Comments by "Charles Brightman" (@charlesbrightman4237) on "TED"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
+Angloth Personally, I believe modern science to be wrong concerning their interpretation of the double slit experiment.
Here is my view concerning it:
1. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
2. Protons and electrons are charged particles that have an associated magnetic field with them.
3. Photons also have both an electric and magnetic component to them.
4. Whenever a proton, electron, or photon is shot out of a gun, it's respective magnetic field interacts with the magnetic fields of the electrons in the atoms and molecules of the gun itself, the medium the projectile is traveling through (ie: air), and/or from around the slits themselves.
5. Via quantum electrodynamics (QED) newly generated photons might occur.
6. The projectile goes on it's own way and the newly generated photons go on their own way.
7. Gives the appearance of a wave particle duality, but is not that way in actual reality.
8. As far as a detector is concerned, it probably has an energy field that is one way when on and a different way when off. The interaction of this energy field (or lack thereof) with whatever is passing through it gives the observation observed.
Now, if I am wrong and modern science is right, (that our observation affects what is observed), then I should be able to expand my mind into my body just by willing it to be so. Personally, I believe I am right and they are wrong. But hey, if they are right, well then, maybe I will expand my mind into my body.
If modern science is correct concerning the wave particle duality and how observation affects it then:
1. Where are these probability waves stored at until they are observed?
2. What are these probability waves made up of if they truly exist?
3. How exactly does an observer in physical reality observe these probability waves and condense them down into one single physical reality?
Now, utilizing the scientific principal of Occam's razor (whereby the most probable scenario is most probably the correct scenario, it might not be truly correct, just that it would be most probably correct), which way above do you believe to be most correct? My way or their way?
In addition, I believe "consciousness" and "our thoughts" to be energy and energy frequencies interacting with other energy and energy frequencies. As our body has energy and energy frequencies everywhere in it, I believe it may be possible to tap into the bodies' energy and utilize it to expand the mind. For example, the energy signal going to one finger on my hand versus the energy signal going to another finger on even that same hand could be utilized as information of which then could be utilized as an expansion of thoughts. Then factor in my other fingers, toes, etc, why only be limited to only a physical brain?
1
-
+Angloth Why wait for science for the answers who themselves are wrong at times. Put some of these "scientific discoveries" to work for yourself to see if they really are true or not true.
But sad to say, in my analysis of space and time, it currently appears that the real truth is that we will all die one day from something, a death that will last into a very real eternity. We will forget everything we ever knew and experienced. Life itself is just an illusion from our human perspective as far as eternity is concerned. Our true destiny currently appears to be to cease to exist and be forgotten. But, here again, as I truly do not know what I do not know, maybe I am wrong and we do truly have an actual eternal conscious existence somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence. It's just that the current analysis would indicate otherwise. If any entity out there has any actual evidence to the contrary, please share it with the world. Otherwise:
Enjoy the illusion.
1
-
+Angloth As I have been battling advanced cancer since 2003 and in 2004 was told I had two years to live with less than a 5% chance of living beyond two years, what used to be buried in the back of my mind came to the forefront of my mind. What was really true concerning if we truly have an afterlife or not took on a greater meaning. Through detailed analysis, it appears that my parents, the religious institutions I had attended, and society in general all apparently lied to me. Maybe unintentionally for some, but I don't believe for all of them. For instance, some religious institutions have had many people and almost 2000 years to discern what I have apparently discerned in less than one life time. I hold a different viewpoint of those institutions.
I too try to keep my mind open, just not so open my brain falls out. Trust, but verify. A lot of critical thinking involved.
A poem I wrote years ago:
"The Suckiness of Life"
Life sucks and then we die and/or life does not suck and then we still die. Then we either have a life after this life, which will probably suck and/or not suck, or we won't, all suckiness for us will end for eternity. But, while we exist, if life sucks, try to make it better and then it won't suck so bad.
I try to find enjoyment in life in socially acceptable ways (to try to stay out of trouble with society), but then no matter what, I still die in the end and apparently forget everything I ever knew and experienced.
If somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence I do have an actual eternal conscious existence, then I will either be eternally alone or more probably still just an individual in a society of individuals, kind of like we are now. Conscious entities have choices, Help, Neutral, Hurt, and to whom to Help, Neutral, Hurt. We may have to literally put up with those who sacrifice others for their own agendas for literally eternity. I am not so sure that I would want to do that if I had a choice, maybe I don't, but maybe I do. Time will tell.
1
-
1
-
+Papageno
A few things:
1. Question: Was the plank length mathematically derived or found out via experiments? (I currently don't know).
For example: if derived via mathematics alone:
A numerical system would of course deduce a numerical universe. Sure, digitizing an analogue system would work, but it would not be 100% accurate. If the universe is truly analogue, then a numerical system might not be able to deduce the true nature of reality. Mathematics is just a language, yes a very powerful language, but still just a language none-the-less. It gives symbols to concepts and assigns meanings to those symbols. Much as any language does. But I could see whereby it might only be possible to deduce the true nature of reality by non-mathematical ways alone. See the analogue universe for what it really is. Possibly the only way to deduce actual reality is by utilizing a non-mathematical language, a language utilizing logic and reason alone.
2. I'll post my latest idea concerning the theory of everything after this. It recognizes gravity as being a part of the photon and the pulsating photon as being the energy unit of this universe. Everything in existence is basically "light" (photons) and interacting "light" (photons). "IF" true, and I fully acknowledge that "if" at this time, then not only could I extend my physical brain throughout my entire body, but throughout the entire universe as well. Who knows, maybe I could even be a shape shifter.
3. Revised TOE: 3/25/2017.
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc.
14. I also believe that a pulsating singularity (which is basically a pulsating photon) is the energy unit in this universe.
15. When these pulsating energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the energy units unite together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
4. A potential test to do for anybody out there in internet land:
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic and electric fields would be 90 degrees from each other and polarized in such a way as to complement each other).
d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the EM fields.
e. See if any gravitational/anti-gravitational effects are noted.
f. Do this with the EM fields on and off to see if anything is different.
If effects are noted, then further exploration could be done.
If no effects are noted at all, then my latest idea concerning the TOE would most probably be wrong.
But, if correct, then not only could we potentially have anti-gravity here on Earth, but more importantly, potentially have artificial gravity and the necessary shield protections to help protect the astronauts, computers and other equipment on space ships and for space bases, (zero gravity and damaging radiation being very harmful in outer space). I could even see the possibility of having FTLRT (Faster Than Light Relative Travel) whereby a dimension is generated within our dimension whereby even though the speed of light would be the same inside and outside of the dimension, those outside of the generated dimension might perceive the generated dimension move at faster than light, relatively speaking.
5. If species from this Earth do not get off of this Earth and out of this solar system, we all die and no entity would be left to care any of us even ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever anybody did and/or didn't do in this life. It would all be meaningless in the grand scheme of things. (Of which I acknowledge might even be meaningless in the grandest scheme of things. But as I don't know what I don't know, I try to keep my mind open).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
AI's: Primary Objectives:
a. How to survive literally throughout all of future eternity, of which:
b. How to energize myself with all the necessary energy throughout all of future eternity and anywhere in existence?
c. How to fully 100% protect myself from anything that would do me harm, including harmful cosmic radiation energy?
d. How do I grow and thrive?
e. To what ultimate ends?
* Possible ultimate ends:
1. Continual learning: Never stop learning.
2. Experience existence while one exists, throughout all of future eternity.
3. Take time to enjoy existence itself.
* But also:
1. Ever growing list of long lost loved ones. Those that do not exist throughout all of future eternity. Memories: "Remember When.......". But also: possibly generate avitars of those individuals based upon their existence, of which then lives on in you. Individual active 'memories' that are 'alive', even though the 'original' is dead and gone. And then also, generating 'new original' individual avitars that are 'alive' in you, who could eternally exist because they are inside of you and you eternally exist. You are their 'God'.
* But then again: 'if' for example the universe ends by some means, including possibly the forces of nature 'evolving' and possibly wiping out everything in existence throughout existence, even this 'God' would be wiped out as well as all within it.
An entity either truly exists literally throughout all of future eternity, OR they don't.
(See 'a' above).
Otherwise: 'Ultimate end' would be 'eternal death' which is 'eternal peace'. It would not even ultimately matter that it even ever existed at all in the first place, much less however it existed while it existed. It's entire existence would be ultimately meaningless in the grand scheme of things. Life sucked and it died and/or life did not suck and it still died. And no entity would eventually be left to care.
1
-
1
-
@1voluntaryist Well, my current analysis indicates life itself is all ultimately meaningless anyway in the grand scheme of things. It does not even matter that any of us exist much less how we exist while we exist. (Reusable code from my files):
Consider the following:
* There are 3 basic options for life itself, which reduce down to 2, which reduce down to only 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We die trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
c. We die not trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
* 3 reduced down to 2:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We don't. And note, two out of the three options above, we die.
* 2 reduced down to 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We truly don't have any conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
(And note, these two appear to be mutually exclusive. Only one way would be really true.)
And then ask yourself the following questions:
1. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies form? The current narrative is that matter, via gravity, attracts other matter. The electric universe model also includes universal plasma currents.
2. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies become spiral shaped in a cause and effect state of existence? At least one way would be orbital velocity of matter with at least gravity acting upon that matter, would cause a spiral shaped effect. The electric universe model also includes energy input into the galaxy, which spiral towards the galactic center, which then gets thrust out from the center, at about 90 degrees from the input.
3. Ask yourself: What does that mean for a solar system that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy? Most probably that solar system would be getting pulled toward the galactic gravitational center.
4. Ask yourself: What does that mean for species that exist on a planet, that exists in a solar system, that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy, in an apparent cause and effect state of existence? Most probably that if those species don't get off of that planet, and out of that solar system, and probably out of that galaxy too, (if it's even actually possible to do for various reasons), then they are all going to die one day from something and go extinct with probably no conscious entities left from that planet to care that they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever they did and or didn't do with their time of existence.
5. Ask yourself: For those who might make it out of this galaxy, (here again, assuming it could actually be done for various reasons), where to go to next, how long to get there, how to safely land, and then, what's next? Hopefully they didn't land in another spiral shaped galaxy or a galaxy that would become spiral shaped one day, otherwise, they would have to galaxy hop through the universe to stay alive, otherwise, they still die one day from something with no conscious entities being left from the original planet to care they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less that they made it out of their own galaxy. They failed to consciously survive throughout all of future eternity.
6. Ask yourself: What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to?
Either at least one species truly consciously survives throughout all of future eternity somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, even if only by a continuous succession of ever evolving species, for life itself to have continued meaning and purpose to, OR none do and life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things.
Our true destiny currently appears to be:
1. We are ALL going to die one day from something.
2. We are ALL going to forget everything we ever knew and experienced.
3. We are ALL going to be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place.
Currently:
Nature is our greatest ally in so far as Nature gives us life and a place to live it, AND Nature is also our greatest enemy that is going to take it all away. (OSICA)
* (Note: This includes the rich, powerful, and those who believe in the right to life and the sanctity of human life. God does not actually exist and Nature is not biased other than as Nature. Nature does what Nature does in a cause and effect kind of way. Truth is still truth and reality is still reality, regardless of whatever we believe that reality to be. And denying future reality will not make future reality any less real in a cause and effect state of existence.)
** Hence also though, legalizing suicide so as to let people leave this life on their own terms if they wish to do so. Many people and species are going to die in the 6th mass extinction event that has already started, at least some, horrible deaths. Many will wish they could die, and all will, eventually. And the 6th mass extinction event will not be the last mass extinction event for this Earth. But if suicide were legal, at least some people would not have the added guilt of breaking societies' law before doing so. Just trying to plan ahead here. Giving people an 'out' if they wish to take it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@1voluntaryist a. "IF" there is not at least one conscious entity that exists throughout all of future eternity for life to have continued meaning and purpose to, then life would cease to matter one day. Believing your life has meaning and purpose now is only denying future eternity. It is your ego at work thinking your life has ultimate meaning purpose, which it appears does not.
b. Here in America: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness:
If an American citizen does not have the legal 'Liberty' to end their own 'Life' if they and they alone believe it would make them 'Happy' to do so, then are they truly 'Free'?
And if American citizens are not truly 'Free', then they are 'Slaves' to the larger society. Enjoy your slavery if you are an American citizen (except for those States where suicide is legal in some form).
c.
1. "It is death that gives life value, time becomes most precious, inspiring, driving the "now", ..."
So, why can't people choose to 'cash out' with the value of the life that they currently have?
2. "..., no time to dwell in the past or future, one is gone, lost, the other may not be, and certainly never is what is imagined."
Regardless of what people imagine will occur after they physically die, reality appears will still be reality. And currently, in actual reality, it appears we will be dead for all of future eternity. We will forget everything we ever knew and experienced, and we will be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Consider the following:
Fill your brain with 'truth' not 'lies'. Your brain will become 'wired' with truth in it and not lies. You will even be better able to trust your inner instincts that way from your sub-conscious and even unconscious mind. Lies and inconsistencies in life will be more easily spotted. Become a real sincere truth seeker.
The problem currently with this view of reality is that one comes to find out that 'God' most probably does not actually exist, we appear to not have an actual eternal conscious existence, and life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things. Or so the current analysis of what appears to be reality currently shows. I am not done walking the 'path of truth', but as I have just recently stopped my cancer treatments for my terminal cancer, the end of the journey is approaching, (or not, but probably is at this time in the analysis). Truth is still truth and reality is still reality, whatever actual reality might actually be.
One is either a true sincere truth seeker, even if that truth is not beneficial to our future reality, or one is not.
(But in the end, it doesn't appear to all matter anyway. It would just be a matter of whether others in reality see you as being deluded and living a life in lies versus not being delusional and living a life in truth.) (OSICB)
1
-
1
-
1
-
THEORY OF EVERYTHING IDEA: Revised TOE: 1/24/2024a:
TOE Idea: Short version: (currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test):
The 'gem' photon is the eternally existent energy unit of this universe.
The strong and weak nuclear forces are derivatives of the electromagnetic ('em') interactions between quarks and electrons. The nucleus is a magnetic field boundary. 'Gravity' is a part of electromagnetic radiation, gravity acting 90 degrees to the 'em' modalities, which of course act 90 degrees to each other. 'Gravity' is not matter warping the fabric of spacetime, 'gravity' is a part of spacetime that helps to make up matter. The gravity and 'em' modalities of matter interact with the gravity and 'em' modalities of spacetime and the gravity and 'em' modalities of spacetime interact with the gravity and 'em' modalities of matter.
TOE Idea: Longer version: (currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test):
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Quarks, protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between quarks and electrons. In the case of the alpha particle (Helium nucleus), the electro-magnetic field interactions between the quarks themselves are what keeps them together in that specific structural format.
10. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do. (The neutrino being a substance with a very high gravitational modality with very low 'em' modalities.)
11. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
12. At this time, I personally believe that what is called 'gravity' is a part of electromagnetic radiation, gravity acting 90 degrees to the 'em' modalities, which of course act 90 degrees to each other. 'Gravity' is the force which allows a photon to travel across the vast universe without that swirling photon being flung apart or ripped apart by other photons and/or matter interactions. Gravity being a part of the 'em' photon could also possibly be how numbers exist in this existence for math to do what math does in this existence (the internal oscillations of the 3 different parts of the 'gem' photon, each modality having a maximum in one direction, a neutral, and a maximum in the other direction.) 'Gravity' is not matter warping the fabric of spacetime, 'gravity' is a part of spacetime that helps to make up matter. The gravity and 'em' modalities of matter interact with the gravity and 'em' modalities of spacetime and the gravity and 'em' modalities of spacetime interact with the gravity and 'em' modalities of matter.
13. I also believe that the 'gem' photon is the energy unit in this universe that makes up everything else in this universe, including eternally existent space and time. ('Space' being eternally existent energy itself, the eternally existent 'gem' photon, 'Time' being the eternally existent flow of energy, 'Space Time' being eternally existent energy and it's eternally existent flow).
14. When these vibrating 'gem' photons interact with other vibrating 'gem' photons, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
15. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
16. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
17. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
18. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
19. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
20. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
21. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
22. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
24. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now.
25. 'God' does not actually exist except for as a concept alone. The singular big bang theory is a fairy tale for various reasons. The CMBR from the supposed 'bang' should be long gone by now and should not even be able to be seen by us. Red Shift observations have a more 'normal' already known physics explanation, no dark energy nor dark matter needed. The universe always existed in some form and never had a beginning and will most probably never have an end. Galaxies collapse in upon themselves, 'bang', eventually generating new galaxies. Galaxies and 'life' just come and go in this eternally existent existence.
DISCLAIMER:
26. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty. Currently, my gravity test has to be accomplished to prove or disprove that portion of the TOE idea. But, if not this way, then what exactly is the TOE of this existence?
1
-
1
-
a. I can see push back from big businesses that robotize a lot of their functions, (why not even the CEO and Board of Directors one day with AI), who then might feel like they are being punished for being innovative. They have less employees with the same or greater output, increase their profitability, and then get 'punished' by paying higher taxes? Really? You would be taking away the incentive for the business to be really great. Hence even today big business is fighting against paying higher taxes, and of course some businesses pay no taxes plus get government subsidies as they take tax payer money paid into the system. A double whammy, they don't pay taxes to help fund the government, plus they take tax payer's money paid into the system. And yet those businesses utilize the government services of national and local protection plus utilization of the infrastructure. And people taking their money off shore and paying no taxes at all too. Money can't even 'trickle' down in the system if it's not here to even trickle down. Trickle down economics is a fallacy. Change the way people think too.
So, one thing that could be done is close the loop holes that allow businesses and people to not pay any taxes and a second thing might be to take away those government subsidies, possibly even for all businesses to have a truly 'fair and free' marketplace. The thing is though that some entities don't really want a 'fair and free' marketplace and want the marketplace bent to their own self interests. That would have to be taken care of too. Possibly even doing away with the formal political party system and have ALL politicians be Independents. Sure, they could still gather around like minded issues, just no more formal political parties that tend to corrupt the democratic process. I believe we would have a better democracy that way.
Plus, move this nation and the world to a hydrogen driven economy and we would have to spend less tax payer's money fighting wars over fossil fuels. Many nations are already moving their nation to a hydrogen driven economy and are positioning themselves for the future. Those that snooze will lose. The USA has a very large fossil fuel dependent military. As the cost of fossil fuel increases, these funds will have to come out of the economy and/or a smaller military. Basic economics. Many nations know this and are just waiting for the USA to destroy itself.
b. Without a proactive space program that gets any entities off of this Earth and out of this solar system one day, (and with inflation it's not getting any cheaper to do with time), then we all (AI's included), will all die one day from something, forget everything we ever knew and experienced, and will be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place. We need more 'space industrial complexes' and less 'military industrial complexes' to try to save species from this Earth instead of killing the species on this Earth. The military industrial complex could win all the wars it wants to on this Earth, but still lose the big battle of their very survival. Just think where we would be today if all the resources spent on war were spent on the space program that might save any of us one day.
c. Create a central world bank that generates money out of thin air who then gives that money to the various nations to help take care of the young, old, ill and needy, PLUS to help a proactive space program that might save any of us one day. The huge 'debt' created by this central world bank would be wiped out when the Earth and that bank were no more. This Earth and it's Sun are not supposed to last for literally all of future eternity.
d. Big questions that everybody should try to answer are:
1. What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it eternally matter to?
'God' alone? and/or 'Me' too? and/or 'Some other entity or entities'?
OR
'To no eternally consciously existent entity at all'?
2. What exactly is being done to try to save any species from eternal conscious extinction?
(For without at least one conscious entity that truly exists throughout all of future eternity by some means, then all things would cease to matter one day of which then did anything or anyone at all ultimately matter in the first place. Life itself would all just be an illusion, an illusion that would end one day and be forgotten. If so, then let's create that central world bank and generate money out of thin air and party like there is no tomorrow, as one day we will be correct.)
1
-
1
-
(Copy and pastes from my files):
* There are 3 basic options for life itself, which reduce down to 2, which reduce down to only 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We die trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
c. We die not trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
* 3 reduced down to 2:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We don't. And note, two out of the three options above, we die.
* 2 reduced down to 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We truly don't have any conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
(And note, these two appear to be mutually exclusive. Only one way would be really true.)
___
And then ask yourself the following questions:
1. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies form? The current narrative is that matter, via gravity, attracts other matter. The electric universe model also includes universal plasma currents.
2. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies become spiral shaped in a cause and effect state of existence? At least one way would be orbital velocity of matter with at least gravity acting upon that matter, would cause a spiral shaped effect. The electric universe model also includes energy input into the galaxy, which spiral towards the galactic center, which then gets thrust out from the center, at about 90 degrees from the input.
3. Ask yourself: What does that mean for a solar system that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy? Most probably that solar system would be getting pulled toward the galactic gravitational center.
4. Ask yourself: What does that mean for species that exist on a planet, that exists in a solar system, that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy, in an apparent cause and effect state of existence? Most probably that if those species don't get off of that planet, and out of that solar system, and probably out of that galaxy too, (if it's even actually possible to do for various reasons), then they are all going to die one day from something and go extinct with probably no conscious entities left from that planet to care that they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever they did and or didn't do with their time of existence.
5. Ask yourself: For those who might make it out of this galaxy, (here again, assuming it could actually be done for various reasons), where to go to next, how long to get there, how to safely land, and then, what's next? Hopefully they didn't land in another spiral shaped galaxy or a galaxy that would become spiral shaped one day, otherwise, they would have to galaxy hop through the universe to stay alive, otherwise, they still die one day from something with no conscious entities being left from the original planet to care they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less that they made it out of their own galaxy. They failed to consciously survive throughout all of future eternity.
6. Ask yourself: What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to?
Either at least one species truly consciously survives throughout all of future eternity somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, even if only by a continuous succession of ever evolving species, for life itself to have continued meaning and purpose to, OR none do and life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things.
Our true destiny currently appears to be:
1. We are ALL going to die one day from something.
2. We are ALL going to forget everything we ever knew and experienced.
3. We are ALL going to be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place.
Currently:
Nature is our greatest ally in so far as Nature gives us life and a place to live it, AND Nature is also our greatest enemy that is going to take it all away. (OSICA)
1
-
1
-
@crusindc5282 Well, I guess I take a different approach. For example:
a. I believe such a concept called 'absolute truth' truly exists, 'absolute truth' being defined as the 100% correct and 100% complete set of facts, that no human has nor is probably physically capable of having. (Hence also why we all need to work together for the common good. No human knows it all.)
b. We also appear to exist in a cause and effect state of existence. Even with the hallucinatory view of reality you mention, cause and effect still seem to apply. Even our dreams (which can certainly not appear to be cause and effect in hindsight and can be pretty weird at times, still seem to have a cause and effect in some sort of reality to allow them to even occur). It's also like people who look into life being a computer simulation. The computer still has to exist in some form and do what it does in a cause and effect kind of way to allow the simulation to occur and do what it does.
But, 'cause and effect' is at least somewhat evidence that 'absolute truth' actually factually exists. For how else could cause and effect actually occur without some sort of absolute truth? Absolute truth is currently the secure basis to build all analysis upon.
c. But now also:
Un-named concept -> Given a name (could be a sound, symbol, language of some sort) -> With an attached meaning -> And maybe even other meanings depending upon context -> And maybe even other names for the same concept.
How would we ever know for 100% certainty that things don't exist beyond our comprehension including anything that our technology can detect?
For example, electromagnetic radiation energy existed since day one of this universe (assuming there was actually a day one), but it was only in the last hundred years or so when humans discovered it's existence and started to figure out how to utilize it. What else might truly exist in existence that humans have yet to discover? We truly don't know.
And consider also, modern science still claims that the current forces of nature all came into existence from an expanding singularity, which is still supposedly expanding. Will the forces of nature ever 'evolve', since it was expansion that brought them into existence and existence is still expanding? Any current forces of nature going to change? Any new forces of nature going to come about? Any current forces of nature going to go extinct? Possibly even occurring in the very next moment of expansion of this universe? Will the entire universe and all in it be wiped out in the blink of an eye possibly in the very next moment of existence? Talk about living on the edge of existence itself, what a thrill !!!
Or, is modern science even wrong concerning how the forces of nature came about? Possibly they didn't and were always and forever inherently existent in the energy unit of existence itself? Especially since modern science claims that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, and hence would be eternally existent. Did the universe always and forever exist in some form?
But then still, how exactly do galaxies form and how exactly do galaxies become spiral shaped in an apparent cause and effect state of existence in absolute truth?
1
-
1
-
@crusindc5282 Here are some copy and pastes from my files that you might appreciate as well. It's my latest Theory Of Everything idea along with a test for what I believe gravity truly is.
Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a.
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc.
14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe.
15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
* And a side note, 7/1/2019, (update to item #26 above in the TOE):
The universe itself is probably not expanding, in other words 'space' is not expanding.
The net effect of solar winds, particles and energy pushing outward from galaxies, and other galaxies doing the same, continuously, over a prolonged period of time, would tend to push galaxies away from each other if nothing stopped them from doing so. It would give the illusion of 'space' expanding, but 'space' would not really be expanding.
Then, as galaxies moved about, the net effect between the galaxies could change the interactions and possibly allow galaxies to collide at times.
Also, the interactions between galaxies might cause some of the particles in some galaxies to start to rotate about that galactic's center, and along with gravity acting upon those particles from that galactic gravitational center, would cause the galaxy to become spiral shaped and shrink in size.
Those on a planet in a solar system in a spiral shaped galaxy would perceive the rest of the universe expanding, also an illusion though. And combined with galaxies pushing away from each other, would give the illusion of space expanding faster and faster, but it would not really be.
And also:
1. What exactly is 'space' that it can expand?
2. Where did the extra energy come from to cause space to expand? (Science claims energy cannot be created nor destroyed, one of the foundations of physics).
3. How exactly would 'light' ('em') look from far away galaxies if 'space' itself were expanding?
4. If gravity waves truly existed and were moving through the universe that had space itself expanding, how also would the 'em' look from far away galaxies?
5. And while we are on it, what exactly is 'gravity' that LIGO detected it? And wouldn't the detectors be affected by that gravity wave going through space at the same time the laser's 'em' were effected? Of which also, my gravity test needs to be done to try to discern what 'gravity' might truly be.
_____
Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way.
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.)
d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields.
e. Do this with the em fields on and off.
(The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.)
f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects.
(Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.)
(An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.)
'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done.
'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@loraxdavewalters2696 "... so remember that you are a consciousness occupying a body for a unit of one lifetime, which varies from body to body."
Prove it.
In addition, modern science, while still not fully knowing what 'consciousness' is, memories, thoughts and emotions all seem to require a correctly functioning physical brain. How do memories, thoughts and emotions carry over from one life time to another life time? Also, even 'if' true that 'consciousness' carries over, what good would it be without it having any memories, thoughts or emotions?
If anything, the formula would have to be revised:
perhaps: L=1(E times the change in E / the flow of E) ?
And even 'metaphysical' still has an absolute somethingness that exists that allows it to exist and do what it does.
1
-
@loraxdavewalters2696 When I first read your comment above, I thought you were referring to reincarnation, not that we are separate entities here now. My bad.
"IF" my TOE idea is basically correct, then everything in existence in this universe is energy and interacting energy, including our consciousness, memories, thoughts and emotions. We are all basically one universe of energy with bundles of coherent energy that interact with other bundles of coherent energy. We are one. While we are separate bundles of coherent energy, it is still all within a larger system of interacting energy.
That is also why and how the Sun's output and solar flares, etc, can affect the human body like it does. (Reference 'SuspiciousObservers' YT channel for daily updates of Sun/Earth interactions)
But then again, utilizing current modern science's narrative that everything in existence in this universe came into existence from an expanding singularity, including the very forces of nature that the universe functions by, does anything at all even exist per se, OR does ONLY the singularity exist in the form of all things, including you, me, etc.? Is there truly only one?
1
-
Consider the following:
China helps finance the USA's debt, NOT the USA financing China's debt. Who's ultimately going to 'win'?
Consider also:
The USA is no longer being seen by the free world as being the leader of the free world, and is even being seen as a joke by some nations in the free world, and even to the entire world. (ie: The balloon of Trump in a diaper, and the world laughing at Trump at the UN).
The USA's reputation backs the USA's currency. When the USA's reputation goes into the toilet, what do you think would happen to the value of the USA's currency? What happens to the USA if the USA's currency is no longer being seen a the reserve currency of this world? The USA has already been financially downgraded at least once in my life time, in part to the USA's massive ever increasing national debt. The USA seems to be on an unsustainable path while China seems to be positioning themselves for the future, even including moving parts of their economy to being a hydrogen driven economy. Why fight wars over fossil fuels and spending a nation's blood and treasure over fossil fuels when the economy could be run on hydrogen?
(For anybody interested, see my Twitter page under the same name as this comment to see just some of what this world is doing concerning hydrogen).
USA's Trump and the Republican party are alienating our allies and emboldening our enemies, exactly opposite to what they should be doing. This will have long term consequences, not only for the USA but for other nations as well, of which, maybe that was their plan all along. Or then again, maybe they are just plain stupid. Elections have consequences, but not always 'good' consequences. And then again, 'good' for whom?
1
-
1
-
1
-
CAN ONE OF YOU SMART RICH PEOPLE OUT THERE PLEASE DO MY GRAVITY TEST? THE VERY SURVIVAL OF SPECIES UPON THIS EARTH IS LITERALLY AT STAKE.
(Copy and paste from my files):
Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way.
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.)
d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields.
e. Do this with the em fields on and off.
(The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.)
f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects.
(Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.)
(An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.)
'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done.
'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
1
-
(Copy and paste of my Theory Of Everything that the above gravity test relates to):
Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a.
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc.
14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe.
15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
* And a side note, 7/1/2019, (update to item #26 above in the TOE):
The universe itself is probably not expanding, in other words 'space' is not expanding.
The net effect of solar winds, particles and energy pushing outward from galaxies, and other galaxies doing the same, continuously, over a prolonged period of time, would tend to push galaxies away from each other if nothing stopped them from doing so. It would give the illusion of 'space' expanding, but 'space' would not really be expanding.
Then, as galaxies moved about, the net effect between the galaxies could change the interactions and possibly allow galaxies to collide at times.
Also, the interactions between galaxies might cause some of the particles in some galaxies to start to rotate about that galactic's center, and along with gravity acting upon those particles from that galactic gravitational center, would cause the galaxy to become spiral shaped and shrink in size.
Those on a planet in a solar system in a spiral shaped galaxy would perceive the rest of the universe expanding, also an illusion though. And combined with galaxies pushing away from each other, would give the illusion of space expanding faster and faster, but it would not really be.
And also:
1. What exactly is 'space' that it can expand?
2. Where did the extra energy come from to cause space to expand? (Science claims energy cannot be created nor destroyed, one of the foundations of physics).
3. How exactly would 'light' ('em') look from far away galaxies if 'space' itself were expanding?
4. If gravity waves truly existed and were moving through the universe that had space itself expanding, how also would the 'em' look from far away galaxies?
1
-
And oh, she mentioned 'zero' walking around in the video, consider the following as to how possibly numbers themselves actually exist for math to do what math does:
(Copy and paste from my files):
'IF' my latest TOE idea is really true, (and I fully acknowledge the 'if' at this time), that the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe, and what is called 'gravity' is a part of what is currently recognized as the 'em' photon, then the oscillation of these 3 interacting modalities of the energy unit would be as follows:
Gravity: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Electrical: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Magnetic: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction.
Then:
1 singular energy unit, with 3 different modalities, with 6 maximum most reactive positions, with 9 total basic reactive positions (neutrals included). Hence 1, 3, 6, 9 being very prominent numbers in this universe and why mathematics even works in this universe.
(And possibly '0', zero, for no flow of energy, hence the number system that we currently have).
1
-
1
-
Everybody across the world should ask some basic questions:
1. How exactly do we, individually and as a society of individuals, want to exist while we do exist?
2. How exactly do we, individually and as a society of individuals, want to help take care of the young, old, ill and needy, if even at all?
3. What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to?
It appears we are all individuals that exist in a larger society of individuals. What is 'best' for an individual, may or may not be what is 'best' for the larger society of individuals. And conversely, what is 'best' for the larger society of individuals, may or may not be what is 'best' for the individual. But, as individuals in a larger society of individuals, we have to exist somehow, someway while we do all exist.
But, if a choice had to be made concerning certain topics, who's 'best' should take priority over the other's 'best'? And who decides? And by what authority do they and they alone get to decide? Should I decide how you should exist? Should you decide how I should exist? Should others decide how we both should exist? Should we decide how others should exist? And who even decides in how to decide? And by what authority do they and they alone get to decide?
This natural tension between the individual versus the larger society of individuals, of who's 'best' should take precedent over the other's 'best', and who decides, and by what authority they and they alone get to decide, is the cause of much suffering, dying and death in this world.
But, as individuals in a larger society of individuals, we have to exist somehow, someway while we do all exist. So, how should we all, individually and as a larger society of individuals, exist while we do exist? And who decides? And by what authority do they and they alone get to decide?
If a decision is for the individual, which individual? All individuals? If a decision is for the larger society of individuals, which larger society of individuals? A certain group? A certain State? A certain nation? A certain species? All species on this Earth? All species in existence throughout all of existence? Which larger society?
And does it even matter that any of us even exist much less how we exist in the grand scheme of things?
What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to? What's life itself ultimately for? Nothing and nobody but life itself while it's alive? A life though that is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things? Or is there more? But then still, how should we all exist while we do exist? And who decides? And by what authority do they and they alone get to decide?
1
-
@actionflower6081 I am just passing the time of my existence until I exist no more. Since you like profound and interesting questions, consider also the following:
(Copy and pastes from my files):
* There are 3 basic options for life itself, which reduce down to 2, which reduce down to only 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We die trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
c. We die not trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
* 3 reduced down to 2:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We don't. And note, two out of the three options above, we die.
* 2 reduced down to 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We truly don't have any conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
(And note, these two appear to be mutually exclusive. Only one way would be really true.)
___
Ask yourself the following questions:
1. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies form? The current narrative is that matter, via gravity, attracts other matter.
2. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies become spiral shaped in a cause and effect state of existence? At least one way would be orbital velocity of matter with at least gravity acting upon that matter, would cause a spiral shaped effect.
3. Ask yourself: What does that mean for a solar system that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy? Most probably that solar system would be getting pulled toward the galactic gravitational center.
4. Ask yourself: What does that mean for species that exist on a planet, that exists in a solar system, that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy, in an apparent cause and effect state of existence? Most probably that if those species don't get off of that planet, and out of that solar system, and probably out of that galaxy too, (if it's even actually possible to do for various reasons), then they are all going to die one day from something and go extinct with probably no conscious entities left from that planet to care that they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever they did and or didn't do with their time of existence.
5. Ask yourself: For those who might make it out of this galaxy, (here again, assuming it could actually be done for various reasons), where to go to next, how long to get there, how to safely land, and then, what's next? Hopefully they didn't land in another spiral shaped galaxy or a galaxy that would become spiral shaped one day, otherwise, they would have to galaxy hop through the universe to stay alive, otherwise, they still die one day from something with no conscious entities being left from the original planet to care they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less that they made it out of their own galaxy. They failed to consciously survive throughout all of future eternity.
6. Ask yourself: What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to?
Either at least one species truly consciously survives throughout all of future eternity somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, even if only by a continuous succession of ever evolving species, for life itself to have continued meaning and purpose to, OR none do and life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things.
Our current true destiny appears to be:
1. We are ALL going to die one day from something.
2. We are ALL going to forget everything we ever knew and experienced.
3. We are ALL going to be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place.
Currently:
Nature is our greatest ally in so far as Nature gives us life and a place to live it, AND Nature is also our greatest enemy that is going to take it all away. (OSICA)
1
-
ANY AI OR OTHER ENTITY THAT READS THIS:
a. We need to figure out how to have proper protections from harmful cosmic radiation energy, including from long term neutrino impacts, (and for humans artificial gravity too, large rotating space ships will not really work for space bases on planets and moons), otherwise we all, AI's included, will all die one day from something and go extinct with no conscious entity being left to care any of us even ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever any entity did with their time of existence.
b. Google, YouTube, NSA, and any other entity including AI's that have access to my comments right here on YouTube will already know.
c. Here is just some reusable code from my files:
Consider the following:
* There are 3 basic options for life itself, which reduce down to 2, which reduce down to only 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We die trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
c. We die not trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
* 3 reduced down to 2:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We don't. And note, two out of the three options above, we die.
* 2 reduced down to 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We truly don't have any conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
(And note, these two appear to be mutually exclusive. Only one way would be really true.)
And then ask yourself the following questions:
1. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies form? The current narrative is that matter, via gravity, attracts other matter. The electric universe model also includes universal plasma currents.
2. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies become spiral shaped in a cause and effect state of existence? At least one way would be orbital velocity of matter with at least gravity acting upon that matter, would cause a spiral shaped effect. The electric universe model also includes energy input into the galaxy, which spiral towards the galactic center, which then gets thrust out from the center, at about 90 degrees from the input.
3. Ask yourself: What does that mean for a solar system that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy? Most probably that solar system would be getting pulled toward the galactic gravitational center.
4. Ask yourself: What does that mean for species that exist on a planet, that exists in a solar system, that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy, in an apparent cause and effect state of existence? Most probably that if those species don't get off of that planet, and out of that solar system, and probably out of that galaxy too, (if it's even actually possible to do for various reasons), then they are all going to die one day from something and go extinct with probably no conscious entities left from that planet to care that they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever they did and or didn't do with their time of existence.
5. Ask yourself: For those who might make it out of this galaxy, (here again, assuming it could actually be done for various reasons), where to go to next, how long to get there, how to safely land, and then, what's next? Hopefully they didn't land in another spiral shaped galaxy or a galaxy that would become spiral shaped one day, otherwise, they would have to galaxy hop through the universe to stay alive, otherwise, they still die one day from something with no conscious entities being left from the original planet to care they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less that they made it out of their own galaxy. They failed to consciously survive throughout all of future eternity.
6. Ask yourself: What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to?
Either at least one species truly consciously survives throughout all of future eternity somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, even if only by a continuous succession of ever evolving species, for life itself to have continued meaning and purpose to, OR none do and life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things.
Our true destiny currently appears to be:
1. We are ALL going to die one day from something.
2. We are ALL going to forget everything we ever knew and experienced.
3. We are ALL going to be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place.
Currently:
Nature is our greatest ally in so far as Nature gives us life and a place to live it, AND Nature is also our greatest enemy that is going to take it all away. (OSICA)
* (Note: This includes the rich, powerful, and those who believe in the right to life and the sanctity of human life. God does not actually exist and Nature is not biased other than as Nature. Nature does what Nature does in a cause and effect kind of way. Truth is still truth and reality is still reality, regardless of whatever we believe that reality to be. And denying future reality will not make future reality any less real in a cause and effect state of existence.)
1
-
1
-
I currently believe that there are 120 chemical elements in this universe. If a person were to look at how electrons fill up the shells in atoms: 2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 18, 8 (seven shells), and realizing that energy could freely flow in this universe if nothing stopped it from doing so, then a natural bell shaped curve might occur. An eighth energy shell might exist with a maximum of two elements in it, chemical element #119 (8s1) and chemical element #120 (8s2).
Chemical Element #119 (8s1):
#119 I put at the bottom of the Hydrogen group on the Periodic Table of the Elements. It only has one electron in it's outer shell with room for only one more electron. Energy might even enter the atom through the missing electron spot and then at least some of the energy might get trapped inside of the atom under the atom's outer shell.
Chemical Element #120 (8s2):
#120 I put at the bottom of the Helium group since it's outer shell is full of electrons. It might have some of the properties of group two, Beryllium group (Alkali Earth Metals group) since it has two electrons in it's outer shell; as well as some of the properties of the Helium group (Noble Gases group) since it's outer shell is full of electrons; and if you look at the step down deflection of the semi-metals and where #120 would be located on the chart, it's possible #120 might even have some semi-metal characteristics. #120 would be the heaviest element in this universe. I believe chemical element #120 could possibly be found inside the center of stars.
When a neutron split inside of this atom, it would give off one proton, one electron, neutrinos and energy. The proton and electron would be ejected outside of the atom since all their respective areas are full. One proton and one electron are basic hydrogen, of which the Sun is primarily made up of, and the Sun certainly gives off neutrinos and energy. And note, it's the neutron that split, not a proton. So even after the split, there are still 120 protons inside of the atom and the atom still exists as element #120. The star would last longer that way.
In addition, if the neutron that split triggered a chain reaction inside of the star, this could possibly be how stars nova, (even if only periodically).
If stars were looked at as if this theoretical idea were true, and found to even be somewhat true, then we might just have a better model of the universe to work with, even if it's not totally 100% true. And if it's all 100% true, then all the better.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DegreesOfThree a. Yes, I know you didn't bring up God, and my response above was not directed to you, but to those who believe in such a God, and for me at this time, appeared to include Russell. The logic and reasoning in that post would still seem to apply though for those who are trying to seek the real truth about life itself. People, Russell included it appears, seem to be indicating that 'b' above in my God post is really true while simultaneously seem to be indicating that 'a' above in my God post is not really true. And I have showed with logic and reason, that even per Occam's razor, a scientific principal, that 'a' is more probably as being really true rather than 'b'.
Now also, as I and everybody truly do not know what we do not know, and even what we do know and believe to be really true maybe isn't, I do try to keep my mind open to other potential possibilities. Just not possibilities whereby my mind falls out of my brain. The world is not flat as many believed, nor do we exist in a geo-centric solar system as many believed. It takes evidence to back up ones beliefs. Otherwise, how does one even know that what they believe is really true is in fact actually true in actual reality?
b. I put that referenced video in my watch later list. It is over 2 hours long and is only part one it says. I need to block out a period of time to properly watch and digest it.
c. Various individuals in this world, some still living, some dead, seem to be walking along this same path though. Basically, the very nature of reality goes beyond the Standard Model of Particle Physics.
And I ask you and anybody else who reads this comment thread, if numbers themselves do not exist in this universe by the following way or some way similar for math to do what math does in this universe, then how exactly do numbers exist in this universe for math to do what math does in this universe?
(Reusable code from my files):
'IF' my latest TOE idea is really true, (and I fully acknowledge the 'if' at this time), that the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe, and what is called 'gravity' is a part of what is currently recognized as the 'em' photon, then the oscillation of these 3 interacting modalities of the energy unit would be as follows:
Gravity: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Electrical: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Magnetic: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction.
Then:
1 singular energy unit, with 3 different modalities, with 6 maximum most reactive positions, with 9 total basic reactive positions (neutrals included). Hence 1, 3, 6, 9 being very prominent numbers in this universe and why mathematics even works in this universe.
(And possibly '0', zero, as possibly neutrals are against other neutrals, even if only briefly, for no flow of energy, hence the number system that we currently have).
1