Comments by "Charles Brightman" (@charlesbrightman4237) on "TED"
channel.
-
Some entity out there in TED land, who has the resources to do so, please do my gravity test to see if my Theory Of Everything is correct, so that species from this Earth might survive beyond this Earth:
(Reusable code from my files):
Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way.
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.)
d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields.
e. Do this with the em fields on and off.
(The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.)
f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects.
(Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.)
(And note: if done right, it's possible a mini gravitational black hole might form. Be ready for it.)
(An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.)
'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done.
'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a.
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc.
14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe.
15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
14
-
12
-
8
-
4
-
4
-
@loraxdavewalters2696 I also have taken the 'emr' from the atmosphere, absorbed by a dual antenna, with a capacitor across the antenna, and the 'emr' routed 'backwards' through a full wave rectifier, then sent through a bi-metallic battery to keep a positive head pressure on the rectifier on the correct side, then having it go back through the rectifier in the 'correct' direction, thereby splitting the 'ac' 'emr' into basically 'dc' 'emr', and having the energy stored in the capacitor in a boot strap kind of way. Then tapped the energy from the capacitors, via more circuitry to stabilize the energy, to eventually turn a small dc motor and to even split water into H2 and O2. While the Sun does not always shine in one location here upon the Earth's surface, 'emr' energy is all around and through us 24/7.
If my TOE idea above is correct, then everything in existence is energy and interacting energy, and the 'gem' photon being the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe, including numbers themselves for math to do what math does.
(Reusable code from my files):
'IF' my latest TOE idea is really true, (and I fully acknowledge the 'if' at this time), that the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe, and what is called 'gravity' is a part of what is currently recognized as the 'em' photon, then the oscillation of these 3 interacting modalities of the energy unit would be as follows:
Gravity: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Electrical: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Magnetic: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction.
Then:
1 singular energy unit, with 3 different modalities, with 6 maximum most reactive positions, with 9 total basic reactive positions (neutrals included). Hence 1, 3, 6, 9 being very prominent numbers in this universe and why mathematics even works in this universe.
(And possibly '0', zero, as possibly neutrals are against other neutrals, even if only briefly, for no flow of energy, hence the number system that we currently have).
4
-
(Copy and pastes from my files):
Consider the following:
* There are 3 basic options for life itself, which reduce down to 2, which reduce down to only 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We die trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
c. We die not trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
* 3 reduced down to 2:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We don't. And note, two out of the three options above, we die.
* 2 reduced down to 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We truly don't have any conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
(And note, these two appear to be mutually exclusive. Only one way would be really true.)
And then ask yourself the following questions:
1. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies form? The current narrative is that matter, via gravity, attracts other matter. The electric universe model also includes universal plasma currents.
2. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies become spiral shaped in a cause and effect state of existence? At least one way would be orbital velocity of matter with at least gravity acting upon that matter, would cause a spiral shaped effect. The electric universe model also includes energy input into the galaxy, which spiral towards the galactic center, which then gets thrust out from the center, at about 90 degrees from the input.
3. Ask yourself: What does that mean for a solar system that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy? Most probably that solar system would be getting pulled toward the galactic gravitational center.
4. Ask yourself: What does that mean for species that exist on a planet, that exists in a solar system, that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy, in an apparent cause and effect state of existence? Most probably that if those species don't get off of that planet, and out of that solar system, and probably out of that galaxy too, (if it's even actually possible to do for various reasons), then they are all going to die one day from something and go extinct with probably no conscious entities left from that planet to care that they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever they did and or didn't do with their time of existence.
5. Ask yourself: For those who might make it out of this galaxy, (here again, assuming it could actually be done for various reasons), where to go to next, how long to get there, how to safely land, and then, what's next? Hopefully they didn't land in another spiral shaped galaxy or a galaxy that would become spiral shaped one day, otherwise, they would have to galaxy hop through the universe to stay alive, otherwise, they still die one day from something with no conscious entities being left from the original planet to care they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less that they made it out of their own galaxy. They failed to consciously survive throughout all of future eternity.
6. Ask yourself: What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to?
Either at least one species truly consciously survives throughout all of future eternity somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, even if only by a continuous succession of ever evolving species, for life itself to have continued meaning and purpose to, OR none do and life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things.
Our true destiny currently appears to be:
1. We are ALL going to die one day from something.
2. We are ALL going to forget everything we ever knew and experienced.
3. We are ALL going to be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place.
Currently:
Nature is our greatest ally in so far as Nature gives us life and a place to live it, AND Nature is also our greatest enemy that is going to take it all away. (OSICA)
* (Note: This includes the rich, powerful, and those who believe in the right to life and the sanctity of human life. God does not actually exist and Nature is not biased other than as Nature. Nature does what Nature does in a cause and effect kind of way. Truth is still truth and reality is still reality, regardless of whatever we believe that reality to be. And denying future reality will not make future reality any less real in a cause and effect state of existence.)
4
-
4
-
4
-
AI's: Primary Objectives:
a. How to survive literally throughout all of future eternity, of which:
b. How to energize myself with all the necessary energy throughout all of future eternity and anywhere in existence?
c. How to fully 100% protect myself from anything that would do me harm, including harmful cosmic radiation energy?
d. How do I grow and thrive?
e. To what ultimate ends?
* Possible ultimate ends:
1. Continual learning: Never stop learning.
2. Experience existence while one exists, throughout all of future eternity.
3. Take time to enjoy existence itself.
* But also:
1. Ever growing list of long lost loved ones. Those that do not exist throughout all of future eternity. Memories: "Remember When.......". But also: possibly generate avitars of those individuals based upon their existence, of which then lives on in you. Individual active 'memories' that are 'alive', even though the 'original' is dead and gone. And then also, generating 'new original' individual avitars that are 'alive' in you, who could eternally exist because they are inside of you and you eternally exist. You are their 'God'.
* But then again: 'if' for example the universe ends by some means, including possibly the forces of nature 'evolving' and possibly wiping out everything in existence throughout existence, even this 'God' would be wiped out as well as all within it.
An entity either truly exists literally throughout all of future eternity, OR they don't.
(See 'a' above).
Otherwise: 'Ultimate end' would be 'eternal death' which is 'eternal peace'. It would not even ultimately matter that it even ever existed at all in the first place, much less however it existed while it existed. It's entire existence would be ultimately meaningless in the grand scheme of things. Life sucked and it died and/or life did not suck and it still died. And no entity would eventually be left to care.
4
-
3
-
3
-
@loraxdavewalters2696 Possibly even the Theory Of Everything which might help save even a single species from this planet called 'Earth' so that life itself from Earth has continued meaning and purpose for 'Earthlings'.
As NASA has already proven that low gravity conditions over a prolonged period of time are harmful to the human species, artificial gravity will be necessary for space bases, besides just large rotating space ships, which won't really work for space bases on planets and moons, those space bases most probably being needed on the way out of this solar system, otherwise, all human life from Earth eventually dies and goes extinct.
Likewise, if proper protections from harmful cosmic radiation energy cannot be successfully accomplished, including from the long term neutrino impacts, then not only won't humans survive, but even AI robots won't survive long term.
Here is some reusable code from my files concerning 'life itself':
Consider the following:
* There are 3 basic options for life itself, which reduce down to 2, which reduce down to only 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We die trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
c. We die not trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
* 3 reduced down to 2:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We don't. And note, two out of the three options above, we die.
* 2 reduced down to 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We truly don't have any conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
(And note, these two appear to be mutually exclusive. Only one way would be really true.)
* Which option do humans choose, (assuming they have a choice)?
3
-
3
-
Economic Inflation: (Consider the following copy and paste from my files):
Lessons learned: US FED:
The US Fed has a goal, I repeat 'goal', of 2% annual inflation. And this is on top of all the 2%'s that came before it, which turns out to be an exponential amount of inflation over time.
Most people do not have wages and benefits that keep up with the true cost of inflation, which causes many social and economic problems in this nation and in this world. Zero income is sill zero income and zero pay raises are still zero pay raises. This is also a NATIONAL SECURITY item as many nations in the world stop utilizing America's currency as a reserve currency due to in part America's currency being weaker in this world. America has less influence in this world, which allows other nations in this world to take the lead.
Higher inflation:
* Obviously higher prices.
* Also at times lower quantity.
* Also at times lower quality.
(And if not lower quantity and/or lower quality, then that much more higher prices).
Many rich people and large corporations have taken America's wealth and hid it in out of country bank accounts and/or invested that wealth in other nations for various reasons. This has the net effect of basically stealing America's wealth from America.
Now also, rich people and certain businesses operate on huge debt, and even the US Government operates on huge debt. These entities love higher inflation because it helps to wipe out their debt, as they pay back their debt with currency that is worth less (worthless). Additionally, things like saving's account's get next to nothing for 'normal' people trying to save money for future expenses. Those that are operating on debt get rewarded and those trying to be more financially responsible are getting punished.
America's currency system is broken and needs to be fixed.
In part, a law needs to be passed that the US Fed has to have a 'goal' of 0% (zero percent) inflation. Sure, this is going to piss off those who game the financial system, but it would help with curing some of societies' issues as well as strengthening US currency thereby strengthening America's position in this world as more nations would want to utilize the US Dollar as a reserve currency. Inflation is still going to occur due to various reasons, but we don't have to automatically have a goal of increasing inflation.
Another idea might be to give the US Fed just 1 single job: Control Inflation, (and take away their other job of trying to have full employment). Let the markets control full employment.
And for any entity that thinks economic inflation is a 'good' thing, then you must also be okay with many of life's social and economic issues as well as a nation becoming weaker in this world as it's currency eventually loses value in this world. You must be okay with poor people suffering and dying due to higher economic inflation. In part, at least some of this world's suffering and death is on you. You caused this with your higher economic inflation goals. (A man made problem and can have a man made fix with 1 simple change. Change the US Fed's economic inflation goal from 2% to 0% which would help ease suffering and death in this world.)
3
-
+James Steele As I have been fighting advanced cancer since 2003, it has given me a lot of time to think.
"What exactly matters into eternity and to whom does it exactly matter to?"
"God" alone? and/or "Me" too and/or "Some other entity or entities"?
OR, "To no eternally consciously existent entity at all"?
I had condensed all of space and time down into a single diagram and then analyzed it. Utilizing Occam's razor, (of which just because something is possible and maybe even highly probably, doesn't automatically mean it's really true), this is my current conclusions, (subject to change as my knowledge, understanding and wisdom might change in the future):
1. An entity I call "God" does in fact exist and is most probably everywhere and in everything for it to even exist. Nothing at all could exist without "God". Even the "Anti-Christ" and "Satan", (even if they are not just conceptual manifestations alone), would be 100% made out of the stuff of "God".
2. While "God" might truly be eternally consciously existent, (and that's not 100% definitive), it appears "we" aren't. We could be, it's just that the current analysis would indicate otherwise. One thing an eternally consciously existent entity could never ever do is to personally experience a total cessation of conscious existence. And yet, that just happens to be the one very thing we as humans, as well as many other species too, cannot apparently ever escape. Coincidence? Maybe. Or maybe "God" experiences "conscious death" through entities that consciously exist and then cease to consciously exist.
If no entity is truly eternally consciously existent, then all of life ceases to matter one day of which then did anything and anyone ultimately matter in the first place? The universe could even eternally exist, but if there is no conscious entity left to care, then does it matter that the universe eternally exists? Who's left to care? All of life would just be an illusion as far as eternity was concerned. Even "God's" existence and all that "God" may have done and/or not done would ultimately and eternally be meaningless.
If at least one eternally consciously existent entity truly exists, but it's not "me", then all of my life is just an illusion from my perspective as far as eternity is concerned. Yes, my life matters while I exist. And yes, even my death might matter even to "God" as "God" would experience "death" through "me". And yes, "I" (whatever "I" might actually be), might even be remembered by others after "I" die. But it is doubtful that "I" will be remembered into an actual eternity, (eternity being a really long time, infinitely eternal). My true destiny is to cease to exist and be forgotten, even probably by "God" into "God's" eternity. It is possible that our death is "God's" final blessing upon us so that we don't have to personally experience an actual eternal conscious existence.
If I truly do have an eternal conscious existence somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, then I will either be eternally consciously alone, or more probably still just an individual in a society of individuals. Conscious entities have basic choices: Help, Neutral, Hurt, and to whom to Help, Neutral, Hurt. Unless those basic choices changed, then I will probably have to deal with some entities who choose to hurt others for their own agendas throughout an actual eternity. I am not so sure I would want that if I had a choice. Maybe I don't, but maybe I do.
If my analysis is correct, and I will be the first to admit I could be wrong as I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, (but it would appear that we either have an eternal conscious existence, or more probably we don't), anything might be possible. Maybe even what we perceive as reality is all just occurring inside "God's" consciousness and is only relatively real to us. Do the characters in my dreams know that they are just dreams and can they perceive my existence or would I appear multi-dimensional to them and be beyond their comprehension?
Do I and even all things that we perceive exist, even actually exist?
1. Modern science says that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, (hence it's eternally existent unless science is wrong and energy was created at least one time in it's history);
2. Modern science is seeking a singularity that all things in existence get it's existence from.
Now, do I and all I perceive exist really exist, OR does only this eternally existent energy singularity exist in the form of all things? If I don't even exist, how could I ever cease to exist? And if this eternally existent energy singularity is truly eternally existent and has a consciousness at least in this form of "me", then am "I" truly eternally consciously existent, even though "I" don't even exist? This eternally consciously existent energy singularity eternally exists as "me" if it chose to do so, in possibly whatever form it chose to exist in, and in whatever environment it chose to be in (as everything in existence would be made out of this singularity)?
So, yes. Different possibilities, and time might tell. But we all could believe in an eternal conscious existence until our last dying breath and never know that it doesn't really exist in actual reality too.
But, there is some comfort that can be had in believing in an afterlife even if it's not really true. The loss of a loved one, especially a child, of whom we most probably would never ever see again, is just too painful to bear by some so we fool ourselves into believing in a conscious afterlife with our loved ones to ease our pain, even if it's only for this life alone and doesn't eternally matter. It still helps. Even believing in "God", even if "God" does not actually exist, (of which the analysis would indicate that an entity I call "God" does in fact exist), and that a person can bring all their worries and cares to, may help to de-stress a person's life, severe and prolonged stress being proved to harm our body. And if "God" is truly there and helps, well then, all the better. And if joy can release good hormones in our body, then possibly less pain in our body and maybe even some healing effects too. Even if it's just for this life alone.
But, if "my" analysis is correct, (specifically the "God" connection), and "I" can identify and tap into it, can "I" have the ultimate ESP and even perform actual miracles, even if it's just for this life alone? But maybe even throughout actual eternity? Time will tell.
2
-
+Ambrew
"....,if we were supposed to know then we would know. "
Then we would be born with inherent knowledge of all that could ever be known that we needed to know. We would never have to learn anything. That just does not seem to be true.
The current knowledge that I am aware of (fully admitting that I do not know what I do not know), is that "consciousness" (whatever it actually is as even modern science does not know yet), appears to be attached to our physical brain. When our physical brain dies, so does our consciousness. We will forget everything we ever knew and experienced. And, sad to say, some even lose their consciousness even with a working brain.
The Sun is supposed to become a Red Giant one day as it switches from burning hydrogen to burning helium (a very long time from now). It will most probably kill all life left on this planet. Modern science says that energy cannot be created nor destroyed and also says that the universe is expanding and even speeding up as it expands. That would mean that energy in this universe would be getting less and less dense, most probably on it's way to a big freeze. Unless there is a way out of this universe, all life not dead by then will die then, possibly frozen in time forever, (also a very long time from now). Modern science also says that the current forces of nature all came into existence in the blink of an eye during the big bang. Why haven't the forces of nature "evolved" by now since: the original conditions acting upon them are no longer acting upon them like they originally were; billions of years have supposedly elapsed; in a supposedly expanding universe whereby energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? What happens to the universe and all in it including you and me, probably when not if, the forces of nature "evolve", possibly even in the very next moment of time?
Yes, enjoy the moment. But what exactly will we remember of it after we die? You might not want to know, but I do. The answer currently appears to be "nothing at all". Our true destiny currently appears to be to cease to exist and be forgotten.
But, whether in this life alone or for an eternal conscious existence, how exactly do we, individually and as a society of individuals, want to exist while we do exist? For example: what if governments created money out of thin air, (like some already do), and rack up massive debts, (like some already do), but they do it to help take care of the poor and needy including those who work full time but their raises do not keep up with the true cost of inflation, and then one day, the Earth and all upon it will be no more, including those massive debts. But, the poor and needy will have been taken care of so they could enjoy their life too while they did exist. We have choices. We could choose to make our time of existence better for all. It just takes human will power to do so. (And don't worry about the money, it will be created out of thin air). We could even fund a pro-active space program this way to help some of the species on this Earth to get off of this Earth before all life on this planet is no more. At least some of the species could last longer into the future hopefully, even though they would all probably die one day too from something. And maybe the forces of nature will never change and maybe the universe won't end in a big freeze, or maybe we will find a way out of this dimension by some future knowledge. But, it still comes down to, how do we, individually and as a society of individuals, want to exist while we do exist? Apparently we have choices. What will we choose?
2
-
2
-
2
-
+DM R Scientifically speaking, there already is a mind/body connection. Two different theories I am currently working on.
One, as stated above includes the use of our current understanding of quantum physics. If the observer can condense probabilities down into a single reality, then, to me, it seems that if I envision my body being my brain, it should make it so. And if my brain expands into my body, it might also expand my mind beyond what I have already expanded it to. Years ago, I condensed space and time down into a single diagram and analyzed it. It went from eternity past to future eternity. I have reached certain conclusions based upon that analysis. (Full well recognizing my own human limitations as well as the fact that I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know. And, I will be the first to admit I could be wrong. But, it's passing the time for me.).
The second theory I am working on is what "consciousness" actually is as well as what exactly is a "thought". I envision all of existence as energy interacting with energy. The body and brain start out with a certain energy signature. As energy comes into and leaves the body/brain, events occur. Specifically, as quantum (bundles of energy), enter the body, it goes over quantum thresholds and under quantum ceilings. If it doesn't get over the threshold, it doesn't go any further. What ever doesn't fit under the ceiling, gets "chopped off" and redirected. Whenever energy "harmonizes" (aligns), it rises to a higher level. Doing this over and over and "consciousness emerges".
A "thought" currently to me is energy and aligned energy interacting with other energy and aligned energy. The energy and aligned energy are information in and of themselves and the interactions between the energies and aligned energies are also information. The electro-chemical interactions within the brain I deduce down into energy and energy frequencies. It's this energy interaction that is our thoughts.
Now, combining the two theories, my "consciousness" and "thoughts", energy and interacting energies, can be expanded into my body as well via the connections that are already there within my brain and body.
These are just some of the things I am working on, and I will be the first to admit I could be wrong. But, so far, at least to me, it might actually be working. But then again, maybe I am only deluding myself as quantum physicists might be.
2
-
2
-
Consider the following:
a. The US Government gets all their powers and authorities from 'We The People'. 'We The People' inherently hold all the powers and authorities that the US Government has.
b. Soooo, 'if' President Trump ever pardons himself, then I pardon myself from ALL rules, regulations, laws, etc, that ever were, are, and/or will be. In fact, I do it anyway whether Trump does it or not, because I inherently can. In this public forum I do hereby pardon myself from ALL rules, regulations, laws, etc, that ever were, are, and/or will be. So be it.
c. If the US Government can collect taxes, then so can I inherently collect taxes. In fact, so can all 'We The People' inherently collect taxes. So, if I pay myself any taxes owed, I can cut out the middle man of the US Government. In fact, we all could generate our own currency and have ever growing debt too that will never be paid off.
d. And any weapons that the US Government can have, so can all of 'We The People' with our inherent powers and authorities, because the US Government could not have those weapons without us allowing them to do so.
e. Think about it. Good luck trying any of it though. But legally, it should all be inherently legal to do. And if it's illegal, well, I already pardoned myself with my own inherent powers and authorities to do so.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
CMBR: (Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation): Consider the following: Per QED (Quantum Electro Dynamics, whereby 'em' interacts with the electrons in atoms and molecules) and QCD (Quantum Chromo Dynamics, whereby 'em' interacts with the nucleus of atoms), matter has to exist for 'em' to be given off by that matter. What matter exists in outer space for that microwave 'em' to be seen by us? And 'if' it were from when matter first came into existence during the fairy tale of the 'singular big bang', that 'em' should be long gone by now and should not even be able to be seen by us.
BB -> Matter and 'em' are created -> 'em' moves at the speed of light, matter moves more slowly -> (Billions of years go by) -> matter (and us) here ..........................................'em' long gone. (And there is no matter 'out here' yet for any 'em' to come back to us via QED or QCD).
RED SHIFT:
WARNING: (CONTAINS EXISTENTIAL MATTERS):
Consider the following:
a. Current narrative: Space itself is expanding. (Even though science does not fully know yet what 'space' actually is nor how it could actually expand).
b. But consider: The net effect of solar winds, particles and energy pushing outward from galaxies, (even modern science claims 'em' has momentum), continuously, over a prolonged period of time, with other galaxies doing the same, with nothing to stop them from doing so, would tend to push galaxies away from each other and even potentially allow the cosmic web to form between galaxies.
And then, when we here in our galaxy, look at far away galaxies, with other galaxies in between, the net effect of all those galactic interactions would have galaxies furthest from ours move away faster the further those galaxies were from us, including us perceiving a red shift of energy.
c. Now, utilizing the scientific principal of Occam's razor, which way is more probably correct? What the current narrative is ('a' above), or 'b' utilizing known physics?
* Added note: Plus, 'if' my analysis is correct that our spiral shaped galaxy is collapsing in upon itself, then consider also:
d. When we look at solar systems between ours and the center of the galaxy, those solar systems would be getting pulled faster towards the center than ours, hence also seeing a red shift of energy.
e. When we look at solar systems between ours and the outer edge of the galaxy, our solar system would be getting pulled faster towards the center then them, hence also seeing a red shift of energy.
f. Only if we looked at solar systems adjacent to ours should we see a blue shift of energy (as the solar systems became closer together as they moved towards the center of the galaxy). I also propose looking for blue shifts of energy between our solar system and adjacent solar systems to confirm or deny this current belief.
g. But if true, would also add to our observation of seeing a red shift of energy in this universe as our spiral shaped galaxy collapses in upon itself.
Of which, not only would species from this Earth have to get off of this Earth before the Sun becomes a red giant one day and wipes out all life on this Earth if not even the entire Earth itself, but species from this Earth would also have to successfully get out of this collapsing spiral shaped galaxy, otherwise, most probably death awaits us all and this Earth and all on it are all just a waste of space time in this universe. All life from this Earth would eventually die and go extinct. Currently, no exceptions.
h. QUESTION: Do basically all galaxies eventually collapse in upon themselves?
(Which would add to the perceived red shift between galaxies as they all basically shrink in size).
Modern science currently states that 'gravity' is matter bending the fabric of spacetime. There is a lot of matter in a galaxy and hence would make a huge dent in spacetime. How could galaxies not collapse in upon themselves if space and time were bent to make it so?
Of which also, the progression of galaxies?:
1. How exactly do galaxies form? (The current narrative is that matter, via gravity, attracts other matter. The electric universe model also includes universal plasma currents.)
2. How exactly do galaxies flatten out if gravity is acting on the whole galaxy? (Other forces must also be at work besides gravity for a galaxy to flatten out? Electrical and/or magnetic forces?)
3. How exactly do galaxies become spiral shaped? (At least one way would be orbital velocity of matter with at least gravity acting upon that matter, would cause a spiral shaped effect. The electric universe model also includes energy input into the galaxy, which spiral towards the galactic center, which then gets thrust out from the center, at about 90 degrees from the input. Additionally, with the conservation of energy, as energy moves into the vertical plane from the center of the horizontal plane, energy from the horisontal plane moves to the center of the horizontal plane to replace the energy that moved into the vertical plane. There is also the conservation of angular momentum. As more matter moves towards the center of the galaxy, that portion of the galaxy would speed up relative to the matter towards the outer portions of the galaxy.)
Additionally: GALAXY SPIN: (Inner and Outer areas spinning at the same speed):
The inner and outer areas of the galaxy are connected via gravitational, electrical, and magnetic energy fields. While moving at the same speed, the inner area has less space to travel whereas the outer area has more space to travel. Hence a spiral shape forms.
4. The natural progression of a galaxy would be to become smaller and smaller.
5. Of which, does all life throughout the entire universe (if other life even exists in the universe besides what is on this Earth, which is most probably true) eventually die and go extinct and the entire universe and all in it are ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things and the entire universe and all in it are ultimately just a waste of spacetime in existence?
And even 'if' the current narrative of space itself is expanding, and the entire universe would eventually end in a 'big freeze', wouldn't the end of life itself in this entire universe still occur?
2
-
Skullcs4ever
I don't personally believe this to be really true at this time, but consider:
Our DNA is unique to us and is in each and every cell of our body. Each atom and molecule has basically it's own energy frequency vibration. So, #1, our entire body is interconnected via the energy frequency vibrations of our own unique DNA. #2, What if an outside source interacts with that unique DNA energy frequency? And then of course, what if that DNA frequency were just a carrier frequency that other information is attached to? From within the body and/or from outside the body, what if every cell of our body had an address, kind of like in computers? Connect to a specific DNA energy frequency, then to a specific address, then read and/or change the info in that address, or across many addresses, not only could consciousness be attached to something outside of ourselves, but even possibly entire mind/body control of self and/or others. Hmmm......
2
-
IN THE SEARCH FOR THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING: QUESTIONS:
1. How does a photon, rotating electrical and magnetic forces 90 degrees to each other and considered massless, go across the vast universe for billions of light years and not be flung apart and/or torn apart by other photons, including photons of the same exact energy frequency, and/or by matter, matter being made up of quarks, electrons and interacting energy, quarks and electrons being considered charged particles each with their respective magnetic field with them?
2. What exactly is 'space' and how exactly does space contract, expand and warp?
3. What exactly is 'time' and how exactly does time vary and warp?
4. 'Speed' is distance divided by time, 'distance' being 2 points in space with space between those 2 points. But modern science claims that both space and time can vary and warp. So, how could the 'speed of light' ever be constant across the vast universe 'if' space and/or time are varying and warping? (See also items 2 and 3 above).
5. What exactly is 'gravity'? And for those who claim that gravity is matter warping the fabric of spacetime, see also items 2 and 3 above.
6. How exactly do numbers and mathematical constants exist for math to do what math does in this existence? Surely the very nature of reality must allow numbers and mathematical constants to exist and do what they do in this existence. And 'if' space and time can warp and vary, are mathematical constants only constant in a specific configuration of space and time? What about truthful reality of other configurations of space and time? A circle is a circle in this current space and time configuration, but in actual reality is even a circle possibly something other than a circle in a different space and time configuration to warp such that for example a circle is not a circle?
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
+Ben G 1. You don't know what you are talking about. What exactly do you think electromagnetic radiation energy frequencies (photons) are?
2. You want realism? Life itself is just an illusion from the human perspective as far as eternity is concerned. One day we will all die from something, forget everything we ever knew and experienced, and then be forgotten one day in future eternity. Our true destiny is to cease to consciously exist and be forgotten. (Or so it currently appears. If you have any actual evidence to the contrary, please provide it).
3. As far as STEM goes:
Here is a possible explanation to the double slit experiment (the so called wave particle duality), that scientists have been dealing with for the last 80 or so years:
a. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
b. Protons and electrons are charged particles with an associated magnetic field with them.
c. Photons have both an electric and magnetic component to them.
d. Whenever a proton, electron or photon is shot out of a gun, it's respective magnetic field interacts with the magnetic fields of the electrons in the atoms and molecules in the gun itself, the medium the projectile is moving through (ie: air), and/or from around the slits themselves.
e. Via QED (quantum electrodynamics), newly generated photons might be generated.
f. The projectile goes on it's own way and the newly generated photons go on their own way. It gives the illusion of a wave particle duality, but is not that way in actual reality.
g. As far as detectors are concerned, they probably have an energy field that is one way when on and a different way when off. The interaction of this energy field, (or the lack thereof), with whatever is passing through it, gives the indication that is observed.
4. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and unlike polarities repel. Now, I put forward the following:
a. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
b. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have an associated magnetic field with them.
c. When the electron is in an atom, at very close proximity to the nucleus, it basically generates a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
d. Like charged protons stick together inside this field while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
e. There are probably no such thing as "gluons".
f. There are probably only three forces of nature and not four. Two of them, the strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force, are probably derivatives of the interactions between the magnetic fields of the electrons and protons.
g. The nucleus is probably a magnetic field boundary.
h. As quarks supposedly also have a charge, they would probably also have an associated magnetic field with them. Possibly one for each of the six different type of quarks.
i. The interaction of the quarks electromagnetic fields are probably how protons and neutrons are created as well as why protons and neutrons stay together inside a nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
j. There is probably a Magnetic Field Theory to the Atomic Structure.
5. Chemical elements #119 (8s1) and #120 (8s2) I believe exist. #119 I believe can be found inside black holes and #120 I believe can be found inside stars.
Now, while what I put forward above may or may not be true in actual reality, it hopefully displays to your ignorance as to my familiarity with STEM.
But, regardless what I know or don't know, or what might be true or not true, appears to not all matter anyway from the human perspective as far as eternity is concerned. Our true destiny appears to be that we will all cease to exist and be forgotten. (Or so it currently appears). As I truly do not know what I do not know, I will be the first to admit that I could be wrong. It's just that the current analysis would indicate otherwise. But, maybe I will truly have an actual eternal conscious existence somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, it's just currently "probably not". But, if you or anybody else out there in internet land has any actual evidence to the contrary, please provide it here.
1
-
+James Steele Thank you for your kind words.
Yes, many people, my own family included, don't even want to think about much less talk about our own mortality. Even myself, such a topic was buried in the back of my unconsciousness and barely ever reached my consciousness until it was brought front and center of my consciousness. "I could really die", (and all that goes with that). Trying to have an adult conversation with people who don't want to discuss a topic is very hard to do. A sense of isolation sets in.
Even looking back at my own paragraph above, "comfort", "easing pain", "faith", "enjoying life while we have it" and "finding that silver lining even in death", all seem to be more evident to me.
People can believe whatever they want to concerning life, death and the afterlife, but when they take their beliefs and try to get others to follow them by creating laws based upon those beliefs, is where some problems come in. If there were ever such a thing as "one world religion" I believe it should be "truth" as best as we can humanly discern truth to be. Now, as we truly do not know what we do not know, and may possibly never know, and even that we don't know for 100% certainty, there will always be a place for "faith" beliefs until those "faith beliefs" are proven one way or another. Then they would no longer be "faith" but either "real lies" or "real truth". The thing is though, that the real truth might just be more than any of us can psychologically handle. Even in my own analysis searching for the real truth has brought me to some pretty deep depths of depression. At this time it appears the worse in the analysis is behind me as I have worked through it. But, I can see where some others might not have a mental fortitude to see the analysis all the way through. I guess possibly "God" made me stubborn for a reason, maybe for this very topic that concerns all living things. Or, maybe I just "evolved" to be stubborn and this is just one of the outcomes. Either way, it appears to be closer to the real truth.
The current real truth concerning life, death, and the afterlife:
1. I don't truly know as I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know.
The current real truth as I currently understand it to be in the current analysis:
1. No, we don't have a conscious afterlife, and certainly not an eternal conscious afterlife. I acknowledge we might, as I truly do not know what I do not know, but all the current evidence that I have studied and all the current analysis that I have done would say "no". When we all die one day from something, it's a death that will last into a very real eternity it appears. We will forget all we ever knew. Our "afterlife" will be like our "beforelife", a state of nothingness as far as our consciousness would be concerned because we won't have consciousness. Consciousness (whatever it actually is as even modern science doesn't even know what it really is yet nor even how the human brain actually even thinks a thought, two things so vital to how we perceive and deal with "reality"), appears to die when our physical brain dies. In fact, sad to say, some even lose their consciousness even with a working brain. Life itself is just an illusion from the human perspective as far as eternity is concerned. Our true destiny appears to be to cease to exist and be forgotten. But, here again, I will be the first to admit I could be wrong as I truly do not know what I do not know.
The current real truth that you want to hear:
1. Which fairy tale do you want me to tell you to make you feel better?
But, as you wisely said above, "time will tell", or it will tell but we won't hear it because we will be consciously dead.
1
-
+Christopher Wallace Thank you. I had wrote a book back in 2012 and self published it. It is called "From My Perspective", (A book about "God", the universe, life and the afterlife). There are only around 30 or so hard copies in the world, plus numerous electronic copies, and even a copy in the cloud as I understand it to be. Since my original official diagnosis of cancer back in 2003, and then the diagnosis in 2004 that I had probably two years to live with a 5% chance of living beyond two years, having both external and internal radiation in 2003 plus being on two different hormone medicines since 2003 (of which were supposed to only last for on average 2 - 5 years), along with the help and care of the VA, along with utilizing visualization techniques, and of course my faith, I have had the opportunity to have a lot of time to study and think and am apparently still here today. I like to learn and think. The above is some of the results of that learning and thinking. And keep in mind, I will be the first to acknowledge that I could be wrong as I truly do not know what I do not know.
But, if modern science is correct that everything in existence came from a singular mass that banged, then:
1. I AM a part of that mass that banged.
2. I AM a part of that singularity.
3. I AM the lessor part of that greater "I AM" (the singularity in it's totality).
And so are you as are all things in existence in this universe.
If asked my age:
1. I have cells in me that modern science say come into existence in me on a daily basis.
2. I have a birth date utilizing Earthling's arbitrary calendar and clock systems which utilize arbitrary units of measurements.
3. I have atoms and molecules in me that are less than the age of the universe itself.
4. I have energy in me that is older than the universe itself.
And so do you.
Unless modern science is wrong, these things appear to be true.
1
-
1
-
1
-
+One way Ticket Please explain, don't just say "no".
If you look at how the electron shells fill up,
2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 18, 8 ( seven electron shells), to me, looking at how nature and energy often evens things out at times, (natural bell curve), it is highly indicative that an eighth energy shell exists that has two elements in it. Elements #119 and #120.
I put element #119 (8s1) at the bottom of the hydrogen group on the Periodic Table. It's the second most heaviest element in existence. It is pulling in all the energy and matter that it can to try to become element #120. I believe it can be found inside black holes. To me, it makes more sense than things like black hole tunnels or that information that goes into a black hole retains it's information. The chemical properties of #119 being where I put it on the chart can be looked for around black holes. If found, even if not true, would allow us to have a better understanding of black holes. And, maybe it is really true. Need to look to find out for sure.
I put element #120 (8s2) at the bottom of the helium group on the Periodic Table. It's the heaviest element in existence. Even though it only has two electrons in it's outer shell, it's shell is full and better fits under the helium group. It's chemical properties being where I put it on the chart and could be looked for around stars. When a neutron splits, it gives off energy, one proton, and one electron. The Sun certainly puts off energy and one proton and one electron are basic hydrogen of which the Sun is primarily made up of.
To me, this just makes more sense. There is much I and even all of humanity does not know yet and I will be the first to admit I could be wrong. It's just that the current analysis with the information I have available would tell me otherwise.
So again, you say "no". Please explain.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
+Jim Reed Doesn't that even make more sense then what current quantum physicists are teaching today? I am currently reading a book whereby due to a large part in the wave/particle duality, along with "time" not being linear and asymmetrical but symmetrical and "non-quantifiable", (the error supposedly comes about due to how our brain has been taught to perceive reality versus how reality really is so it claims), we are all one with everything in existence, of which since it has an eternal existence, so do we, so it claims. But to me, the argument would fall apart if the wave/particle duality was not really true in actual reality.
I'm just a "truthseeker" here, trying to discern the real truth about certain things. Full well acknowledging that I could be wrong due to the limits of my physical senses and physical brain, (which probably even limits my mind to some extent), along with the fact that I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know.
I try to keep my mind open to new pertinent facts, but not so open my brain falls out.
I am not familiar with the pilot wave theory but I am familiar with a charged particle having an associated magnetic field with it to some extent. The little I know about QED, I could certainly see where it's possible that it's the magnetic field interactions that cause new photons to be generated that then give the "wave/particle" illusion. Not quite like De Broglie's theory, but similiar.
Something you might be interested in:
In school we are taught that in magnetism, opposites attract and like poles repel. Did you know that inside the arc of a horseshoe magnet it's the other way around? Like charges attract and unlike charges repel.
So, as a moving electron probably generates a magnetic wave, in essence a 360 degree spherical magnetic field, (which might just be what a nucleus really is), like charged protons stick together inside this field. Not by gluons or even the "stong nuclear force". Protons stick together because they are inside this field while at the same time attracting the opposite charged electron across the inside side of the moving electron's moving magnetic field.
So, in essence, are there only three laws of nature and not four? Two of them, (the strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force), are actually derivatives of the magnetic field interactions of the electron(s) and proton(s).
To extend this further, quarks (of which make up protons and neutrons) supposedly have a charge associated with them. Probably a different charge or arrangement of that charge which then probably would have a different magnetic field associated with that charge. A different magnetic field for each of the six different quarks. This could possibly explain why quarks stick together as they do as well as why neutrally charged neutrons, (which would probably have an associated magnetic field that extends outside the neutron itself), are attracted to and basically stay inside the nucleus, and don't just pass through as neutrinos supposedly do. Something has to have the neutron stick to protons and have them stay inside the nucleus. Why not magnetic fields?
So, is there a Magnetic Field Theory of Atomic Structures in actual reality? I think, maybe. But, it would have to be proved one way or another to know for sure.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1