Comments by "rockethead7" (@rockethead7) on "Inside Edition" channel.

  1. Yes, and judging by the comments, 95% of the viewers fall hook line and sinker for the manipulated story.
    2
  2. Yeah, I wish that wasn't the case also. But, it's part of the Freedom of Information Act. I'm not sure what else could be done. But, if there's any silver lining, at least she didn't need to suffer any embarrassment from the arrest video. It wasn't released until about 1.5 years after she died.
    2
  3. Her arrest was never shown before she passed.
    2
  4. So, you'd have given a warning for a crime? This wasn't an infraction, you know. We don't pay police to have that kind of discretion for a crime. For that, we want the courts to negotiate what happens, not having the cop be judge and jury. And, how much do you really know about what happened here? Multiple people called for this incident. Witnesses said she did this deliberately in front of people. One of the "audience" recorded it, and showed the video to the police. It didn't match her version of a quiet act with nobody around. It was a very loud and public act in front of multiple people, including children. Also, she had served some felony time in prison for stealing cars, had an arrest record a mile long, judgements against her for various other thefts, an arrest record a mile long for various other stuff, including numerous drug and alcohol charges, and open warrants for repeatedly failing to appear in court (which, she also failed to appear for this arrest). You're going to let her go with a warning? Furthermore, why would you believe her act anyway? According to her landlord, she was a stripper at the local club, and her neighbors said that she also did "private" cash transactions in her apartment with numerous men. She had no actual "job" to speak of. This video claims she was a real estate agent, but, she had left that life behind, ditched her career and family (including two sons) about a decade ago to live "off the rails" and "wild" (her family's words), for a life of crime and drugs instead. Seriously? You're letting her go after putting on a show in front of children?
    2
  5. A) Watch the whole arrest video, not the 1 minute version. She admitted it. B) Regardless of that, she was getting arrested anyway. One of the "audience" recorded it, and showed the video to the police. Needless to say, the version told by the witnesses and the video doesn't match the version told by the convicted felon who is trying to avoid her millionth arrest.
    2
  6. Accountable for what? What do you propose instead? Ignore the Freedom of Information Act? The cops managed to keep the video out of the public's eye for 2.5 years, which was 1.5 years after she died. Eventually, though, if the case is closed long enough, they can no longer block a video from being released.
    2
  7. Welcome to Inside Edition.
    2
  8. Freedom of Information Act.
    2
  9. And, given all of her open warrants, do you think the cops had any choice but to arrest her?
    2
  10. You skipped the part about her term in prison, and million other arrests, and drug/alcohol problems.
    2
  11. She put on a show in front of multiple people including children. That's a crime. And, no, it didn't cost her life, because this got almost no press until long after she was dead.
    2
  12. Um, ok, accountable for what? I do not understand.
    2
  13. "Shame" - Huh? Nobody even saw the arrest video while she was alive. What "shame" did she suffer? And, given that her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club, and her neighbors said she did "private" cash encounters with a parade of men in her apartment, um, yeah, I tend to doubt she knew what "shame" meant.
    2
  14. Well, not only is that version completely incorrect... but, pretending that it is... your "logic" is that nobody should ever report a crime for fear that the criminal might harm him/herself?
    2
  15. Really? What more discretion do you expect from the cops? They pulled her away from the restaurant, out of earshot of anybody while questioning. They blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years. Nobody saw the arrest video while she was alive. They still haven't released the actual video of the incident itself, and probably never will. What more do you want?
    2
  16. Huh?
    2
  17. Well, what you're outlining WAS the original intent. The Dr. Smith character wasn't even in the pilot. That character was an afterthought, and, they intended to have him around for a few episodes, then kill him off. But, the performances by Jonathan Harris (Dr. Smith) and Billy Mumy (Will) stole the show, even though they were supposed to just be background characters. And, the audiences loved the robot. So, responding to audience demands, it didn't take long for the primary plot lines to shift away from the Robinson mother/father, and toward the ones most popular with audiences. Remember, this was a typical weekly show, where they're writing the episodes, shooting the scenes, and then they went on the air a couple of weeks later. They didn't plan out the episodes years in advance. They didn't have scripts ready until they were almost ready to shoot.
    2
  18. Who did this?
    2
  19. Well, if you believe this particular arrest was some sort of tipping point, well, I wouldn't know whether to agree or not. But, if so, she waited 8 months after this "tipping point" before she killed herself.
    2
  20. Welcome to Inside Edition.
    2
  21. Well, with her mile long arrest and criminal record and prison time, stealing cars, drugs and alcohol, numerous judgements against her for theft, changing her name over and over again to avoid arrest, repeated failures to appear at court, etc., if that's what a "good" Christian is, please explain what a "bad" one is?
    2
  22. "a reasonable expectation of privacy" - No, not even close. Sorry, dewdrop, but, there is no such concept on a public beach.
    2
  23. "didn't even have the right to arrest" Wrong, dewdrop. Multiple people called about this incident. She put on a public show in front of the public, including children. One person even recorded it, and gave a copy of the video to the police (not released due to graphic content). With that, plus all of her other open warrants, yes, she was going to get arrested.
    2
  24. "disgrace to whoever called 911" Oh? You mean the innocent families and bystanders? Tell me, if it was a guy cranking at a playground, would you be saying the same?
    2
  25. Virtually nobody covered this until well after she was dead. You know this, right?
    2
  26. And, you believe that, why? Because Inside Edition says so?
    2
  27. Starting with you. You cannot even spell "business" correctly, what could you possibly know about it?
    2
  28. Most likely a FOIA request. But, more importantly, what charges? What's the basis of a lawsuit?
    2
  29. First of all, that was the route back to the police cars. Secondly, she should have been pretty used to being arrested, what with her mile long criminal record, million other arrests, time spent in prison, etc. She got arrested so often that the police probably had those pink cuffs made just for her. So, I'm not exactly going to have sympathy when the felon who couldn't stop getting herself arrested, got arrested again.
    2
  30. Yes, the restaurant should have had many different pathways to get back to the police cars. The restaurant deserves the suit for sure.
    2
  31. Well, it wasn't posted anywhere until 2.5 years later (which is 1.5 years after she died). But, the answer to your question is the Freedom of Information Act.
    2
  32. First of all, multiple people called the police. One woman even video recorded the incident with her cell phone, and showed the video to the police. They described it in their police report as a very loud and public display that was visible to multiple people. This hardly matches the claims of a woman who is trying to avoid getting arrested by saying it was a discreet incident with nobody around. Secondly, the release of the bodycam video was probably the result of a legal FOIA request. But, it had no bearing on her suicide, because the arrest video was not made public until 2.5 years later, which was 1.5 years after she was already dead. So, whose blood is on whose hands?
    2
  33. Yeah, she was their primary meth customer.
    2
  34. Huh? Police don't post this on YouTube, media outlets do that.
    2
  35. Yeah, when you see a guy cranking at the playground in front of kids, mind your own business!! Let him crank tomorrow in front of the kids again. And, the next day. And, the next. And, let me get this straight, you think the police were seeking "fame" by releasing the arrest video 2.5 years later (as a result of a FOIA request)? Huh?
    2
  36. The media didn't publish the arrest video until it was released on November 24, 2023. She died 2 years ago. So, um, no.
    2
  37. Huh? You don't get warnings for crimes. You've confused crimes with infractions. Secondly, one of the "audience" recorded the incident, and showed the video to the police. They describe it in their arrest report as a very loud and public show in view of multiple people including children. Or, were you just going to blindly trust the woman who is attempting to get out of being arrested for the millionth time?
    2
  38. The multiple people who called the police, and the video one of the "audience" took of the incident, tells a very different story than the woman does while she's trying to avoid getting arrested for the millionth time.
    2
  39. No, dewdrop. The woman is accountable for her own actions.
    2
  40. She said she thought she was alone, so, you blindly believe her. The "I didn't do it" line that is spoken by a million people trying to get out of getting arrested. Multiple people called the police. One in the "audience" even video recorded it on her cell phone, and then showed the video to the police. The police described that video in the arrest report, saying it was a very loud and public display, in view of multiple people, including children. Even in Europe's beaches that permit people to run around without any bathing suits on at all, they don't permit this kind of public display. And, yes, sorry, but there's nothing wrong with making a comparison to a man at a playground. If this was a man at a playground, you know darned well that you wouldn't be saying, "oh, just go up to him and give him a warning before calling the police." And, no, her life wasn't ruined over this incident. She ruined it in a million other ways.
    2
  41. Naw, they probably know darned well that this is an Inside Edition story, and the picture they paint is about as far from reality as you can imagine.
    2
  42. Huh? What "news" even covered it while she was alive?
    2
  43. Yes, it was public, by definition. Yes, the witnesses said it was intentional, because she had been wandering up and down the beach looking for a spot, and specifically chose one in view of people. Why would you believe otherwise? Because that's what she said as she was trying to avoid her millionth arrest, and didn't want to potentially go back to prison again? Let's see... multiple people called the police about this incident. One of the "audience" even recorded it, and showed the video to the police. She was a convicted felon who spent time in prison, and had a mile long arrest and judgement record for other stuff, stealing cars, other thefts, drugs and alcohol, etc. Her landlord said she was a stripper at the local club. Her neighbors said she also did "private" cash encounters in her apartment with numerous men. Is it REALLY that difficult to conclude that maybe she was making a "public" video to promote herself? Why do you believe the convicted felon, rather than innocent bystanders or the 3 police officers who investigated this incident?
    2
  44. I tried putting this into Google translator, but, it was still all gibberish. Would you maybe try to write this in your own native language, and people can translate for themselves? Because, in English, what you wrote here means nothing at all. Thanks.
    2
  45. Dewdrop, she plopped down in front of multiple people (including children) and put on a show. Why do you believe her when she said nobody was around? Because she said so as she was attempting to avoid her millionth arrest?
    2
  46. Huh? I'm not sure what you mean. She was responsible for the video. And, she's dead now, so, she cannot be jailed. I truly can't imagine that's what you meant, though. But, I just don't get it.
    2
  47. Yeah, I don't get it. Who do you want to jail, and why?
    2
  48. OK, and how do we stop it? Repeal the Freedom of Information Act?
    2
  49. The police didn't release the arrest video until she was dead for 1.5 years. And, even at that, it was because of a legal FOIA request. But, you just keep on pretending to understand things you don't.
    2
  50. How would you have prevented it, if you worked at the police department? They blocked the release of the arrest video for 2.5 years, while the investigation was ongoing. But, 1.5 years after she was dead, the investigation was closed, and they could no longer block legal FOIA requests.
    2