Comments by "King Orange" (@kingorange7739) on "CNN" channel.

  1. We are not denying them options. They have 4: Contraceptions, abstinence, adoption, and parenthood. The only one being denied is the one involving the murder of the newest family member.
    10
  2.  @reg5381  Why would the pro choice care what happens to the kid, considering they are ok with killing them. Also the solution to that is to crack down on those issues and improve the foster care system, not use its flaws as an excuse to commit even worse acts.
    9
  3.  @reg5381  really? That’s it? No counters? I bet the south said the same thing to northern abolitionists.
    6
  4. wearenotamused atall So we should kill all kids in foster care because they aren’t wanted?
    5
  5. Dan Norton premeditated killing of another innocent human being. That is why
    3
  6. Just Saying we’re all a bunch of cells. I love your attempts to dehumanize it even though you can’t scientifically prove that it isn’t human. I can prove that it is scientifically human. That’s what conception is for. Called clump of cells if you want it doesn’t change what it is.
    3
  7. 「Pinorska」 but that logic anyone should just be allowed to be killed. The logic is inconsistent. Also by that nature it makes u immoral. Admitting that abortion is evil.
    3
  8. We didn’t poke anything. Russia chose to start this just because they couldn’t bully Ukraine into not joining NATO.
    3
  9. Wow what a wonderful thing to compare your own child to a parasite. Even ignoring how that isn’t the case on a biological level, it also ignores that a Fetus does provide health benefits to the mother.
    2
  10. Also the fact you can’t tell what the 10th amendment is and the fact it has nothing to do with women is remarkable. Do research before commenting
    2
  11.  @katgibbs-mccoy4947  that’s not what the 10th amendment is. The 10th amendment goes as follows. “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” The overturning of Roe V Wade has been in adherence to the 10th amendment not against it
    2
  12.  @katgibbs-mccoy4947  Once again incorrect on both counts. Heartbeat begins 22 days after fertilization. With its earliest detections at 5 weeks. Also arguing on the grounds of viability is a rather slippery slope. I also mentioned that for something to be a parasite, it would have to be a parasitic organism (typically of a different species) that forcibly latches on to its host and only operates at the expense of the host. However science has already proved that health benefits are provided to the woman by the Fetus including but not limited to stem cells.
    2
  13. Just Saying trying to direct me to a different problem doesn’t change the current problem. Also we aren’t just having 3 weeks being aborted. We have full 8 to 9 months being aborted. So that holds no validation. Also my girlfriend went through a false alarm thinking she was pregnant and even then we agreed not to do an abortion. Once when a pregnancy happens, it’s not just about the mother anymore. It ain’t interfering with anything. When doctors profit out of it, u could literally use the commerce argument to illegalize it
    2
  14.  @rollmops3113  Thank you
    2
  15. Rafid Hossain here’s the thing a woman isn’t being forced into anything if she gets pregnant it simply having her carry out the natural course that her body is designed to do. Not to mention even if you were to defend cases of rape that occurs only 1% of all abortion cases which means it would be intellectually dishonest to justify the other 98 to 99% of abortions that happen purely for convenience.
    2
  16.  @denniswakabayashi9000  murder charges has nothing do with the actual act of murder
    2
  17.  @denniswakabayashi9000  You seem to not grasp that just because something can be done legally wouldn’t change the act being carried out on what it is. Stealing is still stealing even if it’s legal, murder is still murder even if it’s legal.
    2
  18. Mj Matagaono disagree
    2
  19. I couldn’t agree more. That’s the dishonest thing about the pro choice movement
    2
  20. chloe mendes how is it healthcare to murder a baby?
    2
  21. Nice try at using the most rare and extreme case to try to justify the other 99.9% of cases that isn’t carried out over that. Start being honest with your argument
    2
  22. Hahahahaha, Despite a literal commandment making clear of "Thou shall not murder." Also to note since you wish to call it a right, where in the constitution explicitly grants a right to abortion? Short answer, there aren't any.
    2
  23. Dan Norton gaining consciousness is not tied to purely sleep. Ur logic is failing. Get ur facts straight or stfu.
    2
  24. No he isn’t. U fail to understand Putin wanted this war to happen. The President was an excuse. The same way as the Danzig Corridor was Germany’s excuse for invading Poland. Doesn’t change that they were going to do it anyway no matter what
    2
  25. Ok Russia can leave Ukraine alone then
    2
  26.  @joycemjinx  it also use to be a law for eugenics. Your point? No country has a clean past
    2
  27. USSR couldn’t even maintain itself for a century, cope harder
    2
  28. SplixSzn not for this no
    2
  29. SplixSzn that’s an opinion not a fact.
    2
  30. Simple, arm the schools.
    1
  31. The Nazi Batallion already got wiped out earlier in the war. Stop doing false labels for ur agenda
    1
  32. Name even one example
    1
  33. What hypocrisy are you referring to? Also what source indicates that the majority are in favor of it? I hope you’re not seriously taking CNN at their word. Thirdly majority principle does not matter within a court’s interpretation of the constitution. That’s their job. The only branch majority principal truly matters in is Congress.
    1
  34.  @spiceyhotpot  did I say majority were in favor of outlawing it? You are the one saying the majority support it. The burden of proof falls on you to back said claim.
    1
  35.  @spiceyhotpot  name even one source and really what claim did I say that the majority opposed it. I explained it wasn’t relevant.
    1
  36.  @spiceyhotpot  it’s not wasting anything. And it shouldn’t be that hard finding one source to back it. Also I did look on google, not one mentions 70% supporting it. Are you prepared to concede or are you going to actually send evidence?
    1
  37. So am I to assume you were against vaccine mandates? Also they did consent when they did the thing that directly caused pregnancy
    1
  38. Just Saying no u do have other choices. There is 4. 2 made before pregnancy and 2 made after. Contraceptions, abstinence, motherhood, and adoption. I’m only against the choice that involves intentionally killing a human life. I’m just going to ask, at what point would an abortion not be ok. What constitutes human life to u?
    1
  39. Just Saying OK but the problem is those rules aren’t solidified. You may think that abortion up to 12 weeks is the only acceptable option however many you would be OK with it all the way till birth the problem with your argument is regardless of what I deal or not it’s not a consistent logical line because there’s no factual basis to back it biologically speaking the beginning of a new human life is conception and as such is the only consistent line that can be drawn
    1
  40. Just Saying how so?
    1
  41. Dan Norton and I asked time and time again why yet u never gave a valid answer
    1
  42. Maybe, maybe not. It’s not really the point
    1
  43. teatime won’t change either way
    1
  44. wearenotamused atall well guess what not all are. Does that mean we should kill them? No? Then why do people think it’s ok to kill a baby during pregnancy? I can understand in cases that do cause danger to the mother. But other than that to me it feels mis guided to no end.
    1
  45. Unlikely
    1
  46. Hahaha you must be joking
    1
  47.  @ЕкатеринаИгуральникова  um here’s the history. Ukraine became an independent nation after the collapse of the Soviet Union and has been recognized as such by the UN. As such Russia has no right to make such invasion especially when Ukraine even made a deal with Russia to return its nuclear arsenal in exchange for security guarantees
    1
  48.  @ЕкатеринаИгуральникова  I never said they did.
    1
  49.  @ЕкатеринаИгуральникова  I don’t agree with the US actions there either and people were right to condemn us back then just as Russia is being condemned now
    1
  50.  @ЕкатеринаИгуральникова  hmmm funny question. It’s a good thing we never alienated Canada or Mexico to the point where they felt the need to do that. Alliance protections are done mostly out of fear of aggression. Something Russia has done consistently throughout its history. But likely the US would cut off much of its trade and further fortify its border. We wouldn’t be invading though I can tell you that much
    1