Comments by "Chris Machabee" (@chrismachabee3128) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. I have just read that a Polish official has been told by the Russians, that the US has told the Russians that if they use nukes in Ukraine, the US will strike targets of Russia's in Ukraine. It occurs to me, that America has no business in this warfare between Russia and Ukraine, except for two crazy people Biden and Blinken. There is no treaty of protection America has with Ukraine. The two headed monsters keep saying that Ukraine has a right to protect themselves and the US is obligated, for some reason I do not know, to side with them by supplying arms. Now, Russia have been described many ways, such war criminals and terrorists, but are a country at war, a declared war, as a nation it is their right. The US has not been attacked, not even after the severest of provocations with the highly deadly war machines sent to Ukraine use against Russia, America has not declared war, yet it is a rogue actor and justifies itself, it is righteous, helping the helpless Ukraine. If Ukraine is helpless without American help, they should surrender. My purpose here is not to pick sides. I'm an American soldier and I fight for America, but I am not a brainless stick. If you are stating you are going to attack a country you damn well better declare war, period. Enough of this cowardice of having the small country fight in out, commonly known as a proxy war. The US has announced it will fire the first shot at Russia, in an election year! Biden and Blinken could not be more transparent in their nefarious political machinations. I just saw a video that reported the Ukrainians are running out of shells. It is a small matter because the Russian have setup an electronic jamming screen that has reduced virtually all GPS guided attack weapons effectiveness from 55% to below 7%, so the Ukrainians are not only running out of shells, those shells are useless because they are about guaranteed to miss their targets. I don't have to tell people what will happen if the US gets in a shooting war with Russia. The entire EU will be threatened as they are obligated to join in, if the US shoots at Russia. There is a guy in Putin's cabinet, names Medvedev, and he is a frustrated man. He wants to launch the nuclear weapons. Medvedev has had enough of the US and their allies and he wants to set it off. I think he is in charge of the nuclear forces, who have been on stand-by for months ready to launch. No disrespect intended but, everybody know Biden is not right in the head, and Blinken, I personally find unremarkable in intellectual common sense, and these two are planning to go to war against Russia. I think they should be stopped. Like let Russia finish the job and end this ridiculous death and destruction. Biden has never served in the military, and in my estimation he has no affection at all for his own military or anyone else's. I do not trust his judgement. Ukraine is near the end, and cannot defeat the Russian juggernaut. America is wasting time and treasure feeding weaponry to Ukraine to stave off Russia. Now, that weaponry is useless. Its effectiveness being blocked by the electronic jamming, which I surmise will only improve over time. Biden and Blinken must not be allowed to direct attack Russia, UNLESS they declare war, and they better have a dam good reason, when Russia has not attacked America, even after extremely provocativeness by America's Commander-in-Chief. I’m saying no to nuclear retaliation by the Biden bundestag.
    1
  6. 1
  7. Message to a bonehead:: Phillip A. Washington (born 1958) is an American governmental administrator working as the CEO of Denver International Airport. He was previously CEO of the Los Angeles Metro and served as the head of the president Joe Biden's transportation transition team. In July 2022, Washington was nominated to serve as administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration. Can the CEO of GM, tell you about the timing of 6 cycle engine, or what type of carbon brakes are needed for any of his particular brands of cars? No, he can't cause he is the CEO and it's not his job to know. His job is to lead the company and all its facets forward. what this means in lunkhead language is this guy is a CEO, which is short for Chief Executive Officer, defined as, the senior manager or leader of a business or other organization, such as a nonprofit or nongovernmental organization (NGO). A chief executive officer has final decision-making authority within the organization (subject to the general consent of a board of directors, if there is one) and holds a number of important responsibilities, including: articulating the mission or purpose of the business or organization; determining its managerial and reporting structure; setting its short- and long-term goals; devising and implementing strategies for attaining such goals; managing at a high level its operations and resources; establishing a culture that fosters employee engagement, adaptability, accountability, and learning (or skill building); reviewing the performance of lower-level executives and their units or teams; representing the business or organization in public forums and industry-related gatherings; assessing and reporting (to shareholders, stakeholders, boards of directors, or owners) on its operations at regular intervals; and, more generally, ensuring its overall success—which, in the case of businesses, is normally assessed in terms of potential increases in net income, market share, shareholder returns, and brand recognition. In the case of larger businesses and some other larger organizations, the CEO is hired or internally promoted by a board of directors, which may subsequently dismiss the CEO if it is dissatisfied with his or her performance. The specific duties and responsibilities of CEOs tend to vary with the size, structure, and culture of the organization and the nature of the industry or environment in which it operates. For example, the CEO of a small company is typically more directly involved in day-to-day operations and lower-level decision-making than the CEO of a large company. So, we can consider Mr. Washington's job of running the nation's FAA a very, very large company, and he will have company-wide leadership responsibility and a complete department that will handle Aviation Safety, so Cruz's Insinuation Aviation Safety is at risk, won't be because this guy is head of the FAA. Understand?
    1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. Sen Cotton got all his points made, but surprising to me is that no law was mentioned. Is Majorkas a US Law enforcement executive? If he is to enforcement he is non conflict with a policies that encourages the breaking of that said policy he thhinks is interwined. It is interwined like a murderer is with a district attorney who seeks justice for the victim. Murder is immoral, but many people are immoral, so what makes murder a bad thing? The law. The law says you may not murder. If you murder you will be caught, charged, tried and if evidence is shown correctly, you will convicted and sentenced for punishment. Is not breaking the law, of any kind, any way, to take the same process? Of course, illegal border crossers break the law, and the Biden administration, with its servant Majorkas seek the refuse the law, to disregard the law, for their own purpose. They have not only permitted, but encouraged the violation of American law that sets out the immigration process. The Biden administration says that is not how we will handle this, we want all the people that want to come to this country, to come, and we will print all the money to take care of them and the will be beholden to the democrats and vote and it is their votes that will put the democrats in power for a millenia. I don't know how more dispicable a political party can be. How nefarious? Have you noticed whenever they want to do something really nefarious they put a black man in charge so if it goes bad the black man is blame for it. There is a black man in charge of the DNC, a figurehead? Perhaps, but the DNC is the orchestrator of what the plans of the Biden Adminstration and the is no doubt to that and America is in great danger from these lying and conniving politicians in Washintgton who no longer believe the law is a force to stop whatever plans they have that run contrary to what the laws allows.
    1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. The present state of leadership within the FBI is undoubtedly lacking, and it is imperative to address this issue with utmost seriousness. It is concerning to witness the considerable amount of time it takes for them to formulate even the most basic talking points, which highlights a significant lack of control. The appointment of Abbate as Deputy Director raises troubling questions about the selection process. His inability to fulfill the demands of his position is evident and should not be overlooked. Abbate appears to be driven by personal ideology rather than sound judgment, demonstrating a shocking absence of moral compass and ethical principles. It is disheartening to see a lack of discernment between right and wrong within the FBI, as their actions seem to revolve solely around the exercise of power. Even Congress seems to have limited influence over their operations. To address this pervasive issue, we must dismantle the layers of corruption that have infiltrated the top echelons of the FBI. A comprehensive integrity program must be implemented for all management-level personnel, leaving no room for misconduct. We must enforce a strict zero-tolerance policy against any form of wrongdoing. It is crucial to emphasize that the FBI is not an independent entity within our borders, despite its apparent delusions of grandeur. The current state of leadership, which permeates to its very core, is deeply decayed and necessitates immediate rectification. We must take decisive action to restore integrity and accountability within the organization, as it is essential for maintaining public trust and upholding the principles of justice.
    1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. It occurs to me, this particular interview with a "top FBI official" about a critical matter, of which she says she has no knowledge shows conclusively, the entire FBI should not be destroyed, and only the level of the executive and their supportive management should be rearranged and reassign and given position where they have no thought leadership, no command authority more than ordering office supplies. I surmise throwing the baby out with the bath is not the solution, but the corruption here is too deep to ignore and every one of these officials should be flagged, tagged, and monitored for the rest of their careers as dangers to the good order of the nation. Should the occasion arise I suggest a task force review the policy and procedure, management procedures and imperatives, and the command and control of the supervision and management and everything that led to this system becoming so corrupt be eliminated and rewritten or redone to where there is confidence the rule will be obeyed. Too much hurdling over rules using stopgap measures here. The signs were clear about what they should've done. The kind of high-level ignorance we are watching here is because people have no oversight and no consequences when the executive oversight plays the game, a lazy man's political game of, they know than me, they are the experts. It is an abdication of responsibility and guidance, in that, they are being told to do whatever they want, and they will not question them. In a perfect world that would lead to an increasing level of excellence, however, that is not what America got. What America got was a politically filthy den of illegality and inequities where the FBI became judge and jury and decided who would be charged and who they would let slide, because they like them. The exact reverse of the hate for Trump where they did every hateful thing under the sun to the POTUS, in complete collusion with the DNC and Congress, and the intelligence services. There were FBI agents and informants on the scene of January 6th and the FBI refuses to catalog their actions that day on the ground, flat obstruction of the administration of the nation’s investigation to their action. That no FBI agent there showed and raised his shield the crow and said stop, is just damning, the agents were armed and they knew were not alone. We are currently witnessing the collusion of the Democrats with the United Nations to flood this country with people who had no chance of a good life because of substandard government. As a group, they decided to "save people'. As we are a country led by delusion they have the delusion that America is so rich they should take care of all the downtrodden in the world and so the Biden Administration and Secretary-General Antonio Gutierrez colluded to ensure this happened. They are acting this way under their humanitarian mandate because they know the American people would never have approved a plan like this, and so the rogues colluded to override the American nation’s rules and barriers to accomplish their evil purpose. Naturally, this has been a top-secret project but, they are enough public information, people would not have made it without the help of the UN assisting. What rakes me is they know it was a wrong thing to do, if not, why hide involvement? To this day, Joe Biden takes the entire blame when he is only complicit. The Administration has given up American sovereignty to allow the herd of the poor from anywhere to come and be taken care of by America. Much of America is in total shock a POTUS would do such a thing, however, understand it is part of a larger agenda, that will fail and only harm America more.
    1
  49. 1
  50. 1