Comments by "King Orange" (@kingorange7739) on "CNN" channel.

  1.  @ЕкатеринаИгуральникова  there was no promise not to expand NATO. The closest the truth you could argue was a verbal agreement was done between Bush and Gobetrov back in the days of the Soviet Union that NATO would not expand into east Germany after the withdraw of Soviet troops and assets. Even disregarding the fact that it was never a legal binding agreement, it was made mute when Germany reunified on its own and when the Soviet Union collapsed.
    1
  2.  @ЕкатеринаИгуральникова  The broken treaties with the Natives were done over 2 centuries ago so once again I don't know if you want to go with that whataboutism unless you are prepared to hold Russia to the same standard. Also define recent, the USSR stopped existing. Treaties with a regime that no longer exists is made pretty mute. So unless you are prepared to use an actual recent example of the US violating a treaty, I suggest finding new ground to argue.
    1
  3.  @ЕкатеринаИгуральникова  The Cuban Missle Crisis you mean. And yes we drew a line to prevent allowing the entry of nukes. That had nothing to do with Cuba allying with Russia.
    1
  4.  @ЕкатеринаИгуральникова  Once again back in the 1800s? The US has not carried action against Mexico within the last 30 years, even before that. The drug and illegals are a problem though. As for Canada, we have been operating as an ally with Canada since WW2. So once again I don't really see what point you are trying to make.
    1
  5.  @ЕкатеринаИгуральникова  Ok your point is completely based on a whataboutism. No different than what if your wife tried to kill you. It's possible but for most people as so far off that it is not worth even considering. And I already answered how the US would likely respond given its track record. It would likely cut off trade, fortify the border, and maybe resort to sanctions. The US usually will deal with what it perceives as a threat through economic strangulation rather than military incursion. Much like how we responded to Imperial Japan's conquest of China during WW2. Also you only have to look as far as the Zimmerman telegram to understand that Canada and Mexico don't have an interest in combatting the US.
    1
  6.  @ЕкатеринаИгуральникова  once again I never acted as if some of the US’ outlook hasn’t been somewhat hypocritical, ignoring Russia operated in doing the same thing as the Soviet Union. Just saying you can’t absolve Russia of its own shit when comparing the two nations within the same time frame. Also to note that I don’t believe two wrongs make a right. So I will just as easily condemn the US when it does terrible actions as much as Russia. However the key difference is the US’ sins exist in its past while Russia’s is existing now.
    1
  7.  @ЕкатеринаИгуральникова  "These are not just a two wrongs but too many wrongs done by US recently.." - Like? "But many too many wrongs..And I'm not talking just past wrongs but present wrongs too.USA is being involved in Ukraine right before the war and it's being involved right now by fueling this conflict ..." - That isn't a wrong. The United States as a nation has a legal obligation to Ukraine as the US is one of the 3 nations that promised to ensure Ukraine's security in exchange for Ukraine returning its nuclear arsenal to Russia. "So the US 's wrongs are never stopped..And it is not just in Ukraine but in Syria and Iraq too." - Firstly there isn't any actions the US have recently done in Syria or Iraq "USA has installed illegal military bases on these countries oilfields without any consent of these countries governments.So US has been practically stealing other countries oil." - You are missing my point. Once again you are doing a whatabotism. I don't support what the US did then anymore than what is happening in Ukraine now. And the thing I would simply mention as that it has nothing to do with Ukraine itself.
    1
  8. Ok why should it be up to the mother? 🤦‍♂️
    1
  9.  @dadadadoog  That was not my question
    1
  10.  @dadadadoog  I saw the point you were trying to make. But it isn’t relevant. 🤦‍♂️
    1
  11.  @dadadadoog  Ok similar arbitrary lines were drawn when it came to slavery. Just because something historically has been done doesn’t make it ok to do.
    1
  12. Mojave Red killing is ok if the person is a threat to society.
    1
  13. Billy Boy Thou shall not murder. Look up the Hebrew bible.
    1
  14. xvii-TEA right so instead we just tear their bodies apart and suck them in a vacuum. Maybe if people knew how to just manage the children we already had these issues wouldn’t even be needed.
    1
  15.  @joeyhawk2737  not even slightly
    1
  16.  @joeyhawk2737  no he didn’t. Clearly you don’t know the concept of free will. He gave us the ability to make choices
    1
  17.  @joeyhawk2737  again, capacity of free will comes with suffering. As we are not in heaven bud. And the suffering you refer to is often caused either by the works of the devil or by other human beings.
    1
  18.  @joeyhawk2737  Were you born with it? Or did it occur through the course of your life? Do you not understand that life circumstances can give that?
    1
  19.  @joeyhawk2737  which is
    1
  20.  @joeyhawk2737  I don't think you have been forsaken. Even after you are gone, if you accept the lord, he will welcome you to heaven. That is eternal life. Unfortunately we don't get to choose how long we have on Earth, we can only choose what we do with the time we do have. I am sorry for what you are facing, but if you ask for it, God will save you. Maybe that will mean a second chance in this life, or at the very least being welcomed in the Eternal Life. Either way, he won't abandon for forsake you.
    1
  21.  @joeyhawk2737  He didn't. Sadly we are left bad hands in life, sometimes its based on what we do in life, otherwise it's just how we came into being. God didn't give you cancer. That is something that was always going to be part of you either through your genetics or what you did in life.
    1
  22. Do u have any statistics to back those claims?
    1
  23. What fair share would that be?
    1
  24. Um no it really doesn’t. Taiwan became recognized by the Un as a sovereign nation, and peace agreements were settled to ensure Taiwan’s existence. Also I don’t think u get to say that when independence has been held for over 60 years. That’s like saying Korea should still be considered Japanese
    1
  25. So by your logic. The Nazis conquest of Europe didn’t concern us either
    1
  26. Ur a good man my friend
    1
  27. Nice attempt at conspiracies. Isn’t it funny that Putin only made a move when the Dems were in power?
    1
  28. Nice attempt at conspiracies. Isn’t it funny that Putin only made a move when the Dems were in power?
    1
  29. Yeshua Bought no. It really shouldn’t be
    1
  30. Lunar Robot it should never be a choice to begin with if you want the technical answer then legal law. I never said that I man nor the father should have control of that the fact of the matter is no one should. Unless in the case for medical emergency then it should never be a decision to begin with.
    1
  31. Lunar Robot if they want to commit illegal actions if abortion got outlawed because they get so desperate to kill their baby then I’m sorry I’m not gonna feel bad about that. As for foster homes increasing members I’m certain that most children would rather live even if it’s through a complicated and difficult life then for them to be killed. I mean if you wanna prove otherwise then you can look up the suicide ratio.
    1
  32. Right, can’t even beat the 22nd best army.
    1
  33.  @segriofergio3151  not even close
    1
  34. Maybe because he’s the leader of a country. What good is coordinating a war if ur dead.
    1
  35.  @mariafletcher4055  It isn't again. He did go out on the field when he could, but he can't do that now without actively endangering himself, and his death would be a major morale blow if he got killed or captured. Also that is not over. But when the war front as in ur home, u got to have a safe zone.
    1
  36.  @mariafletcher4055  To act like he should surrender based on some casualties is ignorance at best. Putin can end this by simply leaving, but he won't. And Ukraine won't stop until Russia does.
    1
  37.  @mariafletcher4055  Also u only have to look at Vietnam to know that constant fighting will tire the enemy eventually.
    1
  38. 🤦‍♂️ nope
    1
  39.  @ankmamma688  not when u chose to put them there. If u donate blood to someone u cannot stab them during a transfusion
    1
  40.  @ankmamma688  Its not a matter of waking up. You chose to be in that spot. Unless you're referring to rape victims, the risk of pregnancy was completely the choice of the woman in question. They made their choice and they don't get to kill someone to undo it.
    1
  41.  @ankmamma688  elaborate
    1
  42.  @ankmamma688  assuming that I am responsible for putting them in that life threatening condition? Then I should be held legally accountable if he dies. The same way a mother should be held legally accountable if she attempts an abortion.
    1
  43.  @ankmamma688  so indirectly, yes.
    1
  44.  @ankmamma688  No one person would ever be purely responsible I expect ur arguments to be grounded in reality
    1
  45.  @ankmamma688  no i think it should be illegal due to the deliberate termination of another innocent human being. The woman being at fault is simply stating their accountability so they understand they’re not victims in this
    1
  46.  @ankmamma688  that’s not an abortion then. That’s a c section based removal or a premature birth. An abortion is deliberately trying to kill the child. So if the child could be removed without killing him or her then yes I’d be fine with it
    1
  47.  @ankmamma688  really, so now ur just making judgements then? I already stated if the child can be removed without killing him or her then I’d be fine. What part of that is complicated? Do u pro choice people always just give up the minute it’s an actual struggle to convince someone?
    1
  48. Ignoring Putin himself is a hypocrite and tyrant.
    1
  49. Most volunteered, also what do u think drafts are?
    1
  50. We are not forcing them anything, denying them a barbaric procedure that directly kills the unborn is not forcing them into shit, they chose to get pregnant, they chose to have sex being fully aware of the risks that directly came with it. Also to note guns are part of the 2nd amendment specifically to prevent a dictator from rising to power. Or are we going to ignore that many of the nations that criticize America had at least one, major tyrant in their history.
    1