Comments by "faron tilley" (@forzaisspeed) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1.  @brother_marzooq9097  Kid learn some shit before running your mouth ok theres a good kid.
    1
  2.  @brother_marzooq9097  Kid your uncle is not going to like you talking like that now is he.
    1
  3.  @dave_riots  Kid do some research STOP Reading Wikipedia.
    1
  4.  @dave_riots  Kid did you really read it all or are you one of these dumbasses that thinks stealth is the only thing that makes a jet good.
    1
  5.  @dave_riots  Kid facts are facts and if you stop reading Wikipedia and stop believing what pilots say hint pilots will say its good cause it cost billions there not going to slag it off.
    1
  6.  @dave_riots  Kid you stupid or stupid. Papers and reports are all online for all to read. Well done your learning facts are facts.
    1
  7. 1st - The US didn't give the UK anything, fact the UK had the systems in place to make their own Nuclear sub, but like all things both the UK and US sheared information, the US didn't it to us. 2nd - The UK was 1st in nuclear powered subs, the UK was the first to write about nuclear powered engines, with papers on how to do such thing. 3rd - A Italian Enginner led a team of people from UK US and others to make the 1st running nuclear powered engine, not the US. 4th - The UK is one of the leading country's in Nuclear Technology, with Rolls-Royce being ahead of the US in tearms of capabilitie. 5th - The US goes for quantity where the UK goes for quality, so the UK Subs are smaller, but there more capable in more ways, more advanced for example.
    1
  8. The AIM-120D only has a range of 160km but the PL-15 has a range of 400+km.
    1
  9.  @Ganderco  The F-35 is not that stealthy as well no jet is syealthy, the 40km range F-35 is Bullshit the F-35 has a bigger detection range then 40km plus that not even using the most powerfule radars that Country's have, a Eurofighter can easily see the F-35 from more then 40km away for example. Again stealth means that all, and again the F-35 Can't shoot from hundreds of miles away cause it can't.
    1
  10. Funny the F-35 is shit the SU-57 is much better then the F-35 even in stealth the SU-57 is better in twice in 2018 a SU-57 snuck up on AC-130's with out being seen on radars in the second time the SU-57 was only noticed with the co-pilot look out the window and saw a SU-57 just looking at him.
    1
  11.  @spc1481  Kid you stupid or stupid. Look it up, you can use a computer right.
    1
  12.  @scottyates5758  Kid what are you talk about go to bed.
    1
  13. How the EU is richer then the US. The EU has the most advanced Military Tech.
    1
  14.  @lorenzo4408  Kid the EU has a better economy then the US, Europe is the richest, just cause 1 your 2 country's are in debt, that's nothing to the trillions the US is in.
    1
  15. Just 4 not 6
    1
  16. The Eurofighter has beaten the F-22 so many times.
    1
  17. Find it funny how I've been talking about the F-22's early retirement for over a year now due to reports first coming out nearly 2 years ago, and the Upgrades papers for the F-22 again I've been talking about for over 2 years now for example the HMD the report came out nearly 2 years ago to be fitted by 2024, and people still tell me I'm talking shit, now you've made a video on basically the same stuff I've been talking about for years now, maybe people will actually listen instead of arguing with me. Funny how people don't want to listen unless you make a video on YouTube about it.
    1
  18. Jeremiah Marcelo the UK can kick the US’s ass all day everyday the Eurofighter is better the aircraft carrier is more advance are army is better trained and the SAS is the BEST in the world the UK help train the US in flying dogfighting army training elite forces training and most recently teaching the US in how to land the F-35B on a aircraft carrier with more flue and missiles over the limit the UK does NOT need the EU to help kick US’s ass but the US NEEDS help all the time when their go to war not one time has the US gone to war and won on their own people need to know the Difference between quantity and quality the US focuses more on quantity EU and the UK focuses more on quality.
    1
  19. Tyler Benson First NATO again does not mean all have to go 1-2-3 county’s will go if asked (1) Vietnam was NOT a success how on earth can you say that when the US got there ass kicked you can say well that went well. (2) the UK has better tech then the US I was in the army for about 4 years and I know the UK has better tech and the tech that Britain has is more British then the US tech is American most stuff in the US military is from or made by other and helped to make by country’s like the F-22 - F-35 M1A1 the most of your ships and the mean attack helicopter you use. (3) again money does not mean anything when one country is using it for Quantity and the other country is using it for Quality. (4) the US does NOT have the best or the most powerful army it has a big army but not the best the UK has a smaller army but better army the UK is better trained and the tech that the UK has is more up to date and the vehicles they use are better the Challenger 2 is better it has a better gun better armour and better hunt and fire system the Eurofighter is better it’s faster better agility flys higher flys longer better turn rate sharper turning better dive-climb power saving cause of the 2x EJ200 engines. The US focuses more on quantity and the UK focuses more on quality again just cause one spends more then the other does not mean shit it’s how it’s used. At the end of the day we both served and serving in the military the US and UK are both super powers. Both will kick ass.
    1
  20. Tyler Benson US is shit / UK number 1. THE END
    1
  21. Darkus Owlus US is shit / UK number 1. THE END.
    1
  22.  @goobersmoochers1553  The US can't do fuck all with out the UK there to hole the US's hand in to battle or anything. The US is shit.
    1
  23.  @goobersmoochers1553  M8 The US sucks it does not matter how many things the US has US still shit most of the US's military tech is not american cause the US IS SHIT at making there own stuff 20 aircraft carriers so what the US does not know how to use them properly the US cant do FUCK all with out the UK's help the US cant talk without asking the UK for permission first the UK is more of a superpower then the US will ever be the US has NOT won a war on there own the only time the US went in to war on there own was Vitamin and the US got there ass kicked so dont tell me that the US is a power when they got there ass kick by farmers in trees the UK is a lot better are army / navy / air force / SAS / SBS are and can and will kick the US's ass all day everyday most of the US military is trained using UK training Technics US sucks the UK best in the world if you dont like that then who cares.
    1
  24.  @goobersmoochers1553  you are dumb aren't you Vietnam was a failure for the US the US got they ass kicked, the UK is 100% better then the US for many many reasons one for example the US can't go to war with out help and another is that the US's military tech like ( tanks / drones / ships / jets) use British tech software and hardware and US can't do fuck all. The oil tanker is not a war ship it like all other oil tankers are easy to get just like the US oil tankers but the UK now have destroyers out there even US tankers have been taken before its just a oil tanker not a aircraft carrier, you mite want to learn the difference between them oil tanker and war ship.
    1
  25.  @goobersmoochers1553  m8 the USA sucks deal with it UK number 1 THE END.
    1
  26.  @curtiswhyte3297  Yes UK is some much better then the US but I would not say we're a laughing stock we're still one of the most powerfule in the world more then the US, that's way the US can't go to war with out us cause the US knows it will get its ass kicked again like a Vietnam, the US only have size on their side the UK have better ( Tanks / Ships / Jets / Troops / Tech / Hardware / Software / Elite Forces) the US hope to be as good as us, the US's military uses a lot of British hardware and software, the US uses British comando training for the Navy Seal's and British standard army training tactics for the US standard army, the F-35 / F-22 M1A1 / M1A2 lots of the there Ship's plus the SR-71 and most of the US's military and much much more uses Britain tech Hardware and Software. The British don't need a big military cause we are the Best no one wants to start a war with us yes we haven't got the biggest military in the world But Britain only needs 2 Challenger 2 tank's to do want it will take 4 M1A2 tanks to do and only need 2 Eurofighter's to do what it will take 5 F-22's to do, the Eurofighter can hold more missiles more fuel and more agile and faster flys higher and for longer then the F-22 and F-35 the Challenger 2 better armour better gun holds more rounds and more fuel plus are aircraft carrier is the most advanced in the world the US wishes that they were is good as Britain. Britain number 1 THE END.
    1
  27.  @gangrene4085  Yes the UK does have the most advanced aircraft carrier.
    1
  28.  @gangrene4085  1 ) The M1A1 and M1A2 uses British armor its not classified. 2 ) The F-22 is good but not the best the US couldn't sell it if they tried maybe to a under powered country like Mexico. 3 ) The UK is number 1 power in the world power isn't just size the British are better trained in all 3 ( Army / Elite Forces - Air Force - Navy ) The British is more advanced in ( Hardware - Software - Tech ) that is why a lot of country's and the US buys a lot of British Military Tech - Hardware - Software and use the British training for there own Military's With out the British the US would be as shit as Mexico. 4 ) The US could NOT beat the British. 5 ) The only reason the US is in the top 10 world power's is for other country's if not for other country's like the UK Germany and France the US again wouldn't be in the top 10. 6 ) The British is number 1 in ( Hardware / Software / Tech / Army / Air Force / Elite Forces / Navy / Tanks - Challenger 2 / Jets - EuroFighter / Ships - Type 45 - Type 26 - New Type 31 - Aircraft Carrier / Assault Rifle - SA80 / Armor - Body Armor - Tanks - Ships Others ) With BAE Systems and Rolls-Royce and other British companies are why we are ahead of the rest.
    1
  29.  @PiethagorasTearem  1st in WW2 the British won the air War with the Spitfire. 2nd The Eurofighter is still better than the F-22 in all areas.
    1
  30.  @mr.wiggins1474  What ?.
    1
  31.  @mr.wiggins1474  What is it ?, you reply ( OK and ) with no detail on what your talking about.
    1
  32.  @mr.wiggins1474  knowledge is power, so the more you give to people the more knowledgeable people become. 😜.
    1
  33.  @mr.wiggins1474  Well that's on you then.
    1
  34.  @hornet8364  Kid most country's have more military experience then the US. The US sucks its never won a war on there own. Always asking other country's for help.
    1
  35.  @hornet8364  1st The UK and Russia would have won with out the US in WW2. 2nd Being great at war is being able to win, and many country's have won on there own, the US has never won a war on there own remember Vietnam. 3rd The UK has more Military Experience in Cornwall alone then the whole of the US, the UK as more has been winning wars before the US was even founded by the British. 4th Yes Experience is not just winning, but even that still means the US has the lest experience then most country's.
    1
  36.  @dontneedtoknowmyname.6828  At least the UK can win a war on our own, unlike the US. Vietnam 🇻🇳 for the win.
    1
  37.  @thenomad47  Kid the UK already is the biggest power, we already have the most land with the biggest army all under the Queens power, the only 1 with a bigger army is NATO itself but NATO is not under 1 persons control.
    1
  38.  @thenomad47  Yes I now that the UK is a member we are one of the founders of it, what I was saying was that apart from NATO, the UK has the Biggest Army in the world under 1 person the Queen, The Commonwealth where the Queen is the Head of all this country's, and with that is the ability to control the Military from the country's, meaning if she really wanted too she could declare war on another country for example, and bring the whole Commonwealth Military to fight, and considering that India has something like 1.2 million in the army along that already out numbers basically most country's.
    1
  39.  @Tyler-zq7qt  How then.
    1
  40.  @Tyler-zq7qt  So every country has pride in their military, the difference is that the British Military has the records to back it up, and the RAF had the fact that there Eurofighter's have a positive win rate over the F-22.
    1
  41.  @Tyler-zq7qt  Can't you use the Internet it's not hard to find reports and records, and the times I do spend the time to go back and get the links time and time again, most of you guys just start talking BS cause you can't take the facts.
    1
  42.  @outrider425  Kid learn some things first. 1st - The Challenger 2 has the strongest armour to date, plus its the only tank that is Undefeated in combat, unlike the Abrams that have been Destroyed many many times over. 2nd - The L30 out reaches the M256/L44 on the Abrams, meaning the Challenger 2 would be able to destroy the Abrams before the Abrams could fire back with any chance of a hit. 3rd - The Abrams is weaker then the Challenger 2 in more areas around the body on the tank, for example at the back of the turret and sides of the hull, the Challenger 2's L30 would have no problem going through the Abrams. 4th - The Systems in both tanks are good, both would see each other from around the same distance, but the Challenger 2 has a better smoke system making it harder for the Abrams to see it, unlike the Abrams just having the basic smoke grenades. The Challenger 2 is king, the Abrams wouldn't stand a chance, and the Abrams doesn't have a hope in hell in a long range fight.
    1
  43.  @outrider425  Dude again learn shit not from wiki. The L30 is more then capable of penetrations the Abrams, the Abrams has weaker armour then the Challenger 2, the Challenger 2 armour has never been pend by a enemy tank, the Abrams in testing has been pend many times, by over NATO Gun's including the L30.
    1
  44.  @illusions4559  Kid please stop reading Wikipedia, it really isn't doing you any help.
    1
  45.  @illusions4559  Kid you still talking shit, Stealth is not the be all and end all as you claim it to be, yes many country's have done testing for stealth, but on its own its not good, you said the F-117, just look at what happened to it, it got blown out of the sky. Kid if you know what you were at least talking about you would know, that the F-22 and Eurofighter haven't yet done a BVR fight, the only time they tried to do one, the US pulled out cause the Eurofighter's Pirate System was able to see the F-22 from a longer range then the US expected, so the US pulled out and since refused to do a BVR against the Eurofighter since. Fact if you know any, the Pirate System on the Eurofighter can see the F-22 from 100+km depending on the weather, Morden IRST Systems can see the heat on the Jet's wings / body due to the air friction between them, not just engines are needed to see with them.
    1
  46.  @illusions4559  1st - The F-117 still got shot down, by a older SAM System, and the fact that the F-117 didn't have the Defences like other jets at the time did, or even able to manoeuvre to a point to at least try to help it, just like the U-2 the US thinking nothing can get it, so they basically didn't do a lot for its defense, but a existence between the RAF and USAF, the EE Lighting vs U-2 the RAF didn't just prove that a jet could A - Catch the U-2 but also B - Could shoot it down with ease, and the EE Lighting continued passed the U-2 to a hight of around 88,000f, same with the SR-71 no Defences just speed, witch SAM Systems where getting very fast very quickly. 2nd - In a BVR fight is really the only thing that will fully show just how good both are against each other. 3rd - The 120D only has a top range of around 160km vs the Meteor's 300km. The Meteor has a hit rate higher then the 120D at a longer range, for example the Meteor vs fighter jet for a good hit rate is around 100km, vs the 120D good hit rate is around 70-80km so about a 20-30km difference, not to mention the 120D only has a NEZ of around 20km while the Meteor has a NEZ of 60km, 40km between the 2, same with speed Mach 4 for the 120D vs the Meteor's Mach 4.5, plus the 120ad is a SSR while the Meteor is a DRS with a Ram engine. 4th - The F-22 is yes a good fighter, but the facts are facts, the Eurofighter has a higher win rate over the F-22, making the Eurofighter the better fighter. 5th - The point of the 2 fighting are one in the same, both need to train of the other. 6th - The fact I say Kid is to those that talk BS in a subject they don't know that much about, then argue when someone tries to help them, so I call them "Kid".
    1
  47.  @danielthethird0949  Wrong the UK has Basses in the US, so does France. Dude I don't know what your talking about but stop reading Wikipedia. The US does not protect Europe from Russia, fact Europe holds their own, and its Europe that protects the US from the East. Without the UK and others the US would be fuck all, the US military would be as weak as afghanistan's, if not for others helping the US.
    1
  48.  @Powerhaus88  Kid shut up and stop your crying, go to bed let the adults talk.
    1
  49. The US like a lot of things are behind in the military world, so need the Italian's to help. If not for others, the US would be as shit as Mexico, its a good thing the US has a big bank, all that money is needed to buy other country's Tech / Designs / Weapons and vehicles.
    1
  50. A Regular Alabaman Girl stealth is all about misleading the radar it’s like a tank if you shoot a tank and it has 90% armour you will pen and that is like the radar sends out a wave and it hitting a 90% face that then will bounce back to you telling you that somethings there but like a tank if again you shoot and the armour is at 45% it will bounce off and go somewhere else so when the wave from the radar hits the jet it will bounce off in another direction then more sharp corners it has then more it will bounce giving a reading off of nothing but not back to the source and the paint that is used is a big part of it the paint that are on jets can absorb some of the radar waves helping it to not get spotted. Hope this helped in a way.
    1