Comments by "Ivancho" (@ivancho5854) on "Zeihan on Geopolitics"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I agree that Ukraine needs to inflict more damage to Russia, particularly it's infrastructure, particularly oil and gas, rail and factories involved in military production and those which supply them. I don't think at this stage, if ever, America will supply them with long range missiles. I could however be pleasantly surprised. They may well be covertly assisting Ukraine develop their own, but Ukraine has a long history of aeronautics and may not need much help. I am extremely surprised how little Ukrainian special forces have been active in Russia. Targets are plentiful and of all the nations of the world, the Ukraine has the biggest advantage to successfully infiltrate Russia.
Not supplying enough weapons to Ukraine is undoubtedly prolonging the conflict, however the loss of large numbers of young men can not be sustained by Russia as it has extremely poor demographics. The higher the Russian losses the less of a threat to NATO. How many more men will then leave for other lands rather than being mobilised?
The US has a very long and consistently successful history of fighting today's wars today and tomorrow's wars tomorrow, including proxy wars. Nuclear proliferation is not today's problem, doing as much damage to Russia as possible is. I am sure that if there were peace tomorrow that the sanctions against Russia would continue for a long time. Which hurts Russia's economy and reduce its capacity to wage war for decades to come.
All the best Michael.
Slava Ukraine. 🇺🇦🇬🇧
2
-
2
-
2