Comments by "Ivancho" (@ivancho5854) on "Zeihan on Geopolitics" channel.

  1. 481
  2. 242
  3. 120
  4. 91
  5. 87
  6. 85
  7. 71
  8. 62
  9. 58
  10. 52
  11. 47
  12. 38
  13. 37
  14. 34
  15. 25
  16. 25
  17. 25
  18. 24
  19. 24
  20. 21
  21. 19
  22. I know what you mean. I really struggle with some of his key concepts, like that the US Navy is going home, which may eventually come to pass, but for a start I don't think that the US President is ready to relinquish that level of power just yet. Until the invasion of Ukraine, Europe has not had a significant external threat since the end of the First Cold War and so far although the rhetoric is positive Europe is not showing great unity. The entire continent has still not ramped up military production significantly; Germany's military is still a joke; France is ominously quiet; and the only significant contributor outside of countries very close to Russia has been the UK. But consider the EU without German cash. No cash = no voice. What does the EU look like without Germany? Who are the EU's net financial contributors then? France, the Netherlands and Scandinavia? Does the EU in its current state benefit them? For that matter will the financial beneficiary states want the EU when they won't get money anymore? Also what does a banking stress test look like in the EU without German cash to bail it out? I know that it's really hard to imagine life in Europe without the EU in its current form, but gigantic changes are coming whether we like it or not. I think that the way that the UK left the EU was extremely badly managed to say the least, but it may work out well for Britain. I think that this will only happen if the politicians in London get their act together, which is a huge task. All the best.
    18
  23. 17
  24. 17
  25. 17
  26. 17
  27. 17
  28. 17
  29. 17
  30. 16
  31. 16
  32. 15
  33. 15
  34. 15
  35. 14
  36. 14
  37. 14
  38. 13
  39. 13
  40. 13
  41. 13
  42. 12
  43. 12
  44. 12
  45. 11
  46. 11
  47. 11
  48. 11
  49. 10
  50. 10