you need to take a stand. Inconvenient or not. Then continue to take a stand every subsequent time. Once you take the move the first time, then you have more justification for ANY subsequent attempt.
    1
  49. They didn't just think that it's just for women they said as much and berated otherwise. (I know first hand) I also know they refused to accept criticism as I pointed out that by equating all harassment and assault equally (including someone literally saying "hello" was harassment) victims of major instances may feel minimized and drown out.
    1
  50. At this point, did the men let them score?
    1